You appear to have updated it by the "biocapacity" and not the "ecological footprint". Bolivia has 2.4 ecological footprint. Itsbiocapacity is 19.3.JollyΩJanner21:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now updated it with ecological footprint data. Thanks for the help.JollyΩJanner01:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks, I have checked through the data you added to the article against the PDF report. I also found that it's the same data as the Excel document, so it'd be better to just use the PDF as the sole source for the article rather than a mixture of Excel and PDF. I cannot find, however, the ecological remainder data in the report. Where did you find the data for it?JollyΩJanner22:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • Its simply the Eco footrpint minus the biocapacity per person for the nationCK6569 (talk)20:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean biocapicidy minus ecological footprint ;) I put the stats into Excel so it would do all the maths for me and check it against the current stats in the article. Most were right, but there were a couple where I think they were rounded down when they should've been rounded up i.e. 46.65 = 56.7.JollyΩJanner22:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can i know how do you find the CINC for each country and for which year ? thanksPolylepsis (talk)23:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

they are based off the data from the notes referenced at the bottom of the pageCK6569 (talk)21:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onNew World Map requesting that it bespeedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see theguidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting onthe article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles:biographies,websites,bands, orcompanies.Splittist (talk)17:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEncyclopedia of the Stateless Nations has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not assert significance, no third party sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Splittist (talk)15:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCoat of arms of stateless nations has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is essentially animage gallery with almost no text content, with originalPOV judgements about which "nations" should deserve states.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Quigley (talk)21:55, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Care explain whatthis edit was about? I originaly reverted it, thinking it was a test edit by someone unfamiliar to Wikipedia, but then I saw your other edits and realised you were trying to transclude the page onto another one. SeeHelp:Template#Noinclude, includeonly, and onlyinclude for help.JollyΩJanner16:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The same information (and basically word for word) was posted in two places. I was just trying to keep the repetion of text to a minimumCK6569 (talk)16:31, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, cheers for updating the data. I'll get round to updating the map too.JollyΩJanner17:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]