User talk:220.236.126.177
Page contents not supported in other languages.
This is youronly warning; if youvandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at2023 NRL Grand Final, you may beblocked from editing without further notice.Happily888 (talk)05:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:220.236.126.177 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: ). Thank you.Happily888 (talk)07:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk)13:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
220.236.126.177(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Admin~ ToBeFree already determined the block was to be lifted, you can't just overrule it. Lift this new one immediately.220.236.126.177 (talk)13:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You were unblocked with the understanding you'd ceaseedit warring. You specifically said, "Going forward if something I submit as an edit is deemed not useful there is obviously nothing I can do about it and will have to move on." Rather than doing that, you went right back to violatingWP:EW. The block from Bbb23 is for your behaviour after your previous unblock. Bbb23 is not reverting your unblock, he is placing a new block upon you. This is entirely appropriate.Yamla (talk)13:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
220.236.126.177(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Correction, entirely inappropriate. Reopening an already resolved dispute doesn't seem very fair. A long series of blocks have already been served, I'm not about to sit through another one. So again, you can lift this new one as it is in place under false pretenses.220.236.126.177 (talk)13:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
No, you can sit through another one. You violatedWP:EW and this is a new block.RickinBaltimore (talk)13:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
220.236.126.177(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If somebody were to take a look at contributions made since the most recent unblock rejection, contrary to what was previously stated, I have in fact been following disengagement and resolutions per article talk pages. For this reason I do not see why the 1 year ban should remain in place having followed what was agreed upon when I was already unblocked.220.236.112.225 (talk)07:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
You didn't disengage, if you had, you wouldn't have been blocked. This block is entirely appropriate.331dot (talk)08:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have extended the block due to the recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk)09:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And I have further extended it due to more recent evasion using49.3.90.116(talk ·contribs ·IP contribs ·WHOIS).Daniel Case (talk)22:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
