Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcgaylor was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by alarge language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone,editorializing and otherwords to watch
• Vague, generic, andspeculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) andnon-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to readreliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. Seeour help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Large sections of the article, particularly in the beginning, return a high likelihood of being AI generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:3rd Indiana Volunteers (Mexican-American War) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jcgaylor (talk)00:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, none of this section was AI generated. Some of it was borrowed from the1st Indiana Volunteers and the5th Indiana Volunteers which I have contributed to both pages before I had an account on here. The entire page had been edited by me and hand typed with citations before I submitted it. So I do not know why you are accusing me of using ChatGPT or AI, but this is not the case. I have contributed many new pages to Wikipedia including:Henning Von Minden,Alfred Bruce Brackett, andAsgrim Knutson Skaro among many others if you'd like to look at those for example of my writing style, but I have never used AI to create any of these pages. If you could please reconsider this course of action that would be great as I would like to have the article approved so that people can know abut Indiana's service during the Mexican-American War.HappyHistorian1862 (talk)15:48, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,HappyHistorian1862!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Jcgaylor (talk)00:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HappyHistorian1862! I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, thecontributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!GoldRomean (talk)20:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick E. DuToit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk)16:32, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits toFrederick E. DuToit when you modified the page, you introducedunknown parameters. Just because you specify|some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The|some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is aShow preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact thehelp desk for assistance.Thank you.Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing})16:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HappyHistorian1862! Your additions toIndian removals in Minnesota have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have addedcopyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in thepublic domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under asuitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, seeWikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to preventcopyright andplagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate asmall portion of a source. Anydirect quotations must be enclosed in doublequotation marks (") and properly cited using aninline citation. More information is available on thenon-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, seeHelp:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all informationin your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead tocopyright issues and is not permitted; seeWikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must stillcite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, onlyfreely licensed orpublic domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to oursister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of ournon-free content criteria;Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: Ifyou hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, youmay be able to license the text for publication here. Please seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance withWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, seeHelp:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in beingblocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.—TechnoSquirrel69(sigh)04:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lyman S. Kidder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SnowyRiver28(talk)23:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indian removals in Minnesota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asB-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also considernominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's"Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

aesurias (talk)09:45, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George Carlos Whitcomb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rose Abrams (TCL)10:47, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiram P. Grant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Patre23 (talk)12:40, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mmemaigret was:

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

(1) Only significant coverageIRS is in the Star Tribune. (2) Copyvio issues (non-attribution, close-paraphrasing).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:The Flamin' Oh's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MmeMaigret (talk)15:39, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HappyHistorian1862. This message is being sent to inform you that arequest has been filed atContributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation toWikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be foundhere. Thank you.MmeMaigret (talk)12:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MmeMaigret,

None of my edits have been deliberate in trying to use copywritten materials, if I have I apologize. I just wanted to say that plainly and be clear from the start. If I have issues with materials then I will remove them from the pages and edit them so they are not in violation. Although I am "new" with this account, I have been editing and contributing towards pages (primarily history pages) since January, 2025 or earlier before I made this formal account. Yes I am relatively new, but none of this has been deliberate to get in trouble or have issues with people, just negligent on my behalf. I would suggest that your read my other pages besides the 6 you have chosen, such asJudson Wade Bishop OREdwin Aaron Clark Hatch which were both written by me before I had a formal account on here. In the meantime I will make edits or remove sections from the articles you have informed me about to correct them to be in-line with Wikipedia's Terms of Service. Thanks, and I hope I can keep editing and contributing towards WP.HappyHistorian1862 (talk)14:39, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC