You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Achange to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature aswikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available atWikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message atWikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

On 4 December 2021,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleGrand Jojo, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.PFHLai (talk)07:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Sorry to bother you, I wanted to ask. Could you update this file (EU map) withUkraine andMoldova as candidates?

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedCinema of Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBrussels Film Festival. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page. Please do not make these changes without generating consensus and joining the discussion on the talk page. Especially with such an edit as large as the name of an article.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use thetalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read abouthow this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Jo Jc Jo^{Talk💬Edits📝}17:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm sorry I didn't intend on engaging in a edit war. I'm not a expert in Wikipedia editing and in general only make small chances.Jhowie_Nitnek (talk)17:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBrusselians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brusselians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvqr (talk)13:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:MigratieMuseumMigration, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)08:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "MigratieMuseumMigration".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!06:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz I found a red link for this inMigration museum, found some new sources, requested sight of the deleted version, added new content and sources, and it's now back in mainspace atMigratieMuseumMigration. Thanks for your work on starting this, @JhowieNitnek, between us we have created a solid little stub with a nice infobox (all your work) and some good sources. Thanks.PamD13:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've now expanded the infobox by adding the logo!PamD13:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I can't find a photo of the museum anywhere. If you could take one, or find a copyright-free one, it would fill a gap in the list atMigration museum and enhance the article. There's a perfect Commons category:Category:Museums in Molenbeek-Saint-Jean.PamD13:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onBombardment of Brussels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is aprimary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is anorphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.Fram (talk)09:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toArmorial of Brussels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. –Hilst[talk]15:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Armorial of Brussels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin(talk)05:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,JhowieNitnek!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Ratnahastin(talk)05:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTimeline of Brussels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFree inquiry. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)21:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HiJhowieNitnek and thank you for your recent additions toTimeline of Brussels! I agree with all of them and I allowed myself to make some more fixes to the page. I did notice, however, that you restored "span tags", such as in the links toManneken Pis and to Brussels placenames, and you have been using similar tags in several other articles, too. Please note that those tags are outdated, and translating runs of text, when necessary, is generally done through the{{Lang}} templates. You will find more details inWP:SPAN. In this case, though originally a Dutch (Flemish) word,Manneken Pis is now used in all languages, so no translation tag is required here. Moreover, as you may know, Brussels placenames in Wikipedia articles must follow the long-establishedlocal naming conventions, without the need for tags or italics for linkable articles (unless specifically required), so those markups are redundant, hence why I removed them again. If you have any questions, do let me know!Jason Lagos (talk)18:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, you may also wish to familiarise yourself withWP:NOPIPE, which is why I restored the links toPrince Charles Alexander of Lorraine andJoseph II, Holy Roman Emperor to their original forms. Cheers!Jason Lagos (talk)18:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jason Lagos,

Thank you for all the great tips! I am currently adding more stuff. While I am doing that I am also applying your feedback on my edits. Thank you for the help.

Cheerio!Jhowie_Nitnek (talk)19:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Jhowie. You are very welcome. One more tip for good practice: be careful about overlinking (seeMOS:OVERLINK). Basically, terms should be linked maximum one time per major section (i.e. heading), so for instance, no need to repeat the link toPalace of the Nation ten times in the timeline. ;-)Jason Lagos (talk)08:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jason Lagos,

I will keep it in mind thank you. Still trying to learn the ropes of Wikipedia. I have more knowledge of Wikidata which is completely different.Jhowie_Nitnek (talk)09:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries – I made the fixes now. Thanks as well for connectingBrussels Salon to Wikidata.Jason Lagos (talk)13:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageTimeline of Brussels, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Abare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)00:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1370 in Brussels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)19:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Austrian Brussels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Marcocapelle (talk)14:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Reginar Brussels has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.HouseBlaster (talk · he/they)02:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1370s in Brussels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.Liz^Read!Talk!22:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onCategory:1510s in Brussels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not adisambiguation category, acategory redirect, afeatured topics category, under discussion atCategories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted undersection C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag.Liz^Read!Talk!22:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HeyJhowie, just a few extra comments and suggestions about some of your recent edits:

• TheTimeline of Brussels is getting pretty long (over 11,000 words) and might need a bit of trimming to keep it withinWP:SIZERULE. Like I said before, I think most of your additions to this article are really good, so thanks again, but it is also important to keep in mind the article's original purpose, and not turn it into a repository for everything Brussels-related. The rule of thumb should be that if an event would not be featured in a regular encyclopedia listing the key events in the city's history, it probably does not belong in this Wikipedia list either. Some examples of entries that should probably get deleted or combined are the ones with just red links, minor or trivial events, etc.
• TheSaint Verhaegen article has become a bit less readable after you added that table with the themes and medals. Tables may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles, but should generally be avoided if the information can be easily or adequately described by text (seeMOS:TABLES andMOS:NO-TABLES). Plus, this table is completely unsourced and has also causedunbalance to the article, so it should probably be deleted completely or split into a separate article (with proper sources) to maintainWP:PROPORTION.
• Finally, make sure you pay attention as well to the language and date format tags at the top of the articles you edit; they indicate the standard to follow (e.g. use British English, use dmy dates). That table you added uses the wrong spelling and date format compared to the rest of the article, so you will want to fix that, too (seeMOS:RETAIN).

Sorry if all this may sound a bit nitpicky, but I think it might be helpful once again. Cheers!Jason Lagos (talk)14:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Jason Lagos,

Thanks for the feedback! For the timeline, splitting the article like they did with theTimeline of London might be a good idea. Regarding the Saint Verhaegen article, I copied it from the French and Dutch versions; I agree it might be better to include it in a different article as you suggested. As for the language, I aim to use British spelling, but I occasionally slip into American spelling or get corrected by autocorrect.

Hope this helps!Jhowie_Nitnek (talk)14:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again Jhowie and thanks for your very quick reply!

• About the timeline, I strongly believe trimming should be used as the first option, and then splitting as the second if the article is still too long. London is a way bigger city with a longer history than Brussels, so that explains the choice of splitting. For Brussels, I can see plenty of your additions, especially some of the recent stuff (like the opening of all the new radio stations, tram lines, etc.) that is not noteworthy enough and could be easily deleted.
• For Saint Verhaegen, it is great that we agree. Though, if unsourced material (especially in table form) also appears at the French and Dutch Wikipedia, that does not mean it has been "accepted", so it is probably best practice not to translate it in the future. For the split article, I did something similar withList of houses of the Grand-Place, so you could use that as a reference.
• As for the language and date format, ok I understand. It should still be fixed though. ;-)Jason Lagos (talk)12:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I will split the timeline since it is really becoming too long now. This is just a head's up in case you are planning to work on the article, to avoid doing so in the next few minutes, in order to avoid any loss of data.Jason Lagos (talk)18:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Lagos, thank you for the heads upJhowie_Nitnek (talk)18:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome! It is fully done, so you are free to edit the pages again at your will.Jason Lagos (talk)19:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I created Wikidata entries for al the new pages and connected them to the relevant pages.Jhowie_Nitnek (talk)19:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toMoby Train. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)15:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedAna de Jesús, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBlessed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)20:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JhowieNitnek. Thank you for your work onJ. Petermann fondeur Bruxelles. Another editor,MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

please mention J Petermann in the target page with a good reference

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|MPGuy2824}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk)12:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824 could you explain further I don't know what you mean with target pageJhowie_Nitnek (talk)15:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. See,this is now a redirect to the targetFonderie Nationale des Bronzes. "J. Petermann fondeur Bruxelles" seems to be an old/alternative name for the foundry. If you can mention that (with a ref) it would be nice. -MPGuy2824 (talk)16:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedFree University of Brussels (1834–1969), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageUrban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Armorial of Brussels".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!06:10, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the usernameSignifica liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirectAlberteum Aedes Scientiae, created by you. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 2 § Alberteum Aedes Scientiae.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)02:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Moby Train, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)16:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Moby Train and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk)16:42, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedTimeline of Brussels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMunsterites.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedDesign Museum Brussels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageHeysel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)20:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toRABKO. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability andit is promotional and reads like an advertisement.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Charlie (talk)03:07, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek. This message concerns theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Moby Train".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with ourdraftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission, and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructionshere. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!DreamRimmer bot II (talk)17:26, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onMont des Arts/Kunstberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.–DMartin18:32, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JhowieNitnek. Thank you for your work onKaaitheater. Another editor,Agent VII, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add more references in the unreferenced sections.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Agent VII}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Agent 007 (talk)19:06, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,Brusseler, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Dan arndt (talk)10:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek,

Thank you for creatingZwanze.

I have taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:

Thanks for bringing this to English Wikipedia. Can you please add some moreWP:RELIABLE sources, as much of the content remains unsources. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Agent VII}}. Remember to sign your reply with~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit theTeahouse.

Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Agent 007 (talk)15:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:RABKO, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)04:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luizenmolen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GGOTCC00:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great job withLuizenmolen!GGOTCC00:28, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GGOTCC Thank you very much!!!Jhowie_Nitnek (talk)07:35, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC