User talk:IJBall
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | NOTE: This editor hasPage mover rights, and is willing to do uncontroversial page moves (esp.round-robin page moves) upon request. Please make such requests at this Talk page by clicking on the "New section" tab above. |
Welcome to my talk page!
Archives |
| Index1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 41 |
This page has archives. Sections older than21 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III. |
PingingGeraldo Perez – this is more a reminder to myself than to you, Geraldo: but theWP:SCOPE ofList of films based on television programs looks like it needs to be (massively?) narrowed. Right now it's including a bunch of what are basically TV movies in the list (including some TV movies that basically aired asepisodes of these series – e.g. I just removedShake It Up: Made In Japan which should not have been included underany circumstances!). That list should be narrowed to justtheatrically-released films that are based on TV series. FWIW. (And, again, this is more a reminder to myself...) --IJBall(contribs •talk)23:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello IJBall,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to0 (momentarily). Congratulations toHey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed byMeena andGreyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. Seethis page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for themhere.
WMF work on PageTriage: TheWMF Moderator Tools team, consisting ofSam,Jason andSusana, and also some patches fromJon, has been hard at workupdating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-inbeta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite ofSpecial:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details atWT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are nowautomatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply atWT:AFCP like was required previously). To install theAFC helper script, visitSpecial:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visitSpecial:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow atWP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget thatdraftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their ownSNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists isWP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. Thank you.Carter00000 (talk)02:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk)03:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DoneDaniel Case (talk)04:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]What is going on, IJBall? Why would you request an indefinite block? I hope that this request was just said in a moment of frustration and you put in an unblock request when your mood changes. We need you here.LizRead!Talk!04:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]