Feel free to comment (etc). I will replyon this page.

Hi, I'm Isabel Draves and someone just deleted the page I was in the process of updating. It hadn't even been up for an hour yet and was being updated every time I hit save, about every 10 minutes. I was in the process of adding in articles. I do not know why you highlighted my article for deletion the second I created it (?!?) so I am requesting that since you must have some experience editing here, that you reinstate my hour of work on the page, put it back up, give me a chance to add to it and let others know it is up so that they can edit it. Thank you.Idraves (talk)18:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Isabel Draves and I'm in the process of creating a new page to define some industry terminology that has recently (past 4-5 years) come to be in common use and used even more frequently as time goes on, "Creative technology". I've had the page up for less than an hour and am adding references now. I have about 50 people standing by to help me with this. Surely you don't expect someone to have the entire text of a page ready to go before they post it? I think that would be unfair. Why don't you give me a few days or at least more than an hour to get the content in there? I've never done this before, and I'm not a spammer - I've been working in this industry for 6 years. Thank you. - Isabel— Precedingunsigned comment added byIdraves (talk •contribs)18:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the professor and I created stubs this morning that students will develop over the next six weeks (Field Apothecary). The professor picked those stubs as they are part of important agricultural trends in the Hudson Valley. I hope this will prevent their being speedily deleted. Thanks. - Baynard

Hi, sorry I'm new and my where we've been page was mistakenly saved before I wanted it to be. So sorry, my bad.— Precedingunsigned comment added byConceptK8 (talk •contribs)23:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HiJamKaftan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest atthe Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there!Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend,HostBot (talk)20:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Thanks for your kind attention, I just left a message for you on my article talk.— Precedingunsigned comment added byMasoud Moein (talk •contribs)18:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the political party from the infoboxes on MP biographies. Infoboxes are there to summarise the information on the page and the key facts about the subject. For an MP their political allegiance is one of those key facts. Yes it does get repeated elsewhere on the page but that's not reason to take it out of the first and possibly most noticable feature of the page.Nthep (talk)22:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedPhilip Weekes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageGwent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCamp X-Ray (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesAdventureland andInto the Wild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Having my watchlist loaded with updates to articles where you have recently added a Victoria Cross winner, I must give you an award for taking it upon yourself to highlight these important and brave people in articles on their locality.Mabuska(talk)12:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toAthy may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• truth" from Thomas Loe, an English preacher, who was visiting some friends in [[County Carlow]](and who later influenced [[William Penn]]<ref>http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/346007/

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)22:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toChigwell may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[John Watson (VC)|John Watson]], recipient of the [[Victoria Cross]]

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)18:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedList of Scottish Victoria Cross recipients, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMalaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you've been doing a fine job on removing un-necessary middle names from VC winners, and the middle name is, indeed, not actually needed in general. But I also note "Generally, use the most common format of a name used in reliable sources: if that is with a middle name or initials, make the Wikipedia article title conform to that format." In all the sources I'm familiar with, including the portrait in my grandparents' house (he was my great great great granduncle) he is known as Richard Harte Keatinge. I propose to move the article back toRichard Harte Keatinge.

I suppose I might, tongue in cheek, declare a personal interest in that I might find it mildly inconvenient to be confused with him, even briefly and even though I'm never likely to win the VC or merit a Wikipedia article. OtherRichard Keatinges (his distinction made the name popular in the family) may feel the same way. But the name as used by reliable sources is the one that we should use. Would you be kind enough to move the article back, or shall I?Richard Keatinge (talk)15:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing it.Richard Keatinge (talk)16:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you addedWilliam Traynor toList of people from Kingston upon Hull I have tagged this for a reference. Can you return and supply a reference that gives his association with Hull, I know his article indicates he was born there but that fact is unreferenced. Many thanks.Keith D (talk)23:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedEilis O'Hanlon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIRA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You added a photo to this article which is captioned "Roxborough School c.1890". The school in the photograph is of the Diocesan School located on the corner of Roxborough Avenue (Jail Boreen) and the Roxborough Road. That photograph comes from an old postcard and it does say "Roxborough School" on it. However, this building has nothing whatsoever to do with the school referenced in the article and was not in Roxborough at all. I am undoing the edit on that basis.Corcs999 (talk)11:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Aberavon RFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toCork

Irish Examiner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toFree State

Leinster Senior Hurling Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toMichael Collins

Leonard Courtney, 1st Baron Courtney of Penwith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toChelsea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedNorth Circular Road, Dublin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageDonnybrook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message fromMadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofAlternative Ulster Covenant, and it appears to include material copied directly fromhttp://republican-news.org/current/news/2012/09/the_alternative_ulster_covenan.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is notpublic domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)MadmanBot (talk)17:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toBenedict Brogan may have broken thesyntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)21:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

actually there is a reason in fact four. 1) His name was Charles Frederick worth 2) his label was Charles Frederick worth 3) his "house" was Charles Frederick Worth and 4) you need to raise such things on the talk page before you assume that you can move it. please undo. ThanksEdmund Patrick –confer11:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only your fourth reason is convincing me so far.JamKaftan (talk)13:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough but please remember ...generally, use the most common format of a name used in reliable sources: if that is with a middle name or initials, make the Wikipedia article title conform to that format... and based on that can I show you I have started a request to move back to the original title, please see

Talk:Charles Worth. thanksEdmund Patrick –confer15:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for keeping me informed and apologies for the hassle this must have caused.JamKaftan (talk)15:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the apologies, all I can say is start a move by saying you want to do it for reasons x,y and z. There are some articles that if you moved like that you would be barred for a length of time no discussion. These names have been arrived at over periods of time and work by a multitude of editors, Charles Fredrick Worth was created in 2004 and has served enquiring people happily since then. Always pays to check and ask beforehand, any delay would be small.Edmund Patrick –confer19:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finally sorted and move rescinded to match how the rest of the world lists him and all the other Wikipedia do as well. As I say mention it on talk page first, start a discussion, that way people will work with you.Edmund Patrick –confer17:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice, but did you see the tag at the top? Under construction...--MacRùsgail (talk)14:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no time now but don't delete it. It's Germany's most succesful app.Holger.Waldenberger (talk)18:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The web-page is regarding one of the pioneer in Power System operation of India. The person is holding a key position in Indian Power Sector and has given numerous contribution to the sector at national and international level. It has nothing to do with any kind of publicity or promotion on the net. Kindly don't delete it.— Precedingunsigned comment added byAkhilsinghal (talk •contribs)18:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JamKaftan,

I saw your deletion of the Medela page. I sort of understand it, that it was rather promotional. However, this was purely a translation of the Wikipedia German text.

Plus it was designed purely as an intro to a lot more info that is coming; history of the founder, history of the company, scientific research into breast feeding (which is what the company specialises in), and tons of other things.

If you could put it back it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Chrisso14.Chrisso14 (talk)09:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JamKaftan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition toAlternative Ulster Covenant has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material withoutpermission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate asmall amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with doublequotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this atWikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See alsoHelp:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all informationin your own words and structure, in properparaphrase. Following the source's words too closely can createcopyright problems, so it is not permitted here; seeWikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples,hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources toverify information and to demonstrate that the content is notoriginal research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content isWikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to reviewWikipedia:Copy-paste.
• Ifyou own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, youmay be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. SeeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Invery rare cases (that is, for sources that arepublic domain orcompatibly licensed), itmay be possible to include greater portions of a source text.However, please seek help at thehelp desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sourcesmay not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If youdo confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; seeWikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps inWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must beblocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page.(Content appeared to be copied or closely paraphrased fromhttp://www.indymedia.ie/article/102493) Thank you.Justlettersandnumbers (talk)00:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toMEDIA Programme may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[La Promesse|La promesse]]]'' (1997)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)03:10, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHugo Guinness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMichelle Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have created this list as it expands on the existing Category:songs by theme. The list entry is a stepping stone into making a song by theme. In the category entry, however, the song has to have an entry into Wikipedia. The list allows you to find out if the song has this entry. If enough songs are in the list they can be moved to the Category: songs by theme. While love songs are a mainstay of the music world they still each have their own unique character. It is no different than songs about trains or cars. So a recognition of this on Wikipedia is a refinement of the encyclopedia and fits into its objective of universally accessible learning and understanding. I was delighted to find that Wikipedia does have songs by topic and theme and I was willing to expand upon that in a small way. Please explain to me how it does not meet the criteria for inclusion.Whatever2009 (talk)18:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy A7 is only to be used when there is no plausible indication of importance. An article indicating that someone has published books is an indication of plausible importance, though not necessarily notability , unless he meetsWP:CREATIVE. (This applies to books from regular publishers, not self-published books) The bar for passing speedy is much less than actual notability , SeeWP:CSD and its talk page archives for an explanation. DGG ( talk)18:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JamKaftan, I just wanted to suggest that, if you mark a page from the new pages feed for deletion (whether it be through AFD, PROD, or CSD), it might be best tonot also mark it as patrolled. With the articleList of Flirtatious Songs, the author removed your prod tag, and the article appeared in theSpecial:NewPagesFeed as patrolled, so it almost slipped by without getting deleted. Cheers,IagoQnsi20:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, IagoQnsi - I guess this is a problem with thePage Curation tool - it must automatically mark pages as patrolled.JamKaftan (talk)20:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry, I am not yet a confirmed user and can't use the Page Curation toolbar, so I didn't realize that was how it worked. My mistake! -IagoQnsi22:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review of Amirul Hajj but I feel it doesn't come under speedy deletion criteria and request to reconsider. please referTalk:Amirul Hajj.Mufaddalqn (talk)07:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamKaftan. Your question has been answered at theTeahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions arearchived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added byNthep (talk)23:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC). (You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thank you for reviewing so many pages! You deserve this :) ~Anastasia (talk)01:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Matthew Barrett (journalist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toHarry Cole

Tim Montgomerie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toMandrake

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:05, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JamKaftan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion ofAmirul Hajj, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you.Shirt58 (talk)09:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I contested the deletion of Center of Government. Could you indicate which other page is it duplicating?— Precedingunsigned comment added byDrinkTheKoolAid (talk •contribs)15:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for your note. I'm new to wikipedia and just tried creating a meetup page that you have marked for deletion. Could you give me a little more context for why it's inappropriate and should be deleted?Tamale2222 (talk)13:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is of no encyclopaedic notability whatsoever.JamKaftan (talk)13:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression I can delete whatever I'd like off my own talk page. Has that changed recently?AndyGibsonSon (talk)19:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

" Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted", from the page you shared on my wall. I like to work off my talk page and have it be a clean slate of what I am working on. I will remove the comments on there for pending deletion notices. Per the link you shared, deleting a comment off your own talk page is proof you have read it. Further posts will not show good faith in trying to let me know you've nominated an article; it is clearly you wanting to control a situation. Please stop posting the same comment on my page. For further reading, read the article in full from the link you've posted on my wall.AndyGibsonSon (talk)20:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have my permission to remove my comments.JamKaftan (talk)20:04, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not need your permission to remove your comments on my own talk page. Please refer to the article you had linked to on my page and read the sectionin full.AndyGibsonSon (talk)20:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't give you permission. Bite me.JamKaftan (talk)20:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And, again, I don't need it. 20:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byAndyGibsonSon (talk •contribs)

Good for you.JamKaftan (talk)20:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback regarding the articleMichael Pritchard (youth counselor). On the talk page, I have posted a notability rationale. I would appreciate your further feedback. Would it be possible for you to remove the Speedy tag and post it in AfD instead, if you still think the article is not sufficiently notable? Thanks.Peter Chastain (talk)14:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is now out of my hands, but I'd be pretty hopeful the admins will make the right decision, based on your unusually coherent justification!JamKaftan (talk)14:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

==Marty Lenz== American Broadcasting Professional

Hi Jam...new here so thanks for the insight and help. So deleting the entire entry because of the link that should be avoided is the policy? If that is/was the only issue was the rest of entry up to snuff/acceptable? Thanks, and I realize there is detail already here, but it is a lot to consume in some cases so your insight, expertise, and time is appreciated.

Contact— Precedingunsigned comment added byContactlenz (talk •contribs)01:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When reverting my edit onRobert Livermore, you asked "where else is that style of intro used?" I don't know what you mean by "style", but I'll explain the edit. I was just trying to clarify the sentence. Livermore was never "an English rancher and landowner" - that is, he never owned land in England. As the article says, he was an English "stonemason's apprentice" who moved to California to become a California rancher and landowner. Please explain your objection and I'll try to do better.WCCasey (talk)05:44, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. My objection is twofold. Firstly, perhaps we browse different sorts of article on wikipedia, but I've rarely seen someone described as "a native of X who did Y" etc, they are a French/Nigerian/Venezuelan/Chinese soldier/singer/naturalist/clown. My second objection is on the point about whether he was English or not. If he came from England, he was English, regardless of where he did the thing that made him notable. A case in point would beSamuel Beckett, who is (correctly in my view) described as Irish, despite living in Paris for 50+ years, and publishing mostly in French. If you can't see your way to describing Livermore as English, perhaps the compromise could be this:Lawrence Durrell is described as an "expatriate British novelist". He was born in India, lived much of the time in Greece, and died in France, and it later turned out he wouldn't even have been eligible for British citizenship - but his being a product of Britain is nonetheless important. So if Durrell can be described as British, surely Livermore, who was actually born in the country, can be afforded some parity of nationality.JamKaftan (talk)13:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article should note (as it does) that Livermore was born in England, was of an English family, and lived in England to the age of 17. I disagree (as noted) with the wording "an English rancher and landowner". Turn it around and tell me if it makes sense to you: if I were describing an American who moved to England and acquired some land, would it be accurate to call him "an American landowner"?

As to nationality in general, I try to follow the Wikipedia manual of style for biographyMOS:BIO. In the section "Opening paragraph", concerning nationality, it says (emphasis added): "Context (location, nationality, or ethnicity);In most modern-day cases this will mean the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident, orif notable mainly for past events, the country where the person was a citizen, national or permanent resident when the person became notable."

The opening paragraph should summarize what makes the person notable. Livermore became notable (as a rancher and landowner) only after he arrived in California, so it seems more accurate (and grammatically correct) to describe him as a "California rancher and land owner". He became a citizen of California when it was still part of Mexico.

If I was writing the article, I wouldn't mention "English" in the opening paragraph, because that's not part of what made him notable (it would be different if the article was called "Early English emigrants to California"). However, because the term was already there, I tried to find a way to keep it there while improving the description. I don't want to deny that Livermore was English - I just mainly think it's a poorly-written sentence.WCCasey (talk)19:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iwould use "an American landowner" when describing an American who moved to England. But that's clearly my minority view, so feel free to disregard/correct my edits.JamKaftan (talk)20:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to ask why was the article deleted for the second time from Wikipedia. There are many articles presently on Wikipedia of this type. The subject is quite notable for inclusion(non-notability criteria is not applicable). In addition, the reason to include it in the Wikipedia is that she is the person who did the remix of a superhit song, and she got considerable response. The article content was written in a purely encyclopaedic manner(promotional criteria for deletion not applicable to this). Then, why was this speedy deleted?Royalrajasthan2013 (talk)17:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJames Vowles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMercedes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onKen Crawford (Disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is anorphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is aprimary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines.Herald09:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toRampling may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Charlotte Rampling]], OBE (born 1946), British-French actress(daughter of Godfrey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)16:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedThe Review Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTony Parsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedArthur Darvill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWest Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedVanessa Kirby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWimbledon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:44, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Ed Miliband (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toCamden

Shabana Mahmood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toWest Midlands

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I notice that you have made several edits to biography pages, presumably to clarify places of birth. However, at least some of the edits you have made are not very helpful.. for example, Birmingham and Sutton Coldfield are not considered to be part of Warwickshire (they are in West Midlands county), Liverpool is not considered to be part of Lancashire (it is Merseyside). These edits are not accurate and are somewhat confusing.

Please could you ensure that the counties being added are those commonly accepted as being the modern ones (I know the structure of counties is confusing).

Thanks!

Shritwod (talk)20:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We are not dealing with historical figures, we are dealing with contemporary ones. The addition of the counties in many cases does not add value and it does not seem to fit in with theWP:UKPLACE guidelines.Shritwod (talk)22:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right, we aren't dealing with historical figures. I can just as easily cite three people under forty:André Hahn ("Place of birthOtterndorf,West Germany"),Toni Kroos ("Place of birthGreifswald,East Germany"), andGjorgji Hristov ("Place of birthBitola,SFR Yugoslavia"). In each of these cases, their places of birth no longer exist in the form Wikipedia rightly refers to. What is the problem with the same standards being applied to British people?JamKaftan (talk)00:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSunset Strip, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesJewel andDido (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCharlotte Dujardin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEnfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedEngland cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJimmy Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I had to severely trim the restaurant bit of this article. I know you put a lot of work into it and it was well crafted but you went way over the top. This is an encyclopaedia. Leave a message on my or the article talk page if you would like to discuss this further. Thanks.Philafrenzy (talk)18:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCamille Rowe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAmerica. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JamKaftan,

please participate in the discussion atTalk:European Conservatives and Reformists. If users just revert other users' attempts without talking, it will be impossible to find consensus. Thank you, --RJFF (talk)16:42, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toMark Wallinger may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Wallinger is a supporter of the [[Labour Party(UK|Labour Party]].<ref>http://order-order.com/2014/07/10/labours-fundraiser-figures/</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)16:04, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On11 July 2014,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleChiltern Firehouse, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was... that one reviewer wrote that checking in for a meal at London'sChiltern Firehouse restaurant "feels a bit like arriving at aScientology meeting"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Chiltern Firehouse. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,live views,daily totals), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk)08:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

David Jones (artist-poet)

added a link pointing toHarrow

Jim Muir

added a link pointing toHit list

Kay Burley

added a link pointing toEastern seaboard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedBurnopfield, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesDerwent andLanchester. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Boys Bradford was, perhaps bizarrely, known as "Roland Boys Bradford" rather than as "Roland Bradford" thus I have reverted your move.FiddleFaddle22:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you are also familiar with the somewhat rare but normal English practice of having a non hyphenated yet double barrelled surname. A couple of my school colleagues were so named. Please be very careful when making such moves that you have checked every avenue first. If there is nothing substantive either way I suggest you leave it alone lest you err by accident.

The surname practice can also vary within the same family. Some folk embrace the hyphen, others drop the pre or the post hyphen name, and others keep both (all, sometimes) and yet do not hyphenate. Even two full brothers may choose to differ.FiddleFaddle22:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've been updating a few pages with references that I have also been working on. Thanks!

But I noticed you weren't putting in the full references. This tool:http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py will do that for you. It's called Reflinks! It's pretty awesome. Please give it a try!TeriEmbrey (talk)14:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will use that tool, after I'm done editing.JamKaftan (talk)14:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can I also ask that you complete your references as required byWP:BAREURLS especially to articles that have previously assessed Thanks in anticipation.Dormskirk (talk)20:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All done now.JamKaftan (talk)19:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! Thanks.Dormskirk (talk)19:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedBritish National Circuit Race Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageSimon Yates. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make unsourced claims about living people, as you didhere. Thanks. – Arms & Hearts (talk)13:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As was made clear in the edit description, I took the information from his father's wikipedia page. Ifthat is incorrect, then take it up with whoever wrote it - don't accuse me of making unsourced claims. Thanks.JamKaftan (talk)13:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks very much for adding the latest batch of YouGov polls to 2014 Senate election articles. I've added the three previous rounds so I know it can be quite laborious. Thanks again!Tiller54 (talk)21:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the pageKevoo Hard should not be deleted. He perhaps is not so important person, but there should be an article about him.Mirno (talk)18:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've just declined an A7 (significance) that you requested (in fact, two). A7 (or 'significance' if you use Page Curation - I hate PC) is limited in what you can use it on. It's for people and groups of people (companies, churches but not if they are buildings rather than the people, underwater knitting clubs, and so on), named animals (like Gertie the Dancing Wolf, but not Canis lupus which is a species) and organised events (but not riots that just happened or bank robberies even though they were planned). Also, for some reason, web content is included. Crimsonseagull.com can be tagged with A7, but the Crimsom Seagull browser can't because you use it at home on your own machine. The game CraftDungeonMine can be tagged because it's online (or would be if someone created it...), but Furious Butterflies can't, because it's an app (or would be, etc). Anything like software, products, philosophies, games (that are played in real life without a computer), or recipes - no go for A7. Has to beWP:PROD orWP:AFD. Complicated? Yes. No-one said Wikipedia was easy...Peridon (talk)19:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This 'artist' probably doesn't passWP:MUSICBIO, but its speedy deletion, of what is a (badly) sourced BLP from Africa, might be controversial. Sorry to make work for you, but can you take this issue toWP:AfD?Bearian (talk)21:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSebastian Stan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRomanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCharles Wegelius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRoger Hammond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedElvis Radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWYNY. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)13:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedFinlay Robertson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:18, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In regards tothis edit, please seeWP:REFNAME. Thank you.Craig(talk)19:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm rotten at that but will attempt to learn for future edits.JamKaftan (talk)02:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mReferenceBot. I haveautomatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On theLaura Van Gilder page,your edit caused abroken reference name(help). (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,ReferenceBot (talk)00:36, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for editing on it, would you happen to know how to put the right colors on the general classification tables at the end? Once it's started I'll be good to do it. The points jersey isTom Dumoulin, the mountains jersey isnot awarded and the best team is IAM. ThanksMattsnow81(Talk)17:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it, I found out how lol. Your edits are always welcome :)Mattsnow81(Talk)17:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedThe Dumb Waiter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJason Watkins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:37, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited2015 Tour of Alberta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAdam Yates. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedKampioenschap van Vlaanderen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLa Française des Jeux. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamKaftan. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamKaftan. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAhmed Kotiev has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Luis150902 (talk |contribs)21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamKaftan. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirectDomina Vacanze. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 16#Domina Vacanze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Jalen Folf(talk)15:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation