Archives

Arc. 1 - 16 Jun 2006 to 28 Dec 2006 Arc. 2 - 29 Dec 2006 to 29 May 2007

The sand box link appears to be missing a [. ThanksWillow17716:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? It looks okayhere. I'm using {{subst:test1|article_name}} and presently using IE 6.0 --EarthPerson16:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasnt an attack page, it was the truth. Pure fact. I have evidence.— Precedingunsigned comment added bySuckalame (talk •contribs) 19:34, 6 June 2007

If that is the case, why did you blank the article? --EarthPerson19:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For God's sake dude... what summary? Please, take a look at my contributions. I just read Wikipedia. I just created this damn account so, in case I saw some vandalism in an article I wanted to read, I might revert it.

I've done nothing wrong, made nothing controversial, interacted with no one at all, and so far 3 of you have come at me. What's this?

You all have taught me a lesson. When I spot vandalism, let it be. Just go to "History", find a correct edition, visualize it and read it, and then leave. Don't touch it.

This is what I've realized i must do.— Precedingunsigned comment added byだってばよ (talk •contribs) 16:19, 7 June 2007

If I came off as "coming at you", I apologise. But you have interacted with people.

As for the edit summary, it is just above theSave page button which is below the window that you type in when editing an article or talk page. I've looked over your contributions and it's great that you repaired vandalism. That's mostly what I do.

I didn't say you've done anything wrong, but there are guidelines for user names. Click on and readWikipedia:Username policy and you'll see at the top of the page, "When choosing an account name, be careful to avoid names which may be offensive, confusing or unintelligible to English-speaking users. You are encouraged to use only one account." This is the English wikipedia. that's why all of the pages begin withen.wikipedia.org - look at an article that has pages in other languages - such as the main page - it is in the sidebar on the left. If you go to these, you'll see that not only does the language change, but the first part of the web page name changes in the address bar of your browser.

If someone asks you then please consider it and don't go off on a tirade and call people nazis. If you don't know how to do it, ask them for help.

I'm trying to help you which is what others are doing too. One other thing that is helpful is to sign your posts. You can do this by adding ~~~~ at the end of what you type. Cheers. (Also putting this on your talk page.)--EarthPerson16:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. I already took the precaution to create another account, so that I will disappear from now on from your 360º doppler tracking radar. I know Wikipedia too well. Too well. My last bit of beneveloce for this community was to create an accout to revert any vandalism I spotted when reading an article, but given your attitude, from now on I will refrain from reverting any vandalism. It's easy to read the correct version without having to revert it and that's what I'll do.

I contributed for a long time and found this is the reailty behind the well-intentioned wikipedia... harassment from users who don't seem to have anything better to do... apart from Jimmy Wales & co spending six thousand bucks on travel every month, something that you are seemingly oblivious of, or to infatuated with Wikipedia's leaders to be able to realize of...

So well, I will continue to read this useful encyclopedia, but I will never again do the slightest thing for wikipedia, not even revert annoying vandalism, not even correct one single letter... orkana, into the bargain.— Precedingunsigned comment added byだってばよ (talk •contribs) 16:53, 7 June 2007

I have no tracking radar. I noticed your username on the recent changes page. And I've been civil with you. I don't think what I've done is harassment. If you do, I apologize. But I'd like to know what you thought was harassing? If it was suggestions to use edit summaries and signing your posts, then I think you need a thicker skin. Thanks. --EarthPerson17:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that welcome. please may you adopt me??Christine11850017:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome for the welcome. But I'm not interested in WP:Adopt at this time. Thanks for thinking of me.  :) CHeers! --EarthPerson17:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you no anyone who want to adopt?Christine11850015:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the listing onCategory:Wikipedians_seeking_to_adopt_in_Adopt-a-user off of the page forWikipedia:Adopt-a-User. There looks to be over 100 editors listed there. You have quite a User Page for someone so new. Cheers. --EarthPerson16:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whadda u mean, I have such a user page? I don't understand. Ta,Christine11850014:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised how much you put on your userpage since you're new to Wikipedia. You found the Userboxes quickly. Have you been on WP before? --EarthPerson00:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's WP?Christine11850012:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's short forWikipedia. --EarthPerson13:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of couse I have. To betotally honest, I haven't always been a good wikipedian,but I am ready to be a good wikipedian now. PLEASE ADOPT ME!!Christine11850015:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please go here and add yourself if you wish to be adopted. I have no interest in mentoring at the present time. Thanks and happy editing. --EarthPerson21:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have now been adopted by someone on that list you gavee me. Thanks for your help and spek later. Bye, nerd.Christine11850016:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added Raquel to the bottom as a variation of the name, because it's not simply a different spelling, it's pronounced differently too. Would it be appropriate to rephrase it as something like 'For a variation of the name, see Raquel'?--Jcvamp22:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it probably would. Good idea. --EarthPerson22:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on the 'wiping technique' section. The way it was, was crude and trivial and you've given it relevance.--Jcvamp00:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!  :) It was really oddly written. I was part joking and part serious when I called it original research in the edit summary. I chuckled at your comment when you removed it.  :) Thanks for the kudos on my work. The "limited mobility" section just above almost belongs in with it. But I'll leave that for someone else. Cheers. --EarthPerson13:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(spam article repost removed by EarthPerson)— Precedingunsigned comment added byRHudson02 (talk •contribs) 21:49, 13 June 2007

Because it looked like it. I marked it and an admin deleted it. Please seeWikipedia:Spam for guidelines. And please don't repost it to my talk page. Thanks. --EarthPerson21:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know why this page is marked for speedy deletion? I've done as much as I can to show they ARE relevent/signed to a label/have had work released (albeit independently). Cheers, Chris.— Precedingunsigned comment added byXenomaniac79 (talk •contribs) 11:50, 14 June 2007

Hi. Please see your talk page for my reply. --EarthPerson14:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Earthperson,

I noticed that you have made a few changes to some entries about hypnobirthing. I'm trying to write an article that address hypnosis for childbirth looking at the different techniques and methods of using it, including hypnobirthing. Any input from other interested people would be great, as I think it may be in the process of being targeted by products such as Marie Mongan's method, which is a blatant advertisement under hypnobirthing!

Thank you.........— Precedingunsigned comment added bySophiefletcher (talk •contribs) 16:39, 17 June 2007

Hi. I don't know what all help I can be to you. My edits tohypnobirthing were a while back and the last time I looked at the article, it was not in the best of shape. --EarthPerson14:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a chunk of the entry (intentionally) because it consisted of a rambling, semi-literate personal exegesis of a handful of arbitrarily chosen song-lyrics, better suited to an adolescent's fan page than a Wikipedia entry. I rather thought the rationale for the excision was self-evident.— Precedingunsigned comment added by216.15.49.96 (talk •contribs) 00:47, 20 June 2007

Then I wish you'd said that in the edit summary or on the talk page. I just noticed that it was a large removal without any comment as to why. Cheers. --EarthPerson15:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi EarthPerson,

I'm having trouble figuring out a simple way to cite my sources for the JF Robitaille article. I the information I pulled was from www.rhythmbank.com on the artists bio page. Can you help me out? thanks— Precedingunsigned comment added byLowend (talk •contribs) 19:10,22 June 2007

• Linda [Carter] is from the same state as up and coming American actorDavid J Silver.[1]

Every time I think it can't be more outrageous I'm proven wrong. ·:·Will Beback·:·20:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Jupiter! Itis like watching a train-wreck. I know I should look away, but I just can't. --EarthPerson21:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have had somone using my account to to post bogus all over random articles, what might I do about that?— Precedingunsigned comment added byGmoney181 (talk •contribs) 03:00, 24 June 2007

Hi. You're talking about edits that I sent you notices about on 12 June. The best thing to do is go tomy preferences and reset your password. Remember to sign out so that any other edits by someone will not show up under your account. You can also post a message to your talk page similar to what you did here. You can say that those edits were by someone else when you were still logged in. You may also want to check thewp:help desk and ask your question there. Those other edits were weeks back and I reverted them, so don't look sleep over it.  :) Just guard your account. --EarthPerson12:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point & click technology allows familiarized browsers to slam, cram & over-ride internet posting. This is unbecoming to the www information forum. As a non-profit organization, Wikipedia thrives on the publication of new information. Source journalism in this community based on trust can not be mentored by the deletion of pertinent articles, such as the creation of User:StationNT5Bmedia, and subsequent articles being created that have literary value, not only in the scientific community, but also in the fields other valuable topics that could be provided. It is unbecoming of an encyclopedia's contributing editor to delete other editor's work when suspect work is considered outside the single-minded purpose, a very narrow vision of your world.— Precedingunsigned comment added by4.230.15.99 (talk •contribs) 16:09, 24 June 2007

If the articles don't meetWP:Notability then they don't belong here. Plain and simple. --EarthPerson16:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, exerting your sole opinion into the global community doesn't promote the flow of information. Now, isn't that dictating your world view?

StationNT5Bmedia— Precedingunsigned comment added by4.230.15.99 (talk •contribs) 16:22, 24 June 2007

(I'm going to assume thatUser:4.230.15.99 andUser:StationNT5Bmedia are one and the same. Please login though since if you have an ID you should use it.)

The only opinion I have over the deleted article in question (R. Weldon Smith) is that it does not meet the needs ofnotability to allow it to be included in Wikipedia. Any other editor could have marked the article. (I'm not the one that deleted it if that is what you are thinking. Onlyadministrators have that ability.) If a person is sufficiently notable other sources will write and report about them. That allows us to have sources to cite when writing articles.

If I'mdictating [my] world view as you say by suggesting that non-notable articles be looked at to see if they need deleted, then there are many others here that share that view. Please find something to contribute. Look over the articles onamateur radio. You seem qualified to help out on those. --EarthPerson16:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an extreme learning curve for any editor. Slicing film reels, cropping photos, and text edits could be said "were so yesterday". But, the fact is that all media, including our partnered stations ABC13, MyFoxHouston, and the Houston Community Newspapers still have to do it. There are many IP addresses to this network of editors, so singling out one will only cause a change in the dynamic IP addresses. The username (StationNT5Bmedia) could be equal to any other contributor some day, given the opportunity to develope formats. Quickly deleting articles that took weeks to prepart with the push of a toggle could be considered as an unreignable power.Perhaps this bulletin board could be useful if an explanation could arrive on how to undash edits? Why are some fields dashed around the perimeter of the section, and others nicely quoted, without the border?StationNT5Bmedia

Please take a look atWikipedia:Introduction. I left a link to it on your talk page also. As for singling out a given IP, I saw in the article history thatUser:4.230.15.99 was the one that was making some edits. That is how I found out whose talk page to post to. Since the edit summaries were the same, I figured it was you (User:StationNT5Bmedia).

By the way, you all editors are equal here. But not all are admins. But just because an admin hasthe keys as it were, does not mean that they aren't bound by the same rules. Again, I did not delete the articles. Please look in thelogs page by article name and you can freely see who deleted what.

As for dashed edits, they result when you start a paragraph with a space.

Like this.

Look at the introduction. In the second tab, there is info on creating a first article. Read through it. You can try out anything in thesandbox.

PS - If you put --~~~~ at the end of your posts on talk pages, it adds the username with link and the time and date.--EarthPerson17:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the timely reply. Your focus to the quality & formats of fellow Wikipedians in duly noted. The language still requires a mastery of publishing, and is learned, not natural. The sandbox is designed for mute results. Edits there do not go "live". It is a common practice in web edits not to "re-invent" the wheel. Templates useful in the general sense can be "tweeked" by those experienced in publishing that format. Wikipedians also learn to "speak" the language. Please continue at your convenience. The language may have some fluidity.StationNT5Bmedia

What, exactly, is your rationale for opposing the English name forKiki's Delivery Service, which it has been published under? IsThe Three Musketeers calledLes Trois Mousquetaires?Romance of the Three KingdomsSanguo yanyi? The English name takes precedence, as this is the English Wikipedia. --Bakuryuu19:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't oppose it that much or I'd moved the article back.  :) I feel that sinceMajo... is the original title that it should be first in the article. I can live with the redirect. But, after all, the article on the book by JK Rowling reads "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, known in theUnited States asHarry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone,..." with the original title listed first. Admittedly these are both written in English. I've not looked over the specifics on articles on foreign books. Can you point me to the style guide for it?

In the interest of consensus, we should probably have this discussion on the article's talk page.

By the way,thank you very much for the translations of the other book titles. Could you make anything of the three listed at the bottom of that same page on Kadono's site? --EarthPerson19:29, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answeringhere. --Bakuryuu21:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I liked your expansion to the article. I was hoping others would expand it when i posted it. a friend of mine sent me some info on this yesterday and i went to wikipedia to read more and was shocked that there was no entry for Buckle so I created a short one myself in hopes that other people would come work on it. It was speedy deleted twice and on the third posting i added links so I could get it nominated for an AFD. At any rate if you think the article is worth keepin you had better vote at the AFD as it seems that so far i am the only one to feel that it is. --The Emperor of Wikipedia & Protector of Wiktionary13:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your mentoring. I value your feedback more than anyone else on the site,as you can see by the respect I have for keeping reference to pertinent topics. The article needing attention here was inviting however, since I have current informationthat is up to date of on-going reform in the hotly debated issues of immigration. I would like to distinquish the contribution as being reform for legal immigration.StationNT5Bmedia04:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article that keeps reverting back to an unreferenced edit . . . several times byusers not signed in using a dynamic IP address . . . this is not vandalism?

The unreferenced portions appear to lead to another topic . . . illegal immigration.

The addition that is being kept from remaining resident at the site concerns legal immigration. If you are interested in improving this article, I could work with youon seperating it into two issues: legal vs. illegal. Let me know your thoughts.StationNT5Bmedia05:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say how much I like your 'And Tango Makes Three' page, am so happy to see it represented here!--Murmur7415:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to our new page. I'm a new user, and not a web designer, and you helped me learn how to add external links!--http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_1st 03:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

VFMC is a secondary school, d wholeuniversity prep college thing was a tad bit confusing. Btw, its named after d founder's late daughter (hence d memorial). Anyhoo, only wrote this 4 d later comment (saw ur comment onUser talk:Vesay).Adaobi^YELL!!_done23:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm having a serious problem withUser_talk:Kevin1243 . After having a look at his history pages, the SNEEKY VANDALISM issue comes to mind. The user with that screen name keeps altering text in many topics, then systematically tags them, then nominates them as Articles for Deletion. Is this begging the question? Does this user want to hack Wikipedia, and any contributions being made? VisitUser_talk:Kevin1243 to see what this user has been up to. I would like an outsider's opinion of the contributions being made there, and since it is VANDALISM this user is doing, how to stop it.StationNT5Bmedia00:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self - replying onUser talk:StationNT5Bmedia. I don't know why I'm being asked for an opinion on this. --EarthPerson14:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it just a coincedence that two other online encyclopedia publications have a user with the screen name Kevin1243, and that there are numerous other web pages with that user name ie.http://www.faceparty.com/Kevin1243 . . . are alterior motives involved in this VANDALISM? Certainly an 18 year old can not be expected to have superior knowledge of other Wikipedians? The user asks for a consensus? Then proceeds to hack articles, and posts himself as an authority browsing new articles & contributions to the wealth of knowledge in the world ? The external link provided above may only scratch the surface.StationNT5Bmedia01:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self - replying onUser talk:StationNT5Bmedia. I don't know why I'm being asked for an opinion on this. I don't think that all Kevin1243s on the internet are the same. And I don't know why this was not nested under the above comment. --EarthPerson14:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I read the comments about Immigration Reform & after following the article for a while, concluded that the essay on the 13th Annual Citizenship Day event wasn't broad enough to remain. The story can be found at ABC13online, in partnership with Houston Community Newspapers. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison writes a column there also. I think it's peculiar how her career has gone from journalist to statesperson. Comments atUser_talk:StationNT5Bmedia remain in good form so far, and have target usefullness for browsing pertinent topics (ie. Kevin1243 & screen names for web sites outside of Wikipedia). I'll want to correspond there, when he reactivates his user name. I'm not speculating, but need to wait till he arrives back from vacation. Would it surprise him if one of his kids is using his screenname?StationNT5Bmedia22:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your excellent summary of the issues I have had of late. (if this keyboard/PC worked properly I would link to the issue).Kevin10:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from User talk:GT009No1)

I take offend at your use of the word "slant" in the edit summary ofthis edit. What I have seen of your edits to this article have been near-continual efforts to insert your ownloosely cited POV into the article that China is a some sort of backward elite barbarian nation incapable of creativity or innovation. If China is 40 years behind the time do you also feel that Russia is too, sinceSoyuz first flew in 1967? Wouldn't the USA also be at least 35 years behind since theSpace Shuttle program was begun in 1972? I have yet to see you take your observations of either of these facts to the articles on Soyuz or Shuttle. I suggest you take your concerns to the articletalk page and discuss them there. --EarthPerson21:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments - Chinese space development has only now reached the position achieied by the USA, Russia (and in terms of capabilities, Europe) ~40 years ago. This is beyond dispute - comparing the Shuttle to Shenzhou is equivalent to comparing a old-style mini to a Limo. Many of my associates are Chinese and they are on the whole smarter and more dedicated reseacrhers than myself - individuals are the same worldwide! However, that view does not extend to the nation state, Communism - supression of the individual, a closed, controled environment, lack of freedoms - all this will styma research and innovation and - just as with the USSR - collapse is inevitable! This is the context within which the core element of Chinese space reseacrh (that we know of)! must be viewed! My only defence here is that not only am I pursuing my current profession, but I formally trained as a historian, so have a firm belief in viewing developments in a rounded context!  :-) GT009No1 P.S. I've tried to aleviate your worries about the use of the term "slant" - please feel free to edit the resultant paragraph!

(end of block copied from User talk:GT009No1)

Additional: I've made an attempt to compromise on the Shenzhou site and will now likely cease editing online - particuarly if it proves possible to permentally delete this page :-)— Precedingunsigned comment added by23:02, 19 July 2007 (talk •contribs) GT009No1

Thanks for the comments - Chinese space development has only now reached the position achieied by the USA, Russia (and in terms of capabilities, Europe) ~40 years ago. THis is beyond dispute - comparing the Shuttle to Shenzhou is equivalent to comparing a old-style mini to a Limo. Many of my associates are Chinese and they are on the whole smarter and more dedicated reseacrhers than myself - individuals are the same worldwide! However, that view does not extend to the nation state, Communism - supression of the individual, a closed, controled environment, lack of freedoms - all this will styma research and innovation and - just as with the USSR - collapse is inevitable! This is the context within which the core element of Chinese space reseacrh (that we know of)! must be viewed! My only defence here is that not only am I pursuing my current profession, but I formally trained as a historian, so have a firm belief in viewing developments in a rounded context!  :-) GT009No1 P.S. I've tried to aleviate your worries about the use of the term "slant" - please feel free to edit the resultant paragraph!— Precedingunsigned comment added by16:02, 15 July 2007 (talk •contribs) GT009No1

I am responding to your question on Mr. Christain's support for the Vietnam Memorial. Please contact Jan Scruggs (founder of the Vietnam Veteran's Memorial at jimb@usdreams.com for his statement of David. Scruggs is quoted on the back of the book Victor Six "Dave Christian was a significant part of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial effort in Washington. When the memorial came under attack, "Dave Christian" charged forward. The Nation and I will always be thankful for Dave's courage." David worked on veteran's affairs under the Carter Administration until his outspokeness got him fired. When David was offered the head of the VA under the Reagan administration, he turned it down because he would not be able to function freely to get the benefits for our veterans and he pursued other avenues to get those benefits and was successful.1. I can forward to you the pages of the letter to President Reagan.2. See "The Bulletin" of Philadelphia and you will note the coverage of turning down the job was on the front page above the fold in the 4th largest newspaper in the United States at the time.3. See - New York Times, Jan. 25, 1979 above the fold FRONT PAGE. "Highly Decorated Veteran Ousted"4. See - New York Times Archives. for example- NY Times Magazine5. People Magazine - time frame 1980.6. Fox News - I can forwarded you his credentials7. US Senate Credentials - I can forward credentials8. Please Note - he received his commission at Officer Candidate School, Ft, Benning, GA.9. He received the Combat Infantry Badge from serving with the Long Range Recon Patrol, Ist INf Div, Viet Nam.

Please let me now where I can e-mail all of this to you and a nation of veterans will be thankful.Respectfully requesting your assistance.Serinwing

I just created this article on this very topical subject. The subject matter would make for a good featured article, so I am hoping to enlist your help to get it there qualitatively.Ohconfucius03:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously have great abilities on WP and I wanted to know if I could secure your assistance with some editing issues? I have all the info but I am unsure if I should proceed and possible screw something up on a page. I am new at this and I am not physically capable of doing it a lot and I am respectful of your efforts. I cannot sit for long periods of time so I put all the info on a single separate page and was hoping you would look at it for me and then advise.

Thank you in advanceSerinwing00:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Serinwing[reply]

I posted an answer to your question about inclusion rules on different-language projects there, but am also posting it here, since that discussion has seemed to attract a lot of traffic and you might've missed it. Hope you don't mind.

Different projects are allowed to set their own local rules for inclusion. Other than NPOV and adherence to copyright and free content rules, the Foundation does not set content policies, each local project does, so it's entirely possible that a subject could pass one language's inclusion rules but fail another's.

Seraphimblade^{Talk to me}07:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, came across some strange additions to this page while looking at the edits of someone who's been doing strange stuff elsewhere - the list of future titles seems improbably long, and is veering into some strange directions. On checking, I saw that you had been doing some serious work on this article earlier - do you have the possibility of checking - and noting sources for! - the list of future books? --Alvestrand06:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The editor was an anonymous IP, which is another thing fuelling the suspicion that it may be fake... --Alvestrand 10:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)—The precedingunsigned comment was added byAlvestrand (talk •contribs).

User:Simpson007 aka David Jason "Silverkid" Silver. As a fellow Silver fighter, I thought you would be interested. I know it's him because:

• Spastic editing style
• Hitting the same articles asUser:Harvardlaw
• While editing the Gerald F. DeConto article, he briefly reverted to anonymous IP,72.204.222.79, and that same IP went back to edit Harvardlaw's talk page a few days ago to modify a comment you made.

I'll leave it up to you if you want to sockpuppet him. Just thought I'd let you know :) --Nobunaga2411:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. My favorite was the edit toMismaloya.[2] I've blocked the accounts and undone most of the editing that you guys didn't already get. ·:·Will Beback·:·15:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I added a hangon tag to the page, I just need time to add the full version of the article, is there a tag or something I can put on there to show that, besides the hangon tag, that is.

Torakuro17:38, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up my first attempt at disambiguation!Tim Ross18:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the article Slut's Fluff? It may seem like nonsense to you, but not for me. Just because you are an administrator doesn't mean you can go on hurting someone's feelings by downright deleting their contributions. That was rude and you owe me an apology.

Loftyapex21:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to give you a headsup, it looked like the creator ofBioorganizacion meant that page as a redirect toBio-organización so I changed it as such. :) -WarthogDemon21:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, looks like in the end it was spamish content. -WarthogDemon17:07, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just figured that if it's been on wikipedia for a while, I could use it. Stewy⁵⁷¹⁴03:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for writting a bad thing on will filinuk can you forgive me.—Precedingunsigned comment added byMattuc2003 (talk •contribs)15:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but how do you delet pages. I know this may sound silly but I would like you if possible to delete those 'Silent Witness' pages, as I have noted what I have done wrong and will correct it.—Precedingunsigned comment added byDoctorwhomad11 (talk •contribs)19:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here --EarthPerson19:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possably give me some time to make the page? I don't exactly have hours to sit at the computer and write complete articles in one sitting... That's what the hangon and underconstruction tags are for... If you're so antsy for it to be a good article, why don't you check out my references and help me?

• http://www.sherdog.com/fightfinder/fightfinder.asp?FighterID=254
• http://www.heavyweightgladiators.com/profileserrano.html
• http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&q=adrian+serrano

Thanks,

-NickSentowski17:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was just wondering how I would make this a bibliography and not have it deleted form Wikipedia?—Precedingunsigned comment added byPsycholgymajor101 (talk •contribs)20:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repliedhere --EarthPerson20:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I get a license for the picture?—Precedingunsigned comment added byPsycholgymajor101 (talk •contribs)20:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you create an article for me if I give you everything you need to complete it, because this is not working out for me. Is that possible?Psycholgymajor10120:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing,Whiskey Summer of 1947, has been listed fordeletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiskey Summer of 1947. Thank you.Toddstreat113:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a few more additions to theList of fictional astronauts but I'm coming to the end of my book collection and there are several novels I plan to hunt down and read again before I try and add them to the list. Check out the [page] to see which ones I'm looking for.

I've also stumbled across a novel that I'm thinking of adding but I'm in a quandry. It's a late 70's thriller entitledThe Soyuz Affair by Stephen Coulter. The plotline is standard post-Watergate, eg US journalist uncovers evidence of US Govt shenanigans and has to flee for his life. In this case what he finds is a tape that supposedly proves that the CIA used a particle beam weapon to kill the crew of Soyuz 11. Since the story involves real astronauts is it appropriate for the list?Graham1973 (talk)12:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Earthperson was a good friend of mine in real life. Unfortunately, he passed away unexpectedly at the end of last year, so he won't be answering your post.--Nobunaga24 (talk)12:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Newman Bob Uniform crop.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see thediscussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)17:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. TheWikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/IrelandWikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge andWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much likeWikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the currentWikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.}01:54, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:EarthPerson/List of Progress spaceflights, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated fordeletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments atWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EarthPerson/List of Progress spaceflights and please be sure tosign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content ofUser:EarthPerson/List of Progress spaceflights during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Beland (talk)08:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]