Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User:Rschwieb/Cold storage

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    <User:Rschwieb
    The following two structures form a bridge connectingmagmas andlattices:


    Three structures whose intended interpretations arefirst order logic:
    Converse is aninvolution and distributes over composition so that (AB) ˘{\displaystyle {\breve {\ }}} =B ˘{\displaystyle {\breve {\ }}}A ˘{\displaystyle {\breve {\ }}}. Converse and composition eachdistribute over join.[7]

    Others:


    Structures with topologies or manifolds

    [edit]

    These algebraic structures are not varieties, because the underlying set either has atopology or is amanifold, characteristics that are not algebraic in nature. This added structure must be compatible in some sense, however, with the algebraic structure. The case of when the added structure ispartial order is discussed above, under varieties.

    Topology:

    Manifold:

    Categories

    [edit]

    Let there be twoclasses:

    Letx andy be any two elements ofM. Then there exist:

    Category:Composition associates (if defined), andx hasleft andright identity elements, the domain and codomain ofx, respectively, so thatd(x)x =x =xc(x). Letting φ stand for one ofc ord, and γ stand for the other, then φ(γ(x)) = γ(x).IfO has but one element, the associated category is amonoid.

    • Groupoid: Two equivalent definitions.
      • Category theory: Asmall category in which every morphism is anisomorphism. Equivalently, a category such that every elementx ofM,x(a,b), has an inversex(b,a); see diagram in section 2.2.
      • Algebraic definition: A group whose product is apartial function. Group product associates in that ifab andbc are both defined, thenab.c=a.bc. (a)a anda(a) are always defined. Also,ab.(b) =a, and (a).ab =b.

    Unclassified

    [edit]

    Lattices that are not varieties

    [edit]

    Two sets, Φ andD.

    • Information algebra:D is a lattice, and Φ is a commutativemonoid under combination, anidempotent operation. The operation of focussing,f: ΦxD→Φ satisfies the axiomf(f(φ,x),y)=f(φ,xy) and distributes over combination. Every element of Φ has an identity element inD under focussing.

    Arithmetics

    [edit]

    If the name of a structure in this section includes the word "arithmetic," the structure features one or both of thebinary operationsaddition andmultiplication. If both operations are included, the recursive identity defining multiplication usually links them. Arithmetics necessarily haveinfinitemodels.

    In the structures below, addition and multiplication, if present, arerecursively defined by means of aninjective operation calledsuccessor, denoted byprefix σ. 0 is the axiomaticidentity element for addition, and annihilates multiplication. Both axioms hold forsemirings.

    Arithmetics above this line aredecidable. Those below areincompletable.

    • Peano arithmetic: Robinson arithmetic with anaxiom schema ofinduction. The semiring axioms forN (other thanx+0=x andx0=0, included in the recursive definitions of addition and multiplication) are now theorems.

    The following arithmetics lack a connection between addition and multiplication. They are the simplest arithmetics capable of expressing allprimitive recursive functions.

    • Baby Arithmetic[10]: Because there is nouniversal quantification, there areaxiom schemes but no axioms. [n] denotesn consecutive applications ofsuccessor to 0. Addition and multiplication are defined by the schemes [n]+[p] = [n+p] and [n][p] = [np].
      • R[11]: Baby arithmetic plus thebinary relations "=" and "≤". These relations are governed by the schemes [n]=[p] ↔n=p, (x≤[n])→(x=0)∨,...,∨(x=[n]), and (x≤[n])∨([n]≤x).

    Nonvarieties

    [edit]

    Nonvarieties cannot beaxiomatized solely withidentities andquasiidentities. Many nonidentities are of three very simple kinds:

    1. The requirement thatS (orR orK) be a "nontrivial"ring, namely one such thatS≠{0}, 0 being the additiveidentity element. The nearest thing to an identity implyingS≠{0} is the nonidentity 0≠1, which requires that the additive and multiplicative identities be distinct.
    2. Axioms involving multiplication, holding for all members ofS (orR orK) except 0. In order for an algebraic structure to be a variety, thedomain of each operation must be an entire underlying set; there can be nopartial operations.
    3. "0 is not thesuccessor of anything," included in nearly all arithmetics.

    Most of the classic results ofuniversal algebra do not hold for nonvarieties. For example, neither thefree field over any set nor thedirect product ofintegral domains exists. Nevertheless, nonvarieties often retain an undoubted algebraic flavor.

    There are whole classes ofaxiomaticformal systems not included in this section, e.g.,logics,topological spaces, and this exclusion is in some sense arbitrary. Many of the nonvarieties below were included because of their intrinsic interest and importance, either by virtue of their foundational nature (Peano arithmetic), ubiquity (thereal field), or richness (e.g.,fields,normed vector spaces). Also, a great deal of theoretical physics can be recast using the nonvarieties calledmultilinear algebras.

    Combinatory logic

    [edit]

    The elements ofS arehigher order functions, and concatenation denotes the binary operation offunction composition.

    • BCI algebra: a magma with distinguished element 0, satisfying the identities (xy.xz)zy = 0, (x.xy)y = 0,xx=0,xy=yx=0 →x=y, andx0 = 0 →x=0.
      • BCK algebra: a BCI algebra satisfying the identityx0 =x.xy, defined asxy=0, induces apartial order with 0 as least element.
    • Combinatory logic: Acombinatorconcatenates upper case letters.Terms concatenate combinators and lower case letters. Concatenation is left and rightcancellative. '=' is anequivalence relation over terms. The axioms areSxyz =xz.yz andKxy =x; these implicitly define the primitive combinatorsS andK. The distinguished elementsI and1, defined asI=SK.K and1=S.KI, have the provable propertiesIx=x and1xy=xy. Combinatory logic has the expressive power ofset theory.[12]

    Three binary operations.

    • Graded algebra: an associative algebra withunital outer product. The members ofV have adirectram decomposition resulting in their having a "degree," with vectors having degree 1. Ifu andv have degreei andj, respectively, the outer product ofu andv is of degreei+j.V also has a distinguished member0 for each possible degree. Hence all members ofV having the same degree form anAbelian group under addition.
      • Tensor algebra: A graded algebra such thatV includes all finite iterations of a binary operation overV, called thetensor product. All multilinear algebras can be seen as special cases of tensor algebra.
        • Exterior algebra (alsoGrassmann algebra): a graded algebra whoseanticommutative outer product, denoted by infix ∧, is called theexterior product.V has anorthonormal basis.v1v2 ∧ ... ∧vk = 0 if and only ifv1, ...,vk arelinearly dependent. Multivectors also have aninner product.
          • Clifford algebra: an exterior algebra with a symmetricbilinear formQ:V×VK. The special caseQ=0 yields an exterior algebra. The exterior product is written 〈u,v〉. Usually, 〈ei,ei〉 = -1 (usually) or 1 (otherwise).
          • Geometric algebra: an exterior algebra whose exterior (calledgeometric) product is denoted by concatenation. The geometric product of parallel multivectors commutes, that of orthogonal vectors anticommutes. The product of a scalar with a multivector commutes.vv yields a scalar.
    1. ^Wolfram, Steven (2002)A New Kind of Science, p. 1171.
    2. ^Słomczyńska, Katarzyna (2008) "Free equivalential algebras",Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 155: 86-96
    3. ^Wolfram, Steven (2002)A New Kind of Science, p. 803.
    4. ^Jezek, J., andRalph McKenzie (2001) "The Variety Generated by Equivalence Algebras,"Algebra Universalis 45: 212, Prop. 1.1.
    5. ^Wolfram, Steven (2002)A New Kind of Science, p. 803.
    6. ^Pp. 26-28, 251, ofPaul Halmos (1962)Algebraic Logic. Chelsea.
    7. ^Givant, Steven, 2006, "The calculus of relations as a foundation for mathematics,"Journal of Automated Reasoning 37: 277-322.
    8. ^Smorynski (1991).
    9. ^Potter (2004: 90).
    10. ^Machover, M., 1996.Sets, Logic, and their Limitations. Cambridge Univ. Press: 10.9.
    11. ^Alfred Tarski,Andrej Mostowski, andRaphael Robinson, 1953.Undecidable Theories. North-Holland: 53.
    12. ^Raymond Smullyan (1994)Diagonalization and Self-Reference. Oxford Univ. Press: chpt. 18.
    13. ^Birkhoff and MacLane (1979: 369).
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rschwieb/Cold_storage&oldid=487228244"

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp