Thank you foryour contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text fromTed 2 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.DanCherek (talk)05:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits toPontiac G5 have been undone by an automated computer program calledClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very fewmistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, pleaseread about it,report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at theintroduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:Pontiac G5 waschanged by174.27.3.169(u)(t) ANN scored at 0.953851 on 2022-07-30T23:59:49+00:00

Thank you.ClueBot NG (talk)23:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stupid cluebot ng174.27.3.169 (talk)03:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. 174.27.3.169, you added a text, which is believed to be a vandalism. ClueBot NG automatically detected that vandalism and reverted it.95.134.111.98 (talk)12:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Completely unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:List of Caillou episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk)17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,174.27.3.169!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!KylieTastic (talk)17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!174.27.3.169 (talk)03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page should be redirected toLightyear (film) because the film is the fifth installment of theToy Story franchise. Also, theToy Story 4#Future says that "but Nielsen disclosed a possibility of a fifth film, as Pixar was not ruling out that possibility", meaning that Toy Story 5 is possible to be developed. Remember, it's justPOSSIBLE, not definite. Therefore, the redirectToy Story 5 should be temporally redirected toLightyear (film) instead ofToy Story 4#Future, until the official confirmation of Toy Story 5.137.189.90.241 (talk)06:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not gonna change it so thank you.174.27.3.169 (talk)16:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atIPhone 10. Your edits appear to constitutevandalism and have beenreverted. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in theloss of editing privileges. Thank you.CLYDEFRANKLIN16:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops!174.27.3.169 (talk)03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atFuturama: Bender's Big Score. Your edits appear to bedisruptive and have been or will bereverted.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges. Thank you.DonIago (talk)01:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text fromWindows 8.1 toDraft:Development of Windows 8.1. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in anedit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying andlinking to the copied page, e.g.,copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted{{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons atWikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.DanCherek (talk)01:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!174.27.3.169 (talk)03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

AfC is not for content split discussions - discuss on theWindows 8.1 talk page

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Development of Windows 8.1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk)17:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WAT THE?174.27.3.169 (talk)03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Windows 12 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk)01:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported byreliable sources.Reliable sources are required so that information can beverified. If you need help with referencing, please seeReferencing for beginners andCiting sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter and Instagram are notWP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Ted 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk)07:01, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting so old.................174.27.3.169 (talk)03:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Rio 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk)20:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not edit other user's sandboxes. If you want to experiment with edits, make an account and use your own.--Miamiheat631^Talk18:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mMeters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,Socks (cat), but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look atreferencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Meters (talk)03:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yo174.27.3.169 (talk)03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did atBuddy (dog). Your edits appear to bedisruptive and have been or will bereverted.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia'spolicies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result inloss of editing privileges.Please don't invent a new headline for a news article. It does not matter if you think it is not grammatical. The title of the article is what they used, not what you think it should have been.Meters (talk)03:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wat up174.27.3.169 (talk)03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an articlecontent dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or thearticle's talk page, and seekconsensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia'sdispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of therelevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia'sAdministrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did atSuper Why!, you may beblocked from editing.CodeTalker (talk)20:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What?174.27.3.169 (talk)03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed onDraft:PBS Kids Preschool Block requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done undersection G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following adeletion discussion, atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS Kids Preschool Block. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you maycontest the nomination byvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line withWikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact thedeleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a requesthere.DoubleGrazing (talk)05:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

nah.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at theArticles for creation help desk or useWikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic isnot sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk)05:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NaN174.27.3.169 (talk)03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of24 hours forabuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Yamla (talk)21:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stupid block notice174.27.3.169 (talk)03:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did withthis edit toWikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes.Adakiko (talk)00:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i won't.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were told 4 days not to edit other editors's sandboxes, but you have done so at least twice since then,here andhere. If you continue this behavior, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.CodeTalker (talk)00:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what the heck.174.27.3.169 (talk)03:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 174.27.3.169, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion ofDraft:Wild Animal Baby Explorers, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a validspeedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review theCriteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.BangJan199901:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes174.27.3.169 (talk)03:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Windows 93 is in no way an appropriate article to merge toWindows 95. It is a parody website that is not associated with Microsoft or the Windows operating systems. And your request to merge itwithout copying any of the content makes no sense. That's not what a merge is. If you thinkWindows 93 should be deleted then take the article to AFD. This is such a bad merge proposal that I can't tell whether you are trolling or simply incompetent to be making a merge proposal. Istrongly suggest that you withdraw your inappropriate merge proposal.

Oh, and if you ever do propose another merge, you must tagboth articles.Meters (talk)07:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why?174.27.3.169 (talk)03:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of48 hours forabuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Yamla (talk)21:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!174.27.3.169 (talk)02:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of2 weeks forabuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please take this time to decide if you wish to start adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including but most certainly not limited to,WP:COPYRIGHT. --Yamla (talk)01:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please change the blocking thing from 6 months to 1 month.174.27.3.169 (talk)01:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!174.27.3.169 (talk)15:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of6 months forabuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read theguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at theArticles for creation help desk or useWikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chess was: This submission iscontrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a pretty clear failure ofWP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. Wikipedia is not a website for unverified product rumours about future versions of Windows. Reading the sources, there's no real information about Windows 12. It hasn't even been announced yet. I'll quote the relevant paragraph of the linked policy here:

Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. Although Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products,short articles that consist of only product announcement information and rumors are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable.

Bold is from the original, italics are mine.

Chess (talk)(please use{{reply to|Chess}} on reply)23:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Development of Windows 8.1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)18:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:PBS Kids Preschool Block, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)10:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

tank you174.27.21.219 (talk)01:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Development of Windows 8.1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!17:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Sausage Party 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)04:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Ted 3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)17:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Sausage Party 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!03:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Ted 3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!16:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC