This user may have left Wikipedia. Cdtew has not edited Wikipediasince April 18, 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

23 December 2009-4 January 2011 1 January 2012-31 July 2013

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of theMilitary history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject'sPeer,A-Class andFeatured Article reviews for the period Apr-Jun 2013, I hereby award you thisMilitary history WikiProject Reviewers' award.AustralianRupert (talk)11:05, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

I apologize for my sloth in evaluating the above. Being new to the process, I was conscientously fumbling my way through, giving the article multiple readings and taking offline notes. A more proficient reviewer "played through", so to speak.

I did learn some interesting facts about the Revolution in the process. I thank you for the article that exposed me to them.

Georgejdorner (talk)21:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgejdorner:: George, many thanks for your review. Right now I'm close to having all three supports, so if you have any other comments or critiques, please make them and I will try to address them. If there's nothing else you see that needs to be addressed, you might want to close out your review (by either supporting or saying "no further comments") so another reviewer doesn't think that your review is still ongoing. I'm glad to see some new people stepping in to review! Keep at it.Cdtew (talk)13:14, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just so I keep above-board, if you disagree that it's of A-class quality, feel free to "Oppose". I'm not lobbying for your support, just trying to help you get used to the system.Cdtew (talk)13:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am such a greenhorn at this that I did not realize that you needed more than one approval for an A-class assessment. I thought another editor had beaten me to the approval.

Georgejdorner (talk)15:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgejdorner:: Not a problem! ACR generally takes supports from three reviewers who performed fairly comprehensive reviews. You can also specialize in reviewing certain things: Prose (style & spelling); Images (free use tags, captions, formatting); Citation (footnotes and bibliography, as well as spot-checking information in sources); Formatting (MOS compliance, etc.); or you can do like I do and just assess everything together. After you've completed your review, you can Support, Oppose, or state that you're weakly supporting or weakly opposing something due to one issue that hasn't been resolved. Hope this helps!Cdtew (talk)15:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not about rating the article...just a general question. Can you tell me, or refer me to, any further information about conscription during the Revolution? I had always thought it a practice that only began during the Civil War.

My thanks in advance.

Georgejdorner (talk)19:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to dig through my sources, but there were several states with enforced militia service for white, "unscrupulous" (ie: non-Quakers), adult men. There wasn't a federal (or Congressional) draft, but there also wasn't effectively a Centralized recruitment effort. Recruitment of all Continental soldiers was done at the state level. I'll let you know if I find anything.Cdtew (talk)02:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a native Marylander, I had a great deal of Revolutionary War history dinned into me. I am familiar with the scattered recruitment practices for American troops. It's just that I have never before heard of conscription during that era. The earliest use of conscription I know of is by the Confederacy in 1862.

Georgejdorner (talk)15:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdtew. I've posted some more comments.ceranthor00:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participated in the review ofTadeusz Kościuszko for GA and/or A-classes, you may be interested inWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tadeusz Kościuszko/archive1 (at this point there are few substantial comments there, and the article is likely to be failed due to lack of community's interest). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}14:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus, I am happy to take a look. I was generally satisfied with the way things went in ACR, and had I realized it had been nominated, I would have added my support long ago.Cdtew (talk)14:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are twoWP:RFCs atWP:FOUR. The first isto conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger(T /C /WP:FOUR /WP:CHICAGO /WP:WAWARD)06:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed:Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Having fun, yet? :) I've made an page protection request - mostly to deal with the child pornography comment problem (although it will indirectly help with some of the edit warring problem). Gotta love trying to keep some order on articles about popular and controversial reality shows!Singularity42 (talk)03:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're probably tired of this (I'm getting fed up too), but as Tony seems to beimplying that you are a racist (he uses the wordfour five times in opposing the proposed closure you made) you may want to comment atWT:FOUR. — Crisco 1492 (talk)06:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• You were mentioned atWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Continued_policy_violations_from_User:TonyTheTiger_at_WT:FOUR — Crisco 1492 (talk)08:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your memory must be better than mine, I can't find any article of yours I've reviewed (or vice versa). Could you drop me a reminder? Sorry for partially being responsible for ruining your morning. — Crisco 1492 (talk)13:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492: No, you didn't ruin my morning. I thought you had reviewed an article of mine, but I could be entirely mistaken. In fact, looking through my stuff I see I was mistaken. Sorry! I don't know why I thought you had. By the by, I'm a lawyer, so all of my mornings are like this, just usually not about me.Cdtew (talk)13:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• No kidding. Alright, well I'm going to try and avoid the horse at ANI for now... hopefully when Tony's block expires he's ready to apologize. (BTW, watchlisted) — Crisco 1492 (talk)13:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another mention at ANhere. Not a particularly high-profile mention, but I figured I should follow protocol. — Crisco 1492 (talk)23:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• @Crisco 1492: did you know that our mutual friend is keepinga page in his user space containing all of the records/listings from those who have removed their names and articles from WP:FOUR?Cdtew (talk)03:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• No, I didn't, but it doesn't surprise me. He seems to think he'll walk in and "valiantly return the prodigal children to their rightful home" or some pseudo-heroic thing like that. — Crisco 1492 (talk)07:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see the brouhaha--hard to think of a user who deserves it less than you. Thanks for all you continue to do here! --Khazar2 (talk)15:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Khazar! I stepped into it of my own volition, so I expect this is what I deserve.Cdtew (talk)18:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I said much the same to myself after I tried to step in two weeks ago. --Khazar2 (talk)18:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just letting you know I think you'd make a fine addition to the coord team if you're interested -- you'd just have to nominatehere... Cheers,Ian Rose (talk)05:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Ian Rose: Ian, thank for your vote of confidence. I would love to help out in any way I can, but would be worried that my IRL job (lawyer) may at times make it harder for me to contribute. Additionally, I respect all of the current Leads/Coordinators, so I don't want to step on anyone's toes by competing for anything. I may lay low a little while longer and throw my hat in the ring if the field looks thin.Cdtew (talk)13:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I know you'll continue to contribute in a positive way whenever you can, whether a coord or not. Cheers,Ian Rose (talk)14:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ian, after seeing that one of the sitting coords chose not to run again, I figured I might as well sign up. I'm open to any questions you may have, and I appreciate you bringing this opportunity to my attention.Cdtew (talk)17:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		TheMilitary history A-Class medal
		On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History Wikiproject, I am pleased to present you with this A-class medal to recognise your fine work in developing theFrancis Nash,Jethro Sumner, andJames Hogun articles to A-class standard. Thank your for your contributions, and keep up the great work.Nick-D (talk)10:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Kirill ^[talk]16:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdtew, I just wanted to let you know that I haveadded the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload onnew page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, seeWikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!Vejvančický (talk /contribs)12:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Vejvančický: Many thanks!Cdtew (talk)12:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Hey Clark, I hope you're well! After reading your Milhist coordinator nomination statement (esp. "I want to be more involved in the community"), I was curious to know if you'd be interested in contributing to theSignpost's "Featured content" section, which summarizes the English Wikipedia's new featured material on a weekly basis. The two people currently involved are looking to do the "Discussion report" (Pine) and trying to balance their time between other Wikimedia roles (Hahc21). In addition to the summaries, you'll have editorial independence to seek out underappreciated topic areas and editors to tell their stories to a relatively wide readership on the English Wikipedia and around theWikimedia movement. Feel free to take some time to think it over (if needed) and get back to me when you can! Thanks,Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}14:38, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Having formerly done it (for almost a year) I'll let you know it took me perhaps 3 to 5 hours a week, depending on the amount of FC and if I interviewed someone or not. — Crisco 1492 (talk)14:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• @The ed17: I would be happy to pitch in! Would I be going at this solo, or would there be assistance from those already doing the job? My two caveats are that I may need some lead-in time to get up to speed, and my sometimes volatile work schedule would make it helpful if there were others who could cover for me in the rare event I get overwhelmed. I appreciate you thinking of me for this, and look forward to helping.Cdtew (talk)20:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• That's great! You will be working withHahc21 (talk ·contribs) when he's free, and hopefully at least one other editor if I can tempt them into doing it (suggestions welcome!).Pine (talk ·contribs) can assist at times but would rather focus on the discussion report. I'm sure both will be happy to help with getting you acclimated to the regular format. :-) You're free to start on this week's edition, which will hopefully be published early Friday UTC, or next week.Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}04:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Nice! Cdtew, I'd be more than glad to help you on all FC-related. I will be, of course, helping you every week with the report. Although I like to think that we will be helping each other :] —ΛΧΣ²¹05:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The ed17 Thanks for recruiting.Hahc21 are you still planning to write FLs for this week?Cdtew could do FAs. --Pine^✉05:54, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• @Pine:/@Hahc21: I am a little pressed for time, but I will give it a go. Let me know if I'm doing it right/wrong.Cdtew (talk)12:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• @Pine:: I will have them today :] —ΛΧΣ²¹14:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• @Hahc21: I've gotten 7/12 done by now; I'll attempt the rest tonight, but if I don't finish them then, I may need some help. I am traveling all day tomorrow to a wedding in another state. Also, since this is my first go-round, I'd appreciate any constructive/destructive criticism, and feel free to edit my contributions as much as needed.Cdtew (talk)15:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't worry. Do as much as you are able to, and I'll do the rest. I will be able to do so tonights after all the work I have awaiting for me is done. Cheers! —ΛΧΣ²¹18:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Good job with the report. You wrote longer descriptions than necessary but the extra detail is good.Hahc21 do you think you andCdtew can do the job without me next week so I can get back to DR? --Pine^✉07:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Just a quick poke on this; it'll be a short one this week. :-) We normally coordinate by email, if that works for you—feel free to send me one at the.ed17gmail if you'd like!Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}06:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• @The ed17: Thanks for the poke; I've been in depositions all week, and I was traveling this past weekend; I will be able to get to this tonight, I believe.Cdtew (talk)10:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• No worries, Clark! That sounds great. Thanks!Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}13:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some work, but since this is only my second try at this, I hope someone will look at it and tell me if I did anything boneheaded, or if the title I made is too stupid.Cdtew (talk)03:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Clark, that actually looks great! :-)Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}13:23, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed many of the issues you've raised there (I've even managed to track down the names of the tribes in a few cases). I can also attempt to incorporate some material from more recent sources into the article, if you want. --Jakob(Scream aboutthe things I've broken)23:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, in recognition of your successful election as a co-ordinator of the Military History project for the next year, please accept these co-ord stars. Welcome. I look forward to working with you over the next year. If you have any questions about co-ord tasks, please let me know. I'm more than happy to help. Regards,AustralianRupert (talk)06:23, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does it still need work or are you willing to pass it now? Thanks, --Jakob(Scream aboutthe things I've broken)16:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@King jakob c 2: Jakob, see my notes on the GA page. I think at this point I think it'll be worth it to fail the GA for now, and to give you some thoughts to improve. I think biggest issue is structure and the style; one thing that's not an issue is your drive and passion for the subject. Keep those things, and you'll get this improved well enough. Please let me know if I can help out in any way.Cdtew (talk)01:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent job on theSignpost column. - Dank (push to talk)01:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Like — Crisco 1492 (talk)01:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Dank:Dan, thanks as usual for your useful copyedits. And Crisco, thanks for the support!Cdtew (talk)02:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, nice work!Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}14:22, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are off to a great start. This week your workload will be more normal. You can askHahc21 for anything you need help with. He usually does FLs. Thanks for contributing. --Pine^✉06:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Very good job! :] —ΛΧΣ²¹14:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I dare you to include all 20 Puck of Pook's Hill images in the article for this week. >=)Adam Cuerden^(talk)21:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge accepted.Cdtew (talk)02:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of theMilitary history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject'sgood article,Peer,A-Class andFeatured Article reviews for the period July-September 2013, I hereby award you thisMilitary history WikiProject Reviewers' award.AustralianRupert (talk)07:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

		[reply]

Hi Cdtew- I am trying to find reviewers for a Featured List nomination through the Numismatic portal membership list. If you have the time to look at the proposed list, feedback or comments (either positive, negative, or both) would be appreciated. I don't know if Fractional currency is too far afield from your interests. Thanks-Godot13 (talk)04:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed:Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion ofFrancis Nash to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA you may have helped to write) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it atthe requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it tothe "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,327 articles inCategory:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks,Bencherlite^Talk10:12, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me, too--I just saw this good news in the Signpost. Always glad to see you continuing your terrific work! --Khazar2 (talk)21:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've seen your work around the project and some of it is spectacular. Should you wish to stand for an RfA, do tell. It'll be a pleasure to nominate you. Regards. Wifione^Message17:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Wifione: Wifi, thank you for the thought. Given that I have a limited amount of time I can usually contribute to Wikipedia, I would generally prefer to be mop-less, and to concentrate on content creation and my work as a coord with MILHIST. I sincerely appreciate your kind words, and will let you know if I change my mind.Cdtew (talk)13:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Yes, do tell me if you change your mind. Kind regards. Wifione^Message15:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on theSignpost's FC page!Tony(talk)13:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a poke for this week's FC, I am hoping to publish soon. :-)Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}20:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@The ed17: Ed, I apologize for this week. I actually just finished writing, and when I pressed "save page", it showed me the edit conflict with your writing. I had actually gotten the whole thing written as well; my failing was in not responding to you here to let you know I was working on it. I'll be more attentive to my duties this week.Cdtew (talk)04:28, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't apologize, things happen. :-) I'm actually sorry for not telling you I was working on it—you certainly wouldn't have thought I would do it. Please feel free to add/subtract/edit, especially if you have additional information on the big FT.Ed ^{[talk][majestic titan]}04:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@The ed17: and@Hahc21: I'm going to be on the road all day tomorrow and much of the day Thursday; I will try to attack the FP's if and when I get a chance, but I just wanted to give you a heads up that I may be delayed on those.Cdtew (talk)05:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I could give a hand. I just came back home (I was travelling) and will try to help over at FC :) —ΛΧΣ²¹19:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TheSignpost has been covering this year's WikiCup competition in the FCR so I added the information about this year's finish to the report. Thanks for your work on theSignpost! --Pine^✉06:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AtWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Spanish conquest of Petén, the closer probably just forgot to check for new comments before he ran his closing script. Simon will probably respond to your comments anyway, and when he does, even though that page is archived, if you're satisfied, you can change to support "for the record", or ask for it to be re-opened if there are problems. - Dank (push to talk)12:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't think there was much to be added; I probably shouldn't have even reviewed given there were already three supports. Thanks, though!Cdtew (talk)13:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Addition reviews are always welcome (by the reviewers, and usually by the writers), if you see something you'd like to comment on. Thanks Clark. - Dank (push to talk)13:05, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdtew, theSpanish conquest of Petén review was closed before I could properly thank you for your review. I'll work on your last comments before taking it to FAC - many thanks and all the best,Simon Burchell (talk)13:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, perthis, just checking how you might be going -- aiming to get this month's issue out around the 15th and love to have a review from you if you can manage it... ;-) Cheers,Ian Rose (talk)10:43, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Cdtew: Hi again, other priorities have delayed me despatching theBugle today as planned, so if you're able to complete your review during the weekend we could fit it in... :-) Cheers,Ian Rose (talk)01:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise when I posted this that Hawkeye had recently added a book review to this month's draft issue, so no pressure now -- be great to have your ready in December though! Cheers,Ian Rose (talk)02:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that there's space atWP:TFAR at the moment for you to nominateRobert Howe (Continental Army officer) for 29th December, if that's still your plan. Regards,Bencherlite^Talk09:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed:AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Hello,

I am soliciting feedback for the above article. Of especial interest to me would be feedback onWerner Voss#Last stand. If you should review that section alone, I would be grateful. If you review the entire article, I would be even more grateful.

Georgejdorner (talk)15:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedJethro Sumner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageThomas Blount (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking the time to review theSpanish conquest of Petén at Milhist ACR - the article was recently promoted to FA, in no small part due to the prep it got at MilHist. Best regards,Simon Burchell (talk)11:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're going to be spending less time editing, and I've been asked to help with this week's FC, but I see you've started already. I can do the summaries for FAs and FLs, if you like. - Dank (push to talk)19:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see your "away" message on Ed's talk page now. Changed my mind, I'm only comfortable with FAs. Best of luck in all your endeavors, and I hope you know you're welcome back in any capacity any time. - Dank (push to talk)02:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Dank: Hey Dan, thanks for the extra hand; I've gotten some extra time tonight, so I'll do the FP's. Hahc usually gets to the FL's about Thurs-Friday, so I'm presuming he'll get to that soon.Cdtew (talk)03:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. - Dank (push to talk)03:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Biography Barnstar
		Thank you Cdtew for going the extra mile to help promoteJethro Sumner to FA status. On behalf of the article's future audience, I hereby award you the The Biography Barnstar. Please accept it --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions11:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be interested in a small, focused meetup? I'm interested in putting some energy into closing a series of RfCs on issues that have been annoying both the community and the WMF for some time now, and I'd appreciate some feedback. Also, it's just sad that I haven't made more of an effort to get some face time with NC Wikipedians. - Dank (push to talk)18:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Cdtew :). As mentioned on theMilhist coordinators talkpage, we'veopened Flow up for community testing. I'd be really grateful if you could hammer on the system (if you haven't already!), let me know any bugs you find, and leave a note atthe 'first release' page explaining what you, as a member of Wikiproject Military History, would need to see to be okay with it being deployed on that wikiproject's talkpage.

Thanks!Okeyes (WMF) (talk)20:10, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You are invited to participate in the above review.

Georgejdorner (talk)03:12, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview:Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed:TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

This is a note to let the main editors ofRobert Howe (Continental Army officer) know that the article will be appearing astoday's featured article on December 29, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please askBencherlite (talk ·contribs). You can view the TFA blurb atWikipedia:Today's featured article/December 29, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions atWikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Robert Howe (1732–86) was aContinental Army general fromNorth Carolina during theAmerican Revolutionary War. He was one of only fivegeneral officers, and the onlymajor general, in the Continental Army from that state. At the outset of the war, he was appointed abrigadier general in the Continental Army, and eventually became commander of theSouthern Department. His early military career was contentious and consumed by conflict with political and military leaders inGeorgia andSouth Carolina. These confrontations, including a 1778 duel withChristopher Gadsden, and Howe's reputation as a womanizer eventually led to his removal from command over the Southern Department. Prior to the formal turnover of his command, Howe commanded the Continental Army andPatriot militia forces in defeat in theFirst Battle of Savannah. He later sat as a senior officer on the court-martial board that sentenced British officerJohn André, a co-conspirator ofBenedict Arnold, to death. Howe himself was accused of attempting to defect to the British, but the accusations were cast aside at the time as a British stratagem. He died in December 1786 after being elected to theNorth Carolina House of Commons. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk)23:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for reviewers forWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Armed Forces Special Weapons Project/archive1. If you could take a look, it would be much appreciated. Cheers.Hawkeye7 (talk)22:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of theMilitary History WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject'sPeer,Good Article,A-Class andFeatured Article Candidate reviews for the period October–December 2013, I am delighted to award you thisMilitary history WikiProject Reviewers' award. During this period you undertook three reviews. Without reviewers it would be very difficult for our writers to achieve their goals of creating high quality content, so your efforts are greatly appreciated.AustralianRupert (talk)04:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar in recognition of your extensive contributions to theMilitary history WikiProject, as evidenced by your being nominated for the2013 "Military historian of the Year" award. We're grateful for your help and look forward to seeing more of your excellent work in the coming year.Ed [talk][majestic titan]23:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion ofJames Hogun to FA status recently. I know you know all aboutWP:TFAR andthe "pending" list, so this is just a reminder to use them as and when suits you. Many thanks.Bencherlite^Talk10:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

images of North Carolina
Thank you for quality articles forproject North Carolina, covering places such asFort Dobbs (North Carolina), with a focus on history and people, illustrated with your images, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 409th recipient of myPumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk)08:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a general notice to previous reviewers: TheTadeusz Kościuszko article has again been nominated for FA. Opinions are needed atWikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tadeusz Kościuszko/archive2. --Gwillhickers (talk)01:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks atBritain's War Machine Interview:Article writers discuss German military history

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your work on Wikipedia and happy retirement. We miss you at the Signpost. I hope you will return to Wikipedia when you can! You can remove the retirement tag at any time. Best wishes,Pine✉07:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second this barnstar. Thank you so much for everything. Hope you will be back sometime :)→ Call meHahc2120:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thirded. This is horrid news, especially for Milhist (although I'll be the first to understand that real life comes first!). Best of luck in the future, my friend.Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}20:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because you participated in the most recent discussion regarding the proposed move ofHillary Rodham Clinton, you are hereby notified perWikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification that the administrative determination of consensus from that discussion is being challenged atWikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 May. Please feel free to comment there. Cheers!bd2412T19:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks atThe Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed:Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed:TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview:World War I editors Op-ed:TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine:This month in World War I

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September!Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed:TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for theMilitary historian of the year andMilitary history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for theMilitary historian of the year andMilitary history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for theMilitary historian andMilitary newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview:2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay:Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed:TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi Cdtew: I would really appreciate if you can please give me some pointers on how to improve the article aboutTalk:Rafael Carrera, who was a strong Guatemalan and Central American leader and, coincidentally, died the same day that Abraham Lincoln did.Thanks!--Nerdoguate (talk)14:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		For your 2014 contributions to multiple history related articles you are hereby award this Epic Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators,TomStar81 (Talk)07:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline:This month in World War I

images of North Carolina
Thank you for quality articles forproject North Carolina, covering places such asFort Dobbs (North Carolina), with a focus on history and people, illustrated with your images, - you are anawesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 409th recipient of myPumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk)08:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no.409 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk)09:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today'sJames Moore (Continental Army officer), introduced: "one of the lesser-known "what if's" of the American Revolutionary War, but about whom little is written in modern scholarship, has been painstakingly re-written with all of the sources I could possibly find on the subject. Where I couldn't get ready online access to sources, I bought them, including some book sources that qualify as antiques."! --Gerda Arendt (talk)05:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk)07:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today'sFrancis Nash, a "general, whose short career resulted in widespread commemoration, but little subsequent historical reflection"! --Gerda Arendt (talk)07:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk)06:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Review essay:Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed:TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed:TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is arequested move discussion ongoing atTalk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day.NickCT (talk)18:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Op-ed:TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Recent external reviews Review essay:Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed:TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi Clark, good to see that you've been editing recently. A summary of a Featured Article you nominated atWP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. I'm going to summarize the lead, and I should be finished sometime today. Let me know how it looks. - Dank (push to talk)16:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Today!Precious again, --Gerda Arendt (talk)06:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews:Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview:Featured picture participants Op-ed:TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles:Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews:Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed:We can (not) advance Timeline:This month in World War I

Greetings fromWikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annualproject coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on theelection page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours,Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]}05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review:Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay:Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed:TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news:From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles:Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review:Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed:TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline:This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015Military historian of the year andMilitary history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clark, good to see you're checking in from time to time. A summary of a Featured Article you nominated atWP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk)02:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again, your "least-known and least-referenced general in the Continental Army from North Carolina, ... a native Irish"!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)06:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wroteExpulsion of Chileans from Bolivia and Peru in 1879, but as English isn't my first language I am unable to bring the English up to the standard appropriate for an encyclopaedia article. I read your offer inWikipedia:Peer review/volunteers#History and think that it would be great when you could do some part of the work. --Keysanger(talk)12:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to theUnited States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See morehere!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdtew. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdtew. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for theMilitary Historian andNewcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to allactive members of the Military History WikiProject.

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running itsMarch Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be foundhere for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards,AustralianRupert (talk) &MediaWiki message delivery (talk)07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that theJames Moore (Continental Army officer) article has been scheduled astoday's featured article for May 2, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so atWikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks!Jimfbleak -talk to me?15:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from theMilitary history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on theelection page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators,AustralianRupert (talk)10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdtew. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: theMilitary Historian of the Year and theMilitary History Newcomer of the Year. Theco-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage:here andhere. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions atTalk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clark, hope all is well. I know it may be a few months before you see this, no rush. In the linked section of WT:TFA, I was searching for an example to support a point I was trying to make, and I remembered that we talked about the Hogun article briefly ... if what I'm saying doesn't match your recollection, please let me know. - Dank (push to talk)17:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 theMilitary history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members ofWikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign uphere.

For the Milhist co-ordinators,AustralianRupert andMediaWiki message delivery (talk)10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to all! I do not intend to write a regular peer review newsletter but there does occasionally come a time when those interested in contributing to peer review should be contacted, and now is one. I've mailed this out to everyone on the peer review volunteers list, and some editors that have contributed to past discussions. Apologies if I've left you off or contacted you and you didn't want it. Next time there is a newsletter / mass message it will be opt in (here), I'll talk about this below - but first:

• THANK YOU! I want to thank you for your contributions and for volunteering on the list to help out at peer review. Thank you!
• Peer review is useful! It's good to have an active peer review process. This is often the way that we help new or developing editors understand our ways, and improve the quality of their editing - so it fills an important and necessary gap between the teahouse (kindly introduction to our Wikiways) and GA and FA reviews (specific standards uphelp according to a set of quality criteria). And we should try and improve this process where possible (automate, simplify) so it can be used and maintained easily.

It can get quite lonely tinkering with peer review...

With a bit of effort we can renovate the place to look like this!

The list is here in case you've forgotten:WP:PRV. Kadane has kindly offered to create a bot that will ping editors on the volunteers list with unanswered reviews in their chosen subject areas every so often. You can choose the time interval by changing the "contact" parameter. Options are "never", "monthly", "quarterly", "halfyearly", and "annually". For example:

• {{PRV|JohnSmith|History of engineering|contact=monthly}} - if placed in the "History" section, JohnSmith will receive an automatic update every month about unanswered peer reviews relating to history.
• {{PRV|JaneSmith|Mesopotamian geography, Norwegian fjords|contact=annually}} - if placed in the "Geography" section, JaneSmith will receive an automatic update every yearly about unanswered peer reviews in the geography area.

We can at this stage only use the broad peer review section titles to guide what reviews you'd like, but that's better than nothing! You can also set an interest in multiple separate subject areas that will be updated at different times.

I don't think we need a WikiProject with a giant bureaucracy nor all sorts of whiz-bang features. However over the last few years I've found there are times when it would have been useful to have a list of editors that would like to contribute to discussions about the peer review process (e.g. instructions, layout, automation, simplification etc.). Also, it can get kind of lonely on the talk page as I am (correct me if I'm wrong) the only regular contributor, with most editors moving on after 6 - 12 months.

So, I've decided to create "WikiProject Peer review". If you'd like to contribute to the WikiProject, or make yourself available for future newsletters or contact, please add yourself to thelist of members.

We plan to do some advertising of peer review, to let editors know about it and how to volunteer to help, at a couple of different venues (Signpost, Village pump, Teahouse etc.) - but have been waiting until we get this bot + WikiProject set up so we have a way to help interested editors make more enduring contributions. So consider yourself forewarned!

And... that's it!

I wish you all well on your Wikivoyages,Tom (LT) (talk)00:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team. Cheers,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that theFrancis Nash article has been scheduled astoday's featured article for October 7, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so atWikipedia:Today's featured article/October 7, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks!Jimfbleak -talk to me?06:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting forthe 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, votehere before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just got around to seeing some of your past edits on North Carolina Revolutionary War Units. I have been working on filling out the NC militia units and officers for the past six months. Seetemplate:NCRevWarUnits

User:G._MooreUser talk:G._ Moore

In the month of September,Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon,Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is availablehere. If you are interested in running, please sign uphere by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of thecoord team. Cheers,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, voting for the2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G'day everyone, thevoting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks,Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties ofUnited States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented onWikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally,Colonial America, theConfederate States, theRepublic of Texas, multiplestates and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December,WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators onall Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receiveawards. Whether you want to claim theGold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited toparticipate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructionshere

Sent byZLEA at23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello Fellow North Carolina user,

I have reorganized and updated the content for theWikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina. I hope it is useful to improving collaboration.

User:G._MooreTalk

G'day all,March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier!Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me)08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

@Cdtew: Could I interest you in participating in a peer review ofJohn Neal (writer)? I recently overhauled the whole thing, replacing the article I wrote in 2006 and that had slowly improved over the following 14 years through small efforts by myself and others over that time. I think the new article is a major improvement and hopefully worth getting the article's status upgraded, but before I request that upgrade, I put out a request for peer review.

I am asking you since you are listed a volunteer peer review editor interested in American early Republic and Antebellum era history to which this figure contributed.

The peer review request is linked at the top oftalk:John Neal (writer).

Thanks in advance for the help!

--Dugan Murphy (talk)21:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, theApril 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on theAutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed atWP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles atWP:GAN orWP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted atWP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up atWikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at thedrive talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, theApril 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on theAutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed atWP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles atWP:GAN orWP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted atWP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up atWikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist atWikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at thedrive talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdtew, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed atthe list of volunteers forWikipedia's peer review process, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the volunteers list, so that the list is kept up to date and editors who do need help can better find active editors. If you become active again and would like to add yourself to the volunteers list again, you can do so at any time by visitingthe volunteers list.

Thank you for volunteering to be on the list previously, and all the best on your WikiVoyages!Message delivered to you with love byYapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contactmy bot operator. | Sent at18:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cdtew,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this linkhttps://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu

Hi Cdtew,

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this linkhttps://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.eduApolo1991 (talk)15:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that you’re a participant in the Law WikiProject, so I was wondering if you might be willing to take a look atsome edits I suggested a few months ago for theEdelson article? They’ve been stuck in the Request Edits Proposal line for a while now, and since I have a conflict of interest I can’t make the changes myself. Thanks!Mtd6596 (talk)20:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cdtew. Followinga request for comment in May 2025, the community has decided to implement an activity requirement for theautopatrolled permission. Because your account has not edited in the last three years, the autopatrolled permission has been removed from your account. This action is purely procedural and does not affect your ability to create articles; if you return to actively creating articles, you may request that the permission be restored throughthe normal process. When returning, please consider taking some time to re-familiarize yourself with common practices and how they may have changed over the past few years if you wish to request the permission back. Thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and we hope to see you again soon. – –DreamRimmer Alt (talk)11:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians who opt out of template messages