User talk:Ivanhardybirt
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, Ivanhardybirt, andwelcome to Wikipedia! I am your mentor and you can ask me any questions onmy talk page or check out ourhelp pages if you need help. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see theWikipedia Teahouse.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name ontalk pages using fourtildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome!141Pr {contribs}11:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ivanhardybirt! I noticedyour contributions toSam Denby and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Cosmic6811 🍁 (T ·C)02:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toLake Louise (Manitoba). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Suntoloo Panoom (talk)19:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello,Ivanhardybirt!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!DrowssapSMM16:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] |
Thanks for your contributions toThe Diana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability andit has too many problems of language or grammar.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.14 novembre (talk)16:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toNorth Marysburgh Township, Ontario. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources andit has too many problems of language or grammar.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Killarnee (talk)17:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must beverifiable throughreliable sources, preferably usinginline citations. If you require further assistance, please look atHelp:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at theTeahouse. Thank you.— Precedingunsigned comment added byNikkimaria (talk •contribs)05:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. Please check before adding categories to articles that the article is not already a member of a subcategory of that category. For example, the article forDove Holes was already inCategory:Chapel-en-le-Frith, which is a subcategory ofCategory:High Peak, Derbyshire. By Wikipedia convention, and to avoid duplication, only the "lowest" appropriate category in the hierarchy is used, so adding Dove Holes to the High Peak category was incorrect (I've reverted it). SeeWP:CAT#TREE.Dave.Dunford (talk)13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The articleJohnny in the Middle of the Park has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The pageJohnny in the Middle of the Park was created specifically for explaining the lostwave. It is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia and it only as primary sources and not secondary reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
ReadWikipedia:No original research for more information.
Category:Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Bearcat (talk)17:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you made an edit toLa Domenica Sportiva article. You did not state a source of where you got the information of that particular song being played in an episode of the TV program. This edit can be located here -https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Domenica_Sportiva&diff=prev&oldid=1232024579. Therefore, I have reverted it. If you have an actual credible and reliable source that states that this song was played in an episode of La Domenica Sportiva, then you can insert the sentence again. Until then, do not add it back.Soafy234 (talk)23:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny in the Middle of the Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Skyshiftertalk10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toMichael Hofmann de Boer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit has no sources.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)15:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
mention me on reply; thanks!)14:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply] Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Lake Louise (Manitoba), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)20:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:North Marysburgh Township, Ontario, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastair King-Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder (talk)13:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Sherriff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder (talk)13:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:The Diana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)21:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Lake Louise".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!20:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Edward Le Sage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.KH-1 (talk)05:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onStarla Whaley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does notcredibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.CommissarDoggoTalk?13:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed asDisambig-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
I dream of horses(Hoofprints)(Neigh at me)13:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPhilip Egerton (died 1698), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJohn Egerton. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)19:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Michael Hofmann de Boer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)02:08, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created,Charles Crewe, may not conform to some of Wikipedia'sguidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using theArticle Wizard or theArticles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read ourintroduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk}00:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toCeredigion and Pembrokeshire (Senedd constituency). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit isWP:TOOSOON (WP:CRYSTAL), the boundaries and names have not yet been finalised, particularly the names. Source used is about theinitial proposals, which were replaced in December 2024 withanother set of proposals. Happy to re-publish this article and encourage the creation of the others when the final recommendations have been announced sometime in March 2025 (so between tomorrow or a few weeks from now). Diolch/Thanks.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.DankJae20:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "The Diana".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!DreamRimmer bot II (talk)18:25, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work onÉglise Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption d'Auvers-sur-Oise. Another editor,Moriwen, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work! Very interesting little article.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Moriwen}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
—Moriwen (talk)22:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add dates of birth, especially of living people,without showing a source: I have reverted 3 of your recent edits includingSamantha Dixon. Thanks.PamD22:44, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work on1935 United Kingdom heatwaves. Another editor,Klbrain, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this page, consistent with others inCategory:20th-century heat waves. A reminder that sentence case is preferred for headings and page titles; also be careful with capitals only for proper nouns.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Klbrain}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk)11:10, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, I've reverted your addition ofSarah Pochin's birth month. Wikipedia doesn't include birth dates sourced only to official information such as Companies House where someone has given their information whether they wanted to or not. SeeWP:BLPPRIMARY: we only use sources where the subject has chosen to give their birthdate, or given their age from which an approximate birthdate can be derived. (She'll probably be in the next edition ofWho's Who - a spate of new birthdates for MPs have recently been added from the latest edition.)PamD07:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related totheArab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged in, have500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Jay8g[V•T•E]18:54, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onNour News, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator.JesusisGreat7☾⋆ |Ping Me12:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mDeb. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, usingindependent sources, and from aneutral perspective. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk)13:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Charles Crewe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)01:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Charles Crewe".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!00:43, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ivanhardybirt, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,2025 Isle of Wight helicopter crash, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Isle of Wight helicopter crash.
Deletiondiscussions usually run for seven days and arenot votes.Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions isnotability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
TheLongTone (talk)15:10, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mWaxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Eric Stuart, but you didn't provide areliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content beverifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your changewith a citation, your edit is archived in thepage history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page.seeWP:DOBWaxworker (talk)11:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectGeorge Zinn (activist) has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § George Zinn (activist) until a consensus is reached.Clovermoss🍀(talk)06:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ivanhardybirt. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "The Diana".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.LizRead!Talk!22:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated bylarge language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by anyreasonable human review:
Text produced by these applications can beunsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at theTeahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. – {{u|hekatlys}}03:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.11WB (talk)21:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Ivanhardybirt. I have some concerns regarding the sources you used for2025 Ekalaka helicopter crash. Many of themreturned 404s and were notreliable. There were also detections of LLM usage, which is generallyprohibited. You are welcome to contribute articles to Wikipedia, but please make sure they are reliably sourced and are not reliant on AI. Thank you!11WB (talk)00:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is taking place atWP:AN/I#CIR: Ivanhardybirt.11WB (talk)05:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content |
|---|
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Leeke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novodmytrivka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
A tag has been placed onGowhole requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated bylarge language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by anyreasonable human review:
Text produced by these applications can beunsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time. If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at theTeahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions.11WB (talk)11:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply] The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1935 United Kingdom heatwaves until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellie Costello until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
This edit of yours changedSpringfield pet-eating hoax to Springfield pet-eating conspiracy. It needn't be clarified thatconspiracy andconspiracy theory/hoax are not the same. That you also removed criticism of the subject promoting these conspiracy theories/misinfo would lend credence to the fact that you wereWP:POVPUSHingWP:HOAXes at enwiki, please do not repeat this again.Gotitbro (talk)11:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This messagedoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please seeWikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of differences between the former and new systems, seeWP:CTVSDS.FDW777 (talk)23:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions toRhiannon Leaman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.TheInevitables (talk)01:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articleGerman Pole (politician) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Effectively unsourced. 1 source is a blog another an image. FailsWP:SIGCOV.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular,articles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion based onestablished criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you mayrequest undeletion of the article at any time.scope_creepTalk06:12, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work onQueen's Hills. Another editor,Klbrain, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this page for an occupied place. When creating articles, please don't rely on chatgpt to generate text; it's not trustworthy and undermines the basis of Wikipedia as a source generated by people. Nevertheless, I've checked your chatgpt source and they look sound (in this case). The text is brief, and therefore there is an argument that it would be better placed withinCostessey.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Klbrain}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk)05:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Political Peerages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The C of E God Save the King! (talk)07:36, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a source for the creation of the life peerage for Dame Ann Limb further to your recent edit?Bram880 (talk)11:46, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work onRhiannon Leaman, Baroness Leaman. Another editor,Klbrain, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this biography for a member of national parliament (albeit in the upper chamber). It's rightly marked as a stub, given that we have essentially nothing before 2019.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Klbrain}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk)11:03, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ivanhardybirt. Thank you for your work onKylie Smith. Another editor,MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
not mentioned in target page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|MPGuy2824}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)