Welcome!

Hello, Ardenn, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! karmafist21:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ardenn, recently you reverted a useful edit by72.60.128.187 in the article onCIVI-TV. Following up on that change, I noticed that you had in fact proceeded to bulk-revert all of that same editor's additions to five different A-Channel stations. While you are correct in stating that the sale of CHUM assets to Bell hasn't completed yet, it does not invalidate the information about the sale. Those edits were relevant to the respective articles, and should not have been removeden masse. Please use caution in future before pursuing such actions. Thanks! --Ckatz04:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the unnecessary reverts on these pages. There is no need to undo this editor's work. Thank you. --Ckatz04:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The sale of CHUM is irrelevant to the individual stations. The only article it belongs in is perhaps the main A-Channel and CHUM articles. I will revert it, because of the above."(Ardenn, replying on my talk page)

It is definitely relevant to the individual stations, as they are directly affected by this change. Trust me, as someone who has worked in media for the better part of two decades, "who owns you" isvery relevant. Besides, you're now continually reverting information that two editors (at least) agree is important. The proper course of action would be to discuss the issue on a talk page, probably atA-Channel (or somewhere similar). Cheers. --Ckatz04:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to this discussion (and to stop it from degenerating) I'm posting a note atA-Channel to initiate a discussion about this information. Hopefully, that will help to resolve things. Cheers. --Ckatz

"The other guy doesn't count. He's not registered. For all I know, he's you." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)

Please, Ardenn, don't do this. Let's resolve this peacefully, okay? --Ckatz04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)

I've no interest in playing games with Wiki rules, Ardenn. I've asked - quite nicely, I think - that we take this to a discussion. What do you have against that course of action? --Ckatz04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"I'll agree that who owns you is important, but the transaction isn't complete. Right now, it's only speculation. The CRTC may say no." (Ardenn, replying on my talk page)

"Speculation" is a bit of an understatement - yes, the CRTC may overturn the deal, but it probably will go through in some form. Regardless of the outcome, however, just the fact that the deal is pending is of direct relevance to each and every station. Furthermore, someone reading up on their local station may not click through to the main articles - but they still could stand to know about what is proposed. --Ckatz04:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a request for commenthere and a call for discussionhere to get some outside input on this matter. I would appreciate it if you could hold off on resuming your reversions to these articles so that there is sufficient time to allow people to comment. This is, I feel, a reasonable request. Thank you. --Ckatz05:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

SeeUser talk:Tawker --Samir05:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. He didn't even have the decency to let me know about the block.Ardenn05:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd refrain from saying you'll revert changes in 24 hours though. I agree that is gaming 3RR. Don't think it's worth a block in my opinion, but it's not really a wise thing to say. --Samir05:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a 31 hour block. I checked the log. As I said, he didn't have the decency to tell me.Ardenn05:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will e-mail Tawker --Samir05:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is a block message, I think I explained it in there. Per "In 24 hours, I'll be reverting your edits. Ardenn 04:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)" it leads me to strongly believe that you were attempting to game the 3RR system instead of discussing and reaching a compromise. While I agree it is not vandalism that one comment, and that comment alone led to this block which I believe was justified at the time. I'm taking another look at the edits in question and will take another look --Tawker06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin, you're still supposed to let people know why they're blocked.Ardenn16:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me if I over-estimated you in assuming that you would read the block message, I figured the block reason would say plenty.... you know, it is there for a reason... it shouldn't be critical to have a talk page message saying the exact same --Tawker07:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SinceFlag of Canada will be the AugustCanada collaboration I hope You'll read the comments in the nomination and as a nominator prepare to co-ordinate the effort.feydey21:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I personally won't beg you to stay, only ask you to stay. You are not contributing by just saying "Well..ok fine, I'm gone". If something doesn't please you, well, help contributing to Wikipedia by finding solutions. --Deenoe17:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside, I've noticed that the quit message has been in place for a week, but you're still editing. You may wish to remove the quit message or edit it to provide a cutoff date to reflect your change in status. Happy editing!Captainktainer *Talk19:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although it seems that you have alreadly retired from Wikipedia, I post this message because you were the person virtually removed the articleGandi. If you want to delete the article, tryWikipedia:AFD instead.--16[Sechzehn]16:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The wikibreak was actually due to the fact that I was out of broadband range on this weird thing called a vacation. The entire media stink (and man was it elevated way higher than it needed to be) came later. I know, I'm the most unjust crazy rogue admin out there for doing a username block... oh well, all in a day :) - Thanks for the reminder to take down the wikibreak sign, I had totally forgotten about it :) --Tawker00:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Queens University has been nominated for collaboration of the week and artcle improvement drive please help out!! --Speedystickd19:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you have posted a dozen or so edits since you quit. Perhaps you should unquit.JEdward02:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None of Ardenn's edits have been since the 14th of August, and then only very, very minor. Many users will perform a few edits to finish up a few things once and for all before leaving the project. For all intents and purposes, Ardenn has left the project.Captainktainer *Talk05:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ardenn, thank you for the invitation you gave me about creating an account. However, I already have an account and forgot to sign in at that time. Thank you, anyways!Sir Studieselot16:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ardenn. I find your name from reading about it on Wikitruth's article on Wikipedia's article about them. I really like your orange disclaimer so I'm going to use it for my talk page if that's okay, but I'll take it down if you tell me to. I'm sorry to hear about your dropping out of Wikipedia, it's really something I wish the whole world would get in on doing. I understand it must suck getting harassed for your decisions. I still need to read more about the occurances to figure out just exactly what they were and whether or not they're right, but still, you look okay enough.Tyciol19:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To satisfy your curiosity: Based on my review of his contribution history and my own memories of following the dispute, Ardenn left Wikipedia after being blocked numerous times for violations of the 3RR rule, which was in keeping with a generally mutually hostile relationship with the Wikipedia community at large. There was also a long and tendentious dispute between Ardenn and WCityMike, which was one of many factors that led to that contributor's choice to leave the project. Ardenn's relationship with the community was a stormy one, and it appears that he has wrapped up the dangling threads of his participation and permanently left the project (or reregistered as a new user). As for the disclaimer, remember that automatically deleting posts from anonymous users is an egregious violation of Wikipedia's policy ofassuming good faith, which includes anonymous contributors; I caution you in the strongest of terms to avoid implementing that particular clause of the notice. Anyway, I think it would be best if we all just let Ardenn slip away quietly; while I don't think the Right to Vanish applies due to the extensive block log, it would be nice to adhere to the spirit of the policy.Captainktainer *Talk02:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's very sad that someone pushed this user this far, to quit Wikipedia. --66.218.12.21702:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingImage:L-chapman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used underfair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails ourfirst fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go tothe image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. Onthe image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking onthis link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you. –Quadell^{(talk) (random)}20:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT the scope ofWikiProject Ottawa is beingdebated. Your input is requested. Thank you.GreenJoe20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you are a member of WikiProject Deaf. You may also add{{User WikiProject Deaf}}, which also adds a userbox to your page, or [[Category:WikiProject Deaf participants]] to your userpage. If you do, it will list you inCategory:WikiProject Deaf participants.Taric2520:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added you toCategory:WikiProject Deaf participants.Taric2515:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have renominated this for deletion. I notice you voted against last time. If you have any views one way or another, please post them. It appears like it will be a clear deletion anyway. Cheers.—Precedingunsigned comment added byJJJ999 (talk •contribs)03:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PPAP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Arctic Gnome(talk •contribs)16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi..how are you? i saw at your main page..that you left wikipedia!..what is the proplem?..i Knew that is not my business.but if you want to tell me,it will be good? regards.--O.waqfi (talk)11:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedList of Ryerson University people, an article you created, fordeletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ryerson University people. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours}20:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:You Can't Do That on Television, which you created, has been nominated fordeletion,merging, orrenaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon^(Talk)00:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiveing this message because your name appears on theWikiProject VancouverInactive list. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visitWikipedia:WikiProject_Vancouver/Inactive and move your name over to theWikipedia:WikiProject_Vancouver/Members list. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on thetalk page. Thank you for your time.Mkdw^talk08:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedCategory:Green politicians in Canada (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs) for renaming toCategory:Green Party politicians in Canada (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments atthe discussion page. Thank you. --Alan Liefting (talk) -19:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:Lgibbons.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used underfair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go tothe file description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)11:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ardenn! Thank you for your contributions. I am abot alerting you that2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Thebiographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensureverifiability, all biographies should be based onreliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current51 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the{{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Gabriel Draven -Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
2. Al Bowers -Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk)04:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing toFile:NickWright.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used undernon-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go tothe file description page, and edit it to include anon-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make arequest for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)12:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Healthcare in Ottawa, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you.Karl.brown (talk)02:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PPAP-Join has beennominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion atthe entry on the Templates for discussion page.Nigej (talk)08:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectWikipedia:FM has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 24 § Wikipedia:FM until a consensus is reached.48JCL22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]