Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Tu quoque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the logical fallacy. For the historical quotation "Tu quoque, Brute, fili mi", seeEt tu, Brute? For the play by John Cooke, seeGreene's Tu Quoque. For legal defense, seeTu quoque defense.
Fallacy regarding hypocrisy

Tu quoque[a], literally "you, too", is arhetorical technique that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appearshypocritical. Thisspecious reasoning is a special type ofad hominem attack. TheOxford English Dictionary cites John Cooke's 1614 stage playThe Cittie Gallant as the earliest known use of the term in the English language.[1]

Form and explanation

[edit]

The (fallacious)tu quoque argument follows thetemplate (i.e. pattern):[2]

  1. Person A claims that a statementX is true.
  2. Person B asserts that A's actions or past claims are inconsistent with the truth of claimX.
  3. Therefore,X is false.

For example:

  1. Person A: "Smoking is associated with chronic health disorders. You shouldn't smoke."
  2. Person B: "But you smoke yourself. So much for your argument!"[3]

Person A makes a statement, and Person B reasons that because Person A is being hypocritical, their statement is false.

Similar concepts

[edit]

A similar concept in politics is that ofwhataboutism; raising a counteraccusation, often in the form of a larger but unrelated issue. In the Soviet Union in the 1930s, the phrase "and you are lynching Negroes" was often raised against the United States.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^/tjˈkwkw/;[1]Latin for 'you also'. Also known as the appeal to hypocrisy, "you too" fallacy, "two wrongs" fallacy, "pot calling the kettle black" fallacy, and "look who's talking" fallacy.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"tu quoque".Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. Retrieved2016-04-24. (Subscription orparticipating institution membership required.)
  2. ^"Fallacy: Ad Hominem Tu Quoque".Nizkor project. Archived fromthe original on 12 September 2018. Retrieved24 November 2015.
  3. ^Walton, Douglas (September 1998).Ad Hominem Arguments. University of Alabama Press. p. 102.ISBN 978-0-8173-0922-0.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Look uptu quoque in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Commonfallacies (list)
Formal
Inpropositional logic
Inquantificational logic
Syllogistic fallacy
Informal
Equivocation
Question-begging
Correlative-based
Illicit transference
Secundum quid
Faulty generalization
Ambiguity
Questionable cause
Appeals
Consequences
Emotion
Genetic fallacy
Ad hominem
Otherfallacies
of relevance
Arguments
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tu_quoque&oldid=1336336660"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp