User talk:CiaPan archives:

arch1 (Jun 2005 – Mar 2016)

arch2 (May 2016 – Jan 2020)

current

Just... enjoy -DVdm (talk)18:34, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm, yummy! Thank you,DVdm! It made me happy that you gave me a rational number of them. They'll be a perfect cure for some recent irrational proposals.CiaPan (talk)21:33, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A user with no Wiki account made major changes to the pseudocode examples, making them much more complicated. I reverted the pseudocode examples back to a prior state and suggested that user get a Wiki account.Rcgldr (talk)16:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

wishing more happiness for you.I need your help, Notability, Advertisement, Manual of style, these are the three templates has been tagged by you ,I respect all . </ref>Notability[1]</ref> is link where you can see and verify the work for crippling problem like fistula,fissure,Piles and lipoma as well with own innovative techniques (2)for advertisment template i must say Dear wikipedia always require online verifiable sources that is why links has been added. (3) Manual of style--help is required to change. pls help if more editing is needed. Heartiest REGARDSSarvmangal (talk)05:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case: a note fromCommons:File talk:Шнірельман Лев Генріхович..jpg, related toCommons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Шнірельман Лев Генріхович..jpg, preserving here

=== Free status ===

If this image is ever decided to be non-free, please place a request atw:WP:REFUND to undelete this item (w:File:Schnirelman.jpg) for fair use. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

CiaPan (talk)20:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The non-free image has been replaced in theLev Schnirelmann article with the Public Domainc:File:Л.Г.Шнирельман.jpg on 18 March 2021 in this editSpecial:Diff/1012860683. --CiaPan (talk)09:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CiaPan,Could you please tell me issue in my "edit" revision for the Ben Dunk page on March 4th 2020?I am new here, just wanted to learn from my mistakes. Also I am not sure if this is the right place to talk. If I am again on wrong page please let me know the process please. Thank youAyaz.ashraf (talk)18:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Ayaz[reply]

Thank you very much for explaining theSpecial:Diff/943880673. Your answer has cleared the confusion.Ayaz.ashraf (talk)11:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, FYI I filed a request atWP:ANI titled"CIR-based community-imposed site ban re: RTG". In providing a basis for my request I mentioned you and your prior dealings with this editor. Your input at ANI is optional, i.e., invited but not specifically requested. Thanks for reading.NewsAndEventsGuy (talk)13:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HiCiaPan! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes, and I happened to notice that you don't have thepending changes reviewer rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active inrecent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undovandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tools. Instead of having you formally request the rights atWP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you toreview edits that are pending approval on pages currently underpending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.

Please keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed atSpecial:PendingChanges.
• A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed atSpecial:StablePages.
• Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• You'll generally want toaccept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, andreject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
• Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clearvandalism, blatantneutral point of view issues,copyright violations, orBLP violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on myuser talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page - I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D~Oshwah~^{(talk)(contribs)}01:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Oshwah! I've been given this right in pl-wiki in 2008 but didn't use it too often. I hope en-wiki rules do not differ much, so I won't have to learn too much now.

I used to patrol Recent changed at pl-wiki some time ago, but stopped it. I do not regularly look at RC at en-wiki, either. However, I watch WP:Reference Desk and Help desk, also the Teahouse and some sections of Village pump, so I find many questions and complaints there, which often lead me to fixing (and sometimes to reverting) faulty edits.

Sometimes I also jump into Category:Pages with* or Category:Articles with* to fix references, citations etc. and quite a big part of them turn out to result from disruptive edits. I think cleaning them up may look like I am an active RC patroller. :)

Meanwhile, I did my first change accept already It was a simple but unformatted additionSpecial:Diff/988369182 inCiara Bravo, which I also edited to fit the article structure. Thanks, once again, and happy editing! --CiaPan (talk)21:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Well deserved! Yeah, it shouldn't be too bad. You just review and accept good-faith edits, and reject bad-faith edits, etc. You'll get used to it quick, but if you run into any questions, you know where to find me. :-) Cheers -~Oshwah~^{(talk)(contribs)}23:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!I'm sorry about yesterday. It took me a while to realize, that I can find the reasons for revert in my contributions section. I understand your decisions, and tagged my article with {cn}. I hope, that helps, and retry later.Gmac4247 (talk)12:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, nope,Gmac4247. That will not help, neither now nor later. Your wanted addition is your original research, so publishing of it here, at Wikipedia, would be contrary toWP:OR policy. Apart from that it is based on an unjustified claim, so it is actually not a proof, and it ends contrary to mathematical result, well-known for about thirty eight centuries. As such its chance to be accepted equals precisely zero. --CiaPan (talk)00:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CiaPan. You have new messages atIN's talk page.
Message added07:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC). You canremove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Alcremie (talk)07:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HiCiaPan! The thread you created at theWikipedia:Teahouse,Using a link to a redirect back to the referring page, has beenarchived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussionhere. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free tocreate a new thread. The archival was done byLowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byMuninnbot, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page.Muninnbot (talk)19:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Napisz do mnie, jeżeli masz czas i ochotę, na adres (redacted) -- mam ograniczone warunki, email byłby najlepszy.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie,WłodekWlod (talk)08:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For the image that you provided on the Four Color Theorem - it's beautiful! Integral Python click here to argue with me21:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,IntegralPython! I really appreciate the barnstar, it means a lot for me. It's very encouraging to see my activity here serves the project well. Anyway, I must admit that it was not solely my work. The original idea, as well as the first ugly raster sketch (you can see itHERE) were mine, but I have no necessary skills or even appropriate tools to prepare such nice SVG drawings. So I made a request at Commons:Illustration workshop (oldid:539642426, section Please redraw my 4CT_Inadequacy_Explanation.png in SVG), andMrmw created the final image you can see in the article now (THIS one).

So I want to share your special thanks withMrmw, too: Good Job! --CiaPan (talk)13:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! Big thanks to both of you _{Integral Python} ^{click here to argue with me}19:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedLamina (anatomy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageLamina cribrosa. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)06:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A note for readers, not for the author (bot):
that was intentional – I've added a deeper level of disambiguation toLamina →Lamina (anatomy). --CiaPan (talk)07:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for telling me about templates and teahouses.SilverMatsu (talk)00:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,SilverMatsu, for the barnstar. I'm really happy to see my hints make your life of Wikipedian easier and more interesting. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them here. We all were beginners some day, and we all learn. I strongly believe there is no person who knows everything!CiaPan (talk)07:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CiaPan.Thank you for your good work.Quicksort exhibits quadratic behavior under some simple scenarios, which I listed, and are also already listed in the article.It's safer to NOT say those are rare conditions in the opening paragraph. If you want to add "rare conditions" again, please add a citation.Arosa (talk)20:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSixth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page1/6.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)05:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. And that was intentional. --CiaPan (talk)10:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Although for some reason you aren't currentlysigned up as a host at the Teahouse, I recognise you've made a lot of conributions there in recent times. So I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of newGrowth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to theirUser page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - andyou'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

• Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts and other helpers if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
• There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
• Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via aYour mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our currentlist of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; UserPanini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at theTeahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked ofall mentors over the last 14 days,click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up atGrowth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via theirPreferences.

Thank you!Nick Moyes (talk)16:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fileFile:Funhipgeom.png has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded byc:File:Hyperbolic functions.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andfiles for discussion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦»10:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: IfFile:Funhipgeom.png is deleted,File:Funhipgeom.bad.png will deserve deletion as well. --CiaPan (talk)05:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you aDobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread theWikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎)13:20, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, yummy! Thank you,7&6=thirteen, I really appreciate your kind words (and the sweet gift, too!) --CiaPan (talk)15:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brachy08(insert welcoming to chat with you message here) has given you aPączki to enjoy! If you thoughtDoughnuts were delicious, you will love thisPolishPastry! Thanks for helping another user with their user page! To give a Pączki and spread theWikiLove, just place {{subst:Pączki}} on someone else's talkpage.

Brachy08(insert welcoming to chat with you message here)08:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sooo much,Brachy0008!

Uwielbiam pączki, I can eat up to twelve a day (or more, but that's not been proven yet).

How did you notice my action, are you watching the talk page, as I do? --CiaPan (talk)08:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome. I’m watching you eating them as well as the talk pageBrachy08(insert welcoming to chat with you message here)08:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008:CiaPan (talk)08:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Category:Warehouses by country on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk)01:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[2]. So are you going to move it to the correct desk? --Viennese Waltz20:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Viennese Waltz: No, I don't think so. IMVHO this:

Special:contributions/2A02:B027:F02:7329:D1F1:28B9:E550:3B46

is quite enough. --CiaPan (talk)20:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but you're fortunate that the OP posted his question on the help desk as well, and was directed to the article's talk page. When I see an OP asking a question at the wrong desk, my first instinct is not to delete the question, but to advise the OP of where it should be posted. In general, good faith RD contributions should not be deleted. --Viennese Waltz20:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Viennese Waltz: You see, I am not fortunate, but rather somewhat careful. When I see some kinds of request I check the author's contribution first. Well, usually I do. And so I did this time and when I saw the same has been asked in multipletimes places I decided the worst placed one can be deleted safely.
Possibly I might have added some more explanation to the edit summary, like 'duplicated at WP:HD' or at least 'asked elsewhere'. Apparently, I am not as careful as I think I am. --CiaPan (talk)07:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I actually wouldn't have noticed that I called myself a "determined Wikipedia" instead of a "determined Wikipedian". Thanks.Apollogetticax|^talk20:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Apollogetticax: It was my pleasure - I can see typos, mismatched punctuation and grammar mistakes everywhere, all the time. And I love to fix them. Alas, English is not my native language, so I touch only those most obvious here at en-wiki.CiaPan (talk)20:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your help in the Teahouse with advice on en and simple Wikipedia sites! :)

SunnyBoi (talk)04:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunnyBoi: Thank you! This little is one of the cutest ones that visited my talkpage.

I am not very active recent years here, but I'm happy to help. That's probably because - despite the long time I spent here - I still learn new things (and sometimes old things which I happened to forget), so I know wery well what it feels like to miss some obvious basics. --CiaPan (talk)14:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectAR-M100390 has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 24 § AR-M100390 until a consensus is reached.Cremastra ‹ u —c ›15:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cremastra: Thank you for a message. I have commented there. --CiaPan (talk)21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HelloCiaPan! The thread you created at theTeahouse,Expanding a contents index for categories, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for your help in the Teahouse, kind words and understating go along way! dziękuję :)✠ Emperor of Byzantium ✠(talk)15:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloCiaPan! The thread you created at theTeahouse,One sentence medical article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:14, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HelloCiaPan! The thread you created at theTeahouse,How to annotate a source that contains an error?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread. See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you recently reverted one of my edits onRecursive definition with the reason "no consistency is necessary or even useful here". I'm a bit confused on what this means and if it's okay to add 0 back in without adding the other number, which I assume is what you were talking about, but I'm not quite sure. I'd like to understand exactly what you meant and what part of the edit you had a problem with, so that I know how to proceed.TypoEater (talk)14:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,TypoEater, thank you for the message! I just didn't notice I reverted your addition of zero. I focused on the additional fraction you've added. The revert comment describes precisely what I meant to do:“no consistency is necessary or even useful here” was a reply to your comment“added a number in between 0 and 1 forconsistency with the rest of the set”. IMHO adding too many non-integers, together with the word 'consistency', suggest some kind of a rule, that the example set must contain some elements between each two consecutive integers. And that is not true (having just one element different from the one mentioned in the first line of definitionand not being a successor of any other, is enough for a set to be not-minimal).

What concerns zero, I actually would like it removed, because in my 'ordinary' understanding zero is not a 'natural' number. We don't naturally say 'I have zero apples', do we? We 'naturally' count objects when we do have some, hence above zero. You can have one apple or fifteen apples, but when you don't... well, you don't have any apples. However, in mathematics we use definitions, andnatural numbers may well be defined either with or without zero, and I am not going to advocate for either convention.

Conclusion: feel free to restore your version entirely or in any part. I think I just used revert too boldly as a means of discussion – please accept my apologies and edit the part in question the way you think is best. --CiaPan (talk)14:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inthis edit, you replaced valid templates with characters that are sometimes less useful than the templates (e.g.{{circa}}, which includes a thin space and a tooltip) and sometimes invalid (replacing &minus; with a plain hyphen). You also made many grammatical errors. Unfortunately, the page was not on my watchlist, so subsequent edits have made it impossible to revert your edit. Please be more careful in the future. –Jonesey95 (talk)21:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: I'm sorry, but it's definitely not my edit in most parts. I am just en-2 Wikipedian in my opinion, and I promoted myself to en-3 only on the basis of native English speakers fellow Wikipedians. As such, and with 20 years of experience I would never dare to make changes like in the edit you link. Things I would certainly not do:

• removal of{{About}} and{{Very long}} in the head
• unlinking Sagrada Familia and Parker square in the second paragraph
• adding the undescore character in a wikilink in 'Japan' section
• replacing 'where' with 'what' in the 'India' section
• removing valid wikilinks
• adding 'on wards' ('onwards' was not necessary, either)
• removing editors' names from{{cite book}}
• removing{{Citation needed|...}} without adding a reference
• removing a paragraph with malformed square from the 'Gardner square' section – that would definitely tempt me to dig for sources and fix the not-a-square

to mention just a few.

The only explanation I can think of is that I accidentally started editing some older version, thus reverting some changes made by other editors while addig my small improvements.

Thank you for catching and fixing this. --CiaPan (talk)09:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: I dig through the history and it turns out the result of my edit was a plain restoration of some old edit:

Diff between 24 November 2021 and 26 June 2025 with 229 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users

Honestly, I have no idea what the cause was, as going3+3⁄4 years back makes no sense at all!

Additionally, it is a plain revert, while my edit summary clearly states I meantadding some DAB links... --CiaPan (talk)10:34, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited and saved an old version by mistake. It is easier to do than it should be. Maybe someone familiar with the article will want to clean it up. –Jonesey95 (talk)13:46, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CiaPan, I just undid ([3],[4]) your two changes toMathematical fallacy andMathematical joke perwp:unsourced andwp:NOR. What you added may be true but it's really irrelevant, and, more importantly, not in the cited source. Feel free to redo some of the formatting aspects of your edits though. Cheers. -DVdm (talk)15:54, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied atUser talk:DVdm § Mathematical joke. --CiaPan (talk)09:48, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

. -DVdm (talk)17:30, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought I'd mention it, I used the note you invented at[5]. And if you didn't know, that page now has a WP-article,Perennial sources list. Also, the template was recently nominated for deletion, but it didn't fly:Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2025_August_6#Template:Press.Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)08:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Gråbergs Gråa Sång! Nice to see you here.

I'm really happy to see my idea provedto be useful for you, too.

Well, I didn't know about thePerennial sources list article, but I am not very active editor, so I often miss new things that happen at Wikipedia (those important things, too).

As a 3-to-1 wiki-sloth/gnome hybrid I keep somewhat away from most of technical and procedural discussions and tools. That's also a reason why I don't attend deletion discussions and don't miss deleted pages, categories or templates. But now, when you brought the{{Press}}' deletion discussion to my attention, I can say I would sign on thekeep side with all four my paws had I found it alive.

Best regards! --CiaPan (talk)10:05, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:21, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]