• 
  Sailing Boats, 1921
• 
  TheWetterhorn, fromThe Europe Series, 1925
• 
  TheGrand Canyon, fromThe United States Series, 1925
• 
  Kameido (Drum bridge atKameido shrine Tokyo), 1927
• 
  Rapids at the Upper Reaches ofTone River, 1928
• 
  Kagurazaka Street after a Night Rain, 1929
• 
  A Gate to theStupa of Sanchi, from the seriesIndia and Southeast Asia, 1932
• 
  TheGolden Pavilion, 1933
• 
  Hirosaki Castle, from the seriesEight Scenes of Cherry Blossoms, 1935
• 
  Suzukawa River, 1935
• 
  Toshogu Shrine, 1937
• 
  Bamboo Grove, 1939

On14 September 2023,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleBork tapes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... that judgeRobert Bork'sleaked list of video rentals included movies such asCitizen Kane,The Philadelphia Story andSixteen Candles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Bork tapes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Bork tapes), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk)12:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 12,400 views (1,033.3 per hour), making it one of themost viewed hooks of September 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk •contribs) (he/it)03:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GalliumBot, These picture have been for more that 15 years maybe. Few were added recently. Should I create a new heading with Education, Lectures and Visits in Pictures. I will appreciate guidance. ThanksSurance (talk)00:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that on 24th August 2022 you edited theinfluences parameter forSteven Pinker. I don't suppose they bothered to tell you, but as part of a massive purge involving at least 3000 articles theinfluences andinfluenced parameters were removed by PrimeBot in the last few days. If you have any thoughts about this there is a discussion athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_scientist#Influences/influenced_--_abuse_of_powerAthel cb (talk)12:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I know what the point is of making it smaller, since what dictates width in that infobox is the 26 innings of line score and at least from my perspective, making it smaller just increases whitespace and makes it harder to read.Wehwalt (talk)19:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no doubt that making the image a huge size makes it more visible, but it actually makes the article harder to read, rather than easier. A fine balance between good chunks of paragraph and portrait is best — with an image of that size, the paragraphs are far too squished.GuardianH (talk)19:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that it makes the paragraphs any less squished because the line score (the inning-by-inning) is what is making the infobox so wide and doing the squishing. Perhaps it depends on what skin you use?Wehwalt (talk)19:38, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your considerable efforts to assure balance in the C.T. article. Thanks also for including the Jackson quote. Though I have respected him immensely, I never thought of him, one way or the other, as being possessed with a sense of humor. ____

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GuardianH, we know each other from higher-ed stuff. You really know your way around Wikipedia. I am no newcomer, myself, with more than 10,000 edits in German and English, but I do have questions from time to time. Mainly it has to do with conflict resolution, the quest for better referencing, puff reduction and so on. Could you take me on as a mentee for these areas? --Melchior2006 (talk)07:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Melchior2006, I'm unfortunately not the best mentor for such issues, and I fear that I would mislead you in some areas — there are editors much more versed in discussion and conflict resolution than myself. Most of my work is usually a passion project, and as such I try to best avoid any direct conflict. However, I'm always open for the questions, and I'm always willing to collab with you on article! With the amount of stuff on the site, it seems to me that the best teacher is experience; it certainly was for me.GuardianH (talk)18:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see what you mean. If I have questions, I will write you on an ad hoc basis. Is that ok? And as you say, the best way is learning by doing, so if we can collab on some articles, all the better! --Melchior2006 (talk)07:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, no worries.GuardianH (talk)07:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GuardianH, I wanted to ask how you deal with unfounded or erroneous comments on your talk page. I noticed that you deleted one recently (I agreed completely with that decision). Do you feel obliged to archive stuff from your talk page? Then there is the "junk mail" one gets from time to time; hardly anyone could argue for archiving that, or what do you say? Thx. --Melchior2006 (talk)11:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're allowed a great deal of free reign over your talk page. I think there's some editors out there who have never even archived their talk page before; my understanding is that you aren't compelled to do so. It's more of a voluntary cleanup/organization task from time to time. As for comments, I try to respond to them even if they are misguided, so as to see if there is a common ground.GuardianH (talk)21:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GuardianH, I stumbled upon your user page a short while ago — forgive me if it sounds weird, but I think all the stuff you’ve done is just incredible. I was also an Asian-American high schooler from Massachusetts just a short while ago (played a bit of jazz at NEC and All States here too, might be doxxing myself idk lol, maybe I know you?) and I’ve always really liked history (not as rigorous as you, I think) but most of my edits are just me carrying over DOY stuff from other language DOY pages (like Japanese or Chinese) because I don’t feel like I have enough time in college to pore over academic texts. I’d love to hear what your reading/writing process is for Wikipedia as a presumably busy student so I can do more (right now I feel more like I’m filling holes as I see them instead of spending time researching topics and making new pages about them).

P.S. Also, if you end up attending Harvard or MIT I’d love to meet up sometime 😎Marcustcii (talk)14:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcustcii Thank you for your kind words. I always wanted to be a historian when I was a kid, and the field I wanted to specialize in wasByzantine history and become amedievalist based off of the stuff I read fromHerrin,Goffart,Ostrogorsky,Kazhdan, and other authors of theOxford tradition. I think that's largely what has informed my writing the most; my personal bias is that the writing style then was so much more elegant that it is now. So I try to replicate their stylistic approach in summary as much as possible, and I think after you get at it for a long time it enters your subconscious. Same goes for research — you develop an eye and taste for content.

I've shifted a little now. I think it would be very difficult to sustain a lifestyle as a medievalist in the academic field now, which is a terrible shame; my personal sympathies to the field remain, although I've transitioned towardsconstitutional law and all the great figures which have molded that discipline —Scalia,Hand, and the like. It's so similar to medieval history, in a way. I'm laboring away onHenry Friendly (a personalhero of mine) right now. I don't know if looking at it would get my reading/writing process (I'm a terribly messy thinker as evidenced by the log), but, if I were to guess, that would be the page to look at.

I think all the stuff you’ve done is just incredible – I think you are giving me too much credit! I get into a terrible cycle with articles: after some inspiration all I can do for a few days is work on them, become disillusioned, and the writing is actually quite a disappointment. I end up abandoning a lot altogether, leaving their corpses behind (Malone,White,Rand, and countless other casualties). I'd be willing to speak about myprocess if you're still interested, but I think there really are much better writers than myself on here that could offer greater insight.GuardianH (talk)19:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GuardianH! I have a little question: Can I set parameters somewhere to exclude bot changes from my watchlist? --Melchior2006 (talk)12:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Melchior2006 I believe so. I think if you go to Preferences > Watchlist (tab) >Changes shown.GuardianH (talk)12:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gotcha! That was easy. Thanks for your help. --Melchior2006 (talk)13:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 January 2024,In the news was updated with an item that involved the articleCharles Fried, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on thecandidates page.PFHLai (talk)22:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations |March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You cansign up here orask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t ·c)buidhe02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GuardianH, what an impressive userpage you've got- you must have a very broad reading list with the topic interests you display and have made contributions to.

I want to thank you not only for your "thanks" on my recent edits (boy howdy, removing that Stossel LISTSPAM was actually quite a feat on the mobile app, which I learned doesn't scroll when you "drag-highlight," lol. I was in too deep to give up, though), but for all the work you do here. As I just posted on ElKevbo's page, the one positive for me in bumping into the disruptive editing from Summerdays1 has been uncovering contributors like yourselves, who are protecting the encyclopedia from sometimes-subtle BOOSTERISM in areas with higher-than-usual "drive-by" edits. You are awesome, and your tireless work is appreciated.

I am a habitual copyeditor (I find it so relaxing, which I recognize might be weird lol) so if you ever come across articles which need text clean-up or just review, and don't have the time or inclination yourself, feel free to tag me in to have a look! Thanks again and happy editing :-D ~Chelsea akaChiselinccc (talk)17:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. Copyeditors like you are what keeps articles running for years.GuardianH (talk)17:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On30 October 2024,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleMichael Sugrue, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatMichael Sugrue became an "internet phenomenon" during theCOVID-19 pandemic for his lectures on YouTube, recorded in 1992, that covered "the last 3,000 years of Western intellectual history"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Michael Sugrue. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Michael Sugrue), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk)00:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,382 views (640.9 per hour), making it one of themost viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk •contribs) (he/it)01:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GuardianH, thank you for your contributions in the AfD discussion - you have eloquently summarised some of the main concerns I wanted to put directly in the discussion so have saved me some considerable effort. I am perplexed that sources which mention the position in mere passing are suddenly being used to argue forWP:N. Hopefully more sense enters into the discussion and upholdWP:POLICY. Regardless of your age or background, your contributions are appreciated.EmyRussell (talk)17:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, following up onthis edit, I don't understand howMOS:EGG is relevant here. The link "Yale Law School" goes directly toYale Law School, so it doesn't easter egg anything. Arguablyyour previous edit created the easter egg. Your current edit makes it seem like the subject got a master of laws degree at Yale University itself, not the law school (which in some context with other schools could mean the school did not yet have an independent law school, which would not be accurate in Yale's case). Can you please clarify your reasoning? --Engineerchange (talk)22:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS:EGG was in regards to fixing the previous edit, yes. As for the linkage ofYale University overYale Law School, this is generally considered the norm for degree-granting bodies in U.S. articles to use the parent institution — i.e., a person who graduated fromYale College,Yale Divinity School, andYale Law School wouldnot have all of these schools listed separately in the infobox for obvious reasons of clutter. This is especially true for law schools; a similar Yale University vs. Yale Law School debate happened forJD Vance some time ago with the result of sticking to the "[X] University (JD)" standard. FAs follow this example:Albert Levitt,Antonin Scalia,Mitt Romney, etc. GuardianH 19:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, looking at a few others (like Ruth Bader Ginsburg), I see your point. Thanks for taking the time to explain! --Engineerchange (talk)19:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm reaching out because I saw that last year, you did some helpful cleanup to theSidley Austin article. I posted someCOI edit requests to that article's talk page a few months ago, and you're clearly an expert in this space, so figured I'd reach out in case you have a few minutes to take a look. I also welcome any feedback you're willing to share on formatting or wording of my requests to make them easier to review! Thanks for your time and all your contributions to Wiki.Mary Gaulke (talk)02:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MaryGaulke Thank you for reaching out to me. It is true that one of the areas I cover on the site are American law firms, particularlywhite-shoe law firms. I will try and see if I might review some of your requested changes sometime, but this process may take a while. GuardianH 04:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per our prior discussion, I finally got a chance to put together a notable alumni section forHotchkiss School. I think one sentence on four notable alumni in the lead complies withWP:UNDUE now. Happy to discuss if you have any concerns.Namelessposter (talk)01:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Namelessposter, looks good to me -- no objections. Passes review!Jay-GH06:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

-->

• Wikipedia pages semi-protected from banned users