| Ulmus minor 'Sowerbyi' | |
|---|---|
'Sowerbyi', Christ's Piece, Cambridge before 1915[1] | |
| Species | Ulmus minor |
| Cultivar | 'Sowerbyi' |
| Origin | England |
TheField ElmcultivarUlmus minor 'Sowerbyi', commonly known as theSowerby Elm, was described (asUlmus nitens var.sowerbyiMoss) byMoss[2] inThe Cambridge British Flora (1914).[3] The tree, once referred to as the 'Norfolk Elm' by Smith, was commonly found in the hedgerows and woods ofNorfolk,Cambridgeshire, andHuntingdonshire in the early 20th century before the advent ofDutch elm disease.[4]Melville considered it a hybrid of 'Coritana'.[5]
The tree was named for the botanical artistJames Sowerby, who had illustrated it inEnglish Botany, or Coloured Figures of British Plants (1863, figure T.2248),[3] from a specimen collected in Essex c.1810 and now in the Borrer Herbarium atKew.[6][7]
A smaller tree than'Hunnybunii', the branches shorter and the upper ones very tortuous; leaves smaller and acute.[8][9] The obovate to elliptical fruits are also smaller than 'Hunnybunii'.[4][10] "Type" specimens of leaves and samarae from the Parker Street tree in Cambridge (see 'Notable trees'), obtained on the instructions of Moss, are preserved in the Cambridge University Herbarium.[11]
Though susceptible toDutch Elm Disease,field elms produce suckers and usually survive in this form in their area of origin.
Moss inThe Cambridge British Flora (1914) described 'Sowerbyi' as "often planted, as onChrist's Pieces,Cambridge".[3] Herbarium specimens from Wageningen suggest that 'Sowerby' was cultivated in The Netherlands in the mid-20th century, possibly as part of the elm collection assembled there the 1930s for DED-testing byChristine Buisman, on behalf of the Dutch Elm Committee. No mature specimens are known to survive.
Moss's "type" tree stood by Christ's Pieces, Cambridge, at the junction of Parker Street and Emmanuel Road[12][13] (also described as "on the pavement near the junction of Drummer Street and Emmanuel Road"[11]) and was (1932) 77 ft (23 m) high, with a diameter of 5.5 ft (1.7 m) towards the base and the branches spread 72 ft (22 m) across.[14] In 1954 the tree, which had lad lower horizontal branches removed in the 1940s, had a bole-girth of 16 feet and was estimated to be about 250 years old. In addition to F. G. Preston's c.1914 photograph, a second photograph of the tree, showing its tortuous winter branching, appeared in theCambridge Daily News in 1954.[11] Shortly after, the tree was propagated by the University Botanic Garden, and severely pruned owing to decay.[11]