User talk:Bildete
Page contents not supported in other languages.
HelloBildete and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some ofyour contributions, such as the ones toJewish pogroms in Amsterdam, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, seeWikipedia's policies on vandalism andlimits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in thesandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is aHelp desk, or you canclick here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom ofmy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!LizRead!Talk!03:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently editedIvan Mazepa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRuthenian. Such links areusually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.(Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk)19:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, our disagreement is not limited to the ethnic attribution of some historical figures. By undoing my edit You successfully deleted a lot of information added by me to an article, which I am not going to restore for a second time, because I suspect by now that your aim is to keep the quality of Wikipedia articles related to a particular topic artificially low, so that eventually most of their content will be deleted. It is useless to edit an article if one's edits will be deleted anyway.
Please seeTalk:Identification of inmates in Nazi concentration camps --Altenmann>talk20:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see fromPortal talk:Current events/2025 February 27 that you've apparently given up on adding this holiday to the Current Events page. That's good, because you've already broken thethree revert rule a couple times over, so it's already within my discretion to block you from editing. I'm not doing that at this time.
Also, vandalism has aspecific meaning on Wikipedia, and "an unregistered user changed something I edited" does not fall into it. (Especiallywhen they're right.) Calling non-vandalism edits "vandalism" is a personal attack, which isalso blockable, so please, cut it out. —Cryptic10:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work onJudaszki. Another editor,MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
this phrase isn't mentioned in the target page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|MPGuy2824}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk)05:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work onZbrodnie w Leonówce. Another editor,MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
"Zbrodnie" isn't mentioned in the target page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|MPGuy2824}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk)05:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedSmorzhiv, Lviv Oblast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRadziechów.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Witam
Please stop reverting edits on page2025 Polish presidential election!
Nobody agree with you, but if you want to convince editors to you opinion, you should start discussion on thetalk page.You won't convince people if you keep reverting edits - and such action can only end with a ban for you.Szturnek¿?19:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.SMasonGarrison03:54, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with thecategorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on thecategories for discussion page. Thank you.SMasonGarrison03:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I saw your nomination for deletion atKatarzyna Cichos. You haven’t created a deletion discussion so I have removed it. If you would like to create a deletion discussion and renominate it, then that’s fine.ScrabbleTiles (talk)13:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2025 Amsterdam stabbing attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesBelgian,Polish andAmerican.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you have recently added mentions to the lead section of candidates for the 2025 Polish presidential election about their candidacy. I understand that this is a practice at the Polish Wikipedia, however in my opinion these mentions can be contrary with the English Wikipedia policy of what is noteworthy to put in the lead section of a biography in regards to most recent events, seeMOS:LEADBIO. Please note that the information about person standing in the election, becomes dated right after the election is over and has to be removed, as its not a major activity of the person (this is with exceptions, when the person became notable for standing for a specific election or repeatedly runs for an office, e.g. Szymon Hołownia who became notable in Polish politics when running for the office in 2020, or Rafał Trzaskowski who advanced to second round). Therefore I opt for removing these mentions from lead sections of Zandberg, Senyszyn or Biejat. —Antoni12345 (talk)13:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bildete reported by User:XYZ1233212 (Result: ). Thank you.XYZ1233212 (talk)11:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bildete,
Thank you for creatingIvan Litvinchuk.
I have taggedthe page as having some issues to fix, as a part of ourpage curation process and note that:
Subject of article seems notable. More details are needed on fact " a war criminal" which is mentioned in lead. Article says he was imprisoned, but can more words be added that describe which sources conclude " a war criminal"? What words do the sources use? Which sources?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit theTeahouse.
Delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Noleander (talk)13:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk)15:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atGeorge Floyd. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted. If you would like to experiment, please useyour sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.DanielRigal (talk)19:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently edited a page related tothe Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at theTeahouse. // Timothy :: talk 00:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a Contentious topics warning above. From this point on you will be expected to understand the special restrictions when editing topics related to Eastern Europe.
Re: Your inappropriate changes, slow moving edit war, and personal attacks on other editors.
On June 3 you made this change:[1], which was reverted. You made the same change on June 16[2], which again was reverted, then you again made the same change on June 22[3]. This is clearly a slow moving edit war and it needs to stop. Two other editors in addition to myself object to your changes. Before continuing editing you are strongly advised to readWikipedia:Edit warring and the special restrictions related to topics in Eastern Europe I placed above. Before making this change again, you need to gainWP:CONSENSUS for the change on the article talk page.
Regarding the source you use[4], this is a political statement on a government website; Wikipedia requiresneutral independent reliable sources. Before you continue editing please readWP:RS. Questions about this can be answered atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.
I have also noticed you changed "massacre" to "genocide" in the template at[5]. The name of the article is clearlyMassacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia; the article discusses the claim that this constitutes genocide, but this is not the consensus of historians (outside of Poland). After being reverted you repeated this again at[6]. There is a significant difference between "massacre" to "genocide"; if you wish to make this significant change you will need to show there is a consensus of neutral independent reliable sources and a consensus of Wikipedia editors to make this change.
Finally also accuse another editor of being a sockpuppet in your edit summary at[7] and accuse other editors of genocide denial[8],[9].If you accuse any other editor of genocide denial, you will need very good evidence and be prepared to defend your comments atWP:ANI.
Again please read:WP:EW,WP:CONSENSUS,WP:RS,WP:NPOV and the special restrictions mentioned in the notice I placed above; if you have questions, post either toWP:TEAHOUSE or the appropriate notice board. Given your history of problematic editing (seeUser talk:Bildete), I would strongly suggest you read and follow these guidelines. After reviewing your edit history, I believe you should be blocked from editing articles related to Poland, Ukraine and genocide. In the event this problem continues this will be discussed atWP:ANI and you may be blocked from editing, either entirely or from the topics I mentioned.
// Timothy :: talk 00:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedRudnitsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageRudnica.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)18:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bildete,
I'mSignifica liberdade, and Ipatrol new pages here on Wikipedia.
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Świniarski) for deletion because it is an unnecessarydisambiguation page per one of the criteria atWP:G14.
If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact thedeleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with{{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)17:07, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:intitle does not distinguish diacritics. Therefore
redundant, it is enough to add
--Altenmann>talk09:42, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is English-language Wikipedia. Do not put "plural: ...scy" for Polish surnames, because in English plural is Świniarskis. --Altenmann>talk09:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did toUkrainian nobility of Galicia, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has someguidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed,consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use thetest Wikipedia. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.Moves of this page have been flagged as apotentially controversial move, therefore if you wish the title to be changed you need to start a formal discussion throughWP:RM. Thanks. — Amakuru (talk)10:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did toFar-right politics in Ukraine. Doing so violates Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.TylerBurden (talk)17:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The articlePiotr Szczerek has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Do we really want an encyclopedia article about a stupid tennis fan? This guy's only claim to fame and inclusion was taking a hat from a boy in the crowd. Is that encyclopedic? Sounds more like tabloid fodder. 5 years from now this article will be ridiculous.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to thepage's history for further information.DatBot (talk)00:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)07:52, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onDecarlos Brown Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
per BLPCRIME
Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.TurboSuperA+[talk]20:27, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectDecarlos Brown Jr. has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 8 § Decarlos Brown Jr. until a consensus is reached.TurboSuperA+[talk]20:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are surnames. DO not add "other" with titles that include the surname:[10] Even in disambig pages we do not include arbitrary titles, seeWP:PARTIAL. I included the square becaause it can be called simply "Szczepański". --Altenmann>talk17:35, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not put disambiguation pages into templates. It creates problems for wikipedia. You have to split name or surname pages out of disambig pages if you want to use tghem in surname templates.
By the way, I fail to see why you addedAnthos intoTemplate:Anton-surname: It does not list any surnames. --Altenmann>talk19:11, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When you add the surname template, you have to remove all surnames of this type from the "See also", because they are already in the template and listing them in "See also" is redundant and confusing. --Altenmann>talk19:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add into surname pages the items which are not obvious without references. It is not at all clear that "Antuna" is somehow related to Antonius. And the Lebanese surname Antun inFarah Antun is also of unknown origin. --Altenmann>talk19:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And FinnishAntonen is in no way related to Anton. --Altenmann>talk19:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, if you do not know for sure the origin of a surname, do not try to guess from its spelling and do not list it. If you are really curious you can leave a question about surname origin in the surname talk page. --Altenmann>talk19:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please add template{{srt}} only to given name pages, because in includes the link{{starts with}}, which is useful only for first names, which can start article title. Everywhere else it only creaates clutter. --Altenmann>talk02:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently editedPoland men's national 3x3 team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageMichael Hicks.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work onKruszwick cathedral. Another editor,MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:
nothing about it being a cathedral is mentioned in the target page
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|MPGuy2824}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk)07:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello and welcomeBildete! Thank you for your contributions related toPoland. You may be interested in visitingWikipedia:WikiProject Poland,joining the project,joining our discussions andsharing your creations with our community. |
--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here12:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited2025 Polish speedway season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesFredrik Lindgren andRobert Lambert.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Other is used forWP:DISAMBIGUATION pages and none of those that you added are disambiguations. I advise you to stop, because you have already been warned multiple times for edit warring and additions of contentious content. –sbaio04:09, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see you take it very personal and nationalisticwriting is a personal attack so readWP:NPA if you wish to continue making edits. –sbaio02:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{Other uses|A|B}}results in
For other uses, see A and B.
Please resolve your disagreement inTalk:Lithuanians#Revert_war_about_hatnotes. --Altenmann>talk06:33, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've reverted your edit onUkrainian nationalism and have started a discussion attalk:Ukrainian nationalism#Article image. If you disagree, please revert my edit attemplate:Ukrainian nationalism (but not atUkrainian nationalism since this would beWP:EDITWARRING) and contribute to the discussion. Thanks for your work adding the series box to pages by the way, I had no idea it existed. Cheers.Joko2468 (talk)00:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mRosbif73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Guillaume V, Grand Duke of Luxembourg, but you didn't provide areliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content beverifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your changewith a citation, your edit is archived in thepage history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page.Specifically, I see zero reliable sources that refer to him as William. If you are aware of any sources, feel free to add them to the article.Rosbif73 (talk)13:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isUser:Bildete with WP:BATTLEGROUND, WP:IDHT and general WP:UNCIVIL behavior. –sbaio14:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The redirectLithuanian occupation of the Vilnius Region has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 11 § Lithuanian occupation of the Vilnius Region until a consensus is reached.+JMJ+ (talk)18:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk)22:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The followingtopic ban now applies to you:
You are topic-banned from Poland and Lithuania,broadly construed, for one year.
You have been sanctioned for battleground behaviour, personal attacks, and other uncivil conduct, as discussed in the ANI thread here:[12]
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as anuninvolved administrator under the authority of theArbitration Committee's decision atWikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, thecontentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in thelog of sanctions. Please readWP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may beblocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this topic ban usingthe appeal process and thearbitration enforcement appeals template. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this topic ban, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. ~~~~
,asilvering (talk)22:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have noticed that youoften edit without using anedit summary. Please do your best toalways fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box inyour preferences. Thanks! –Jonesey95 (talk)20:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topicGreat Lithuanians. Thank you. --Pofka19:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, your creation of the redirect toMaja Heban from her birth name was a violation of your topic ban from Poland. Additionally, it was a violation ofMOS:GID: we donot include trans people's birthnames anywhere unless they were clearly notable under that name, and as the name was removed from the article when you added it you should have been aware this was at the very least disputed. This is considered a serious privacy violation, especially for aWP:BLP.Rusalkii (talk)19:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use theUnblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Hello I have nominated your articleŻelazowski for speedy deletion under the G5 criteria ofSpeedy deletion for being created by a topic banned editor.GothicGolem29(Talk)18:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I have nominated your articleGawlikowski for speedy deletion under the G5 criteria of Speedy deletion for being created by a topic banned editor.GothicGolem29(Talk)18:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk)11:51, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]