I see you removed information posted toBaphomet byUser:Khaosinfire. You gave the following edit comment: "There is no historical evidence that proves Baphomet was identical with a pagan fertility god. Thers is only speculation, and a speculation shouldn't be stated as a fact in an encyclopedia." I agree with that wholeheartedly, as did other editors on that page. Khaosinfire has since moved to putting the same unsourced information onBaphomet (disambiguation) and has repeatedly put it back after myself and another editor removed it. He's done it again and I can't remove it without violating 3RR. I would appreciate it if you check the page out and revert it to the last good version if the unsourced speculations are there. Thanks.DreamGuy 02:21, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

Hello - if someone doesn't leave a reason at VFD, it is means that they agree with the nominator's reason for wanting the article deleted. Thanks. --PhilipO 15:41, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hmmm, I had the same idea in the beginning, butWikipedia:Guide_to_Votes_for_deletion#Discussion says:"Votes without rationales may be discounted." However pardon me if it was unnecessary.BorgQueen15:59, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I never saw this, so I suppose you're right. It's just that I deal a good bit with VFD, and it always seems clear what is meant. Cheers. --PhilipO 20:59, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hi BorgQueen - thanks for formats. New here but getting a handle on things. Best regards, Scambler

Cheerrs fo r skygazing - get it nominated as a FA soon. --Wonderfoolt(c)19:43, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your support for my RfA, We shall surely interact more. I am certain that our association shall grow. --Bhadani09:53, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I got your message about the picture inMatsya, and I find that the picture is really nice. Thanks for the nice picture. --Bhadani13:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It should of course beI thankingyou for your effort! The Merseburg Incantations are such an important testimony of continental Germanic paganism in complement to the Norse sources. Many thanks! --Salleman07:51, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BorgQueen -thanks for your message regardingGeist.I am a native german and my source for thenewweltgeist chapteris my translation of the germanweltgeistif you can improve on it ,please do.I hope theres some useful info, since I am new to all this,Its 4am here in Sydney,so I got to say good night.If theres any more Info you need,I will contact you tomorrow,cheers and good night,Guss18:11, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BorgQueen ,

I think this stub is really comingalong and I enjoy very muchgetting material together andseeing it all grow more universally.

Its amazing to me, how so many concepts and aspectsof any one subject or object interlink and theneverything grows and comes together like a perfect puzzle, creating the bigger Picture. I am not an Academic.I also dont think thatwikipedia is here to copy Textbooks.I believe it is much more than that!

By researching and digesting Ideas and conceptsan understanding can be achieved that can be sharedwith anyone , coming to wikipedia - even if they are no academics .

What good is Knowledge,if it is so abstractthat it cannot be communicated to others?

I read some Books by Albert Einstein and i was amazedby the way he writes so effortlessly and uncomplicated.

Some Academics consider themselves elite,and are very proud of the fact,that nooneunderstands a thing they say.

what good is that? Its just dumb...anyway , I answered some critic on theGeist talkpage,

who thought I had to justify the ghost philosophyto him and that the page had no relevance.yet he offered no contribution .

I had to control myself not to let loseand tell him with 2 basic words, what I really think !

anyway,hope you are well,I reckon the Geist Page needsa Painting by some symbolist esoteric painter or something like that.

just to liven the page up a bit?what do you think?

got to go now, Dinners waiting,thanksGuss07:23, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you BorgQueen ,for your good advise.I know you are right of course.I do sometimes get too involvedin things.I did notice however that thecollaboration of the Month for September is the German languageby popular vote on wikibooks. I agree,theGeist (philosophy) pagestill needs a lot of work,but at this stage it is onlya stub and like many pages on wikipedia,it is an ongoing process.

I only made a small contribution to geist so far,anyway the page is labeled as astub ,inviting People to contribute . I did not start the page,but came across it throughZeitgeist andfound it very helpful and interesting.

Maybe it could be includet to the Zeitgeist Page?Anyway, it is not that important to me,since I got plenty of other projects going onat present in my life and I am too busy.

I agree,thatArt should relate to the theme ofthe page, but I know that there is lotsthat would be suitable.

thanks again for your advise,Guss20:16, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Art Wikiportal[reply]

Thanks for your help on that article; I didn't think it warranted the 'wikify' sign, which, in any case, was not explanatory.Tony12:37, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've reported copyright infringements toWP:CP in the last week, a new measure was recently passed to allow the speedy deltion of new pages that are cut and paste copyvios. Please follow these instructions if you come across this type of copyvio. Thanks. --nixie00:09, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You rock. I should go look at all the stub cats at some point.Hipocrite -«Talk»19:14, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2 days ago, I created an article about 1985 sword and sorcery motion picture Red Sonja and placed it to Red Sonja (check article Red Sonja history). I also moved the comic book character article to his correct place Red Sonya. But an user Kchishol1970 wiped my work and moved article to an unsuitable place “Red Sonja (movie)”. Therefore, I moved the article to a more suitable place Red sonja. But he again moved it a to third place “Red sonja (movie)” without a good reason. I believe Red Sonja is exactly place for this article since the character's article already exists Red Sonya but preventing my self in wiping war I choosed this place as a second choice, so please don’t move the article to any third place like “Red Sonja (movie)” since its hard to find or search for a new user. However, we can still make decisions for its correct place Red Sonja. Place your opinions to my taik page.
--spmeka 01:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)spmeka 01:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for help
I spent almost tree weeks for this article. I agree it’s the exact place, and now I'm able to work on other articles

Sincere:SPMEKA 10:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

You put a cleanup tag into the article. I (the author, or rather the person who copied the material from the Library of Congress material) am confused why. I would have expected "expansion", or "update", or "US-centered", but why cleanup? The language and the links are okay ... --Mkill20:38, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have felt the language is too technical for general readers, and does not get along with the usual style of wikipedia. I changed the tag now so please check if you find the new one more appropriate. --BorgQueen21:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey did you get your name from a Seamus Heaney poem entitled "Bog Queen" and you just changed bog to borg to relate it to the Star Trek phenomenon?, if so, you are an amazing individual and by the way thanks for helping out the wikipedia community!

[1], please check the first citation given on the page, and discuss on anarticles talk page before placing dispute templates within an article in the future. Thank you.Sam Spade22:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Today in some parts of the Middle East and Africa you can still encounter shrine sleep. Sleep Temples were and are used for the mentally ill, as a place where priests interpret the sick person's dreams. Thus, by the use of suggestion, (and the help of the god) the priests appear to cast out bad spirits from the mind and body of the sick.

Sam Spade22:53, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,Sam Spade22:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I wans't realizing {fact} was actually a dispute template. I provided my reasoning in the talk page now so please check. Thanks for your work. --BorgQueen23:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quite alright, it appears your rather new? I left a reply @Talk:Sleep temple, cheers,Sam Spade23:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help with my first article, "The Spindle of Necessity". I'm a still learning the basics, so thanks again for your help and for your time. One problem, I not sure what I exactly need to do to wikify the article...I'll have to read over the wikify page again.

Now that the voting has officially closed, I would like to thank you very much for supportingmy candidacy for adminstrator and as of 18:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC) I am an administrator. I will make sure to use the additional power judiciously and I welcome any comments you may have. --Reflex Reaction19:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! I am indeed half-Korean but learning Korean was one of the casualties of my youth; lost to video games and cartoons. I know a few words but have never learned to speak properly. My twin has married a Korean woman and his daughter is guaranteed to learn, but I'm afraid that it might be too late for me to learn! Take care keep wikying. --Reflex Reaction (talk)•20:48, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I've noticed your edits to the Musashi page, many thanks. I know there's a lot of errors bt i only found an hour in my lunch-break in which to edit the article, and it was on a horrible keyboard with coffee stains on it. Anyway, i will fix my work up now, but i thank you immensely for taking the time to fix up the parts i have just trimmed over due to obvious obstacles.

We seem to be gel'ing together as a good team, so lets hope after theMiyamoto Musashi article is air-tight, that we can collaborate on other articles :-)

Thanks again, i appreciate your changes :-)(Spum20:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your recent edits on this article.SchmuckyTheCat10:11, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BorgQueen. Thanks for thecubebs merge. I must have been sleeping on the job with that one. --Kjkolb01:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BorgQueen. Can you explain why you categorized my edits toxanthone as vandalism? I added two valid categories and removed linkspam (identical to linkspam that has been repeatedly removed by others from this article and many others.) I don't think those edits warrant the vandalism warning you put on my IP address' talk page.148.177.1.21321:00, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not entirely certain that it is a "spam". The external link seems to contain relevant information to me. And it would have been better if you added edit summary when you removed it. I resurrected the categories you had added and removed the Test2a-n warning since you provide explanation in my talk page now. If you think the external link is certainly inappropriate and should be removed, I suggest you provide your reasoning in the talk page of the article and gather consensus. Thank you. --BorgQueen21:16, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks.148.177.1.21321:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Me? A perfectionist? Oh, yeah, that's right, I forgot, I am. ;-) In all seriousness, I sort of knew my specific list of things that were missing wasn't a major problem for the article. I wanted to get them enumerated partly so that voters wouldn't be surprised to see new material on those topics showing up in the article soon. —Bunchofgrapes (talk)03:25, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm afraid the anonymous user is correct about the translation from the German WP article. This states: -

Der Begriff geht auf den deutschen Philosophen Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803) zurück. Dieser setzte sich im Jahre 1769 mit der Schrift "Genius seculi" des Philologen Christian Adolph Klotz kritisch auseinander und führte das Wort Zeitgeist als Übersetzung von genius seculi (lat. genius „Schutzgeist“ und lat. saeculum „Jahrhundert“) ins Deutsche ein.

I would render this as: -

The concept goes back to the German philosopher Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803). In 1769 he wrote a critique of the work "Genius seculi" by the philologist Christian Adolph Klotz and introduced the word Zeitgeist into German as a translation of genius seculi (latin: genius - "guardian spirit" and saeculum - "century").

I'll amend the article accordingly.Valiantis13:53, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Danke schön. --BorgQueen18:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My complements on theHymenaea protera article. Nice to see someone with a respect for prehistoric things, especially plants, which are all-too-often neglected. Great work. --DanielCD14:26, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliments. I have felt, with the exception ofHymenaea protera, it is exceedingly difficult to find much meat for extinct/prehistoric plants - so I guess most of the red links in theList of extinct plants will remain red... --BorgQueen18:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, finding good info is a problem. But we'll keep pecking at it! --DanielCD20:56, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! -Tεxτurε20:49, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Borneo Post is a Malaysian newspaper, so I am puzzled as to why it is placed into the Indonesia-related stubs category. --Matthew A. Lockhart 15:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Then you are more than welcome to correct it. --BorgQueen17:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Borgy. :)—Precedingunsigned comment added by216.12.62.100 (talk •contribs)

Thank you for the barnstar! It's nice to know the taxoboxes are appreciated!Eugene van der Pijll18:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Hope the bile has settled. Writing them was also, in truth, a stomach-wrenching proposition. —Bunchofgrapes (talk)00:59, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let me begin by saying that I'm in a really bad mood, and that although that has nothing to do with you it is possible that I'll be snappy and not realise it until later. You know how it is, when you think, "Ok, be nice" yet still fail?

RegardingAlpha →Alpha (disambiguation):

Firstly, pages titledFoo (disambiguation) are intended to be used whenFoo has a primary meaning that it is presumed that people will want to see. Please seeWikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages).

Secondly, when you perform a page move, you have to correct the redirects perWikipedia:How to rename (move) a page. If you'll look atSpecial:Whatlinkshere/Alpha you'll see that this would be a big job. The reason that I noticed this was that I was working through [[Alpha]], fixing the links, and it takes forever.

Finally, when you got toAlpha (letter), the disambig notice at the top is useless. A person would have had to type "Alpha (letter)" in the GO box to get there without having already been to the disambiguation page, which means that they are probably not looking for other uses of "Alpha".

So I'd like to put this back to alpha, would that be ok with you?
brenneman^(t)(c)05:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation. I movedAlpha (disambiguation) back to its original name, as per your reasoning. However if you discover such mistakes in future you are welcome to correct it yourself and provide me a notice - but I still appreciate your courtesy. As for the disambig notice at the top ofAlpha (letter), another editor already has corrected a few days ago, but I take your explanation as a useful future reference. No, you are not snappy at all! Thank you for your civility and hard work. Keep the good work. --BorgQueen06:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and the disambig notice thing is that, another editor before me had put it in the form of "See Alpha" so I had made it disambig notice, for the sake of layout. In other words, I merely tried to make it look better, but it wasn't my idea. Thanks. --BorgQueen06:32, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The taxobox looks good (except for one small mistake in the authority, which I corrected).

You have included more ranks in the taxobox than usual. In general, you're encouraged to include only the main ranks in the taxobox (kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species), plus only those minor ranks that are important for the rank you are describing. So the articleScyllaridae (a family) shows the minor ranks between order and family, but not the ones above "order"; an article on a species likeMoreton bay bug should probably not include the infraorder and suborder. I'm not a biologist, so I do not know the importance of those ranks; if you had a special reason to include them, that's fine. For example, the subphylumCrustacea is commonly known, and the inclusion of that rank does convey useful information to the reader, so it should stay.

Only thing missing now is a picture; I've looked for it on commons, and on images.google.com, but could not find one that we can use. Pity.Eugene van der Pijll11:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of zoologists by author abbreviation may be useful. Also, you may just add (taxonomy) to the name: [[Lund (taxonomy)|]]. That redirect works correctly for most abbreviations.Eugene van der Pijll12:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. It links to Peter Wilhelm Lund (1801-1880), who described the species in 1793. There might be a problem here. Perhaps this is the point at which we ask the real experts to join in, atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life.

Good idea, thanks. If something as tame askumis can be on there, certainly there's room forcasu marzu. I didn't thinkcheese fly, on it's own, was particularly unusual (it's just another high-jumping maggot, until you lose your sanity and deliberately use it to make something to eat), so I only linked it from the casu marzu description. Thanks for the kind words too! —Bunchofgrapes (talk)19:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As a party to her RfC, you might be interested to know a request for arbitration has been filed towards deeceevoiceWikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Deeceevoice.

-Justforasecond18:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theodore7 has been blocked for 24 hours for the ridiculous reverting. Thanks for letting me know he was still up to it. .:.Jareth.:.^babelfish02:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BorgQueen. I've updated thelist of science articles. I'm just letting you know in case you want to update yours. It's much better than the first version. I noticed your list when I went click on the "what links here" for one of the topics. Talk to you later, --Kjkolb12:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks!BorgQueen12:30, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest also that you also do the same on the Astrology Talk Page. I have been participating and am a professional and expert on the subject. I would like to know your expertise on the subject before you make any additions or deletions. Thanks.Theo00:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if he does anything else tricky. —Bunchofgrapes (talk)03:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that Theodore7 did makethis edit after deleting the exchange, which seems to indicate an acceptance of the idea that sources are the important element, not expertise. I hope. If he sticks around, that's the only way to resolve this sort of thing — I guess — stickling for sources on every single statement in the whole page. Sigh. —Bunchofgrapes (talk)04:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

—BorgHunter (talk)04:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of my RfA. Have a safe and happy holiday.Tom Harrison^(talk)15:34, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year. --Bhadani15:54, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Hanukkah, BorgQueen, and let me be so bold as to offer early congratulations on your upcoming adminship too. I'm sure you'll be a good one. —Bunchofgrapes (talk)23:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now anadministrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from theadministrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as theMain Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the newadministrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- 05:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Congrats BQ! And anytime you need any help in Arabic. Cheers --Szvest22:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)^{Wiki me up™}[reply]

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --King of All the Franks22:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on adminship! --Jbamb22:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. --DS1953^talk23:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask. --Deathphoenix03:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Congratulations BorgQueen! --a.n.o.n.y.m^t03:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated you, and all I got was a form thanks? ;) Congrats on "making it." Have fun! May the Force be with you! ...Wait, wrong series? —BorgHunter (talk)03:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could help resolve a problem atDoosan. Someone has repeatedly created articles about this Korean conglomerate and its subsidiaries. These articles contain, almost exclusively, material copied from the company'sbrochure. Administrators kept deleting the articles, but the user posted them again with sock puppet accounts, and did not respond to messages.

Now the user has left a message atTalk:Doosan. Do you think you could go there and try to engage the user?

I do not doubt that a company with so many different businesses is notable. However, the user needs to understand some things:

• He can copy the material only if he has the express permission of the copyright holder.
• Any material posted is subject to the GFDL.
• Other users will modify the article to conform to NPOV.
• Ignoring other users, and using aliases to evade the rules, is not nice.

Let me know if you can do this. Thanks.Gazpacho06:45, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

geeeez.. what a mess. When I asked Izehar to remove the deletedpage, he removed the talk page as well, with your response. I guess we lost that one.Gazpacho05:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblockMoldova page. It should be blocked the anon users not the page. Better users then the page since we still have to be able to edit the page. -- Bonapartetalk10:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your adminship. Can you please unprotect (or semi-protect) the1.800.Vending article?Can't sleep, clown will eat me11:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether the domain i took the picture from is public but you can remove it if you want to.—Precedingunsigned comment added byHariharan91 (talk •contribs)

User:HappyApple (who added most of the images) claims on histalk page that he will restructure the article with fewer images within a week.User:Ta bu shi da yu seems to be pursuing this issue. -RegardsNv8200ptalk20:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see that you speak Korean; I wonder if you could help me out with theCh'on-Sang-Yul-Cha-Bun-Ya-Ji-Do article, by seeing if there is an interwiki to a corresponding article in the ko: Wikipedia, or a more commonly used English transliteration. I've got a Hangul syllabary in front of me at the moment, but I wouldn't know where to begin. Thanks, --The Anome13:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wish you and your family a prosperous and happy New Year 2006! We shall surely remain actively involved in the Project Wikipedia. --Bhadani16:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I unprotected the page. The vandalism needs to be for a longer period than that. It looks like it's basically an edit or two a day. Even if it's the same person, that can be easily reverted by RC Patrol. I'll put the page on the watchlist on #wikipedia-en-vandalism. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)}01:01, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both of you. --Ze miguel01:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a couple of fair use images and the entire game screenshot gallery which is probably copyright infringment on this page. -Nv8200ptalk22:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Am I now part of the hive?-Cberlet

Awww I suppose so :-) --BorgQueen05:10, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HiBorgQueen,

I see you removed theH.K. commercial link fromAirsoft. I've got absolutely no problem with this - sensible. However, since there seems to have been a bit of vandalism to the external links section (which has quietened down a bit lately), it might be a good idea to leave a note to that effect on thetalk page.

While your edit obviously won't be mistaken for vandalism, you might help encourage the vandals to post on the talk page before deleting links. (Or is that just wishful thinking ...)

BTW, are youUser:81.151.150.254 who made the deletion I reversed?

Ciao,Wulfilia07:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind, I have extended this block to 2 months. A month long block didn't change behaviour and had no collateral damage, and 24 hours clearly doesn't seem to help. Let me know if you object. Respectfully,Wikibofh_(talk)17:12, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I support your decision. --BorgQueen17:14, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for experimenting with this site, I was simply fascinated by its endless possbilities. Jacob.—Precedingunsigned comment added byDULEKAJ (talk •contribs)

Hi, I accidently stumbled onto the edit command and I was wondering how it is possible to edit things permanently. If I had enough reliable sources, could I talk to a webmaster for the site and change it permanently? Thanks for your time.

                 Sincerly,                           Monkey06

There is aWikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games that are looking into the articles on Playstation, Xbox, etc. I am out of this debate because I don't want to spend time watching and reverting these articles. Please discuss any further issues you have with the pages with the Wikiproject people -ThanksNv8200ptalk19:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BorgQueen, firstly you leave Jean Luc alone!!! :-P. I wish to request that you sign your warnings for vandalism, it helps to determine when the vandal has been warned. ThanksKnowledgeOfSelf |talk00:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of my RfA, and congratulations on your own recent success. Best regards,Tom Harrison^Talk13:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my article on Mark and Nicko? The code said G4 nn bio and I'm not too familiar with Wikipedia codes. What does this mean? How do I fix it?—Precedingunsigned comment added byFourganger (talk •contribs)

Mark and Nicko are highly respected cult musicians within the Peterborough area, I think I should be allowed to write an article on them. The link didn't explain what the code meant either.—Precedingunsigned comment added byFourganger (talk •contribs)

Within Peterborough they are very notable. Soon they will move around the country and their noteability will spread. Certainly they are more notable than Penis Reflexology. Mark and Nicko have had a positive impact on many people's lives with their music and comedy. The article is intended to spread their fame so that others may benefit. I will keep recreating it as necessary, adding more each time as their achievements grow.

I'm not the one who deleted your second article. Please contactUser:Doc glasgow if you wish to protest. As for penis reflexology... hmm yes you have a point. I am removing it :-D --BorgQueen14:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BorgQueen, please use Astrology Talk Pages before your reverts, and cite sources. This would help to improve the encyclopedic Wikipedia Astrology Page. Thanks.Theo08:34, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BorgQueen, please refrain from deleting messages from your Talk Page. I asked you to also please refrain from instant reverts on the Wiki-Astrology Page, and to use the Astrology Talk Page if you have problems, or to sort out a way to create a better, more balanced encyclopedic article. As for 'POV pushing" - suggest that you see that the version I support is "cited with sources" and the version you constantly revert back to is not. Thanks.Theo08:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears thatWikipedia:Requests for comment/Theodore7 speaks well for the situation in question. Regards,BorgQueen08:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why are u deleting important pages. like paul witt's page. please dont do that again.—Precedingunsigned comment added byJunejo (talk •contribs)

What does "G4, A7" stand for?⇒JarlaxleArtemis06:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please seeWP:CSD. --BorgQueen06:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've blockedUser:Theodore7 for a 3RR violation onAstrology.Tom Harrison^Talk06:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BorgQueen,

I noticed you have taggedImage:DLs.jpg and four other images as nosource, which puzzled me on why you did so. It appears to be a legitimate upload with a proper copyright image tag. (With the uploader's name watermarked in the image itself.)

In any case, they are transferred to Wikipedia Commons, as it appears the user has uploader too many images of the same kind, so it's better to have them reorganised into albums.

-Best regards,Mailer Diablo07:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I've reverted {No source} tags — I had applied the tag because the image summary didn't explicitly state the picture has been created by the uploader himself/herself. Merely applying a copyright tag normally isn't complete enough; the reason the particular tag has been selected needs to be stated. But I will leave it to you from now on. --BorgQueen08:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) Interestingly, a check on DP5480's upload history shows that the first ~20 photos has a short summary claiming that they are self-taken. Thereafter, I think he/she probably too lazy to put them anymore!

Anyway, I suppose you're doingCSD patrol? If you keep finding yourself with an empty CSD category, you may want to check outCategory:NowCommons with a king-kong backlog. :P -Mailer Diablo08:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck are u talking about? I never edited Sharukh Khan page. And dont leave stupid messages in my inbox.Bye.—Precedingunsigned comment added byBigboss0101 (talk •contribs)

Kindly check your talk page again. There is no message left by me. --BorgQueen17:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Borgqueen!

I don't quite get why you put the {{advert}}-Tag in the article, it looks okay to me. Please explain. --Mkill19:49, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I answered onTalk:Korean wave --Mkill20:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BQueen! Sorry for the late reply! Anyway, this can serve for not only this case but for any other case related toArabic. كبابه is more a spoken language than كبابة, which is moreModern Standard Arabic orFusha, if you want. Academically speaking, كبابة is the right thing though I don't believeCubeb got a lot of thing to do with Arabic. Anyway, and for personal reasons, you can compare MSA with Fusha (language) andLiterary Arabic.Szvest22:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)^{Wiki me up™}[reply]

NPOV agent reporting for duty... I don't have a lot of time to dig through yet another major controversy, but if you give me the versions in history you think should stay and who the main players are I can take a look at it.

Would appreciate you stepping in to look atMythology if you would. We have some religious people trying to redefine myth to mean false belief, when that's not the academic usage. They want to do this so the word myth cannot be used in any connection with Christianity, because they find it insulting, despite the lengths we go to in the article to explain the academic version of the term and the difference with the layman's idea. Not surprisingly, they are fine with people calling other religions myth, just not theirs, a clear case of POV-pushing.DreamGuy00:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the Mythology page until the dispute is resolved through discussion. --BorgQueen07:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.DreamGuy07:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm taking steps to lodge a formal complaint againstUser:Theodore7 due to various reasons that I'm sure that you are aware of, or have experienced by now. Right now I have a rough draft of the complaint that I would like to have some people look over, add to, correct, and sign if they agree with it. I've never had to do anything like this before, so if you would please take some time to take a look at it and give me some feedback, suggestions, support, etc., then I would really appreciate it. It can be found here:[2] Thank you. --Chris Brennan06:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although the Taiwan is not recognized as an independent country by most countries around the world, it none the less is currently being governed by a body that is distinct to the government of People's Republic of China (PRoC,) nor does it obey any of its laws.

As such to state "... such as Japan, China (including Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao)... Despite rumors that Airsoft has been made illegal in mainland China, it is actually legal and very popular, both in mainland China and in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao as well." creats an impression that Taiwan is currently governed by PRoC and its laws, but is not a statement of fact.

In the future if and when Taiwan ... rejoin PRoC, it would then be appropriate to state it as such.—Precedingunsigned comment added by67.111.73.2 (talk •contribs)

I replied on your talk page. --BorgQueen23:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. We are in agreement.—Precedingunsigned comment added by67.111.73.2 (talk •contribs)

My fellow editors and I eliminated a redlink onUser:BorgQueen/science last week. I thought you might like to know.Walter Siegmund(talk)06:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

as a neophyte to computers in general and the fact i'd never heard of wikipedia before last novemeber,i thought i'd pick a subject as obscure as i could think of at a moment's notice on my friend's computer..the subject being leaf mould,(the English spelling). i have only personal experience that shredding fallen leaves with a rotary lawnmower really does speed up the decomposition process.not being at all web community savvy i didn't cite any sources.i am personally amazed at the power of the internet and the amazing scope of this web site in general.it is a very powerful tool and i am happy that my little snippet of information has been assimilated.yours faithfully ,ian,manchester,England,Europe,the world/Earth/the milky way,the universe.truly amazing.apologies to all the experienced computer/intellectual people i may have slightly irritated.i'm just a learner at the moment!no apologies though for lack of capitals,spelling,punctuation or grammar.what's a tilde by the way?82.69.52.4423:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Borgqueen, please refrain from deleting Talk page. I've asked you to please also use the other talk pages, such as the Astrology Talk Page before instantly reverting to non-sourced articles. You have asked me, as a Wikipedia newbie, not to delete my own Talk Page, and I suggest you show the same consideration here as well to show your leadership by example. Thanks.Theo09:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your comments haven't been deleted. They have been archived and can be seen here:User talk:BorgQueen/archive1, along with my reply. I hope this solved your misunderstanding. Regards,BorgQueen09:56, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and for the record, it wasUser:R.Koot who asked you not to delete comments from your talk page, not me. If you have any objection or protest please discuss them with him from now on. I would appreciate if you check the history of your talk page more thoroughly so you wouldn't mistake my comments with someone else's, and vice versa. Thank you. --BorgQueen10:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Pages with missing files