Hi, Enginear! I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. I noticed you've been on Wikipedia for a while but you haven't been formally welcomed, so I'm stopping by to give an official hello and offer you some helpful links:

• WP:CITEHOW
• Wikipedia:Citation_templates#Using_the_same_footnote_multiple_times
• Wikipedia:Hatnote

• Help with page editing
• Writing a great article on Wikipedia
• Wikipedia's manual of style
• The village pump, a place to ask questions about wikipedia
• IRC channels for Wikipedia, where you can talk live to other Wikipedians
• The Votes for Deletion Page, where articles are decided to be kept or deleted

If you are unsure about what to do, take a job from the tasklist.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (SeeWikipedia:Maintenance or theTask Center for further information.)

Help countersystemic bias by creatingnew articles on important women.

Help improvepopular pages, especiallythose of low quality.

If you need help immediately with anything, you can write {{helpme}} on your userpage or place acomment on my talk page. I encourage you to create a userpage in order to tell the Wikimunitty about yourself (and to get rid of the red link in your signature :P). Don't forget tobe BOLD!!!!--Theikiroid (talk/parler/hablar/paroli/说/話)01:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[This section was previously erroneously placed on my user page. Having belatedly noticd it, I have moved it to here]Enginear (talk)02:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Are you aware of the sub-threadWiktionary:Wiktionary:Beer parlour#Wiktionary:Spelling variants in entry names, and the thread of which it forms partWiktionary:Wiktionary:Beer_parlour#capiche_and_.7B.7Balternative_spelling_of.7D.7D?" — Thanks for the heads-up; I was not aware of it. I responded to it atWiktionary:Beer_parlour and the policypage in question. —SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib]ツ21:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I moved that material to the Holy Spirit page. And please note that perWikipedia:Reverting

If you make a change which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit - leave the status quo up.

So you should leave that material out to see if you get consensus for adding it. Thanks.History2007 (talk)14:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have never, ever, reinstated one of my edits after being reverted, unless I have altered it to comply fully, IMO, with the criticism made of it. Nor have I ever had two successive edits reverted, except by you on this occasion (though I suppose you might call your action a move, rather than a revert).Enginear (talk)21:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHarry Ricardo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLondon Transport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A useful prompt from a useful bot! Now corrected.Enginear (talk)19:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedChurch of the Militant Elvis Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIndependence Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)12:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCorby by-election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLiberal Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)17:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to be making a habit of this! Corrected.Enginear (talk)18:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHonister Pass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageWatershed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think we need to tidy the bird pages I agree - the Malaconotoidea is a name coined for this grouping, for which there is more evidence every year or two with new work.Casliber (talk·contribs)20:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedStreatham Ice Arena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageOlympic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedZoe (talking and emoting head), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageCoding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)12:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

King post (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing toBoom,Apex andKingpin

Backhoe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toBoom

Kingpin (automotive part) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toBoom

Power shovel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toBoom

Steam shovel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing toBoom

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)11:32, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I have correctedapex andUser:GoingBatty has correctedkingpin, but all the links toboom were intended, since until someone writes the appropriate article, we can only link to the appropriate section of the disambig page, as I have done (since the disambig page gives a short but useful definition, I believe it is still worth a link, rather than leaving a redlink or nothing at all).Enginear (talk)18:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The articleZoe (talking and emoting head) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, single reference is sourced from project itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Doctorfluffy(robe and wizard hat)06:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Text of article follows, copied for my own interest in case of deletion:

"Zoe" is an innovative talking andemoting head produced by a collaboration between researchers at theUniversity of Cambridge Department of Engineering and theToshiba's Cambridgeresearch laboratory.

The digital, two-dimensional head is programmed to talk words typed in, with both visual and audio effects determined by any combination of six different primary emotions. Thecorpus used was video recordings created ofZoë Lister saying about 7,000 sentences in six different emotions - Happy, Sad, Tender, Angry, Afraid and Neutral. The prototype'suser interface not only allows different proportions of these emotions to be mixed, for example, very sad, fairly angry and a little afraid, but also allows alteration of the pitch, speed and depth of the voice itself.

On 19 March 2013, the research team reportedly said, "by combining these levels, it becomes possible to pre-set or create almost infinite emotional combinations. For instance, combining happiness with tenderness and slightly increasing the speed and depth of the voice makes it sound friendly and welcoming. A combination of speed, anger and fear makes Zoe sound as if she is panicking." They say this "allows for a level of emotional subtlety which has not been possible in other avatars like Zoe until now."

Thecoding has been kept compact enough to fit in the memory of asmartphone, and the team are said to be working on a system that would allow people to upload their own faces and voices in a few seconds, enabling them to "customise and personalise their own, emotionally realistic,digital assistants".

They are exploring other possible applications, working, already, with a school forautistic and deaf children, where the technology could be used to help pupils to “read” emotions and lip-read. In a trial, volunteers obtained via acrowd-sourcing website, successfully recognised the emotion in 77% of cases, even though othercues, for example hand gestures, were missing.^[1]

Enginear (talk)08:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedTunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageAquaduct (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, and spelling corrected.Enginear (talk)18:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually made over 60,000 edits over the years, for what it's worth. Instinct from experience shouldn't really count for much here, but I'd expect articles about works of fiction to refer to characters in the same way that the works themselves did. A surnames-only policy would look odd applied to subjects where a character's surname was barely used in the work itself - we don't refer to the protagonist as "Pirrip" throughout theGreat Expectations article.

It seems like an oversight that themanual of style doesn't seem to address this (I can only find a couple of series-specific British television WikiProjects saying "Names should be used in a context suitable to their role in the episode", with protagonists and neutral characters being referred to by forenames or nicknames, and antagonists and officials by their surnames). Perhaps it's worth raising the subject atWikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction? --McGeddon (talk)14:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I've raised this myself atWikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Writing_about_fiction#Forenames_and_surnames_of_characters. Feel free to join in. --McGeddon (talk)19:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedRonan Point, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageBuilding Regulations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:04, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DoneEnginear (talk)21:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedBeverley Brook, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesBrook andLea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected -- actually they were supposed to be links to Wiktionary, and I had left out thewikt:Enginear (talk)09:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cites^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]}

I am writing this from memory, without checking facts, but I am fairly certain that

• There are no normal "no-go" areas for police in the UK, although there were a few small areas from which the police made a tactical withdrawal for a few hours during the 2011 riots, until reinforcements arrived.
• There are no areas in the UK where sharia law is tolerated for criminal matters, although for civil matters,if both parties agree to do so, then rather than going to court, they may use an arbitration service which might, if they wish, work according to any religious laws, eg Jewish, Muslim or even Christian, provided that the penalties do not involve any illegal act, eg wounding or bigamy
• In the UK, claimed religious or ethnic practices which are illegal in UK, eg female genital mutilation, honour killings, forced marriage, abusive relationships including abusive parenting, pedophilia, human trafficking, carrying kirpans (unless they are small and blunt) and even supplying marijuana are all prosecuted without any fear or favour (although until that was clarified recently, greater leeway was sometimes allowed)
• Discrimination on grounds of sex, sexuality, race, disability, etc is illegal in all public buildings/spaces and also at work and in education, even if it is claimed not to disadvantage anyone -- so, for example, enforcement of seating segregated by sex or marital status is illegal
• Veils are permitted to be banned where they affect safety or make work less effective, so schoolteachers and care workers may not cover their faces (possibly so deaf pupils can lip read, but I'm not certain of the reasoning)
• Within weeks of a tip-off that Muslim governors were pressurizing head teachers in what turned out to be only a handful of schools in Birmingham, the issues were rectified
• Within days of opening, a UK Muslim faith school which tried to segregate pupils by sex and teach only "halal" viewpoints was shut down
• Within days of hearing that Muslim men near the East London Mosque were verbally abusing women whom they felt were not appropriately covered, a few years back, the practice was stamped out by the police, who were backed by the Mosque leaders
• After years of a laissez faire attitude to those who preached jihad, or any other violence or intolerance, English law has been tightened about as far as it can be without outlawing many Jewish and Christian preachers too, and anecdotally, seems to be enforced.
• I cannot be so certain about conditions in France, but I would be surprised if they are significantly different, and all the other Western European countries are likely to be similar. I know much less about Eastern Europe, so can't comment.

If anyone is sure I'm wrong about any of these points, please say. (And my apologies if I take a long time to answer, as I'm going through a busy patch in the real world.)Enginear (talk)06:55, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enginear. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enginear. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedManor of Copped Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageEpping (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)07:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Private_Eye&diff=910630164&oldid=910625791Enginear (talk)21:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]