A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleManish Chandra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manish Chandra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GrabUp -Talk07:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Captain sparrow199. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Microdiscectomy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)08:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Captain sparrow199. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission ordraft page you started, "Microdiscectomy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!07:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Captain sparrow199. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Don 3: The Final Chapter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)01:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toVaidam Health. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time becauseit needs more sources to establish notability.I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.Cinder painter (talk)17:45, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for helpCaptain sparrow199 (talk)17:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you recheck, is this ready to go?Captain sparrow199 (talk)18:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you can easily submit now the draftCinder painter (talk)18:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meetall four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Vaidam Health and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Baqi:) (talk)09:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,Captain sparrow199!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Baqi:) (talk)09:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at theArticles for creation help desk or useWikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic isnot sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: SeeWikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vaidam_Health

qcne(talk)19:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDraft:Vaidam Health requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Created to bypass the salting ofVaidam.

Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.qcne(talk)19:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mDeb. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, usingindependent sources, and from aneutral perspective. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about aconflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest mustavoid orexercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating indeletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (seeWikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especiallyneutral point of view,verifiability, andautobiography.

Note that you arerequired by theWikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. SeeWikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using theconnected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please seeWikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk)08:05, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDeep Goel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Goel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kqol (talk)20:28, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

SureCaptain sparrow199 (talk)06:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageDeep Goel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Adates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow theWikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)09:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meetall four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit itafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Vaidam Health and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk)07:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia'smandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with themandatory requirements under theWikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page atUser:Captain sparrow199, and the template{{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:{{paid|user=Captain sparrow199|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Pleaserespond before making any other edits to Wikipedia.DoubleGrazing (talk)07:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice.

I am making a paid-editing disclosure in accordance with the Wikimedia Terms of Use.

I am associated with Vaidam Health and have a conflict of interest regarding articles related to the organization. I acknowledge that I should not edit articles directly where I have a financial or professional connection.

Going forward, I will refrain from making direct edits to such articles and will instead use article talk pages to suggest changes in line with Wikipedia’s conflict-of-interest and paid-editing guidelines.

— ~~~~Captain sparrow199 (talk)08:40, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why does your userpage say you're a participant in AfC, when you're not? --DoubleGrazing (talk)07:49, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meetall four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit itafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Vaidam Health and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk)09:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Captain sparrow199. Thank you for your work onVaidam health. Another editor,Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as perWP:NCORP. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Mariamnei}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk)14:13, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi {{re|Mariannei}}, thank you for reviewing the article and for pointing out WP:NCORP. I have now added multiple independent, reliable secondary sources that provide significant coverage of Vaidam Health (including national media coverage) Please let me know if any further improvements are required. Thanks again for your precious time.Captain sparrow199 (talk)16:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei:Captain sparrow199 (talk)17:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing to me. It is certainly an improvement, but I am still not sure if the sources are adequate for meeting NCORP. Since the article has beennominated for deletion, I would rather wait to see what happens there and then we can figure out how to proceed. Have a great day!Mariamnei (talk)08:12, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mQwerfjkl (bot). I haveautomatically detected thatthis edit performed by you, on the pageVaidam health, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• Ageneric name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix |Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk)17:08, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at theArticles for creation help desk or useWikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission iscontrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Paid editor has already bludgeoned to mainspace under yet a third alternate title atVaidam health. This draft is now irrelevant and Vaidam health will go AfD.

CNMall41 (talk)19:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleVaidam health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaidam health until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk)19:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions toAbhideep Chaudhary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time becauseyou may have a possible Conflict of Interest.I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information atHelp:Unreviewed new page.When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.CNMall41 (talk)20:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
• User talk pages with Uw-advert1 notices