Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Precedingunsigned comment added byProfitoftruth85 (talk •contribs)

Be aware that you may be blocked fordisruptive editing if you ignore the ANI complaint and keep adding mentions ofParamhans Swami Maheshwarananda to articles. I do not see where you have received support from other editors to do so. The fact that you keep deleting warnings from your talk suggests that you don't like the feedback you have been receiving. To stop the negative feedback, consider acting in a more cooperative manner with other editors. Thank you,EdJohnston (talk)01:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that I was only restoring mentions ofParamhans Swami Maheshwarananda from other articles which were systematically deleted by another Wikipedia user called Wikidas. This is not the same as "keep adding". What actions have Wikipedia Administrators taken to prevent this? Thus far I deleted only one warning from my talk page from a user which has shared his disagreements before already on dozens occasions and is not wiling to accept any compromise. If there is one user "Wikidas" which does not like one author he can clean the Wiki from it without any consequences? Thanks!Atmapuri (talk)08:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond at the AN/I page, I thought the discussion was over because you hadn't responded to the challenge addressed to you there.--Profitoftruth85 (talk)07:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion there was deleted by a bot. It was not concluded. I did not know that it has 24 hours timeout.Atmapuri (talk)07:38, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]