User talk:Ellinewilliams231
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Archives:2014;2015;2016;2017;2018;2019;2020;2021;2022
Hello can you add the missing showThe Jack and Triumph Show on the Universal Television section onList of Universal Television programs please?185.69.144.44 (talk)07:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello can you addAlex Murdaugh: Death. Deception. Power. on the Universal Television Alternative Studio section in the television specials section onList of Universal Television programs please? And also add a source to it.185.69.144.44 (talk)15:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello can you add the missing shows Harlem and As We See It onList of Universal Television programs please?85.255.237.43 (talk)08:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you also add the upcoming show Bel-Air onList of Universal Television programs please? And also Fremulon and 3 Arts Entertainment never produced American Auto so can you change it to the right production companies and also make to add redirect links.85.255.237.63 (talk)13:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions, such as the edit you made toFreestyle skiing at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's halfpipe, did not appear to be constructive and have beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use yoursandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message onmy talk page.Please do not mark someone as Qualified when its not officially qualified. Please be careful how you are editing especially on mobile.Swaggalicious (talk)05:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you may beblocked from editing.Please, don't doyour own calculations, just like what you did at2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference. I had so much cleaning up to do after your updates. Also, could please use edit summaries? Thanks.Engr.SmittyWerben17:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to2021 Barangay Ginebra San Miguel season, please use thepreview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging uprecent changes and thepage history, as well as helping preventedit conflicts. Below the edit box is aShow preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact thehelp desk for assistance.Thank you.Engr.SmittyWerben08:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup qualification (Asia), you may beblocked from editing.Please stop adding your own wrong information into articles.Engr.SmittyWerben10:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It does not make sense to add the delay now, de Jong is unlikely to hold the first position, and then all the delaye will be recalculated with respect to the champion.--Ymblanter (talk)08:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageChristian Rivera.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, we only list the country when the game is not played in the country of the home nation.Kante4 (talk)16:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you make sure that your edits are consistent with the FIBA 3x3 website? Because I always have to do cleaning up your edits. Thanks.Engr.SmittyWerben04:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I will edit the updates in real time. thank you.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)05:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia'sno original research policy by adding your personal analysis orsynthesis into articles, as you did at2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference, you may beblocked from editing.Don't add qualification letters if it is not yet sure. You have been repeatedly warned about this.Engr.SmittyWerben06:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did atTemplate:2021 PBA Governors' Cup Playoffs bracket.I'm very tired of cleaning up your wrong edits. You have warned already but there is no change. Make sure that there are sources supporting your edits, not just doing edits based on yourown calculations.Engr.SmittyWerben13:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Stop disrupting editing next time
Decline reason:
This account is not directly blocked.Yamla (talk)14:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Engr.SmittyWerben12:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you stop adding your own standings at2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference? There is a source provided – use that for the standings and scores. Don't make up your own info. If you won't stop, I will be restoring my report atWP:ANI.Engr.SmittyWerben02:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk)11:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ymblanter blocked me for one day because of disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty is responsible for editing some pages related to basketball. Do not make disruptive editing next time. Thank you.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)13:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You're listing why you're blocked. We already know that. You need to tell us why you should be unblocked.--jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇14:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text fromAmazon Prime Video intoIMDb TV. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.DanCherek (talk)03:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you addunsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference.Engr.SmittyWerben08:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youvandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference.Engr.SmittyWerben06:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Minoa(talk)15:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C09:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Don't make changes to vandals next time. Don't make misinformation like did to2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus § Airspace closures. Thank you.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)09:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Unclear what you mean.PhilKnight (talk)14:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Don't make changes to vandals next time— what does that even mean? But they managed to also addthis right before I pressed the button. Doesn't matter. May well be just tooincompetent, even to fully understand what's happening right now. Language barrier likely a major factor, but this is theEnglish Wikipedia, so a decent command of the English language is required, at least when one makes contested edits to a contested topic area.El_C10:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(block log •active blocks •global blocks •autoblocks •contribs •deleted contribs •abuse filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Sorry, Ellinewilliams231, I do not respond to emails from users whom I don't know well. But as the message above explains, in order to regain talk page access for the purpose of filing an appeal of this block, you'll need to contactWP:UTRS. Thanks.El_C13:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
is pending. Restoring TPA to request unblocking here. --Deepfriedokra(talk)10:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring TPA after asking first. --Deepfriedokra(talk)11:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So a while ago I ran across a page with inaccurate information, which I tried to fix, but there were too many inconsistencies to fix so I rolled the page back to what it was before I had begun and gave up, but later found I was blocked anyways? So to make this very clear, yes I am hoping this block can be removed becuase I was blocked anyways despite rolling back the change as if I had never made it. I will to continue writing emails, editing and creating articles and following the editors and admins. I much better understand that, if a draft article that feels limited in scope an appears to paint a overly-negative picture, it is best for it to either go unpublished in the article space, or at least first go through other hands for review and revision first. I will attend future ArbCom elections in the near future. I contribute to the project with good faith was being that I proceed to make positive edits where I can. I am not making legal threats. Again, I'm just trying to help.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)11:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
As noted below and as accepted by Ellinewilliams231, this unblock request is insufficient.Yamla (talk)10:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I will to continue writing emails, editing and creating articles and following the editors and adminsis very vague.
Thank youEl_C. Will accepting your request.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)03:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thanks for your time reading this request- it may be a little lengthy, but I want to respond to the various points raised. ToDeepfriedokra,El_C, and others: I have closely reviewed thewp:GAB as well asWP:BATTLEGROUND,WP:COMMUNICATION andWP:RS and would like to make a second Unblock appeal.
(1) As an established editor, I'll never cause damage or disruption and I always try to make the best contributions accordingly with an edit summary, because I admit that I've never taken it seriously thus far, but will try to implement it in my future edits. Here I’m requesting the unblock of my user account. I hope that I will be able to redeem myself for my mistakes. I will be very cautious and careful in editing, but probably I will not edit as much as I used to. All of my articles are well-researched. I promise to never ever again as this is wrong and I would like another chance. I will cite my edits so that other editors and readers know the accuracy of what they are reading.
(2) I promise to only use this account for making the rest of my edits on Wikipedia. In that time, I've studied Wikipedia guidelines, manuals, instructions and tutorials. I understand how to correctly add references to new information. I will also review the 5 Pillars. I apologize for that. After much reflection, I honestly think I am in a better, more self-aware state now and can curb any compulsiveness should it arise again. I will admit I have been a bit trigger happy with the editing over the past few months but I promise if given a second chance it will not happen again, after more then a few warnings and also that now I have a better understanding of the rules. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I continued the discussion on the talk page with editors and progress was made. The Wikipedia policy on blocking is supposed to be to protect Wikipedia from disruptive edits, of which the edit activity had already concluded.
(3) I honestly have no idea how to communicate, as all I have done is edits and creating pages. I have done no communication with any other editors. If I could have some guidance towards how to communicate, I would definitely begin to do so. I've learned to listen more carefully and articulate myself more clearly. Until a disagreement about sources, the vast majority of my edits were deemed credible, and I got too frustrated with opposition to some of my edits. Building a consensus and listening to consensus are Necessary, especially since I have beenWP:Bold; I understand that now. It means like the ability of reaching consensus, the ability of knowing communicate with other users in this Wikipedia in English, and understand errors, in this case now I reflected and I promise that I will be better and when I put comments it will be shorter but understandable, if I put an extremely large text the users cannot understand me.
Now I understand the reason I was blocked, I wasn't following policies properly, please excuse me that I did not realize that while I edited articles with the reason of following policies I didn't realize I was going to make edit war in so many articles. But now I reflected and I see the reason why I was actually blocked: Disrupted editing in articles and also lack of competence, now I understand, I promise you that when I will be unblocked I will not continue with the same edits that I had been doing in that articles that led to this block, what I will do is first get consensus on the talk pages of those, also I promise that I will do my best to keep my explanations or comments short and to the point. I will stop making disruptive edits and start making better edits. A lot of articles have citation errors and I might correct any that I see. I hope that you, the admin reviewing this, takes my request to be unblocked.
Ultimately I accept that my constant back and forth was not the most productive. I am seeking this approval so I may continue contributing to the Wikipedia Community in a compliant, ethical manner. I like to think that generally my edits are well researched, and made in good faith in an effort to expand the project, not disrupt or vandalize. first of all, I appreciateYamla's acknowledgement that this is a procedural decline only. I am requesting thestandard offer to any admin. I will try to be less disruptive and convince more. I also asking the admin to have a block repealing. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular. I'm sorry and I'm apologized. I thank you for taking the time to consider this, and for my future unblocking. The 2 admins below seemed to see my likelihood of getting unblocked as "promising", and I just want to be a productive wikipedien again. I await your reply. Thank you all for your help!Ellinewilliams231 (talk)02:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
I'm not seeing a benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you. It might help if you described a substantive edit you would make.331dot (talk)07:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. No confidence at this time that theWP:BATTLEGROUND will be corrected, not to mention even acknowledged. The issues ofWP:COMMUNICATION andWP:RS failures must be addressed if editing privileges are to be reinstated. Please take my appeal to the AN.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)03:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand why I was blocked, I made mistakes, and I understand following respecting citations from some sources much better. I also apologized for my behavior as like did to the edits of2021 PBA 3x3 season – Second conference,Template:2021 PBA Governors' Cup Playoffs bracket and2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)06:48, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. You already have an open unblock request. It's abusive to have TWO open unblock requests.Yamla (talk)10:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. It was unintelligible. Nevertheless, I have redirected user here. --Deepfriedokra(talk)15:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 | Please use the{{help me}} template appropriately. The{{help me}} template is for help inusing Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{help me-inappropriate}} on this page with{{help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at theTeahouse, thehelp desk, or joinWikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. |
Hello, you are taking a long time to answer, it's been 1 month without answer so please any administrator answer me.Ellinewilliams231 (talk)05:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ellinewilliams231(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry for my disruptive editing what I did two months ago. I had 2 blocks this year, most recently the indefinite one back in April. I have to follow the technical accuracy and checking on language and grammar. I want to improve my English skills and I prove that Wikipedia is a better encyclopedia. I promise that will not editing unsourced citations ever again and I will give a another chance. I will not repeating any of mistakes. I already understand the concerns by the three blocking admins and those handling the UTRS. After unblocking, I will plan to contribute to articles related to Television, current events and replying to other user's talk pages. Thanks as always,Ellinewilliams231 (talk)11:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
It's becoming clear from the multiple requests, and the continuing edit after edit of these requests, that youlack sufficient competence to edit on Wikipedia. As it stands I am declining this unblock and once against removing talk page access as this has become a major time sink.RickinBaltimore (talk)12:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is almost incoherent and demonstrates youlack sufficient competence to write English. It also does not describe "a substantive edit you would make", as directed by 331dot. It looks like you are deliberately wasting our time. Are you absolutely sure this is the unblock request you wish to make? Be warned, it may result in you losing talk page access. --Yamla (talk)11:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
is closed. --Deepfriedokra(talk)15:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on thevoting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, pleasereview the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,