User talk:Betty Logan
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is aWikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other thanWikipedia, you are viewing amirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other thanWikipedia. The original talk page is located athttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Betty_Logan. |
Archives | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than180 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi Betty, do we have the data to updatethe table with the 2024 inflation?--Luke Stark 96 (talk)13:17, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why you delate my updated?79.52.193.19 (talk)06:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think I conflated the latter with the former. The latter pseudogenre has a wider breadth. Could we perhaps discuss the whole list together for both pages? For example, I've always been under the impression thatDarling was BNW, not just KSR. (I still need to see this one; it's on the queue!)
I love a bevy of the films I've seen thus far, so I've always had great interest in this. But I guess thedefinitions of each one, which even the Wikipedia article highlighted the blurred lines, is where I lost the plot.
There are several titles during the 1958–1964 period which I wonder about. (I give that year padding surroundingLook Back in Anger andBilly Liar, because I do think a few 1964 titles and maybe one 1958 title are borderline. There are definitely "cusp films" imo.) And the troublesome thing is, I feel like the interpretation or sources pool are conflating it as bad as I sometimes.
Film Forum and some corresponding British venue had a summary and list closer to the one I expanded, including those that bled over. I think that led to some further confusion for me. Sorry if I'm talking all jagged here. I am exhausted. Hope to hear back from you. Feel free to reply on my page if you prefer, or just here.
M.Billoo12:32, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, about yourGuinness sandbox, I just want to let you know that not only Jaws had a re-release, but alsoThe Sound of Music, with$1,601,237 earned so far, and on October 3 Avatar 2 will have are-release. And also I would like to know your opinion aboutthis, when you have time, thanks--Luke Stark 96 (talk)13:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it makes sense to includeWeb 1.0 in the lead since it would clarify the difference between what Millennials had (dial-up Internet, static webpages) vs the more robust Internet Gen Z kids had in 2008 (YouTube videos, broadband).--Jw00231 (talk)18:19, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:Who Framed Roger Rabbit? § Organizing the cast section.Lord Sjones23 (talk -contributions)08:26, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Betty Logan, I'm reaching out to you as a participant of theFilm/finance task force in the hope that you'll review my request forRyan Kavanaugh, a film financier, here:Talk:Ryan Kavanaugh#Trimming details for NPOV. The page is acontentious topic, and I'd appreciate a neutral editor looking over the request. I am happy to discuss further on the article Talk page. Thank youFrancine72790 (talk)14:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --~2025-32417-38 (talk)21:16, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Betty Logan. Your wiki edit anniversary was 2 days ago, marking 17 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee❚❙❚❙❙✉13:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
