Uruguayan peso (Spanish:peso uruguayo) has been a name of theUruguayan currency since Uruguay's settlement byEuropeans. The present currency, thepeso uruguayo (ISO 4217 code:UYU) was adopted in 1993 and issubdivided into 100centésimos, although centésimos are not currently in use.
Uruguay obtained monetary stability in 1896, based on thegold standard. This favorable state of affairs ended afterWorld War I. An unsettled period followed. Economic difficulties afterWorld War II produced inflation, which became serious after 1964 and continued into the 1970s.
The peso moneda nacional was replaced on 1 July 1975 by thenuevo peso (new peso; ISO 4217 codeUYP) at a rate of 1 new peso for 1000 old pesos. The nuevo peso was also subdivided into 100centésimos.
After further inflation, thepeso uruguayo (ISO 4217 code UYU) replaced thenuevo peso on March 1, 1993, again at a rate of 1 new for 1000 old.
Uruguayans became accustomed to the constant devaluation of theircurrency.Uruguayans refer to periods of real appreciation of the currency asatraso cambiario, which literally means that "the exchange rate is running late" towards future devaluement. As a consequence of the instability of the local currency, prices for most big-ticket items (real estate, cars and even executives' salaries) are denominated inU.S. dollars.
During the military rule, the peso was on acrawling peg to the dollar. A table of the future value of the dollar was published daily by the government (called thetablita). In 1982, the currency was abruptly devalued ("thetablita was broken"), throwing thousands of companies and individuals into bankruptcy. In the 1990s, a new mechanism to provide predictability was introduced, this time in the form of a sliding range, with top and bottom margins, at which thegovernment would intervene. In 2002, after abanking crisis and amid a huge budget deficit, the currency was again allowed to float, losing almost 50% of its value in a couple of weeks, and, again, throwing into bankruptcy thousands of companies and individuals who held debts denominated in US dollars.
In 2004 a phenomenon completely new to most Uruguayans developed: the currency appreciated in nominal terms against the US dollar, going from 30 to 24 pesos to the dollar. By 2008 the peso reached 19 to the US dollar, recovering more than half of its loss during the crisis. This revaluation hurt exporters and brought protests from the industrial sector, which felt that it lost competitiveness, but by July 2020, the peso had depreciated to over 40 to the dollar. The government hopes that a floating currency will "de-dollarize" the economy. Uruguay does not seem to have found a mechanism that provides the exchange rate some level of predictability, while at the same time allowing the country to adapt its prices so that its exports remain competitive.
In 1994, stainless-steel 10, 20 and 50 centésimos and brass 1 and 2 pesos uruguayos were introduced. 5 and 10 pesos uruguayos were introduced in 2003 and 2004, respectively. The coins replaced same value notes.Coins in circulation are:
In 1995–1996, banknotes in denominations of, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 (all modified versions of 5,000, 10,000, 20,000, 50,000, 100,000, 200,000 and 500,000 nuevo peso banknotes respectively) and 1000 pesos uruguayos were introduced, followed by new models of 5 and 10 pesos uruguayos notes in 1999. In 2003, 5 and 10 pesos uruguayos notes have been replaced by coins and 2000 pesos uruguayos were introduced. A new series of banknotes were introduced in 2014–2015, the same as the previous issue without the vertical word "URUGUAY" on the left side.Banknotes in circulation are:
Although in many parts of the world, the amount of cash in circulation has risen over the last decade, there are some countries that buck the trend. In this small club of jurisdictions, a few have considered general purpose CBDCs that would be a complement to cash. Sweden and Uruguay are notable not just for the advanced stage of their work but the amount of information their central banks have made publicly available about their respective projects.[6][neutrality isdisputed]