User talk:AliAkar
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hello, AliAkar, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such asSelection of Spouse in Islamic Marriage, may not conform to some of Wikipedia'sguidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read calledYour first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to theTeahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type{{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check outWikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk)12:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onSelection of Spouse in Islamic Marriage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.331dot (talk)12:40, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to thebottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I deleted your article "Selection of Spouse in Islamic Marriage" because
Jimfbleak -talk to me?06:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you cancreate articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk)14:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,Use:AliAkar/Ahmad Keshvari. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page –User:AliAkar/Ahmad Keshvari. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged forspeedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out atUser:AliAkar/Ahmad Keshvari – you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:User:AliAkar/Ahmad Keshvari|the article's talk page]].
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest thearticle creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.WWGB (talk)11:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to readthe guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using theArticle Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed onAhmad Keshvari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under thecriteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more aboutwhat is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.WWGB (talk)09:16, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)15:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Ahmad Keshvari.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email topermissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria atWikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as{{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add arationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. SeeWikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created inyour upload log.Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia'simage use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)21:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stefan2 (talk)15:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered,File:Ahmad Keshvari.jpg, has been listed atWikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on thefile description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry atthe discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)14:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stefan2 (talk)14:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Mazda Publishers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described in thecriteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.Stefan2 (talk)22:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message fromCorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents ofChess with the doomsday machine, and it appears to include material copied directly fromhttp://downtowndartmouth.ca/index.php/events1/chess-with-the-doomsday-machine/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is notpublic domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See ourcopyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, seeWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)CorenSearchBot (talk)10:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedChess with the doomsday machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageHalifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedMahdi Zein-eddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageFrench. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)10:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions toWikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you cancreate articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Cerebellum (talk)10:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]I have deleted the article; it clearly constituted promotion of both the book itself and the ideas contained in the book.Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion of any products, or for political campaigns.
The book itself appears to be notable and probably deserves an article, but as it stood, it was better to scrap all of the contents and redo it from the scratch. If you did not save the contents of the article, and want to either re-write it, or find analternate outlet for it, please e-mail me and I'll send it to you. -Mike Rosoft (talk)08:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I assure you, I am not deleting your article (or marking it for deletion) because of my personal bias. In fact, I do oppose the policies of Israel in the Palestinian conflict. Rather, I am deleting it because it is outside the scope of Wikipedia, for reasons I have already explained. (I haven't read the book, so I can't comment on its factual accuracy, but it is my opinion that anything written by an anti-Semite and a Holocaust denier isa priori suspect.)
For example, a user has attempted to change the articleHomeopathy to state as a fact that the procedure is a fraud. While I don't believe in the efficacy of homeopathy, either, I have reverted the edit and tried to explain to the user that such statements of opinion do not belong in an encyclopedia. (See[1] and[2].) -Mike Rosoft (talk)15:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isTopic ban on Jews and Judaism needed for AliAkar. Thank you.Ian.thomson (talk)16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary or your ownpersonal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did toJewish Supremacism. Doing so violates Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.Attempting to presentFRINGE opinions as fact can be considered a form ofdisruptive editing.Ad Orientem (talk)22:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have rewritten your additions to the articleHassan Tehrani Moghaddam. As just one example what was wrong with your contributions, it is not acceptable for Wikipedia articles to refer to Israel as the "Zionist entity" (except in direct quotes when they are needed to demonstrate a point; in this case, the quote needs clearly marked as such). See the policy ofneutrality. -Mike Rosoft (talk)14:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedHassan Tehrani Moghaddam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageZelzal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You say that a "government website published a picture from Iran-Iraq war" - which website is it?
The copyright status depends on the laws of the individual countries. In the United States, works of the federal government are ineligible for copyright, so they may be freely uploaded to Wikipedia (or Wikimedia Commons). This is generally not true for other countries, or even for works of the individual U.S. states.
For example, in the Czech Republic official works are ineligible for copyright. This includes text of laws and other regulations, court decisions, drafts and official translations of such works, publications of the Czech parliament, municipal chronicles, state and municipal symbols (e.g. the Czech flag and coat of arms). It generally does not include photographic and other media works.
In any case, it needs to be verified that the work is indeed in the public domain; even if a work is found on the government website, it might not actually be a government work (or even if it is a government work, it might not be one which is excluded from copyright by the country's laws). If the work is not in public domain, or when there's doubt, you may want to contact the administrator of the website and ask them to clarify its copyright status; once the copyright holder is known, you may ask them to release the work under a free license or into public domain. (A free license must permit third-party commercial use and creation of derivative works.) See the guideline onrequesting copyright permission. -Mike Rosoft (talk)07:35, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@Mike Rosoft: Thanks for your attention to this matter. If we and also administrator of the website don't know the copyright holder of a photo, what should we do for upload this photo in commons?
AliAkar (talk)08:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hey AliAkar! Please keepindenting in discussion pages so that one can follow the discussion. As you see, you did not respect this in theDYK discussion page. ThanksMhhossein (talk)03:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that quotations from citations must be copiedexactly and not altered in any way. This is a rule in Wikipedia - seeWP:MOSQUOTE. I have mentioned this twice in the edit summaries and once on the Talk page, but you are still altering quotations! Please could you remember this rule and keep to it! ~P-123 (talk)09:32, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 | On25 January 2015,Did you know was updated with a fact from the articleHassan Tehrani Moghaddam, which you recently nominated. The fact was... that the Iranian missile architectHassan Tehrani Moghaddam was known as the father of Iran's missile program? The nomination discussion and review may be seen atTemplate:Did you know nominations/Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page(here's how,live views,daily totals), and it may be added tothe statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on theDid you know talk page. |
Harriastalk01:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware thatWikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of thethree-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block,breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to ablock.If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. Thanks.Ism schism (talk)13:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAhmad Keshvari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Keshvari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedAhmad Keshvari, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesMig andKurdistan conflict. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! Thank you foryour contributions toWikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary(Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.Thanks!220ofBorg08:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 | The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for creating the page for Ahmad Keshvari! God bless!Strivingsoul (talk)16:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
Sorry, but after working very hard to copyedit this article I'm running into edit conflicts; it's too unstable to copyedit at this time. Feel free to re-request a copyedit when things settle down. All the best,Miniapolis22:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isReally need to topic ban AliAkar from Jews and Judaism. Thank you.Ian.thomson (talk)19:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello AliAkar, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition toAhmad Motevaselian has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material withoutpermission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must beblocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.GabrielF (talk)21:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See theArticle Wizard.
A tag has been placed onJewish Supremacism (My Awakening to the Jewish Question), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under thecriteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please readthe general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well asthe guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visitthe page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and addcitations from independentreliable sources to ensure that the page will beverifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Ian.thomson (talk)08:01, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)09:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition toUser:AliAkar/Jewish Supremacism (My Awakening to the Jewish Question) has been removed, as it appears to have addedcopyrighted material to Wikipedia withoutpermission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please readWikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source ofinformation, but not as a source ofcontent, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing.You appear to have copied at least some of the text froma review of the book which appears on the author's website.Psychonaut (talk)11:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It also appears that you copied or moved text fromBasij intoList of Iranian commanders in the Iran–Iraq War, and fromAhmad Motevaselian intoList of people who disappeared mysteriously. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing doesrequire that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.Psychonaut (talk)11:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen |talk15:58, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]A discussion is taking place as to whether the articlePaul Sprachman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Sprachman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ●MehranDebate●06:55, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]