
Hello, Foxcub1984. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "London Firebird Orchestra".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!UnitedStatesian (talk)01:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

![]() | Hello,Foxcub1984!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!MCE89 (talk)09:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply] |

The 12 source pile-up is unhelpful for readers, to say the least. SeeWP:REFBOMB and the essayWP:THREE for insights into this area.
Secondly there are effectively only 2 sources here, plus a primary source, which isn't sufficient to get notability. Ideally we need 3 in depth profiles from independent sources, rather than relying on connected sources.
More easily fixed is that the tone needs to be more encyclopedic.