Welcome!

Hello, Ash Loomis, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! feydey01:31, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Wikiproject_Reggae. Join the proposal, if you are interested $) --Nagasheus (talk)11:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participation! (8 The project is created, look here:Wikipedia:WikiProject Reggae. First we gonna make assessment table and assess as much articles as we can. (= --Nagasheus (talk)16:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw you tagged Videodrome as a movie based on urban legend(s). I read in the trivia of the article (without references) that in the 40's there were people thinking that tv signals could cause brain tumors, and I'm sure that it's possible to find many strange popoular stories about television and its bad influence on human minds but I think that stating that this movie is "based on urban legends" is not proper, if there aren't references about that. --Ermanon (talk)09:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ash, I'm wondering if you could give some more detail on your concerns with my merge. I posted onTalk:Ska#Merge_with_ska. Thanks!MakeBelieveMonster (talk)15:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted two of your recent edits because I'm not sure you understand thatCategories are a pretty blunt instrument, and therefore requireproper sourcing. Adding articles to this category when the topic of atheism isn't mentioned in the article at all is specifically unhelpful, and unnecessary. The mere absence of a mention of a belief in Our Lord is insufficient to qualify for inclusion in this category. Thanks.Rodhullandemu01:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks! I'm not done with the Chester Brown articles yet, either. I'm working on one forUnderwater at the moment.Acidtoyman (talk)04:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCreepshow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageHouse of Secrets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)12:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedFrank Miller (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageIslamicism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)13:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mMoe Epsilon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more ofyour recent contributions toWes Craven because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Regards, —MoeEpsilon09:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did withthis edit to Stephen King. As I'm sure you must know by now, Wikipedia requires material added to articles to be accompanied by citations of reliable sources. There is no mention in the article of King's religion, let alone one that is sourced. Thank you.Nightscream (talk)05:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onPunisher. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware,Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.

This edit seems to have been made for the sole purpose of levelling an insult towards another editor in the edit summary while avoiding the 3RR ruling. Any more edits like that and I (or any number of other editors who you are warring against) will almost certainly raise the issue atAIV who generally take a dim view of such actions. Consider thyself non-template warned.Chaheel Riens (talk)06:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They attacked me first bitch.

Ok, can't say you weren't warned. I've brought this up at AIV.Chaheel Riens (talk)07:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

There's no substatiable alibi for that.Ash Loomis (talk)07:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)I love you, no one ever wants me to say it but it's ture.[reply]

Your account has beenblocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have beencompromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your rights to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom atarbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org.Yunshui 雲‍水08:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Since it might be his younger brother messing with his computer again, and there is no reason to leave vulgar nonsense on the talk page, I removed the irrelevant obscene post.DreamFocus15:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toDevo may have broken thesyntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}
• *[[David Kendrick]] – drums <small>(1987–1991, live - 2003))</small>

Thanks,BracketBot (talk)19:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Compromised accounts