Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User:Scott Burley/dash

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    <User:Scott Burley

    Page edit suggestions:User:Scott Burley/suggest

    User:Xenocidic/dashboard/usersUser:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

    Immediate requestsEntries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages0
    Wikipedians looking for help0
    ...from administrators1
    Requests for unblock56
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests2
    Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests20
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests58
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests2
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests242
    Requested RD1 redactions22
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations2
    Candidates for speedy deletion32
    Open sockpuppet investigations53
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    Purge the cache of this page

    Administrative backlog

    [edit]

    WP:AIV

    Reports

    [edit]

    Bot-reported

    [edit]
    Appears to be a false positive.PhilKnight (talk) 12:44, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    User-reported

    [edit]

    CSD /PRODs

    [edit]
    Candidates for speedy deletionEntries
    Attack pages0
    Copyright violations2
    Hoaxes0
    Vandalism2
    User requested4
    Empty articles0
    Nonsense pages0
    Spam pages9
    LLM pages0
    Importance or significance not asserted1
    Possibly contested candidates9
    Other candidates14
    		The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion foraround 7 days:

    WP:UAA /WP:RFPP

    [edit]
    Usernames for administrator attention


    User-reported

    [edit]
    Requests for page protection


    Currentrequests for increase in protection level

    [edit]
    Requestaddition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
    Placerequests for protection increases at theBOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check thearchive of requests or thepage history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Extended confirmed protection: Persistent addition of unsourced cast after extended-confirmed protection expired.Media Mender (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Socks and logged-out editors repeatedly re-adding the same unsourced original research about how TikTok is "Neo-Libertarian Falangism" despite multiple requests for a citation. •a frantic turtle 🐢 14:23, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistentblock evasion.CFA 15:38, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Frequent vandalism from anonymous/non-participating editors due to past association with extremist entities & his informant role within said organization. Additionally, the subject is controversial within the MMA world, attracting negative attention from UFC fans.30Four (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite pending changes: Persistentvandalism.Theknoledgeableperson (|have a chat) 19:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    Moved fromWP:RPPD.Zinnober9 (talk) 21:24, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Theknoledgeableperson: Are you asking for removal of semi-protection? I don't see any vandalism.@Zinnober9: This page is semi-protected, so pending would be a reduction, no?Sdrqaz (talk) 04:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    @Sdrqaz I regularly see "Persistent vandalism" as the comment for waylaid increase requests in RPPD, usually from Twinkle placed requests, so with that history at RPPD (by anyone, not specifically Theknoledgeableperson), I automatically thought this was an increase request in the wrong place. The lack of a padlock icon was also supportive of this viewpoint. I admit I failed to look at the page history, and see now where it is quiet (filter log as well). But if it is a very quiet recent history, why the typical RPPI comment of "persistent vandalism" and not something more conducive to lowering language that doesn't automatically lead the reader to think the page needs an increase of a protection and got misplaced? I fully own the error of moving if it is indeed a decrease request, but the language of "Persistent vandalism" is at face-value, contradictory to a RPPD request in my way of thinking. Regardless, apologies for any error I caused in this potential misread.Zinnober9 (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Declined I'll chime in here...if it is a request to up protection: there's no disruption which would warrant it. If it is a request to downgrade it: the repeated request for edits on article talk makes me think this isn't a good idea.Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry.45dogs (they/them)(talk page) 00:30, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry.ChildrenWillListen (🐄 talk,🫘 contribs) 02:19, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection.Lectonar (talk) 12:44, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content.Waxworker (talk) 03:04, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing by an IP:1,2,3.Anbarasan1523 (talk) 03:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: High level of editing using onlyWP:ABOUTSELF sources form possible sock puppet accounts.Andwats (talk) 04:06, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Just like to add this aBLP and political candidate.Andwats (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms ofdispute resolution. This would need to be fully protected, as almost all involved are ec-users; we aren't there yet. Fwiw, I see more or less normal editing, and disagreements about content. If you really think there are sockpuppet accounts at work, please file aSPI.Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired.Waxworker (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Vandalism war.MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 07:09, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition ofunsourced or poorly sourced content – Two temp accounts, but likely the same person.Wikishovel (talk) 07:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection. FWIW the temp accounts look probably unrelated.Giraffer (talk) 12:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: It’s getting vandalized because the article is about the Kurdish people~2025-35960-99 (talk) 07:40, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection.Lectonar (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: His wife posted on Facebook that he has died. No third party references for this yet.Karst (talk) 11:10, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection.Giraffer (talk) 12:27, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Currentrequests for reduction in protection level

    [edit]
    Requestremoval of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

    Before posting arequest for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

    To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the"View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words"protected","changed protection level", or"configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

    DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

    • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
      • If you can edit the article's talk page, use theWP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of theexact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
      • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change atWikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
    • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
    • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
    • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

    You may request a protection reduction below if...

    • ...you want to change the protection level of atemplate ormodule fromfull protection totemplate protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
    • ...you need to removecreation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after adraft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
    • ...you are proposing atrial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years,provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
    • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

    If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the requestarchives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

    Indefinite pending changes: Persistentvandalism.Theknoledgeableperson (|have a chat) 19:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    I made the right call this username is trying to lower the protection.~2025-36016-43 (talk) 04:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    (Discussion present atRequests_for_page_protection/Increase#Sulaiman_Al-Fahim for which board this request goes, RPPI/D).
    Thank you temp editor. It is possible I've erred in moving this to RPPI, but the request's language is more common of a misplaced RPPI than an RPPD, and Twinkle placed requests do get mis-sent every so often. OP has been pinged for clarification at the moved request linked above. And apologies to all if I did err.Zinnober9 (talk) 06:12, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    Currentrequests for edits to a protected page

    [edit]
    Request aspecific edit be made to a protected page
    Please add an edit request to thetalk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here

    Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page isalso protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

    Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.

    Further information:Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Handled requests

    [edit]

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found atWikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Protected edit requests

    2protected edit requests
    PageTagged sinceProtection levelLast protection log entry
    Template:Yesno (request)2025-11-19 17:05Cascade-protected fromWikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content(log)FromWikipedia/Protected templates: Protected byRich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
    MediaWiki:Bad image list (request)2025-11-21 04:01MediaWiki page(log)Protected byRedwolf24 on 2005-10-23: "Like all pages in the MediaWiki: space"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:11, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    62template-protected edit requests
    PageTagged sinceProtection levelLast protection log entry
    Template:Hidden archive top (request)2025-08-03 09:01Template-protected(log)Modified byMike V on 2014-08-01: "Highly visible template: perWP:RFPP request"
    Template:Afd2 (request)2025-08-20 19:47Template-protected(log)Modified byFuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
    Template:Edit COI (request)2025-08-21 00:54Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Request edit: Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Legend (request)2025-08-23 01:36Template-protected(log)Modified byWOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Old XfD multi (request)2025-08-30 10:05Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Old AfD multi: Modified byCallanecc on 2014-03-27: "Highly visible template: Over 80000 transclusions, allowing template editors"
    Template:Afd-merged-from (request)2025-08-30 10:07Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Image frame (request)2025-08-31 18:04Template-protected(log)Modified byPppery on 2025-03-09: ""
    Template:Talk quote inline (request)2025-09-02 13:34Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Talk quotation: Modified byKrakatoaKatie on 2016-06-02: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Infobox automobile (request)2025-09-02 22:17Template-protected(log)Modified byPlastikspork on 2015-12-27: "Highly visible template"
    Template:WikiProject cleanup listing (request)2025-09-03 23:31Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Search box (request)2025-09-04 00:25Template-protected(log)Protected byCallanecc on 2014-02-05: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Infobox baseball biography (request)2025-09-07 01:00Template-protected(log)Modified byCourcelles on 2015-09-21: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Strongbad (request)2025-09-08 08:53Template-protected(log)Modified byEdokter on 2014-05-04: ""
    Module:College color (request)2025-09-08 17:04Template-protected(log)Protected byThe Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
    User:AmandaNP/UAA/Whitelist (request)2025-09-10 17:06Template-protected(log)Modified byAmandaNP on 2020-07-24: "Try Template editor per main blacklist page"
    Template:Tree list/styles.css (request)2025-09-14 00:34Template-protected(log)Protected byYmblanter on 2018-07-26: "Highly visible template: RFPP request"
    Template:Infobox company/styles.css (request)2025-09-19 07:17Template-protected(log)Protected byIzno on 2024-08-25: "Highly visible template, match parent"
    Template:AfC submission/draft (request)2025-09-19 18:42Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:AFC submission/draft: Modified byMark Arsten on 2013-10-17: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Module:College color/data (request)2025-09-22 05:18Template-protected(log)Modified byGalobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Country showdata (request)2025-09-25 18:30Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Tracked (request)2025-10-02 21:38Template-protected(log)Modified byMr. Stradivarius on 2014-10-02: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
    Module:Section link (request)2025-10-07 21:49Template-protected(log)Protected byMr. Stradivarius on 2014-12-09: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:Infobox (request)2025-10-14 19:52Template-protected(log)Modified byAndrew Gray on 2017-02-15: "Degrade to template permission per request, in line withWP:PP"
    Template:Album chart (request)2025-10-18 02:45Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
    Template:Param value (request)2025-10-20 09:19Template-protected(log)Protected byMusikBot II on 2023-07-29: "High-risk template or module: 134494 transclusions (more info)"
    Template:Canadian party colour (request)2025-10-23 01:17Template-protected(log)Modified byMSGJ on 2018-03-24: "reinstate template protection"
    Module:Infobox gene (request)2025-10-24 07:27Template-protected(log)Modified byGorillaWarfare on 2018-05-12: "Highly visible template"
    Module:IPA/data (request)2025-10-24 19:36Template-protected(log)Protected byFavonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested atWP:RFPP"
    Template:Infobox legislative election (request)2025-10-25 19:54Template-protected(log)Protected byNumber 57 on 2020-04-13: "High use template, recent additions messing things up"
    Template:Infobox racing driver (request)2025-10-26 17:44Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Polparty (request)2025-10-26 18:22Template-protected(log)Modified byWOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Infobox drug (request)2025-10-27 22:30Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Drugbox: Modified byMark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Further (request)2025-10-28 00:12Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Further: Modified byMr. Stradivarius on 2014-05-05: "High-risk Lua module: allow template editors"
    Template:Infobox election (request)2025-10-29 13:56Template-protected(log)Modified byXaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
    Template:WikiProject Anime and manga (request)2025-10-29 20:01Template-protected(log)Modified byRenamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-12-01: "Highly visible template"
    Template:AfC submission (request)2025-10-29 20:07Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:AFC submission: Modified byMark Arsten on 2013-10-17: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Committed identity (request)2025-10-30 07:31Template-protected(log)Protected byXaosflux on 2017-06-28: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Infobox Wikipedia user (request)2025-10-30 13:06Template-protected(log)Modified bySamsara on 2017-01-13: "lowering move prot to tp, in line with current policy"
    Template:Track listing (request)2025-11-01 21:29Template-protected(log)Modified byWOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Policy (request)2025-11-02 14:49Template-protected(log)Modified byPppery on 2025-08-03: "Locking down all templates used onWikipedia:Copyrights to at least TPE"
    Module:Storm categories (request)2025-11-04 15:58Template-protected(log)Modified byBusterD on 2022-04-12: "Highly visible template; requested atWP:RfPP"
    Template:Infobox Chinese/Chinese (request)2025-11-06 08:38Template-protected(log)Modified byAd Orientem on 2019-01-07: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Bar box (request)2025-11-09 15:14Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Module:Portal/images/a (request)2025-11-09 20:48Template-protected(log)Modified byMr. Stradivarius on 2013-11-24: "High-risk Lua module: allow template editors"
    Template:Welcome-unregistered (request)2025-11-10 04:28Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Welcome-anon: Modified byYmblanter on 2020-04-11: "Highly visible template: request atWP:RFPP"
    Template:Welcome-unregistered-constructive (request)2025-11-10 04:35Template-protected(log)FromTemplate:Welcome-anon-constructive: Protected byWugapodes on 2020-03-02: "Highly visible template:WP:BEANS"
    Module:Gridiron color (request)2025-11-14 04:45Template-protected(log)Protected byCambridgeBayWeather on 2018-06-22: "Highly visible template"
    Template:WikiProject Academic Journals (request)2025-11-14 14:26Template-protected(log)Modified byRenamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-12-23: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Designation/colour (request)2025-11-14 16:09Template-protected(log)Modified byWOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Designation/colour2 (request)2025-11-14 16:09Template-protected(log)Protected byAlex Shih on 2017-09-04: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Designation/text (request)2025-11-14 16:09Template-protected(log)Modified bySamsara on 2017-09-03: "Highly visible template: via RfPP"
    Module:WikidataIB (request)2025-11-14 19:59Template-protected(log)Modified byGalobtter on 2019-01-24: "700000+ transclusions"
    Template:Country data Albania (request)2025-11-14 22:46Template-protected(log)Modified byCourcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
    Module:Video game reviews/data (request)2025-11-15 17:05Template-protected(log)Protected byST11 on 2014-07-18: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Press (request)2025-11-15 20:05Template-protected(log)Modified byPrimefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:WikiProject Canada (request)2025-11-16 22:19Template-protected(log)Modified byWOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request)2025-11-17 05:31Template-protected(log)Protected byIvanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Unblock on hold (request)2025-11-18 05:53Template-protected(log)Modified bySoWhy on 2019-09-23: "Highly visible template"
    Template:In use (request)2025-11-18 16:09Template-protected(log)Modified byMark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Module:College color/data (request)2025-11-21 20:03Template-protected(log)Modified byGalobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
    Module:Pagelist (request)2025-11-22 02:15Template-protected(log)Modified byMr. Stradivarius on 2013-11-15: "High-risk Lua module: allow template editors"
    Module:Rotten Tomatoes data (request)2025-11-24 06:23Template-protected(log)Modified byPppery on 2025-08-13: ""
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 12:22, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

    WP:PERM

    There are no outstanding requests for account creator.

    Account creator

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Requests for autopatrolled

    Autopatrolled

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

    I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies.Λeternus(talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

    I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity withWP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles.~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

    @Michelangelo1992: I'm a little concerned aboutoverly lengthy quotations. Would you commit to summarizing quotations a bit more? Also, seeMOS:SAID.voorts (talk/contributions) 03:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you for the feedback! I’ve always trended toward direct quotes to avoid concerns for original research, but I can make an effort to paraphrase more in the future while still citing the original source. I’ll also try to be more mindful ofWP:SAID. I thought I was doing fairly well with this, but I am always open to feedback particularly if you have specific suggestions relating to recent articles. Thank you!Michelangelo1992 (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

    AutoWikiBrowser

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Hello,I request AutoWikiBrowser rights to generally help apply consistent templates and make efficient edits across many pages. I saw it onWP:JWB.

    Thank you.Bagwe Neza (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 17:50, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I want to use this tool to correct grammar, fix Bare URLs, adding and improving references and apply consistent templates. I have been doing this using the standard web-based editor, which is more tedious, so this will bring productive efficiency to my work.ddas|edEn (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done But remember, accuracy is more important than speed - fixing bare URLs may not be easily automatable and giveWP:AGCR a read.* Pppery *it has begun... 17:51, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    Hi! I would like to request access to AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) for my accountUser:Will229. I have been making manual edits such as fixing typos, improving references, formatting citations, and adding wikilinks to underlinked articles. I would like to use AWB to streamline these maintenance tasks, always reviewing each edit before saving. I understand and will follow all Wikipedia policies regarding the use of AWB. Thanks!Will229 (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 17:52, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I am a long-time content creator, and work frequently with references and lists, which can get quite tedious at times. I would like to obtain AWB to streamline the process.❆ AKAZA ❆ 23:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 17:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I recently discovered this tool and it will remove a lot of the tedious, repetitive work I often do. Things like Syntax fixes, template fixes, MOS fixes, etc.Equine-man (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Equine-man (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

    If you get access to AWB, please be careful to avoid creating problems like the batch of pages you created likeUser:Equine-man@Drafter/Sandbox/AutoDrafts/Veldenz Castle, now atthis location. Those pages took a lot of work to clean up. Automated tools make it easy to create problems at a large scale, and you are still responsible for all edits you make, with or without the tool. –Jonesey95 (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
     Not done per Jonesey95. I'm sorry, but I don't think it's appropriate to grant you AWB access so soon after that incident.* Pppery *it has begun... 17:54, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I request autowikibrowser rights in order to carry out large-scale edits on dozens of local constituencies in Hong Kong (which wereabolished in 2023). Thank you. ~~J. Dann 02:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 17:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I would like to have access to this tool in order to make quick find-and-replace changes across multiple articles.Erisie (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done But please use edit summaries for your edits - AWB makes this easier by having one place to provide an edit summary which is then automatically applied to each change.* Pppery *it has begun... 17:56, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I'm requesting access to use JWB so that I can optimize and fix Infobox and templates. I have been using JWB with my bot account GnoeeeBot at mlwiki.-❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee❚❙❚❙❙✉ 17:25, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 17:56, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    Hi !
    I would love to have access to AWB to better help with search and replace and to maintain templates on articles.
    Thank you for the consideration !
    Eugenia ioessa (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 17:57, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for confirmation

    Confirmed

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    I would like to request confirmed rights to contribute more effectively to Wikipedia. My goal is to help improve existing articles, create high-quality content, and participate more actively in maintenance tasks. Obtaining confirmed status will help me edit without frequent CAPTCHA interruptions and allow me to work more efficiently.Somjeedd (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

     Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gainconsensus for your edits, and then use{{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges ofreliable sources, thebiographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. Thegood news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now!stwalkerster (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    I would like to kindly ask for assistance regarding my account permissions. Although my account is already more than seven days old and has over ten edits, it still hasn’t been granted autoconfirmed status.

    I am currently working on creating a page about a company and need to upload a logo under a non-free license. I have authorization to use this material and will follow all Wikipedia guidelines for non-free content. However, without autoconfirmed status, I am unable to complete the upload and continue improving the article.Camila Bernardi Moniz (talk) 12:11, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

     Not done. In order to be autoconfirmed, you need to have 10 edits on the English Wikipedia -- you have more than 10 edits globally, but only seven on enwiki. If you make three more edits here, you'll be autoconfirmed.Giraffer (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Thank you so much!Camila Bernardi Moniz (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for extended confirmation

    Extended confirmed

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Reason for requesting extended confirmed rightsWikiEditor451 (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

     Not done Reason for declining request.* Pppery *it has begun... 18:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
    My alt account I used it when editing on an unsafe wifi, but I have restrictions, I would love Extended confirmated right, PCR and Rollback.Destinyokhiria💬 07:08, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

    Event coordinator

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
    There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

    File mover

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
    There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag.

    Mass message sender

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Requests for new page reviewer

    New page reviewer

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Given the articles I have created/contributed to on Wikipedia, I would like to have access to review new articles, and believe I could contribute to expanding the new articles, finding citations, fixing tone, etc.KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapplysigned,Rosguilltalk 18:30, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

    I would like New Page Reviewer rights to help review pages and redirects and reduce the backlog. I am familiar with Wikipedia policies. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 04:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply.signed,Rosguilltalk 18:33, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

    I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for the past years, during which I have created and edited serval articles in line with Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I've been an AfC reviewer since May and have enjoyed the work. I'd like to help with new page reviewing as well. In the last year or so, I've been more interested in reviewing and editing and have participated in many AfD discussions and done various cleanup tasks in addition to the AfC reviewing. I'm committed to using the tools responsibly, Thank you for considering my request.Destinyokhiria💬 22:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply.signed,Rosguilltalk 18:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

    I’ve already created a few articles and I often check new pages for sourcing, notability, and overall quality. I also help out in AfD discussions when I can, mostly to look at whether topics meet notability and if the sources are solid. I enjoy helping new editors fix their pages and guiding them on what needs improvement. Since I’m already active in this area, I’d like to take a more direct role in keeping the new pages feed clean and helping page creators understand the basics. Becoming a reviewer would let me contribute more effectively. Thanks for considering my request!Acrom12 (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]).—MusikBottalk 12:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

    Hello to the reviewer! I've noticed the large backlog and would like to help make some progress with patrolling pages, mainly redirects. I have some previous experience in the article for creation space, creating my own articles, and creating my own redirects. I try to help new incoming editors, including mentoring my current partner and teaching them how to use the features of Wikipedia. I'm capable of catching content that probably shouldn't belong on Wikipedia, but also helping new users expand draft articles.

    I participate in AfD, though my suggestions are often rejected; I consider this a skill that I am still learning. It's worth noting that I have never misused speedy deletion or other non-discussion deletion methods; my usage of these has been successful when I have applied them. Even still, my knowledge of AfC and redirects provides me with a good basis to use this right.

    Thank you, and please ask any questions you may have.aaronneallucas (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

    Hey! I got my trial NPR rights a month ago and really enjoyed my time so far. I am still learning the ropes, and the start wasn't easy, but I hope that I'm slowly getting there. Unfortunately, I've been quite busy due to a few real-life matters that needed my full attention and have therefore not been able to do too extensive reviewing, but I'd like to help where I can, and I've really enjoyed it during the few times when I was able to look into some articles.

    Thank you for considering.Squawk7700 (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user wasgranted temporary new page reviewer rights byExtraordinary Writ (expires 00:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)).—MusikBottalk 00:40, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done I see no issues here.CoconutOctopustalk 14:30, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    Hi! I retuned Wikipedia after a little wiki-break and found NPP with a "very large" backlog and so I want to help review new pages to keep it sorted out (at least what I could).Vestrian24Bio 13:00, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    I've been editing a while and over recent years have been helping mostly withWP:Ukraine-related topics and pages. Having done research on Ukraine on and off-wiki, I would like to extend the help to review new Ukraine and related page creations. I have 7 successful FL nominations (one was a joint-nomination), 1 successful GA (Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine) and 1 unsuccessful (NAFO). Thanks in advance and feel free to ping me with questions/comments.DantheAnimator 01:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for page mover

    Page mover

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Hello, I am an AFC reviewer, and recently going through a lot of pages that move from userspace to draftspace, using the tool onTemplate:AfC submission. This makes me the creator of future sandboxes, which I have then noticed developing into pages I am uninvolved with.So I would like to request for redirect suppression. Also, as agnome, I would be more than willing to help out atWP:RM, which at the moment has over a dozen requests in the uncontroversial section, as well as a backlog of elapsed listings going back over a month. You can see some of my Gnome work in redirect requests (for which I ampsuedo-autopatrolled, which is also a good reason for me to suppress redirects), AFC listings, NPR (mostly redirects, but it would be nice to suppress redirects on draftifications, although I dont do that much anymore), and some recent changes patrolling. There have also been a few times I wanted to create redirects as an AFC/R patroller, but was blocked by the blacklist. I've read the policies on page moving, and would continue to refer back to them as I learn the rest of what goes on at RM, until I understand them all. Happy Editing --IAmChaos 05:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

    One of the reasons you mentioned requesting page mover for was suppressing redirects for moves from userspace to draftspace. Theoretically, if you had the rights to do that, which redirect suppression criteria would you use in your edit summary?Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
    I would say G6.Deleting pages unambiguously created [...] in the incorrect namespace, or redirects created by moving away from a title that was obviously unintended. The default edit summary for moves given to AFC reviewers in the template is that submissions should be created in draftspace, so it would seem to me that the correct namespace is Draft, and fixing the namespace is uncontroversial cleanup. I would also commit to only suppress on generic sandbox pages, not on subpages with specific titles, that way individual users could be the creators of their pages, and not have notices sent to me in the future, which I have seen happen to others. Happy Editing --IAmChaos 18:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
     Comment: I am striking part of my request and my previous comment after I found{{Draftified userpage}} It makes sense to me why we would keep such pages, especially for new users. If a patrolling admin thinks that with that struck, I don't have enough reason for the role, I will gladly withdraw my application. However, I am still willing to gnome in WP:RM/TR, and WP:RM if you would let me. Happy Editing --IAmChaos 05:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
     Request withdrawn per above & I don't want to split attention too much. Happy Editing --IAmChaos 03:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
    Hi there! I am an NPP and often find myself needing to draftify articles. I would like to have page mover so that I can suppress the redirects that would otherwise be left behind. In addition to draftifying articles, I would also like to help out withWP:RM/TR. Thanks & happy editing =D–LuniZunie ツ(talk) 19:05, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for pending changes reviewer

    Pending changes reviewer

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Hello all. I’d like to be a pending changes reviewer to help keep articles accurate and reliable. I’m interested in taking on more responsibility and expanding my experience and role on Wikipedia. Thank you!Erin1973 (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 18:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I would like to become a pending changes reviewer because I think I could help quite a lot in the process of reviewing pending revision changes. I am notably experienced (450+ edits in mainspace, 1200 edits total) and do not have any COI with any article. I also think I should become a pending changes reviewer because I would really like to contribute to the community in more ways, as I am very much involved in the fight against vandalism by my efforts as a recent changes patroller. I am familiar with the policies of Wikipedia and have not had any edit wars or the sort (excluding warnings) with anyone in a considerably long time. I also do not have any biases to any pages, only adding information by collecting references from other sources. Thank you!Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 09:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]).—MusikBottalk 09:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
    Request was withdrawn, not declined (bot comment is incorrect)Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 15:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
    @MusikAnimal: just a note to say this comment is incorrectTheeverywhereperson (talk here) 15:49, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 18:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    Hello! I have done some anti-vandalism work, but feel like I could take on some more responsibility. Would it be possible to get Pending Changes Reviewing permission? Thank you in advance, for your answer!Legendbird (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

     Not done Sorry, I don't think you have enough experience to qualify for advanced permissions right now.* Pppery *it has begun... 18:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rightsNikunj12387 (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reasons:

    I am active in Wikipedia since 2019, with 3,600 edits in 1,300 pages, created 162 articles. My work focus on improving quality, formatting, adding references, and maintaining neutrality. I have controlled changes. I would like to support the pending changes system by reviewing good-faith edits and helping maintain accuracy on semi-protected pages.
    Requests for rollback

    Rollback

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Reason for requesting rollback rights

    I have been recent-changes patroller for a long time on and off, also am a proud twinkle user. I kind of did not realise I didn't have this right, gaining the sacred right would make my counter-vandalism work much easier. Thanks for reading this :)Kajjul (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

     Not done Too little recent changes patrolling activity in history. And user rights aren't sacred, they're merely positions of trust.* Pppery *it has begun... 18:05, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I’ve been patrolling recent changes consistently and have handled a substantial amount of vandalism. I also pending changes reviewing rights. Gaining rollback rights would allow me to respond more quickly and effectively, especially during spikes in vandalism, and would support the work I’m already doing.Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

    I've been handling vandalism for quite a while now, I have a chunk more than 1000 edit's the majority of which are dealing in vandalisum(the rest of witch are other simmalar activitys). I mainly use Ultraviolet and ocasionally twinkle but would like to try to use the tools that require rollback.Pyrrhicvictor (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]).—MusikBottalk 15:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

    I am requesting rollback afterwillingly giving up Twinkle, and more recently being suggested Irequest rollback. I believe Rollback would be beneficial to my patrolling of recent edits.Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 14:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

    I have been patrolling recent changes for a while. I currently useUltraviolet when patrolling recent changes, but would like to tryAntiVandal to expand my toolbox, which requires rollback. I use the standard warning templates with Ultraviolet, although I do havea set of "uw-0" style messages that I use occasionally.mdm.bla 03:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

    I have been RC patrolling for over two months now. Clicking individual diff links to revert edits is very inefficient and unnecessary, and I believe having rollback could fix this. I've made over 200 edits to mainspace and have no history of edit warring.Seanwk :)(Talk |Contribs) 02:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]).—MusikBottalk 02:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

    I often use the twinkle or redwarn rollback tool to revert vandalism or sock edits, however sometimes it does not load for me. I'm requesting access to the rollback tool as it would make things much easier. I'm familiar with when to use rollback and would be confident with this tool. Thank you.Golem08 (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done* Pppery *it has begun... 18:08, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
    I am requesting rollback rights. I regularly revert vandalism and want to do it more efficiently. I understand how rollback works and will use it carefully.ACROM12[TALK] 11:52, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for template editor

    Template editor

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    I have been stepping up my template editing in recent months, and believe that I meet the requirements. I likely haven't made 5 significant edits to template-protected modules, but I think it's more than 0. I'll leave that up to the reviewer, though. I have contributed a number of simple templates that have become relatively standard-use in a short period of time, including{{Game-won}} and related templates, as well as{{Hockey season stats entry}} and related templates.MikeVitale 18:20, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

    Standard Guidelines review:
    1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
    2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~18k)
    3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
    4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
    5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 1)
    6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 1)
    Primefac (talk) 19:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
     Done, till the end of Jan, I see a lot of "normal" template editing occuring and that gives me some hope, I'm gonna give the right till the end of Jan and once that time is up, if you still need it for a longer period, we can discuss the edits made.Sohom (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
    Requests for temporary account IP viewer

    Temporary account IP viewer

    [edit]
    Sorry,unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.

    As a Balkans-focused editor, I have a long record of reporting socking (both at SPI and by directly contacting relevant admins). The ability to compare IP ranges and geolocations has been central to my work on that front. I fully understand the relevant privacy policies and practices.Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:49, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done—Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I can't say I'd use the privilege frequently, but at times I have found IP information helpful when investigating vandalism and puppetry. I promise to use this power only for good, never for evil.EEng 02:17, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

     DoneSohom (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

    I have participated in many SPIs over the years, and have a history of working to prevent long-term abuse on controversial articles. While I expect I will only use this right occasionally, I would appreciate being permitted to have it in my toolbox for such occasions. I have read, understand, and agree to all terms and conditions attached to this right.Yours, &c.RGloucester —☎ 00:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

     DoneSohom (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    I am returning to counter vandalism and believe that being able to view IP addresses of temporary accounts will be valuable to identify patterns of vandalism. I understand the importance of privacy and have familiarized myself with the foundation guidelines on its use.Lucas7yoshi (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

     Done—Femke 🐦 (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

    I've returned to being active with counter-vandalism since I earned rollback rights a few months ago. I think it'd be useful to have TAIV rights as I have already encountered a few TAs who I suspect are the same person. I have read and understood the criteria of use.Tarlby(t) (c) 00:57, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

     DoneSohom (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    I would like to request this userright because I have done a lot of work in the past in recent changes patrolling and especially dealing with long-term abusers. I don't foresee myself using it a lot because behavioral evidence is usually a dead-ringer, but I still think it would be useful to have. I have read and understand the policies for use.Passengerpigeon (talk) 06:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
    Wikipedia's centralizeddiscussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see thedashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards seeformal review processes.
    General
    Articles,
    content
    Page handling
    User conduct
    Other
      This dashboard (talk)
      Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Scott_Burley/dash&oldid=894304052"
      Hidden categories:
      [8]ページ先頭
      ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp