Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム

Jump to content

User talk:BlueEleephant

Page contents not supported in other languages.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, BlueEleephant!

I noticedyour contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you candiscuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there isconsensus.
Always useedit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to areliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read ourconflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers,Sarsenet•he/they•(talk)08:53, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission atArticles for creation:Carletonville Dolomite Grassland has been accepted

[edit]

Carletonville Dolomite Grassland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStub-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne(talk)17:00, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am honestly quite surprised that my submission got noticedso..quickly, but perhaps that is due to the fact that I had gone for articles high up onWP:WANTED's list, when I was searching for articles to create. -BlueEleephant (talk)17:49, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BlueEleephant. Nothing to it, I just clickedRandom draft to review, and yours happened to come up.qcne(talk)17:52, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. I just checked at WP:AFC again and I realized the odds that my draft would have been noticed so quickly are about a1⁄80 chance, considering that there are ~500 AfC submissions that still haven't been reviewed... -BlueEleephant (talk)18:08, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Last month the backlog was 3,500 unreviewed drafts, so you submitted at a good time. :)qcne(talk)18:10, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Is the "It may take 2-3 weeks for your draft to be reviewed." message intended for when there are several thousand unreviewed drafts, or several hundred? -BlueEleephant (talk)18:12, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is just an estimate - when there are several thousand unreviewed draft the message changes to "2-3 months". It just so happened I came across yours and reviewed it. It's not a queue, they're mostly reviewed in random order.qcne(talk)19:05, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I know the submissions are reviewed in a random order, I was wondering if that message mean that it could take 2 weeks to review 800 drafts, or 8,000 drafts. But, it is good to know that the message changes, because reviewing800 drafts is nowhere near as easy as reviewing8,000 drafts. -BlueEleephant (talk)19:43, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! We're currently in a backlog drive, so much more reviewers are happening than normal.qcne(talk)19:46, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]

HelloBlueEleephant! The thread you created at theTeahouse,TWENTY+ sections of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review need expert attention, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can stillread the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, pleasecreate a new thread.

See also thehelp page about the archival process.The archival was done bylowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered byKiranBOT, bothautomated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing{{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk)03:03, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BlueEleephant&oldid=1329166131"

[8]ページ先頭