Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User talk:Clovermoss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17

Newbie Central

[edit]

Are you a newcomer to Wikipedia? Here are some resources that you may find helpful:

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readdedFathoms Below
removed

CheckUser changes

added
removed

Oversight changes

added
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Science fiction

[edit]

Reading through it now. ImmediateOrson Scott Card vibes. Thein medias res is slightly jarring. A lot of science fiction uses prologue-like devices to help the reader gradually enter the world you've created, although I realize that prologues can be controversial with some writers. You may be very interested in the wayIan Banks uses them in theCulture series. My take is he does this because he assumes that most readers aren't going to slog through ten books composed of thousands of pages. But it's a cool way to setup the narrative in less than ten pages. I think if you gave me a prologue-like invitation to the story, that would make me feel more comfortable as a reader. Otherwise, I feel like I just walked into a party as an uninvited guest.Viriditas (talk)02:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Viriditas: Would you say it broke your immersion completely or just that it wasn't your personal preference? I find that most people perceive writing as weaker if it requires exposition. I think you're the first person I've met that actually prefers it the other way around. It might also be a matter of generational differences?In medias res seems to be quite common for YA fiction these days, whereas you see prologues more with "traditional" sci-fi. Personally I've always liked stories that slowly weave the worldbuilding into the narrative.Dracula is a really good example of this. My characters are confused about what is going on as well, so it's more like you're secretly along for the ride instead of an uninvited guest. Although maybe that reframing doesn't do it for you. I understand if that's the case. My email is always open if you ever want to have extended conversations about fiction. :)Clovermoss🍀(talk)03:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You're right about the YA fiction approach; I definitely picked that up from what you sent me and it comes through loud and clear.Viriditas (talk)03:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
When facing difficulty in writing a story, Isaac Asimov once received the advice to start later in the narrative. It became something he would often do whenever he got blocked, knowing he could rework the earlier portions of the narrative into the story later on. As I recall, he had two key pieces of advice for writers: know where the story is going, and start later. (He was thankful for those like John Campbell and Frederik Pohl, who had the talent of being able to offer suggestions to improve the writing of others, which he was aware he mostly lacked.)isaacl (talk)03:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of Asimov,Seth Andrews recently recorded a version of "The Last Question".[1] If you know his voice, but haven't heard him read it, then you're in for a ride.Viriditas (talk)04:03, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that I've known most of the plot for years but have faced difficulty actually writing it all.Writer's block sucks although I think I'm slowly fighting my way out of it. I sent Viriditas some notes about my worldbuilding and what I hope to accomplish eventually. I hope they at least enjoyed the premise. I get very excited about the details and hope to do them justice.Clovermoss🍀(talk)04:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Use the index card, post-it note whiteboard system all of the television writers use. There's even software you can download that does it.Viriditas (talk)04:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Without saying too much, the keystone is the flower. Spend a week just writing about the flower. The entire story will come together from that one central point. It will work, just try it.Viriditas (talk)05:01, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vital signs 2026

[edit]

Hi Clover! You've been asking intelligent questions onWT:MED for a while, and I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining theVital Signs 2026 campaign. We're trying to update all top-importance medical articles to B-class or above, and can use a few more hands. Editing these big articles is easier than you think: the bigger the topic, the more established clinical guidelines and easy-to-read review papers exist.—Femke 🐦 (talk)12:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Femke: Hmmm. I've been avoiding time-intensive volunteer work lately in an effort to focus more on real-life projects such as my writing and moving to a new city. I felt a bit bad saying no to the backlog drive for NPP as I normally participate whenever they're going on. I have been trying to get better at learning how to address issues in medical content on Wikipedia because there's more nuance to the sourcing requirements but I'm not sure I'm quite at the level where I feel like I could take on a whole article by myself. But this appears to be a year-long project? If you'd be willing to work on an article with me, I could see myself taking on that challenge. A little help makes a world of difference sometimes. I try not to be reckless when doing new things.Clovermoss🍀(talk)03:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely willing to help :). With medical articles, to some extent there's less nuance in the source selections. A lot of grey area sources are simply not allowed and strongly discouraged, meaning that you end of with mostly really good sources that are not too difficult to use. When you've got the head space, let me know what article you might want to take up.—Femke 🐦 (talk)08:18, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Hey Clover, I saw that you are active and I was hoping an admin could take a look at this:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#~2026-23354-3. Thanks,Marincyclist (talk)04:09, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Marincyclist: I've blocked the TA in question.Clovermoss🍀(talk)04:24, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Clovermoss Thank you for your help!Marincyclist (talk)04:27, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 1

[edit]
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on December 5. Please helptranslate.

Highlights

  • Wikipedia turns 25: Time to start the party!Join the virtual celebration featuring musical performances, games, and more on January 15 at 16:00 UTC. and The party will be live interpreted into Arabic, Chinese, French, Spanish, and Portuguese.

Join the celebration

Annual Goals Progress onInfrastructure
See also newsletters:Wikimedia Apps ·Growth ·Product Safety and Integrity ·Readers ·Research ·Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia ·Tech News ·Language and Internationalization ·other newsletters on MediaWiki.org


Annual Goals Progress onVolunteer Support
See also blogs:Global Advocacy blog ·Global Advocacy Newsletter ·Policy blog ·WikiLearn News ·list of movement events ·The Wikipedia Library


Annual Goals Progress onEffectiveness
See also:Past issues of the bulletin for progress on the annual plan


Board and Board committee updates
SeeWikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard ·Affiliations Committee Newsletter


Other Movement curated newsletters & news
See also:Diff blog ·Goings-on ·Planet Wikimedia ·Signpost (en) ·Kurier (de) ·Actualités du Wiktionnaire (fr) ·Regards sur l’actualité de la Wikimedia (fr) ·Wikimag (fr) ·Education ·GLAM ·Wikidata ·Central and Eastern Europe ·other newsletters ·Milestones ·

Subscribe or unsubscribe ·Help translate

For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see theproject page on Meta-Wiki. Let foundationbulletin(_AT_)wikimedia.org know if you have any feedback or suggestions for improvement!


MediaWiki message delivery00:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]
*Read this Signpost in full *Single-page *Unsubscribe *MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:13, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto meetup: WikiDiaspora: Exploring Canadian-Caribbean Cuisine

[edit]

Hello! On 28 February, theToronto WikiClub, in partnership withAfroCROWD,WikiCari, andEat More Scarborough, is hostingWikiDiaspora: Exploring Canadian-Caribbean Cuisine. Registration closes 12 February. Details are available on the meetup page. We hope to see you there!

You're receiving this message because you wanted to be notified about Wikipedia meetups in Toronto. You can remove yourself fromthis list if you're no longer interested in Toronto-area messages.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:35, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bernice Tongate

[edit]

On23 January 2026,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleBernice Tongate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was... thatBernice Tongate was the model for one of the most well-known recruiting posters(pictured) for the American military during World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Bernice Tongate. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page(here's how,Bernice Tongate), and the hook may be added tothe statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free tonominate it.

Hook update
Your hook reached 30,836 views (1,284.8 per hour), making it one of themost viewed hooks of January 2026 – nice work!
GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it)03:28, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rjjiii (talk)00:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Authentication on the web

[edit]

Regardingthis comment: each request made to a web server is handled by the server independently from the other, even if they are all from the same browser with the same user at the same computer. So to check if a given user is authorized to make a given request, the request has to be authenticated, and then the corresponding permissions/authorization controls for that user can be checked. For technical reasons, the built-in HTTP authentication methods don't scale well in practice, so authentication is typically handled by having a login page, and then in response to the user logging in correctly, the web server sends back a cookie with a session identifier. All subsequent requests from that user (on the same browser and computer) will send back the cookie with the request, and the server can use the session identifier to check that it corresponds to a valid, authenticated session that started when the user logged in. The session ID has to be sufficient random that an attacker can't just guess a valid session ID, and to that end, it's best practice for sessions to time out in order to limit the period during which an attacker can guess the associated ID. (The requests sent through the network are encrypted when using the HTTPS protocol, so attackers can't just intercept the request somewhere in the network and read the cookie.)

Non-logged in users now also get a cookie with a session ID of sorts. It links subsequent requests to the initial request. But as there is no registered account associated with it, there's no account-specific data associated with it. Users can clear their cookies, use a different browser, or use a different computer, and they'll get a new cookie with a new identifier (and a different temporary account). So the implementation of temporary accounts doesn't use any mechanism that would help with identifying sock farms. There are limits placed on how many temporary accounts can be created from a given IP address within a specific period of time. SecurePoll already allows scrutineers to sort votes by IP address. Given how network gateways can make many users appear to come from a single IP address, I'm not sure it would be a good idea for SecurePoll to implement IP-based throttles.isaacl (talk)03:41, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]
*Read this Signpost in full *Single-page *Unsubscribe *MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:26, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green reviewing drive

[edit]

Hello Clovermoss:

This month, February 2026,WikiProject Women in Green is participating in theFebruary 2026 GAN Backlog Drive, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out theproject talk page for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out thereviewing instructions andguidelines and feel free to ask for amentor to check your work.

We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free tosign up at the eventbrite page; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on theproject talk page for updates as the event progresses.

We hope to see you there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 2

[edit]
Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue on Jan 10. Please helptranslate.

Highlights
Let's Talk continues

Annual Goals Progress onInfrastructure
See also newsletters:Wikimedia Apps ·Growth ·Product Safety and Integrity ·Readers ·Research ·Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia ·Tech News ·Language and Internationalization ·other newsletters on MediaWiki.org

Annual Goals Progress onVolunteer Support
See also blogs:Global Advocacy blog ·Global Advocacy Newsletter ·Policy blog ·WikiLearn News ·The Wikipedia Library ·list of movement events

"The Birthday Cake Song" is an original song created for Wikipedia's 25th Birthday, performed by the WikiChoir, featuring Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons content.

Annual Goals Progress onEffectiveness
See also:Progress on the annual plan

Other Movement curated newsletters & news
See also:Diff blog ·Goings-on ·Planet Wikimedia ·Signpost (en) ·Kurier (de) ·Actualités du Wiktionnaire (fr) ·Regards sur l’actualité de la Wikimedia (fr) ·Wikimag (fr) ·Education ·GLAM ·Milestones ·Wikidata ·Central and Eastern Europe ·other newsletters

Subscribe or unsubscribe ·Help translate

For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see theproject page on Meta-Wiki. Let foundationbulletin(_AT_)wikimedia.org know if you have any feedback or suggestions for improvement!


MediaWiki message delivery02:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Help with the Suicide among LGBTQ people article

[edit]

Hello! I recently came uponyour proposal to reassess GA status for the article onSuicide. In it, you bring up how the article does not mention LGBTQ people, which prompted me to add aSexual and gender variance section to the page in order to fix that issue. In turn, this led me to theSuicide among LGBTQ people article, and, particularly, the bad state it is in. Other than some highly dubious information about trans suicides (which has thankfully now beenremoved), the article uses very old sources, mainly primary studies, and may also need some help on the wording. I put up an update template about this andmade a list of recentWP:MEDRS on the Talk Page. Sadly, I am facing some very difficult time constraints, so I do not believe I will be able to sufficiently update the article myself. Since you seem to be a prolific LGBTQ editor who has taken interest in the topic, I would appreciate if you could take a look. Thanks!Amateur Truther (talk)14:11, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

HiAmateurTruther. I appreciate you reaching out to me, but I don't think I'll realistically be able to take on a task like that in the near future. I have a lot on my plate as well, especially when it comes to my life offline. I also only have so much tolerance for emotionally heavy subjects. When I have the headspace for that, I usually am trying to focus on the article aboutJehovah's Witnesses, which I've been working on and off for about three years now. That said, you definitely have some serious research skills and I have faith that you'll make a meaningful difference to content quality in this subject when you have the time.Clovermoss🍀(talk)17:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That's completely understandable. I have already made some changed to the article, and will likely try to make more in the near future. I thank you for your attention.Amateur Truther (talk)11:49, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Administrator changes

addedVacant0
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

addedDaniel Quinlan
readdedVanamonde93
removedMkdw

Oversight changes

addedDaniel Quinlan

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recentmotion, a rough consensus of administrators at thearbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor'sArab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


Sent byMediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:08, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 February 2026

[edit]
  • Disinformation report:Epstein's obsessions
    The sex offender's attempts to whitewash Wikipedia run deeper than we first thought.
  • Crossword:Pop quiz
    Sharpen your pencil. How well do you really know Wikipedia?
*Read this Signpost in full *Single-page *Unsubscribe *MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:58, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Clovermoss&oldid=1338797112"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp