Hello, this is a message froman automated bot. A tag has been placed onChristmas number two, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it bespeedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted becauseChristmas number two is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please seeWikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deletingChristmas number two, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions atWP:WMD. Feel free to contact thebot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind thatthis bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, clickhereCSDWarnBot (talk)11:30, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on3.6943847483324-654-3-634544523843534643-5404605468554865393544535288335328432, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use thesandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions)}12:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onSefex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use thesandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions)}12:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the pageGareth Gates worked, and it has beenreverted or removed. Please take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing toour encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use thesandbox. Thank you.Also, please use more descriptive edit summaries. "A good one" doesn't explain to anyone what you're trying to do.Onorem♠Dil12:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onFungi (website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Whale plane (talk)17:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Thank you.17:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onThe fantasy (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Pleasesee the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specificnotability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} tothe top ofthe page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note onthe article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.carelesshx_talk17:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you've added separate articles forMachiya Ekimae Station and a couple of other tram stops which are adjacent railway stations e.g.Machiya Station. These already cover the topic and the other Wikipedia's (particularly theJapanese) keep them together. Additionally the stops themselves are probably non-notable. Can I suggest these articles be merged with the railway station articles?Alex Sims (talk)03:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to theOxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please seehere for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over tothe Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attendthe next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watchWikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk)23:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleBayside Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayside Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Rcsprinter(natter)13:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleTokyo Disneyland Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Disneyland Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.13:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleResort Gateway Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resort Gateway Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.13:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectBayside Station. Since you had some involvement with theBayside Station redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Jc86035 (talk)11:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]