Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit to2008–09 Blackpool F.C. season may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)07:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Imlikeaboss, thanks for creating2000 Helsingborgs IF season!

I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.Sulfurboy (talk)03:00, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit to2000–01 Derby County F.C. season may have broken thesyntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)00:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Inthis edit I understand the change of managers but I do not understand why you changed my linebreaks? Please readWP:LINEBREAK that says that you should use use <br /> (or <br>).Please note that they use <br /> in their example code and that the other break will be translated to <br /> so there was no need for you to remove that.If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Thank you.QED237 (talk)22:45, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One more warning before I start putting templates on you. Do not remove fine linebreaks like inthis edit.Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it.QED237 (talk)23:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toCaolan Lavery may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Finally, in the summer of 2012, Lavery signed for [Sheffield Wednesday F.C.|Sheffield Wednesday]] to join their [[Sheffield Wednesday F.C. Academy|development squad]].<ref name="swfc">{{cite news |

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)04:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toList of English football transfers winter 2013–14 may have broken thesyntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | {{sort|Lawrence, Liam|{{flagicon|IRL}} [[Liam Lawrence]]}} || {{flagicon|GRE}} [[PAOK Salonika]]}} || [[Barnsley F.C.|Barnsley]] || Free
• |}

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)00:13, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,1998 Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi season, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this:{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also,be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or onthe article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note onmy talk page if you have questions.UBStalk17:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toList of English football transfers winter 2013–14 may have broken thesyntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• } || {{sort|Olympiakos|{{flagicon|GRE}} [[Olympiakos F.C.|Olympiakos]]}} || [[Fulham F.C.|Fulham]]}} || £11m
• |}

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)08:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for updatingTemplate:2013–14 Football League Championship table. I just wanted to know that next time it would be could if you move the team-lines to make sure the teams are in the correct places and update helper templateTemplate:2013–14 Football League Championship table/p. The information on how to do it i in the template documentation, and if you have any questions feel free to ask.QED237 (talk)10:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay now are edits are getting purely disruptive. What aboutthis edit? You upodate half the table and not the timestamp or change the positions of the teams. Please stop the disruptiive behaviour.QED237 (talk)12:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand (at least kind of). The problem with your partial edit is that is says "as of 12 March" when you on some teams have added matches after that and on some not. So we should not do partial edits. Perhaps you could have left page open to continue an other time or copy'n'paste to a document or something instead of saving a partial update.QED237 (talk)12:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

Imlikeaboss(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host.Imlikeaboss (talk)22:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The IP address you're using has been blocked, because it acts like aproxy server. While we could grant youIP Block Exemption, this would only be done if there was an actual need for you to edit from this IP address.PhilKnight (talk)01:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This username is not directly blocked. Please use{{unblock-auto}} instead, filling it out with all necessary information. —Jeremyv^_^v^Bori!23:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

When you update statistics please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you.Qed237 (talk)00:48, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mMattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article,2000–01 Sunderland A.F.C. season, but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see thereferencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Mattythewhite (talk)22:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not areliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with2000–01 SC Heerenveen season, among others. Thank you.Sir Sputnik (talk)15:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mHijiri88. I noticed that you made a change to an article,The Queen's Justice (here), but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see thereferencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you. —Hijiri 88 (聖やや)12:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Imlikeaboss, thanks for creating1992–93 Borussia Dortmund season!

I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk)19:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Imlikeaboss, thanks for creating2006 FC Luch-Energiya Vladivostok season!

I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing better sourcing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk)19:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at2004–05 Inter Milan season, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles.Sir Sputnik (talk)04:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop addingunsourced content, as you did to2003–04 Inter Milan season. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy onverifiability. If you continue to do so, you may beblocked from editing Wikipedia.As I've explained to twice now, Tranfsermarkt is not a reliable source. Please stop citing it in articles.Sir Sputnik (talk)13:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to theManual of Style, as you did at2006–07 Sunderland A.F.C. season.PerWP:MOSFLAG.Mattythewhite (talk)00:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating2008–09 PSV Eindhoven season, Imlikeaboss!

Wikipedia editorRedalert2fan just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

In the lead of the article it says "During the 2004–05 Dutch football season" while the article appears to be about 2008-09. I think this needs quick copy edit.

To reply, leave a comment on Redalert2fan'stalk page.

Learn more aboutpage curation.

Redalert2fan (talk)12:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Imlikeaboss, thanks for creating2002–03 PSV Eindhoven season!

I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix.Please add additional references for verification. All articles are required to meetWP:RFV, even sports seasons articles.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.

—Insertcleverphrasehere^{(or here)}03:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I had an e/c after changes to one paragraph of the article.

I redid a small section due to what looked like quite a lot of OR, but I guess you also saw them lol :)

Hopefully I did not change your edits too much[1]

CheersChaosdruid (talk)10:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSouthampton F.C. 0–9 Leicester City F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southampton F.C. 0–9 Leicester City F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Govvy (talk)10:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Regarding some of the changes you made to the summary of the The Iron Throne, some of the edits that you had modified were discussed and agreed onin discussion (such as "Unable to dissuade Daenerys, a conflicted Jon reaffirms his fealty to her and fatally stabs her as they kiss") and other editswere reverted when you first made them in July. But are there any issues you have with this phrasing?

Three issues I have include 1) the removal of detail that Daenerys had destroyed the city after it surrendered, which I think that is a key detail illustrating the type of situation characters are dealing with at this point. 2) The phrasing that Jon pretended to reaffirm his fealty. Because people have interpreted Jon's final words to her in a variety of ways (meaning them on a personal level, feigning loyalty, etc.) and it's not confirmed these words were meant as a pretense, I think it is best to stick to 'Jon reaffirms his fealty to[...]' to describe what was said on screen? I think the 'conflicted' wording is meant to pertain to the nature of the assassination, as the character is reluctant to do it and doesn't feel it was right later. 3) I think the wording 'their love' is a bit ambiguous in describing exactly whose love is being referred to if a reader is not familiar with the episode (re: if they've not watched Jon and Tyrion's conversation). 'Jon's love' might be more accurate since Tyrion is arguing that despite Jon's love for Daenerys, it is his duty to kill her, illustrating the conflict set up for this character. I'd like to restore some of these changes back to their previous wording but I really want to avoid disputes. Can you share some of the issues/thoughts you may have so we don't revise back and forth?

Thanks!Anatashala (talk)09:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I started a discussion over proposed wording changes!

Hello, Imlikeaboss. You have new messages atTalk:The_Iron_Throne_(Game_of_Thrones).
Message added 15:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Anatashala (talk)15:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Imlikeaboss! I've responded to your reply to my Request for discussionhere atTalk:The_Iron_Throne_(Game_of_Thrones) and offered another idea for a compromise on points #1 and #4 to address your word count concerns. Can you please offer your thoughts? Thanks!Anatashala (talk)15:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. You have new messages atTalk:The Iron Throne (Game of Thrones).
Message added 00:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Anatashala (talk)00:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2009–10 AFC Wimbledon season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 AFC Wimbledon season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Spiderone17:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,1999–2000 1. FC Kaiserslautern season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Spiderone11:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,2001–02 1. FC Kaiserslautern season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Spiderone11:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to giveDraft:2001–02 1. FC Kaiserslautern season a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into2001–02 1. FC Kaiserslautern season. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits thepage history, which islegally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to bemoved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account isfour days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may behidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates aredirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions atrequested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them atWikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.Nathan2055^{talk -contribs}23:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article1999–2000 1. FC Kaiserslautern season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1999–2000 1. FC Kaiserslautern season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nathan2055^{talk -contribs}02:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article2001–02 1. FC Kaiserslautern season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001–02 1. FC Kaiserslautern season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nathan2055^{talk -contribs}02:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,1996–97 AFC Ajax season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.JBchrchtalk04:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,1993–94 SG Wattenscheid 09 season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969^{TT me}13:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,2001–02 Hertha BSC season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.John B123 (talk)10:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:1996–97 AFC Ajax season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)05:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:1993–94 SG Wattenscheid 09 season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)14:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article1998–99 Willem II season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998–99 Willem II season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sakiv (talk)09:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "1996–97 AFC Ajax season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!Sakiv (talk)09:28, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,2000–01 SC Heerenveen season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Sakiv (talk)13:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:2001–02 Hertha BSC season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)21:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "2001–02 Hertha BSC season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!20:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:2000–01 SC Heerenveen season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)05:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "1996–97 AFC Ajax season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!19:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleThe Fall (Robert Muchamore novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fall (Robert Muchamore novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969^{TT me}09:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imlikeaboss! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor atCheshire that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such astypo corrections or reverting obviousvandalism. Any edit that changes themeaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please seeHelp:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -Sumanuil._{(talk to me)}04:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imlikeaboss. Thank you for your work on2006–07 RCD Espanyol season.SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of ourpage curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with~~~~.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠(contact)11:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJorah Mormont, to which you havesignificantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should bedeleted.

The discussion will take place atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorah Mormont until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visitthe configuration page. Delivered bySDZeroBot (talk)01:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article1981–82 Brighton & Hove Albion F.C. season has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article relying on single source. Empty Sections and massively incomplete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.BletheringScot21:54, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]