This user may have left Wikipedia. JoeSperrazza has not edited Wikipediasince 26 March 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Please post comments about thecontent of a specific article on the Talk page of that articleif it is relevant to all editors.

To Leave a New Message Please clickhere to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes ("~~~~") and use colons (":") forindentation when responding to prior comments. Thanks.

I prefer to maintain the continuity of threads by keeping them in a single location when possible. If you post a message here I will almost certainly reply here. If I've left a message on your user talk I will watch your page for any reply.

Archives

2009 Archive 2010 Archive 2011 Archive 2012 Archive 2013 Archive 2014 Archive

Done - disambiguated toTowanda Township, Bradford County, Pennsylvania]
The following discussion has been closed.Please do not modify it.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedWyalusing, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageTowanda Township. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Done - disambiguated toTowanda Township, Bradford County, Pennsylvania]JoeSperrazza (talk)12:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

is a good example of fair-mindedness - obviously, since you agreed with me :-) Actually, it really is.Guy(Help!)22:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!JoeSperrazza (talk)22:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joe - This is to truly THANK YOU (see below). To get going after the recent turmoil, I have updated and submitted "neovandalism" project as final for review, assuming it will eventually be deleted, and happy to accept any outcome, and added the note: "This project was discussed heavily both now and 3 years ago. I agree it is a highly controversial topic and may be perceived with high level of sensitivity, and understand that it is high risk for deletion, and I am happy to accept the outcome trusting the judgement by balanced and fair editors such as C.Fred and JoeSperrazza. Thank you for the opportunity.". I am still working on the BO-diabetes project and have already revised it rather extensively and will try to prove its notability and exceptional significance in a few days and will submit. I wished more WP editors were like you, Joe and Fred, and thanks.S.Burntout123 (talk)20:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	A true thank you for supporting ordinary users during challenging times S.Burntout123 (talk)04:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	In appreciation of your vigilance and concern for the treatment of Wikipedia editors/users!Iryna Harpy (talk)23:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JoeSperrazza. I truly appreciate your removal of the vitriolic personal attack on my own talk, but I don't delete comments there as I prefer to have them archived for future reference should there be an incidence in the future where it may be useful to retain instances of language usage, and any other tell-tale signs that the same user has returned (should there be need of an SPI, for example).

I am, however, very grateful for your concern and decency, and am more than happy for you to revert vandalism to my actual user page. Cheers for your considerate removal of the offensive comment. I'm sure that a lot of editors (particularly newcomers) would be happy to know that an experienced editor is looking out for them. --Iryna Harpy (talk)23:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed.Please do not modify it.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you toreview other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located atSpecial:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located atSpecial:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also: Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.—MusikAnimaltalk23:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello, thank you very much for your kind message. Actually I'm not fluent in English (I'm French) and I will not be able to make many contributions. I did it only in very basic cases. Anyway I will try to do my best... with caution.thank you again,--Otto Didakt (talk)19:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Otto, you are very welcome. If you need anything, please contact me.JoeSperrazza (talk)20:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed.Please do not modify it.
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectWWE 2K (Mobile Game). Since you had some involvement with theWWE 2K (Mobile Game) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.RichardOSmith (talk)12:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for the notification, I replied there.JoeSperrazza (talk)12:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JoeSperrazza! We're officially kicking off theWikipedia:Labels campaign foredit quality. You should be able to load the interface by going toWikipedia:Labels and clicking "Install the gadget". Once you've installed the gadget, the "Install the gadget" button will be replaced by the "campaigns" listing where you can request worksets from "Edit quality (20k random sample, 2015)". The software is still a little rough around the edges. We'll be on the look-out for your bug reports & feature requests throughout the week. I'll post progress reports on thecampaign talk page. Thanks for your help and let me know if you have any questions. --EpochFail (talk •contribs)05:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user is a nightmare to WP, but still got lots of supporters ---@Ravensfire:@Nafsadh:@AsceticRose:

Result was Keep after being withdrawn
The following discussion has been closed.Please do not modify it.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDetective Willy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted. The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detective Willy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.De728631 (talk)18:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your good faith efforts on Jimbo's talk page and for being exceptional in your ability to adjust (and even apologize) after getting feedback from others. You have earned my support and respect! —Keithbob •Talk •15:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Save for reference
The following discussion has been closed.Please do not modify it.
Hello, JoeSperrazza, andwelcome to STiki! Thank you foryour recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over atthe STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks!West.andrew.g (developer) andWidr (talk)05:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe,

Looking at your recent revision of the page Be-Bop Deluxe... I wasn't sure whether your talk page was the right place to post, but I've posted here because I think this is probably more an issue of style than of content.

Firstly, thanks for cleaning up some references I've put in, great improvement.

Secondly, I've a query about another change you've made in the same edit.

Quote:

Latest revision as of 00:25, 15 June 2015:ten minute → ten-minute, 40 year → 40-year

I don't understand why you've added in the hyphens - I don't believe they should be there. Please explain why you believe they're needed. I'd like to know your reasons.

(I'm not going to hit undo as that would lose the cleaning up of references you did, which is an improvement. But my gut feeling is, take these two hyphens out.)

Thanks,

Alterations (talk)01:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the very nice note. Seehttp://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/hyphen, rule 4:

Rule 4. Hyphens are often used to tell the ages of people and things. A handy rule, whether writing about years, months, or any other period of time, is to use hyphens unless the period of time (years, months, weeks, days) is written in plural form

This seems to apply to the examples given. These rules are just one of many documented atWikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/TyposJoeSperrazza (talk)01:35, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Joe, thanks for this.

I stand corrected; one lives and learns.

I subsequently spotted another 40 year you missed, in the discography; have now hyphenated that too.

Alterations (talk)08:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

... with the whole pile of nonsense associated with editing here. Disruptive editors get treated very sensitively (I guessWP:AGF is a suicide pact), but trying to help gets you criticism. Why do I bother?JoeSperrazza (talk)02:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're fed up, but thought you might be interested inthis edit.32.218.36.31 (talk)14:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, boy.@OrangeMike: This is very disappointing. TheWP:ANI discussion has sputtered out, but this edit is another example ofPackerfansam (talk ·contribs ·deleted contribs ·nuke contribs ·logs ·filter log ·block user ·block log) using a misleading edit summary to remove sourced religious information from an article:

Edit summaryportion replaced with sculpture parks

Prior version:

There are several otherhistorical cemeteries in Omaha, historicalJewish synagogues and historicalChristian churches dating from the pioneer era, as well.

New version:

The city's pioneering history is celebrated at two sculpture parks, Pioneer Courage and Spirit of Nebraska's Wilderness.^[1]

References

1. ^Sculpture Parks. Retrieved 6/22/15.

Help!JoeSperrazza (talk)15:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And another one:[5]32.218.36.31 (talk)16:05, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For anyone looking here, being discussed at the editors talk page:

• User_talk:Packerfansam#Omaha
• User_talk:Packerfansam#Cornish_politicians
• User_talk:Packerfansam#Continuing_to_create_problem_stubs_vs._cleanup

JoeSperrazza (talk)01:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think that's just a repost of the very same Wikipedia article. There's really no source for it that I can find. The sentence wasadded in 2008 by an IP out of Fort Myers, Florida. Maybe just a bit of boosterism there.JohnInDC (talk)16:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that might be the case, but didn't check the timestamps. I thought it might be the reverse. On a related note, I'm not too pleased to haveWP:HOUND thrown around, but the editor's talk page is the wrong place to discuss (if at all). I reiterate my "I'm fed up" comment from earlier on my talk page. But I do thank you for trying to do the right thing. You, I and the 33 IP, along with others (e.g., RFD) have all been working to improve the articles and find a way to suggest, plead, cajole, and almost beg the editor to improve. Having only looked at their last 500 or so edits, I can't say how far back the problem goes, but I'm concerned it goes back farther than the beginning of May. Hopefully, editors who routinely work in that area will have some time to look and fix things. I had thought we could get improvements on the new stubs being created, but I've lost hope. I don't pretend to understand other's motivations, nor why accusations of bad faith are being thrown at us (which are themselves in bad faith). Simultaneously we're trying to fix things, explain things, and debate other editors who seem to be, sometimes, shooting from the hip (inasmuch as some, clearly, have not read the links to the things on which they comment). As I said, when you add to that the general incivility of some editors and the constant barrage of socks, I am fed up.JoeSperrazza (talk)17:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't let it get to you! My experience on the whole is that the community susses out problem editors sooner or later. Like you I am a bit mystified in this instance - the problem seems so abundantly clear, and the editor so determinedly clueless, that meaningful improvement seems like a pipe dream. And it's not like my concerns were shouted down in ANI - there were lots of folks calling for an indef block. So yeah, I'm frustrated too, but figure either 1) I've pegged it right, in which case eventually the right thing will happen; or 2) I'm wrong and things will be fine. The third option - I'm right and everyone is is wrong and the encylopedia will suffer as a result - well, I encounter it so infrequently that I'm willing to wait a bit longer to see how it sorts out. The intimations of bad faith (from real editors as opposed to vandals and sock puppets) are kind of unfamiliar and unwelcome territory for me but there too I figure the best way to show it is to acquiesce for a while. If the problem persists in a real way, it will be easy to revisit. And if not, then we were statesmanlike. Win-win, eh?JohnInDC (talk)17:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well said, my new found friend, and thanks for making me laugh. I have decided I'm done with editing on any of those topics, and am going to clear them from my watchlist. Certainly I agree that it is either 1) or 2). I am surprised and disappointed that other editors (none newbies, some with considerable tenure) chose to respond they way they did on an obviously troubled (I don't mean that on a personal basis, just regarding their contributions) editor's talk page. It turned into the kind of drama-fests that make me avoidWP:ANI whenever I can. Hopefully, IP 33 can continue to chip away at fixing new contributions of that editor. As for the old ones, well, they'll either come to light some day and be fixed, or they won't. Thanks again for the nice note. Best regards,JoeSperrazza (talk)17:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on the Sunny Side32.218.38.92 (talk)19:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A minor update. I was a day or so away from dropping you a note to observe that the problematic edits had ended, and suggesting that perhaps we had, in fact, been overzealous. Today however broughtthis edit to Eau Claire, Wisconsin, removing a comprehensive list of churches (including a synagogue and LDS Temple) as unsourced, and substituting a sourced / wikilinked list describing 5 Christian denominations in town. The longer listwas unsourced, but the effort that went into building the list of major Christian churches could have as easily been directed toward filling in sources for the others, rather than deleting it wholesale. (I found sources for four or five of the more obscure ones as an easy starter.) I learned my lesson with the Naples painting here, which is that if she makes what looks like a biased edit but offers up a technically correct justification, I'm going to fix the bias but make sure the restoration is within WP policies. I plan to continue in that way for the time being. That way the encyclopedia is improved; and, as I said above, if in fact a pattern of biased editing re-emerges, we can raise it again.JohnInDC (talk)21:59, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, and good approach. Thanks, and happy July 4th!JoeSperrazza (talk)01:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for editing the page, I recently went to the Crewe heritage center and asked about the class 87. They told me that the traction motors had been robbed last year and vandalized the whole train that is very sad. I thought it would be a good idea to put this on the wiki to tell people that the train was hopeless of ever working again. I would really appreciate if you included this in the wiki to let people know the current condition of class 87035. Sorry for taking so long to reply and i hope you can make these changes if you don't that is fine by me.

Thanks cdgames— Precedingunsigned comment added byCdgames (talk •contribs)12:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,@Cdgames:, and thanks for the note. I see the edit to which you refer[6]. Can you help find a reference to this in the news or something? If so, as I now understand it, it sounds like it may be a worthwhile addition to the article. Thanks again for getting in touch with me. Best regards,JoeSperrazza (talk)13:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again I have been to the heritage centre recently and I have confirmed that the traction motors have robbed but only a few parts not the whole traction motor also other electrical parts. Apparently the throttle of the traction motors was stolen and sadly they as well said that 87035 has no chance of working ever again. I could not find anything on the news or around the internet about it only the staff know. Anyway I hope this is enough info to add this careless and sad robbery to the page.

thanks cdgames— Precedingunsigned comment added byCdgames (talk •contribs)11:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joesperrazza.... I dont know how to deorphan a profile. Could you help me out with an example? After searching on the internet i found out to deorphan you must link the wiki page in other pages. If possible jus give me an example. Would help alot. Thank you

117.253.199.73 (talk)11:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joesperrazza.... I dont know how to deorphan a profile. Could you help me out with an example? After searching on the internet i found out to deorphan you must link the wiki page in other pages. If possible jus give me an example. Would help alot. Thank you:Cambite01 (talk)11:51, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,@Cambite01:. I believe you received an answer atUser_talk:I_dream_of_horses#Orphan_Page regardingNavaneeth Unnikrishnan, but I'll elaborate:

1. Don't be overly concerned about anorphan tag. It is there to let editors know that, at the moment,other articles in WP don't link to that article.
2. To find relevant articles in which to add a link toNavaneeth Unnikrishnan, consider looking at linked articles. Example: Perhaps add him toThalassery#Notable_residents.

Best regards,JoeSperrazza (talk)13:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You probably don't want to change "movie" to "movi.e." as you didhere. You might want to seeWikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 138#Protecting an entire article against automatic spell-miscorrection.CambridgeBayWeather,Uqaqtuq (talk),Sunasuttuq02:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! What a dufus edit. Sorry I missed it. Thanks for the link.JoeSperrazza (talk)02:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe! I've also fixed the similar issues fromthis edit. Could you please look through your recent contributions to see if there are any others that need to be fixed? Thanks!GoingBatty (talk)03:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! Will do.JoeSperrazza (talk)06:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Anotherclown (talk)05:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this text fromGregorian_calendar#Months_of_the_year:

Numerical methods were described in the ''Journal of the Department of Mathematics,'' Open University, in 1997 and 1998.<ref>Journal of the Department of Mathematics, '''M500''' (ed. A D Forbes) Issue 157 (September 1997) p. 21, Issue 160 (February 1998) pp. 19 - 20 (contains typographical errors), and Issue 161 (April 1998) p. 21. The M500 Society, Open University, Milton Keynes, England. ISSN 1350-8539.</ref>

When you look into it, you'll see that the so-called "Journal of the Department of Mathematics" is neither a journal nor a reliable source. Per the publisher,M500 Society it is a collection ofWP:SPS. The text also appears to beirresistable for certainLondon areaanonymous editors:

The M500 Society began in 1973 as a self-help group for Open University maths students in Southampton.

In the early days of the OU there was very little contact between students other than at their own tutorial group meetings, which often only took place during the teaching periods of the school or university in which they were held.

Before students had personal computers and the various forms of electronic communication that they now use to communicate with each other and OU staff, the Society compiled and published the names, addresses and current courses of students willing to help other students with their studies. These lists were mailed out with a magazine containing articles, comments, puzzles, reviews and news submitted by members.

Now there are members throughout Britain and in many other countries across the world and, although we no longer publish student contact details, the magazine is still going strong.

The M500 Magazine

This is published free to all M500 members six times a year.It still contains articles, comments, puzzles, reviews and news submitted by members. It is aimed at all levels of mathematical attainment from Foundation to Postgraduate.

JoeSperrazza (talk) 12:10 am, Today (UTC−4)

P.S. A formatting error occurred whenever I pasted the above into thearticle talk page. Thus, I posted it here.JoeSperrazza (talk)14:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain the script error that was being caused by the legitimate template you just removed. Then lets fix this so the template can be returned.Trackinfo (talk)16:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I just happened to look at the article, and noticed that it stated "Script Error", in red, at the top of the article, and for every reference (except the first one, oddly). I tried undoing the most recent change (yours, I'm afraid), and the error went away. Your addition seemed perfectly fine, otherwise.

Following your note, I went and looked at the prior version (i.e., your edit's version), here:[8]. This suggests:

1. There was something wrong with {{Footer US NC 1500m Women}} that has suddenly been fixed
2. There was something transiently wrong somewhere else that is now fixed (note I did briefly check a random article and didn't see the same script error).

So, based on the above, I just reverted my revert. Who knows what was wrong before, but there was an error.

Thanks,

JoeSperrazza (talk)16:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I politely ask to stop the action of this bot inserting a comma after each "therefore" (at the beginning of a sentence?). This is inappropriate for formulating immediate, logical consequences. I encountered the second occurence of this effect in one day inJerk (physics), the other was in a logic-page. One could consider this as vandalizing. Regards.Purgy (talk)17:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you and he havesomething in common, and you could be friends? -2601:42:C100:9D83:B1BB:193D:AAF6:31A4 (talk)17:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no hate, sorry if you feel that's the thing. Since you asked:

• I'm totally cool with Wiki criticism. I've seen some good things done by you at WO. Sometimes, you do come across in a bad way, but I can't be the first person to mention that to you.
• While I'm firmly in theWP:BMB camp, I know that JimboTalk provides leeway. On-topic, genuine posts (even snarky one's pushing a WO blog entry) are OK. TPO, despite you flogging it at WO, seems pretty off-topic here. YMMV.

As for Bear Creek Camp Conservation Area, I don't think I've ever been anywhere near it (there's aBear Creek Lake in CO I've likely been near, as I used to live west of there for many years, so for a moment I was surprised, as I thought you meant that). ISTR you are in the PA area. I did recently finish a multi-month assignment in Central PA, and have some family north and south of Central PA, but my knowledge, let alone experience, in that area is pretty limited.

Regards,JoeSperrazza (talk)17:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your thoughtful reply. Sorry, I blindly assumed you were the Joseph Sperrazza from Jenkin Township, PA, but then saw that there are plenty of other individuals named Joe Sperrazza out there. I'm in a pickle as regards Jimbo, because he says publicly that I should maybe "e-mail him", but then he has told me in the past "never e-mail me again". I'm working on a story about TPO that should be fairly interesting, including a segment on one company subcontractor having been presided over by a former FBI suspect in a money laundering sting at a strip club he night-managed. And that happens to dovetail with a "right to be forgotten" situation with a metro newspaper, another item on which Jimmy Wales is regarded as a global expert. But, if Jimbo won't discuss with me, it's difficult to allow him fair response before the story is published. -2601:42:C100:9D83:95EB:91F:6010:83B4 (talk)19:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Joe Sperrazza's in the world, there are more than one would think. I am believer in full transparency on-wiki (and don't agree with WMF on anonymous editing, but I'm a nobody, so have no traction on this issue). I don't hide who I am, but don't feel the need to publish my address (lol). I used to have a badge on my user page indicating I'm originally from Maryland (I seem to have removed it, as I no longer live there).

Regarding the situation with Jimbo, I have two thoughts:

• For the article you are writing, you could have your editor (if there is someone in that position for wherever you plan to publish) contact him via email. Not being any more than a life-long reader of newspapers, I can't say what a reasonable timeframe or process would be to wait for a reply before publishing.
• Theelephant in the room, of course, is the history between you and Jimbo. I don't need to detail it (I don't know it that well), but, to me, it seems (a) you feel you have been personally wronged, but (b) he feels you are unreasonably obsessed with him, and that your attention makes him uncomfortable. Various people at WP fall in one or the other of those camps. There seems to be information supporting both points of view. Regardless, I think you would accept your approach with respect to Jimbo and WP is considered to be that of agadfly, i.e., "someone who persistently challenges people in positions of power", with the person in power you most frequently challenge being Jimbo. The challenge for you, I think, is that your observations and criticism are clearly considered by some (if not many in the WP hierarchy of authority) to be tainted and diminished by a personal agenda. Sometimes, your postings to Jimbotalk reinforces that point of view. Even your work on "creative vandalism", which was interesting and did, as I recall, get some press, was surely considered by some to be driven by your conflict with Jimbo and not by any desire to objectively identify and report on a genuine issue within WP.

I have no clue how to best move forward regarding the second point. I apologize if anything I said, above, was offensive in any way.

Kindest regards,JoeSperrazza (talk)20:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe, re the tag onUser:86.181.243.0. This IP locates to an entirely different continent from the sockmaster. I'm pretty sure this is just a troll. I suggest you remove the tag. Best,Voceditenore (talk)08:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ThanksJoeSperrazza (talk)08:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JoeSperrazza. We have added you to the list of clerks and subscribed you to the mailing list (info:WP:AC/C#clerks-l). Welcome, and I look forward to working with you! To adjust your subscription options for the mailing list, see the link atmail:clerks-l. The mailing list works in the usual way, and the address to which new mailing list threads can be sent isclerks-llists.wikimedia.org. Useful reading for new clerks is the procedures page,WP:AC/C/P, but you will learn all the basic components of clerkingon-the-job.

New clerks begin as a trainee, are listed as such atWP:AC/C#Personnel, and will remain so until they have learned all the aspects of the job. When you've finished training, which usually takes a couple of/a few months, then we'll propose to the Committee that you be made a full clerk. As a clerk, you'll need to check your e-mail regularly, as the mailing list is where the clerks co-ordinate (on-wiki co-ordination page also exists but is not used nearly as much). If you've any questions at any point of your traineeship, simply post to the mailing list.

Lastly, it might be useful if you enter your timezone intoWP:AC/C#Personnel (in the same format as the other members have), so that we can estimate when we will have clerks available each day; this is, of course, at your discretion. Again, welcome! Regards,L235 (t /c /ping in reply)02:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I look forward to contributing. Best regards,JoeSperrazza (talk)03:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the clerks team,JoeSperrazza!Liz^Read!Talk!17:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for applying to become an SPI Clerk. At this time we have decided to take you on to theDecember 2015 training. Please watchlist the page and keep updated with it as time goes on. Thanks, --Amanda(aka DQ)19:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDJ Esco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please readthe guidelines on spam andWikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.Atlantic306 (talk)04:34, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to theUnited States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See morehere!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk)02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is currently arequest for approval of a bot to manage theAutoWikiBrowserCheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at theBRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may beuncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it atWP:PERM/AWB. Thank you!MediaWiki message delivery (talk)23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectChaaval. Since you had some involvement with theChaaval redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -CHAMPION^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)}02:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectNimbu. Since you had some involvement with theNimbu redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -CHAMPION^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)}00:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect2027 Cricket World Cup. Since you had some involvement with the2027 Cricket World Cup redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Tavix^(talk)02:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectAnde (food). Since you had some involvement with theAnde (food) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you have not already done so.Steel1943 (talk)17:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm reaching out to you because I saw that you signed up as a labelling volunteer atWikipedia:Labels/Edit quality. I'm starting a new project that builds on Edit quality, to predict Newcomer quality. That is, to predict the damagingness and goodfaithness of "sessions" (multiple related edits) of users within 1 day of their registration. With this AI trained, we could help automatically distinguish betewen productive and unproductive new users. If you wouldn't mind taking a look at this new labelling campaign and label a few sessions I would be very grateful. In addition if you have any feedback or discover any bugs in the process I would appreciate that too. You can find the project page atWikipedia:Labels/Newcomer_session_quality or go directly tolabels.wmflabs.org/ui/enwiki/ and look for the campaign titled "Newcomer Session quality (2018)". Thanks so much!

Maximilianklein (talk)20:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoeSperrazza. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties ofUnited States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented onWikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally,Colonial America, theConfederate States, theRepublic of Texas, multiplestates and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December,WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators onall Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receiveawards. Whether you want to claim theGold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited toparticipate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructionshere

Sent byZLEA at23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) viaMediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectThe Italian Job (2003 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theThe Italian Job (2003 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectMighty Joe Young (1998 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theMighty Joe Young (1998 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectSweet November (2001 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theSweet November (2001 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectScarecrow (1973 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theScarecrow (1973 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectThe Devil's Advocate (1997 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theThe Devil's Advocate (1997 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectSatisfaction (film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theSatisfaction (film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectThe Good Mother (1988 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theThe Good Mother (1988 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectBilly Bathgate (film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theBilly Bathgate (film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectSeven (1995 film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theSeven (1995 film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirectThe Cider House Rules (film) (film). Since you had some involvement with theThe Cider House Rules (film) (film) redirect, you might want to participate inthe redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards,SONIC67819:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirectHari-Faliyan. The discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 19#Hari-Faliyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Steel1943 (talk)02:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectAsc.edu and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Alabama Supercomputer Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.Graham8704:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAberdeen F.C. (disambiguation) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to thehistory of each individual page for details. Thanks,FastilyBot (talk)10:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAmin Khani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Khani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GoldenBootWizard276 (talk)11:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectEssex (whaleship has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Essex (whaleship until a consensus is reached.Utopes_{(talk /cont)}18:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please name Roks Munmu to the name Kors Munmo the great Change.Sobhanigd (talk)16:28, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoeSperrazza. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Single engine air tanker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again orrequest that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)01:07, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate inThe World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. I'm hoping to see some of our older stale US articles improved! Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦Dr. Blofeld20:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectMoongfali has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 30 § Moongfali until a consensus is reached.ArthananWarcraft (talk)07:22, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians who opt out of template messages

• Noindexed pages
• Pages with missing files