Archives

1

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:44, Thursday, November 27, 2025 (UTC)

Your recent reversions of additions I've made to both of the articles involving these topics only helps racist denialists of the Armenian Holocaust. The CUP were the fundamental political group that carried out the killings and therefore their article MUST be a part of the series of "persecution of Armenians." I'm going to revert it back.

I'm not sure what the problem was with the changes to the Young Turks article. I deleted a single useless sentence that spoke of some new "meaning" to the words that have zero to do with the pan-Turkist/genocidal party in question. I will revert it back. Let me know what problems you have before making changes. Thanks!— Precedingunsigned comment added by68.119.138.205 (talk)11:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions are not constructive. You're adding infoboxes to the articles that are meant for other articles. These articles are already in a series of articles relating to the Armenian Genocide. The sentence you deleted is also not a "new meaning", as you say, but an established one. It is sourced. Don't remove sourced content. Your edits seem to be extremely POV and biased, as well as not encyclopedic. That's the problem.Ithinkicahn (talk)18:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What's POV? Your deletion of the link of the Young Turks party to the Armenian Genocide is extremely POV. The Young Turks article is a fundamental part of the series of the persecution of the Armenians. This MUST be noted boldly. The main reason anyone even visits that page is in regards to the Armenian Genocide. You try to break a link between the Nazis and the holocaust would you? As to the deletion of hte sentence, that sentence is often used by Armenian Genocide deniers to paint the Young Turks in a favorable light. As far as the Young Turks as a term being used to mean progressives, that is a relatively new phenomenon and doesn't have anything to do with the genocidal Young Turks political party of the 20th century.— Precedingunsigned comment added by68.119.138.205 (talk)11:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you to check out the Talk pages before doing something like that, since you were simply copying and pasting an infobox not meant for that article. And no, changing the title of the infobox to the article name doesn't constitute a good infobox. The Armenian thing is already mentioned very heavily throughout the article. Your claims about the Young Turks not being a progressive movement before WWI is also an unsupported view and completely POV. You can, however, mention suggestions for improvements on the Talk page (there is now a discussion) instead of making unconstructive edits and removing sourced content to push a certain POV. Cheers.Ithinkicahn (talk)15:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned it in the talk page. Interesting use of "Armenian thing" too. Shows your NPOV....--68.119.138.205 (talk)10:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toSafiye Sultan may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [http://web.archive.org/web/20060926203638/http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Turkey/turkey.htm ]</ref>) née ''Sofia Bellicui Baffo'', was the favourite consort and later wife of [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)02:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedProgressive Republican Party (Turkey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMustafa Kemal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with your reverts atSecularism in Turkey. I know you believe you're reverting vandalism, but next time, unless it's a clear case of vandalism (seeWP:VANDTYPES), be patient and wait for another editor to come along and make the second revert within such a short space of time. Ping me at my talk page, if it's taking too long for another editor to notice. Thanks,RubyMurray11:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I was wondering if he'd get up to 3RR again. Notice I've only made 2, to see if he would counter, and it seems like he did. I wonder if I should make another noticeboard report?Ithinkicahn (talk)16:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should be careful about raising a new report if I were you, since you've both only just come out of a block for edit warring. There are many eyes on both of those articles now, and any large scale deletions or POV additions won't last long.RubyMurray16:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good advice. Hopefully someone will come along on the Secularism in Turkey article sometime soon.Ithinkicahn (talk)16:58, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Kind regards,Afro-Eurasian(talk)02:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Although we do our best, we still need more editors contribute to WP Turkey and WP Ottoman Empire.Nedim Ardoğa (talk)08:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in joining a discussion about this article? --Kansas Bear (talk)06:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely would; both theCommittee of Union and Progress article and theYoung Turks one.Ithinkicahn (talk)06:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've begun creating some categories for the governors of some of the major Ottoman provinces. The typical format is "Governors of XXX Eyalet" or "Ottoman governors of XXX", with the latter for cases like Bosnia and Crete where there is a distinctive region with more or less stable boundaries, both pre- and ante-dating Ottoman rule. Anyhow, in two cases, namely Rumelia and Anatolia, I was wondering if maybe the better term would be "Beylerbeys of Rumelia" rather than "Governors of the Rumelia Eyalet", since governor would imply awali, and these two were the first and IIRC longest where the title of "beylerbey" was used. I am not sure, however, what the proper title of the Rumelia and Anatolia governors was in the 17th-19th centuries, and whether or not it changed towali as well. Can you perhaps help?Constantine ✍18:49, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your assessment on dichotomy between the two "Governor" category formats. In any case, I think the "Governors of ..." format is better than the "Beylerbeys of ..." and "Walis of ..." formats, since the research I've done on, for example,Egypt Eyalet, indicate that "Beylerbey" (a specific, flowery, occasional title) and "Wali" (just literally "governor" in Turkish) were pretty interchangeable. I think with all the various references to the same figures as "viceroys" and "governors" and "governor-generals" and "beylerbeys" in English sources as well as in native Turkish sources, especially, it's just better to refer to them as "Governor" in context of Wikipedia. It's extremely difficult to get a straight answer from the historical sources, probably showing that it wasn't an exactly-determined title for most provinces, including Rumelia and Anatolia Eyalets. So I think the general and fitting term "Governor" is both accurate and all-encompassing for all of the provincial governor titles. I appreciate you for the category creations!Ithinkicahn (talk)23:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Koca Ragıp Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toKoca

The Imam's Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toJustice and Development Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Ithinkicahn. In the AKP article, recent changes by another user have led to the inclusion of Neo-Ottomanism under the ideologies heading of the party's infobox. I'd like to know your position on this matter. Should it be removed, given that the AKP officially rejects this characterization?--Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk)15:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it should be included, since it's a very loaded term and has been rejected by the party itself quite strongly. However, I'm not staunchly against it, if other editors have the opposite idea and including it would be in line with past examples, then I'd say fine. Still, once again, it's a loaded term, but not quite as loaded as, say, including "American imperialism" under the ideology of the U.S. Republican Party. It's a concept more than an insulting term. I'd say there should be a discussion on this somewhere so consensus can be reached, but it's up to you. Cheers!Ithinkicahn (talk)20:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMachine elf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machine elf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --TRPoDaka The Red Pen of Doom17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason of writing this to you is to clarify my situation about the article and also wanted to explain what I wrote to the page protection request.Rivaner (talk)09:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)I opened a case about this article to dispute noticeboard but it was denied on the grounds that it was already on the neutral point of view noticeboard. This was what I wrote there and hopefully will help you understand my situation anout this article.[reply]

This article lacks a neutral point of view, I have already made my cae to the neutral point of view noticeboard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) 11 days ago but today, things became really frustrating for me. Some IP adressed users are attacking the article using my edits, I know it is not the right way to do things but the reason for that is they finally found a voice in wikipedia. You can see all the reasons for my edits from one of the inolved users talk page;(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LardoBalsamico#2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) which really sumarizes my siutation. I can understand the users attacking but don't accept their ways. As you can see from here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:93.115.94.149#About_2011_Turkish_sports_corruption_scandal_article) I have did the best I can to calm the situation.

Hope this helps and thanks for you concern about the article.Rivaner (talk)08:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HeyRivaner, I have no dog in the fight, I was just worried about the repeated vandalism of the page by anonymous IPs, not your edits. I haven't read the article, so hopefully the NPOV process works out for everyone in the end. Good luck!Ithinkicahn (talk)21:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSiege of Rhodes (1522), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageJohn Webb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)17:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TheArbitration Committee has permittedadministrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is atWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related toArmenia,Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, satisfy anystandard of behavior, or follow anynormal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page atWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections ofWikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Just reminding you aboutWP:AA2. I foundthis edit to be rather problematic since the paragraph was actually cited by several sources. I nevertheless hope we can work together to build a bigger and better encyclopedia and have more constructive discussions. Thanks,Étienne Dolet (talk)22:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing, as you did atPersecution_of_Ottoman_Muslims. Your edits have beenreverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved throughconsensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your beingblocked from editing.Alexikoua (talk)21:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How Pargali Ibrahim Pasha could be governer of Egypt from 1583 until 1585 when he had been dead in that time?? He died in 1536!!!!!!!Keivan.f (talk) 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Haha what are you talking about? Pargali Ibrahim Pasha was governor as an interim governor in 1525. The governor from 1583 to 1585 wasDamat Ibrahim Pasha.Ithinkicahn (talk)22:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJulius Caesar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMark Anthony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedWinston's Hiccup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageConcave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen your edits in these articles. Could you please bring more clarification and details in both articles on the recent history of the province? It is not very clear. Thanks. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk)20:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I'm no expert on the subject, all I made were largely formatting and aesthetic fixes, but I will certainly take a look at it. Thanks for looking out!Ithinkicahn (talk)20:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

Hadım Ali Pasha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toÇemberlitaş

Çemberlitaş, Fatih (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toGrand Bazaar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toFatma Sultan (daughter of Ahmed I) may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• demanded he return her dowry to her, which amounted to one year of taxes of [[Egypt Eyalet|Egypt]](this was possibly related to the fact that one of her previous husbands, the late [[Kara Mustafa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)05:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toCacık may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• fa| ماست و خیار }}; {{lang-ku|jaj}}<ref>http://www.etimolojiturkce.com/kelime/cac%C4%B1k</ref>) or '''tzatziki''' is a dish of seasoned, strained [[yogurt]], eaten throughout the former [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)19:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removedmaintenance templates fromGülen movement. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has beenreverted. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Thank you.Walter Görlitz (talk)00:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onGülen movement. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware,Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.
Please seeWP:SEEALSO: "As a general rule, the 'See also' section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body" andWP:BRD.Walter Görlitz (talk)04:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've broken the 3RR rule. I wonder if I should report you for that, like you did me in the past without listening to reason or notifying me?Ithinkicahn (talk)04:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toRostam (name) may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Rustam Rahimov]](born 1979, German-Tajik boxer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)00:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedNecati Şaşmaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageZaza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSlavery in the Ottoman Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAgha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:55, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toEdhem Pasha may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Edhem Pasha was especially successful in the Battle of Dömeke/Domochos {{lang-tr|Dömeke Harbi}}) on the front. He captured Yenişehir ([[Larissa]]) and Tırhala ([[Trikala]]) again, but other

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)06:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abd%C3%BClaziz_Bay%C4%B1nd%C4%B1r&diff=612018517&oldid=598726479) The other editor removed all sources from it, hence it has no sources as now. He claimed the sources I added are fanatical Quranist webpages.Kavas (talk)15:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken note and restored the cited sources. This user, RookTaker, seems to have an agenda in defacing articles like this, especially by libeling this person because of his criticisms ofSaid Nursi.Ithinkicahn (talk)22:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toKıbrıslı Mehmed Emin Pasha may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] who had entered the service of the Ottoman Empire, or with other past notables of the same name(see [[Mehmed Emin Pasha (disambiguation)]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)07:06, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toKöprülü Abdullah Pasha may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in 1735, part of the renewed [[Ottoman–Persian War (1730–35)|Ottoma-Persian War of 1730–35)]]. Ordering his forces to entrench in preparation for the advancing Persian army, he managed to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)05:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedŞehzade Cihangir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageŞehzade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFülane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under thecriteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.R'n'B (call me Russ)20:27, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Batuhan. I just wanted to thank you for your interest in and effort on the article ofSaid Nursi's biography.I have been planning to improve this article for so long and couldn't accomplish what I want yet, but it is good to see that there are people like you who are also interested in him.rinduzahid^(talk)22:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedSidon Eyalet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMustafa Pasha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedDoğukan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageKhan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:53, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mReferenceBot. I haveautomatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On theSecond Constitutional Era page,your edit caused aduplicate page number error(help). (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,ReferenceBot (talk)00:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJanuary 1913, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIzzet Pasha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedMustafa Reşid Pasha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIbrahim of Egypt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHoward R. Hughes, Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageGlenwood Cemetery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ithinkicahn. Thanks,Étienne Dolet (talk)03:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've suggested that you be topic banned from theArmenian genocide. There may still be time for you to respond if you are inclined to do so. Thanks,EdJohnston (talk)20:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As a result ofthis AE thread (of which you were made aware, and to which I pinged you), and in accordance with discretionary sanctions authorised byWP:AA2, I am banning you from editing any articles related to Armenian Genocide topics, and from adding, removing, or editing any mention of the Armenian Genocide in any other article. Violations of this topic ban will result in blocks.HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?22:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year !
	Hello :Ithinkicahn, I wish the very best for you and the world in 2015. Cheers,Nedim Ardoğa (talk)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Several categories which you created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if they abide with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.Dawynn (talk)22:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting upWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based onWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge andWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, likeWikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on theWikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. TheWikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/IrelandWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge andWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much likeWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the currentWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.}04:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ithinkicahn. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of theWomen in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Ithinkicahn. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HelloIthinkicahn! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access toAutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from theCheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it atWP:PERM/AWB. Thank you!—MusikBot II^talk22:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Wellertalk09:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	Nothing
	Iyi muhabbet (talk)20:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]