• Cypp0847 (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

@Cypp0847 has authored 198 articles, of which only 2 have been deleted. One of these was forWP:SYNTH,the AfD having taken place during October 2022. They primarily translate articles from the Chinese Wikipedia, recent examples contain no issues that require action by an NPR. I reviewedMa Tau Wai Road building collapse and found no issues, other than adding the translation banner to thetalk page. Chinese sources vary in reliability, but based on the articles I have reviewed from @Cypp0847, the sourcing appears consistent and without issue. BLPs such asJohn Clancey are well sourced and do not leave any information uncited. A recent AfD of their articleJohn MacLennanresulted in a unanimous keep. Theirtalk page is mostly filled with automated messages regarding images, with little after April 2025. Based on what I've seen from @Cypp0847, I am quite confident the 2022 AfD SYNTH concerns were an anomaly, and doesn't appear to have been an ongoing issue, with no reoccurrences since. Thank you for your contributions and translations, @Cypp0847!11WB (talk) 10:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

@11WB: Thank you for your nomination and your kind words. Will do the best to keep up with the good work. ~~J. Dann 10:47, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

No problem! This should be seen and reviewed by an administrator within the next 7 days or so!11WB (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 DoneArcticocean ■ 20:50, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Javajourney (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I came across Javajourney while reviewing new pages and was impressed with their clean pages on music subjects. They have created 106 undeleted mainspace pages since late 2024. (There are three deleted articles, all from early on in their Wikipedia career, plus a recently deleted inadvertently created redirect. A number of articles created in 2024 were redirected or merged at AfD, and Javajourney appears to have takenBastun's advice to bone up on notability to heart.) I reviewed the last 10 created pages in depth. Notability is always clearly demonstrated, whether through chart performance, reviews or some otherWP:NMUSIC criterion. (NMUSIC is one of the harder SNGs to master and Javajourney appears to understand how to strongly demonstrate notability for the benefit of a reviewer.) Pages are all highly presentable, NPOV is maintained, and talk pages are created. Sourcing is strong and primary sources are used appropriately (e.g. for chart performance). At the pace Javajourney is creating new articles, granting them autopatrolled will reduce the queue for reviewers without compromising on the quality of the encyclopedia.Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not doneArcticocean ■ 20:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Arcticocean any reason?HurricaneZeta^C 23:36, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Gonna echo Zeta here, I'm unsure why this was declined ?Sohom (talk) 02:53, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

• Abdullah1099 (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

I think i potentially need Autopatrolled rights to do contributions on Astronomy and Spaceflight parts of WikipediaAbdullah1099 (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@Abdullah1099: why areGunter's Space Page andNext Spaceflight reliable sources?voorts (talk/contributions) 00:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

They are not primarily the most reliable source but they are some of the most popular sources. Both can have there own problemsAbdullah1099 (talk) 02:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Abdullah1099: "popular" ≠ reliable. You should only be using sources that you know are reliable. Those sources appear to be unreliable to me.voorts (talk/contributions) 19:07, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Bro i mean they are not completely unreliable, they are reliable enough in spaceflight lists as a source but if you want to create a spaceflight article at that time it becomes unreliable and other sources like NASASpaceflight, Ars Technica, etc becomes more reliable. That why it is part of{{TLS-R}}.Abdullah1099 (talk) 03:46, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

What are you unable to do right now where the autopatrolled right would help? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not doneArcticocean ■ 20:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Mathew D'Marco (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

I've been editing Wikipedia regularly for about a year now. Initially, the quality of editing was poor, but I have always tried to contribute to Wikipedia through constructive editing. In addition to this, there have been about 30,000+ edits. Most of his edits and articles are constructive, so his articles do not require initial verification. I am aware of the right to autopatrolled verification and think that having this right would reduce the workload on article examiners.Marco (talk) 06:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

 DoneArcticocean ■ 21:06, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

@Arcticocean thank you.Marco (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• ScottyNolan (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I returned to Wikipedia last year after an extended break that I was forced to take for personal reasons. I used to have auto patrol, however,I lost it due to inactivity in May 2025. I'm now applying to have it reinstated. Thank you!ScottyNolan (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

 DoneArcticocean ■ 21:07, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• RedShellMomentum (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Requesting AWB rights for updating deprecated CS1 parameters to their current forms ("accessdate" to "access-date", "archiveurl" to "archive-url", "archivedate" to "archive-date", etc.).RedShellMomentum 20:52, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done This would be a cosmetic edit and violate point 4 ofWP:AWBRULES. And, in any event those parameters are not deprecated;Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 April 16#Category:CS1 maint: discouraged parameter et al. made sure of that.* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:50, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• LucasBrown (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I do a bunch of{{short description}} edits, especially "none"-ifying the SDs for pages likeFishing industry in Canada andAthletics at the 1920 Summer Olympics – Men's 110 metres hudles. AWB sounds like it would make this easier: it sounds like I could load up a category likeCategory:Women's events at the 2020 Summer Paralympics, use a regex to find and delete any non-"none" short descriptions, and append{{short description|none}} to the beginning of each article. I also like the sound of the regex typo-fixing feature.

I also request permission for the JS Wiki Browser, because I run Linux and do not quite trust Wine to make AWB work properly.

—LucasBrown 20:13, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done There is no separate permission for JS Wiki Browser; AutoWikiBrowser and JS Wiki Browser use the same list of allowed users.* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:51, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Lp0 on fire (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I sometimes find myself doing REFSPACE fixes while doing NPP work, so I'd like JWB so I can do this to all recently patrolled pages. I might also do some other miscellaneous fixes, or I might end up never using it at all (I'm very good at procrastinating). I understand the AWB rules and won't use it for anything contentious.lp0 on fire () 01:12, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Nimbus227 (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

To assist in the many repetitive edits I do in aviation and aircraft articles. We have deprecated template coding that needs to be removed, outdated section headers (e.g. Survivors to Surviving aircraft or Aircraft on display) and left over coding from the article creation wizard that causes excessive white space. There are probably more tasks that it could help with after learning how to use it and gaining practical experience.Nimbus(Cumulusnimbusfloats by) 19:42, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• BrieBot (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Bot trial ofWikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BrieBot. The main account has AWB rights. Please ping when approved.Sammi Brie (she/her · t ·c) 21:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

 DoneToadspike[Talk] 22:17, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Shocksingularity (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I frequently work on changing certain phrases to comply withMOS:DISABILITY guidelines (eg; changing "mentally retarded" to "intellectually disabled"). See [here] for examples. I make sure to check that the text is not part of a quote/citation and that it's not a proper noun before removing.Shocksingularity (talk) 02:09, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:53, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Chorchapu (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

• LuniZunie-Mentor (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Alt account.–LuniZunie 06:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 22:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• LuniZunie-Mentor (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Alternate account.LuniZunie-Mentor (talk) 03:25, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:57, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Geichel (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I will be on-site coordinator for Wikimedia Community Ireland events going forward. Will use the Programs and Events Dashboard but this will be a fall-backGeichel (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

@Geichel a quick question.

what are your plans for using this right for Wikimedia Community Ireland?– robertsky (talk) 03:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

• Thilio (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I am the ICT Director at Kuda University in South Sudan, we are launching a long term education program starting in March 2026,.. So as part of this program I will be teaching students Wikipedia policies, how to conduct research, how to create drafts or article and giving them assignments related to editing, creating articles, Drafts and etc. I will use the Programs & Events Dashboard to track n monitor the work. The event coordinator perm will allow and help me to create accounts for students during training sessions and confirm their accounts as event attendees. Regards. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 17:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 21:17, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• AdobongPogi (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Hello, I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights again. This is my second request, and I would like to return to reviewing articles that need work. I have experience working at AfD last year and currently making articles. I have created and expanded several articles and through this work, have become familiar with notability requirements (especially the importance of notable sources) and BLP policy. I would like to help out further by reviewing new pages.AdobongPogi^{masarap 🍛} 04:19, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

On hold. In your prior trial run, I think you made the wrong call atHussain Al-Aryan andThe Festival Players Theatre Company, which comprise about a third of the pages you reviewed. However, you've opened a lot of AfDs recently, and most of them appear to be going well at the moment. If your AfD track record still looks good in a week or two once those are closed, I think a second trial run is warranted._signed,Rosguill^talk 16:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Coining (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I'd like to help address the NPP backlog. I've been a pending changes reviewer for some time, but the backlog there is typically very low.Coining (talk) 22:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Comment: 610 mainspace edits, account created 2024-03-20. 99.6% of edits are live.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions and interest in this permission. However, between a lack of new article creations that demonstrate strong understanding of notability guidelines, and an AfD record that suggests more of an interest inWP:PIA flashpoints than anything else, I'm not seeing a track record of relevant experience for new page reviewing. Not done_signed,Rosguill^talk 17:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration. I wasn't aware that involvement in a contentious topic was relevant to the criteria for this permission. Beyond one article that I know I have tried to draft a few times and has been knocked asWP:NOTTVGUIDE (including by a now topic-banned editor), even though it was subsequentlyconceded thatWP:NOTTVGUIDE did not apply, which of thenew articles that I've created have been problematic? More generally, what threshold would you suggest I need to meet before coming back here to try to help with the NPP backlog?Coining (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Participation in PIA topics generally doesn't directly correlate to being trusted with NPR. The point @Rosguill was making (I think), is that only participating at AfDs that are in PIA topic areas won't show a wide ranging amount of knowledge or experience across the spectrum of notability guidelines and other such P&Gs. You also have no history of reviewing atWP:AfC. I will note however that despite the lack of history on your talk page, you have received a couple of barnstars. For a new editor, this is commendable! I would recommend continuing to engage in discussions and !voting at AfD (perhaps outside of PIA topics), maybe apply to be an AfC reviewer atWT:AFCP and create some reliably sourced content! All the best and happy editing!11WB (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you @11WB for the feedback and suggestions. As @Rosguill seems to handle most of these NPP requests, I'd welcome their affirmation that these (or other) steps are the right ones to take and that if taken will enable me to come back here with confidence that the criteria will be as stated.Coining (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Of course. Deferring to an administrator is the appropriate step. I have no issue with that. I believe the advice I've given you is sound, however administrators such as @Rosguill are the authority on such matters.11WB (talk) 16:14, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, only seeing these replies now. Regarding your article creations, none of them problematic, but your choice of topics (CONCACAF tournaments and an international TV station) inadvertently does not do much to demonstrate that you have experience applying notability guidelines, as these topics are pretty much guaranteed to be notable. So it's not a mark against you, but there isn't much for me to evaluate there either. That leaves your AfD record as the main thing to assess here, which is on the low-end of the match rates as far as NPP candidates go, and examining the cases where you did not match the result shows a troubling pattern, especially at discussions likeWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of civilians killed in the Gaza genocide, where you cite a policy that does not support your position. Frankly, looking at the totality of your AfD participation, you have a 62.5% match rate with the overall result, but a 100% match rate when it comes to !voting keep on things that make Palestinians look bad (Muhammad Atzar,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Other Side: The Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1991 Muslim Brotherhood memorandum,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Hamas executions,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kidnapping of Evyatar David,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Shem Tov,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual and gender-based violence against Israeli hostages during the Gaza war) and a 100% match rate when it comes to !voting delete/merge/redirect on things that make Israel look bad (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel annexation,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (disambiguation),Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Israel strikes in Syria,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syria missile strikes (August 2019),Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of statements by Israeli officials cited as genocidal,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of civilians killed in the Gaza genocide)--of course, some of those !votes individually are defensible or even unambiguously correct (I even coincided with you atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel annexation), but the overall pattern is one that is highly suggestive of aWP:BATTLEGROUND approach when taken together with an overall low match rate. This pattern of !votes is highly reminiscent of behavior that got multiple editors on either side of the conflict banned inWP:ARBPIA5. A cursory glance at your recent contributions shows you continuing this patternat RfD.

I had been hoping to avoid investigating your case to such a degree that would require me to intervene as an uninvolved admin with respect to your participation in Arab-Israeli conflict topics, but at this point I can't un-see the activity in question, and feel obligated to proceed to issue a topic-ban._signed,Rosguill^talk 17:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• Antoine le Deuxième (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

My temporary New Page Reviewer rights are set to expire tomorrow. I would like to request an extension, as I intend to continue contributing to this area.Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user wasgranted temporary new page reviewer rights byRosguill (expires 00:00, 12 February 2026 (UTC)).—MusikBot^talk 19:10, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Antoine le Deuxième, could you comment on your review ofJacob van Lennep Canal?_signed,Rosguill^talk 21:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

I noticed that the article was translated from the Dutch Wikipedia. I verified the subject’s notability, but I believe the article should be improved with additional sources.Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 15:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Antoine le Deuxième could you provide a little more detail as to how you verified the subject's notability? What steps did you take?_signed,Rosguill^talk 18:12, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

I just googled it. This canal is mentioned in tourist guides; it is a landmark:

[1][2][3][4]

There are also no problems with significant coverage:

[5]Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• CostalCal (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

• Cukie Gherkin (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I sometimes wish to move drafts from my user page into mainspace over articles with only a simple history; for example, I'm wanting to moveUser:Cukie Gherkin/Super Leaf toSuper Leaf, but because of minor edits redirecting the name, I cannot. In cases where there is a previous version of an article at the target page, I will not use these privileges to overwrite that version. -Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust💬) 11:28, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• C1K98V (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

To handle undiscussed and uncontroversial move requests. You can also refer to instances/page history likeFitrat,Bhabiji Ghar Par Hain! Fun on the Run. I did discuss this with fellow editors related to G6 move, seehere. Thanks for your consideration.C1K98V^{(💬✒️📂)} 12:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Athanelar (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Resubmitting now that I'm over the 3000 edits threshold; pagemover would be very handy forWP:AINB cleanup which sometimes requires mass-draftifying large numbers of articles created by AI users with no/low review, e.g.,the ongoing cleanup of Lamp21's 200+ articlesAthanelar (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([6]).—MusikBot^talk 10:10, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Littlestepsforward (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I’ve been active for months now and have made 500+ edits, mostly focused on improving article tone, adding reliable sources, fixing formatting issues, and cleaning up drafts. I’ve created and improved a number of articles, particularly in biographical and cultural topics. I’m familiar with key policies like WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:COPYVIO, and I aim to contribute more to content maintenance through reviewing edits on protected pages. I’m careful with sourcing and would use reviewer tools with that same level of care.

Requesting access to assist with the backlog in helping to ensure pending edits meet the criteria of the Wikipedia policies & guidelines. (Littlestepsforward (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2026 (UTC))Littlestepsforward (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• ArthurPlummer (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I have been actively editing Wikipedia for several weeks and have accumulated over a thousand contributions. Since January 25th, I have been using Ultraviolet to revert vandalism and warn users who engage in disruptive edits. I am confident in my ability to identify contributions that are vandalism separately from contributions that are not vandalism but good-faith.

If granted the Pending Changes Reviewer right, I will continue patrolling recent changes and carefully review pending edits to ensure they are appropriate and meet Wikipedia’s standards.ArthurPlummer (talk |:) 03:08, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Sidenote: Before Ultraviolet, I used Twinkle, but not for very long.ArthurPlummer (talk |:) 03:08, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had an account for 23 days.—MusikBot^talk 03:10, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

• Lflin16 (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I am experienced in the fields of counter vandalism and would like to assist where possible with articles protected under pending changes.Lflin16 - :) (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done* Pppery *_{it has begun...} 04:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Likeanechointheforest (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I've been patrolling recent changes since December, doing quick vandalism reversions and notices/warnings. I've been active on Wikipedia for over five years and have more than 4800 mainspace edits. I've started using Twinkle to give notices and warnings, but I'd like rollback to be able to get Huggle access for more efficient counter-vandalism work.Likeanechointheforest (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done ~ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 18:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

• EditorShane3456 (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

I have patrolled Recent Changes for around a year at this point and I feel that to help in my anti-vandal work, I will have to use the rollback tool probably anywhere I see vandals and reverse their contributions to the last helpful version.shane(talk to me if you want!) 14:29, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

• Mathew D'Marco (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Reason for requesting rollback rights

• Newbzy (t·th·c·del·cross-wiki·SUL·edit counter· pages created (xtools·sigma)·non-automated edits·BLP edits·undos·manual reverts·rollbacks·logs^{(blocks·rights·moves)}·rfar·spi·cci)(assign permissions)^{(acc·ap·ev·fm·mms·npr·pm·pc·rb·te·taiv)}

Hi, requesting template editor access to help fix dark mode problems which are sadly quite common in template-protected pages. For example, many of the WikiProject templates, such as{{WikiProject Mythology}}, and also some of the article editnotices, where dark mode functionality is often overlooked. I've worked with templates quite a lot in my time here, and made quite a few edit requests, so having the permission would be great. Cheers,Newbzy (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~2)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~3k)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~540)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
5. Y (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~4)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~2)

Primefac (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Just wanted to say, I'm not sure Guideline 6's count is accurate. Seehere andhere,here,here, andhere for five template-protected edit requests that I have had successfully implemented. I guess they could be considered insignificant, but then again I only really like making small additions/fixes to templates.Newbzy (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

You are correct, the "significance" aspect of the guideline is what I failed to find in the majority of your edit requests. Points 5 and 6 are there primarily as the subjective demonstrations that a TPE candidate has the skills and ability to successfully implement edit requests.Primefac (talk) 22:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)