User talk:80.235.139.234
Page contents not supported in other languages.
To edit, pleaselog in.Editing by unregistered users from your sharedIP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if yousign in with an account. If you are currently blocked fromcreating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions atWikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Pleaseuse an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check onthis list that theusername you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.
2025.
Hello, I'mWaxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Tim Draxl, but you didn't provide areliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content beverifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your changewith a citation, your edit is archived in thepage history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Waxworker (talk)11:48, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mMaterialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one ofyour recent contributions—specificallythis edit toLincoln Younes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse or theHelp desk. Thanks.Materialscientist (talk)10:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mWaxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Bebe Bettencourt, but you didn't provide areliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content beverifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your changewith a citation, your edit is archived in thepage history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Waxworker (talk)13:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did atJames Frecheville, without citing areliable source. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you.Waxworker (talk)13:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atKangaroo Jack, you may beblocked from editing.Waxworker (talk)13:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time youdisrupt Wikipedia.Larry Hockett (Talk)15:15, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?15:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] Hello, I'mIgor123121. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Kangaroo Jack, but you didn't provide areliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content beverifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your changewith a citation, your edit is archived in thepage history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Igor123121 (talk)09:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mIgor123121. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toPeter Pan (2003 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse or theHelp desk. Thanks.Igor123121 (talk)09:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or significantly change content without citingverifiable andreliable sources, as you did withthis edit toDot and the Kangaroo (film). Before making any potentially controversialedits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines atWikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.Materialscientist (talk)11:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atTim Draxl, you may beblocked from editing.Faster than Thunder (talk |contributions)Tamil speakers: Contribute here15:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell |Penny for your thoughts?16:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)12:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ser!(chat to me -see my edits)11:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply] Hello, I'mLizardJr8. I noticed that you made a change to an article,Street Sharks, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like toinclude a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.LizardJr8 (talk)13:39, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 80.235.139.234! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version ofTim Draxl. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia'sedit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on articletalk pages in order to try to reach aconsensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement atTalk:Tim Draxl, please use one of thedispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. RBarr-12@wiki:~/user/talk/contribs$ 14:26, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war, according to the reverts you've made toTeagan Croft. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected tocollaborate with others, avoid editingdisruptively, andtry to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.
Important points to note:
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article'stalk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate torequest temporary page protection.If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may beblocked from editing. RBarr-12@wiki:~/user/talk/contribs$ 14:39, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
