Archives

/2005 - 2006 /Jan - Jun 2007,/Jul - Dec 2007 /Jan - Jun 2008,/Jul - Dec 2008 /Jan - Jun 2009,/Jul - Dec 2009 /2010,/2011,/2012,/2013,/2014 /2015,/2016,/2017,/2018,/2019 /2020,/2021,/2022,/2023,/2024

Dear Bastun,

Greetings! Thank you for your review on my bio article about Murillo de Aragão. I am trying to locate the draft version of it so I can make the changes you suggested, but I am not managing to find it.

Could you help me, please?Bruno Furtado Vieira (talk)18:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HiBruno Furtado Vieira, you'll find the draft atDraft:Murillo de Aragão. Regards,Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}18:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bastun, greetings once again!

I tried to comply with your suggestions, but I am not sure if I managed. Please let me know how I can improve. Since I am new here, if you can lay out the details of how to fix the erros I would be very grateful.Bruno Furtado Vieira (talk)20:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		This award is given in recognition to Bastun for conducting 484 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up!Hey man im josh (talk)18:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You recently placedDraft:Dallas Pro Volleyball into the draftspace. Comparing it with theKansas City Pro Volleyball page I see no difference. Both have local references, both start off in the same year. Shouldn't KC also be in the draftspace of both in the mainspace of Wikipedia? Explain the difference to me...Roberto221 (talk)19:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Roberto221. I draftified Dallas Pro Volleyball as it appeared on myNew Pages Feed, required review, and met the criteria for moving to draft, as set out in the notice.Kansas City Pro Volleyball, on the other hand, was created in February 2024, and can't be draftified. It also fails to meetWP:NSPORTS, so can be nominated for deletion, or draftifying could be suggested as an alternative to deletion.Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}17:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you tagged this page,Malskinsfjørður as reviewed? Seems to be a hoax.Fram (talk)14:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Fram, it's been deleted so I can't see it now. IIRC, it was referenced? I didn't check all the references but nothing struck me as out of place at the time. I'll try to be more diligent future.Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}17:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It had one ref which didn't mention the place (logical, as it doesn't exist). No problem, shit happens.Fram (talk)17:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that editor had also added related hoax material toList of airports by ICAO code, caught byGuliolopez.Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}17:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And created another hoax, also deleted. If they resume similar editing in the future, they will get blocked (not by me obviously).Fram (talk)17:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How are you Bastun? Please don't tag articles with improper tags as you did toThe Arrangements (short story), and others. I provided sources for many of them, and tagging with "notability" makes me worry whether you did a BEFORE before tagging, and so, you should have done, be it you are taking it [the articles] to AFD. Cheers.Safari Scribe^Edits!Talk!12:38, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe any of the tags were improper? You must provide sources forall of them, and single sources for stub articles (as some had) is questionable. Re notability - please seeWP:GNG andWP:NBOOK. Is there any significant, lasting coverage of any of these short stories? It may have served better to include a section in the author's own article or on her bibliogrpahy article on her short stories, rather than one-sentence stub articles that may very well be deleted. Additionally, you should note that notability is not inherited - yes,Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie is notable; not all of her stories are necessarily notable. As a new page patroller yourself, you should know this. Please also seeWP:PAGEDECIDE. Regards,Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}13:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Bastun for accumulating at least 25 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!Hey man im josh (talk)19:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)08:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go raibh maith agat, Gerda! Thank you, Gerda! Very much appreciated!Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}11:19, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections |Renewal RFC phase

 You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, pleaseremove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk)06:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone [tag placement] onClaire Marin because there are at lease two newspapers of national record in those sources.𝔓^420°𝔓^Holla22:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thank you for your work with NPP! I want to let you know that I declined yourG4 speedy deletion nomination ofHarsh Patel. G4 onlyapplies to sufficiently identical copies of previously-deleted articles. Although you cannot see the previously deleted version, one of the things to look out for is the date of the late deletion and compare that with the information provided in the article. In this case, the AfD was in September 2015, and the new article included many sources published since then, indicating that the new article is sufficiently different. Therefore, the article isn't eligible for G4. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns on the matter. Take care,Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)04:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good spot,Significa liberdade - I'll watch out for things like that in future. Thanks,Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}23:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)r[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thissurvey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view itsprivacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards,Sam Walton (talk)16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bastun! I just created a new article, on theSurajpura Raj. Was wondering if you'd be kind enough to check it out, and point out the deficiencies, if any.Localproblem7110 (talk)17:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
: DoneBastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!}00:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]