Hello, I'mTheInevitables. I noticed that you recentlyremoved content fromEdward Yum without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurateedit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.TheInevitables (talk)04:35, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , Theinevitables, I would like to update updated information of Edward Yum . Would you please kindly advise the best way to be finished and not to convert again? On the other hand, I would like to add recent photo, would you please advise how to make it?Csuenayasa (talk)09:18, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do notremove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did atEdward Yum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in theedit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has beenreverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please useyour sandbox for that. Thank you.Kvinnen •dispatch an owl08:46, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understand. I am very green at using Wiki, I understand it cannot be overwrited the history by the news. From my point of view , I would like to vanish the page to make it read-frienly.Csuenayasa (talk)09:20, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Csuenayasa! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version ofEdward Yum. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia'sedit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on articletalk pages in order to try to reach aconsensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement atTalk:Edward Yum, please use one of thedispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you.Tacyarg (talk)10:27, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Csuenayasa. Wewelcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or thingsyou have written about on the pageEdward Yum, you may have aconflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See theconflict of interest guideline andFAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on thetalk pages of affected articles (you can use theEdit Request Wizard), including links or details ofreliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (seeWikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (seeWikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia'scontent policies.

In addition, you arerequired by theWikimedia Foundation'sterms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. SeeWikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Tacyarg (talk)10:19, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• User talk pages with conflict of interest notices