I'm Peter Benjamin Meyer. I'm a big fan of Wikipedia, its software and its international descriptive community. I'm on theWikimedia DC chapter's board of directors. I help run editathons. I edit on many subjects, notably early aviation, economics and economic history, technology history, U.S. government institutions, and things related to our chapter. I took a special interest in theAlice case on software patents, created that article, and attended the Supreme Court hearing of the case.Assisting teaching copyright: In fall 2019 I'm a Wikipedia assistant for this legal writing course taught by Sean Flynn at American University's Washington College of Law. Formal teaching with Wikipedia is new to me.
My research: Professionally I research the sources and effects of technological inventions, economic history, and productivity statistics. For many years I've focused on the invention of the airplane, which came about from the efforts of a large network of experimenters, authors, and others. Their stories are wonderful, spectacularly well documented, and there is straightforward useful research to quantify these efforts in new and interesting ways.
Userboxen
0.0016%
This user started114 of the 7,138,359 articles on the English language Wikipedia
Government use: For many years I've been pressing for this software to be available across the U.S. government for defining terminology and brainstorming, as is done in theIntellipedia,Diplopedia,Bureaupedia, and Canadian civil serviceGCPEDIA. We started an internal U.S. federal government site calledStatipedia for definitions and procedures and other information that government staff would benefit from sharing broadly with one another. The site was good but never notable enough for Wikipedia, and tragically has now been shut down for reasons beyond my control. Creating a U.S. Federal government web site was astonishingly difficult and heroic; resistance was amazing. It was a joy to develop it and recruit for it. Someday it will come back I hope. To get more users, we'll need a single-sign-on system within the U.S. government so that URLs to the site work directly when a civil servant tries to go to one in their browsers. Statipedia, or whatever MediaWiki reference work/encyclopedia/workspace takes its place, will be a wonderful time-saver and cost-saver and morale-booster for government staff.
My username,econterms, has a history. In 1997-8, as a suffering economics grad student with experience in databases and programming, I started econterms.com as a searchable database of economics terms. It was cited on Wikipedia. The program running on the server was a "CGI" program in C, and ran fast. It had a simplified HTML syntax like wikitext for internal hyperlinks. It doesn't work any more, and I haven't tried to fix it because the great Wikipedias have made it obsolete. The main content is available as astatic web page.
Official statistics -- wrap the URLs in footnotes; cite GSIM and GSBPM properly; maybe refer to policy issues and scandal; cnstat transparency report for example
study how these images are tagged in the HTML fromAlexandria, Virginia: (a) the 2015 memorial image in the infobox comes in "right" for JAWS which can identify it as an image ; (b) the "alt text" for the image of the 1878 map is not being read and the image is not identified as an image to JAWS. Zack wanted to use the "G" function in JAWS to get to the next image but could not.
strengthen citations ofOctave Chanute ; fill outCharles Harvard Gibbs-SmithY based on the Deutsch wikipedia sources ; put Gibbs-Smith into the French Wikipedia ; expand French page onLilienthal ; comment on talk page ofFOLDOC that it helped as design model for econterms and maybe google and was pre-WWW, and got lots of use.
Tobin's q -- the lead needs to say why this statistic gets attention, and the article needs to be sharpened with fewer or less lengthy quotations from sources ; the history of the article has clearer versions
Review of Japanese Culture and Society, which I created in 2020, probably at an editathon, was judged non-notable in 2025 and deleted. It was well recorded in the Wayback Machine:[8],[9]
Possible record for most errors in an edit summary. A text deletion was summarized thus:"Walter Shaub was fired by McGahn. His tweets are not objective." But (a) Shaub wasn't fired, (b) McGahn didn't fire him, (c) the text referred to wasn't from tweets, (d) objectivity isn't required in a critique, rather it needs to be informative.
Y based on the Deutsch wikipedia sources ; put Gibbs-Smith into the French Wikipedia ; expand French page onLilienthal ; comment on talk page ofFOLDOC that it helped as design model for econterms and maybe google and was pre-WWW, and got lots of use.
.svg)
