Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for30 days are automatically archived1 or more at a time byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than4.

Anamendment request to which you were a party has been closed and archived. No action is needed on your part, this is only a notification.EggRoll97^(talk)06:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the directions for properly bundling deletions.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 in German television was not done properly because you didn't list each article you were nominating. I'veasked for help cleaning up from AWB editors. In addition, deletion is not cleanup. Don't nominate articles just because they're stubs and uncited. FollowWP:BEFORE.voorts (talk/contributions)02:38, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JHD0919. You've added the template {{NoACEMM}} toNableezy's andBbb23's talkpages, to stop them from receiving mass messages in the future, on the argument that they "won't be needing these kinds of messages anymore". Well, probably they won't, but it's not for you to say. I understand that you meant well, but Nableezy edited a mere 18 hours ago; he might edit again. And Bbb23 has a note on his page stating that he intends to remove any messages he doesn't like, which, AFAICS, implies he's still watching his page. Please let all users handle their own pages, unless they shouldask you to add a template or something.Bishonen |tålk22:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC).[reply]

Considering his farewell message, as well as its contents, there's no way Nableezy's ever editing again. And I don't believe Bbb will be watching his talkpage forever. It's for those reasons I added the template to both their pages. Oh, and the "Not your business" section header comes off as rude to me.JHD0919 (talk)22:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Please, not your business. Thank you."Magnolia677 (talk)22:17, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

as does your clerking, which is also disruptive. Consider this a final warning, or you will be blocked. Count me among those who nearly already did so.StarMississippi23:28, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'm not gonna put templates on user talkpages and remove users from newsletters without permission anymore. I've gotten the hint now.JHD0919 (talk)23:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Stop. Now. If you continue to add that template I will block you. My finger hovered over the button before I typed this message.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?22:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Where were you guys when I added that same template toErgo Sum's page and removedhim andCarlossuarez46 fromWikipedia:Administrators' newsletter/Subscribe? Why did you guys not tell me not to do such things then?JHD0919 (talk)22:30, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I see those edits have been reverted. If one feels that meremoving Ergo from theNewsletter list (which I honestly forgot I did) was also wrong, feel free to revert that too.JHD0919 (talk)23:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bishonen warned you and you did it again. Then you did it with Nableezy. Please take a hint.Acroterion(talk)22:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my question above.JHD0919 (talk)22:33, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please see warnings from three admins. Stop it. I don't care what you did before and got away with it.Acroterion(talk)22:34, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I got the hint. I'm not gonna slap that template on any more talk pages without permission. I just wish you guys didn't get onto my case about this in anWP:UNCIVIL manner.JHD0919 (talk)22:48, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Slapping templates" in this manner is usually perceived as a form of gravedancing, which is a far more egregious offense than a direct admonition.Acroterion(talk)22:54, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that. Had I known, I never would have put those templates there. I've always hated gravedancing.JHD0919 (talk)22:55, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What were you trying to achieve? How does it matter to you if someone else receives a message even if they aren't currently active?~2026-61025-9 (talk)05:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Anamendment request in which you were a party has been closed and archived. No action is needed on your part.EggRoll97^(talk)06:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your many PRODs of small places in the US, thanks for your industry, but how muchWP:BEFORE are you doing on each one, if any? Also, please don't post so many at once, as it places an unfair time pressure on other editors carrying out their BEFORE checks.Ingratis (talk)08:11, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]