Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Unit (ring theory)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromUnit (algebra))
In mathematics, element with a multiplicative inverse
Not to be confused withUnit ring.

Inalgebra, aunit orinvertible element[a] of aring is aninvertible element for the multiplication of the ring. That is, an elementu of a ringR is a unit if there existsv inR such thatvu=uv=1,{\displaystyle vu=uv=1,}where1 is themultiplicative identity; the elementv is unique for this property and is called themultiplicative inverse ofu.[1][2] The set of units ofR forms agroupR× under multiplication, called thegroup of units orunit group ofR.[b] Other notations for the unit group areR,U(R), andE(R) (from the German termEinheit).

Less commonly, the termunit is sometimes used to refer to the element1 of the ring, in expressions likering with a unit orunit ring, and alsounit matrix. Because of this ambiguity,1 is more commonly called the "unity" or the "identity" of the ring, and the phrases "ring with unity" or a "ring with identity" may be used to emphasize that one is considering a ring instead of arng.

Examples

[edit]

The multiplicative identity1 and its additive inverse−1 are always units. More generally, anyroot of unity in a ringR is a unit: ifrn = 1, thenrn−1 is a multiplicative inverse ofr.In anonzero ring, theelement 0 is not a unit, soR× is not closed under addition.A nonzero ringR in which every nonzero element is a unit (that is,R× =R ∖ {0}) is called adivision ring (or a skew-field). A commutative division ring is called afield. For example, the unit group of the field ofreal numbersR isR ∖ {0}.

Integer ring

[edit]

In the ring ofintegersZ, the only units are1 and−1.

In the ringZ/nZ ofintegers modulon, the units are the congruence classes(modn) represented by integerscoprime ton. They constitute themultiplicative group of integers modulon.

Ring of integers of a number field

[edit]

In the ringZ[3] obtained by adjoining thequadratic integer3 toZ, one has(2 +3)(2 −3) = 1, so2 +3 is a unit, and so are its powers, soZ[3] has infinitely many units.

More generally, for thering of integersR in anumber fieldF,Dirichlet's unit theorem states thatR× is isomorphic to the groupZn×μR{\displaystyle \mathbf {Z} ^{n}\times \mu _{R}}whereμR{\displaystyle \mu _{R}} is the (finite, cyclic) group of roots of unity inR andn, therank of the unit group, isn=r1+r21,{\displaystyle n=r_{1}+r_{2}-1,}wherer1,r2{\displaystyle r_{1},r_{2}} are the number of real embeddings and the number of pairs of complex embeddings ofF, respectively.

This recovers theZ[3] example: The unit group of (the ring of integers of) areal quadratic field is infinite of rank 1, sincer1=2,r2=0{\displaystyle r_{1}=2,r_{2}=0}.

Polynomials and power series

[edit]

For a commutative ringR, the units of thepolynomial ringR[x] are the polynomialsp(x)=a0+a1x++anxn{\displaystyle p(x)=a_{0}+a_{1}x+\dots +a_{n}x^{n}}such thata0 is a unit inR and the remaining coefficientsa1,,an{\displaystyle a_{1},\dots ,a_{n}} arenilpotent, i.e., satisfyaiN=0{\displaystyle a_{i}^{N}=0} for someN.[4]In particular, ifR is adomain (or more generallyreduced), then the units ofR[x] are the units ofR.The units of thepower series ringR[[x]]{\displaystyle R[[x]]} are the power seriesp(x)=i=0aixi{\displaystyle p(x)=\sum _{i=0}^{\infty }a_{i}x^{i}}such thata0 is a unit inR.[5]

Matrix rings

[edit]

The unit group of the ringMn(R) ofn × n matrices over a ringR is the groupGLn(R) ofinvertible matrices. For a commutative ringR, an elementA ofMn(R) is invertible if and only if thedeterminant ofA is invertible inR. In that case,A−1 can be given explicitly in terms of theadjugate matrix.

In general

[edit]

For elementsx andy in a ringR, if1xy{\displaystyle 1-xy} is invertible, then1yx{\displaystyle 1-yx} is invertible with inverse1+y(1xy)1x{\displaystyle 1+y(1-xy)^{-1}x};[6] this formula can be guessed, but not proved, by the following calculation in a ring of noncommutative power series:(1yx)1=n0(yx)n=1+y(n0(xy)n)x=1+y(1xy)1x.{\displaystyle (1-yx)^{-1}=\sum _{n\geq 0}(yx)^{n}=1+y{\biggl (}\sum _{n\geq 0}(xy)^{n}{\biggr )}x=1+y(1-xy)^{-1}x.}SeeHua's identity for similar results.

Group of units

[edit]

Acommutative ring is alocal ring ifRR× is amaximal ideal.

As it turns out, ifRR× is an ideal, then it is necessarily amaximal ideal andR islocal since amaximal ideal is disjoint fromR×.

IfR is afinite field, thenR× is acyclic group of order|R| − 1.

Everyring homomorphismf :RS induces agroup homomorphismR×S×, sincef maps units to units. In fact, the formation of the unit group defines afunctor from thecategory of rings to thecategory of groups. This functor has aleft adjoint which is the integralgroup ring construction.[7]

Thegroup schemeGL1{\displaystyle \operatorname {GL} _{1}} is isomorphic to themultiplicative group schemeGm{\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{m}} over any base, so for any commutative ringR, the groupsGL1(R){\displaystyle \operatorname {GL} _{1}(R)} andGm(R){\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{m}(R)} are canonically isomorphic toU(R). Note that the functorGm{\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{m}} (that is,RU(R)) isrepresentable in the sense:Gm(R)Hom(Z[t,t1],R){\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{m}(R)\simeq \operatorname {Hom} (\mathbb {Z} [t,t^{-1}],R)} for commutative ringsR (this for instance follows from the aforementioned adjoint relation with the group ring construction). Explicitly this means that there is a natural bijection between the set of the ring homomorphismsZ[t,t1]R{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [t,t^{-1}]\to R} and the set of unit elements ofR (in contrast,Z[t]{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [t]} represents the additive groupGa{\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{a}}, theforgetful functor from the category of commutative rings to thecategory of abelian groups).

Associatedness

[edit]

Suppose thatR is commutative. Elementsr ands ofR are calledassociate if there exists a unitu inR such thatr =us; then writer ~s. In any ring, pairs ofadditive inverse elements[c]x andx areassociate, since any ring includes the unit−1. For example, 6 and −6 are associate inZ. In general,~ is anequivalence relation onR.

Associatedness can also be described in terms of theaction ofR× onR via multiplication: Two elements ofR are associate if they are in the sameR×-orbit.

In anintegral domain, the set of associates of a given nonzero element has the samecardinality asR×.

The equivalence relation~ can be viewed as any one ofGreen's semigroup relations specialized to the multiplicativesemigroup of a commutative ringR.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^In the case of rings, the use of "invertible element" is taken as self-evidently referring to multiplication, since all elements of a ring are invertible for addition.
  2. ^The notationR×, introduced byAndré Weil, is commonly used innumber theory, where unit groups arise frequently.[3] The symbol× is a reminder that the group operation is multiplication. Also, a superscript × is not frequently used in other contexts, whereas a superscript* often denotes dual.
  3. ^x andx are not necessarily distinct. For example, in the ring of integers modulo 6, one has3 = −3 even though1 ≠ −1.

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Dummit & Foote 2004
  2. ^Lang 2002
  3. ^Weil 1974
  4. ^Watkins 2007, Theorem 11.1
  5. ^Watkins 2007, Theorem 12.1
  6. ^Jacobson 2009, §2.2 Exercise 4
  7. ^Cohn 2003, §2.2 Exercise 10

Sources

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unit_(ring_theory)&oldid=1309407347"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp