| Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Limits, and Settlement between the United States of America and the United Mexican States | |
|---|---|
 Cover of the exchange copy of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo | |
| Signed | 2 February 1848 (1848-02-02) |
| Location | Guadalupe Hidalgo |
| Effective | 30 May 1848 |
| Negotiators | List
|
| Parties | |
| Citations | 9 Stat. 922;TS 207; 9Bevans791 |
| See also the military convention of 29 February 1848 (5Miller 407; 9Bevans807). | |
| Part of a series on | ||||||||
| Chicanos andMexican Americans | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||
Literature
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Visual art
| ||||||||
TheTreaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo[a] officially ended theMexican–American War (1846–1848). It was signed on the 2nd of February 1848 in the town ofGuadalupe Hidalgo.
After the defeat of its army and the fall of the capital in September 1847,Mexico entered into peace negotiations with the U.S. envoy,Nicholas Trist. The resulting treaty requiredMexico to cede 55 percent of its territory including the present-day states ofCalifornia,Nevada,Utah, most ofColorado,New Mexico andArizona, and a small portion ofWyoming.Mexico also relinquished all claims forTexas and recognized theRio Grande as the southern boundary ofTexas.
In turn, the U.S. government paidMexico $15 million "in consideration of the extension acquired by the boundaries of the United States" and agreed to pay debts owed to American citizens by theMexican government.Mexicans in areas annexed by the U.S. could relocate withinMexico's new boundaries or receive American citizenship and full civil rights.[2]
The United States ratified the treaty on 10 March andMexico on 19 May. The ratifications were exchanged on 30 May, and the treaty was proclaimed on 4 July 1848.[3]
TheU.S. Senate ratified the treaty by a vote of 38–16. The opponents of this treaty were led by theWhigs, who had opposed the war and rejectedmanifest destiny in general, and rejected this expansion in particular. The amount of land gained by theUnited States fromMexico was further increased due to theGadsden Purchase of 1853, which ceded parts of present-day southernArizona andNew Mexico to theUnited States.
Nicholas Trist negotiated the peace talks; Trist, the chief clerk of theU.S. State Department, accompaniedGeneral Winfield Scott as a diplomat andPresident James K. Polk's representative. After two previous unsuccessful attempts to negotiate a treaty with GeneralJosé Joaquín de Herrera, Trist and General Scott determined that the only way to deal withMexico was as a conquered enemy. Trist negotiated with a special commission representing the collapsed government led by José Bernardo Couto, Miguel de Atristain, andLuis Gonzaga Cuevas ofMexico.[4][page needed]
AlthoughMexico cededAlta California andSanta Fe de Nuevo México, the text of the treaty[5] did not list territories to be ceded and avoided the disputed issues that were causes of war: the validity of the 1836 revolution that established theRepublic of Texas,Texas's boundary claims as far as theRio Grande, and the right of the Republic ofTexas to arrange the 1845annexation of Texas by theUnited States.
Instead, Article V of the treaty described the newU.S.–Mexico border. From east to west, the border consisted of theRio Grande northwest from its mouth to the point where it strikes the southern boundary ofNew Mexico (roughly 32 degrees north), as shown in theDisturnell map, then due west from this point to the110th meridian west, then north along the 110th meridian to theGila River and down the river to its mouth. Unlike theNew Mexico segment of the boundary, which depended partly on unknown geography, "to preclude all difficulty in tracing upon the ground the limit separating Upper fromLower California", a straight line was drawn from the mouth of theGila to onemarine league south of the southernmost point of thePort of San Diego, slightly north of theprevious Mexican provincial boundary atPlayas de Rosarito.
Comparing the boundary in theAdams–Onís Treaty to the Guadalupe Hidalgo boundary,Mexico conceded about 55% of its pre-war, pre-Texas territorial claims[6] and now had an area of 1,972,550 km2 (761,610 sq mi).
In theUnited States, the 1.36 million km2 (530,000 sq mi) of area between the Adams-Onís and Guadalupe Hidalgo boundaries outside the 1,007,935 km2 (389,166 sq mi) claimed by the Republic ofTexas is known as theMexican Cession. That is to say, theMexican Cession is construed not to include any territory east of theRio Grande, while the territorial claims of the Republic ofTexas included no territory west of theRio Grande. TheMexican Cession included essentially the entirety of the formerMexican territory ofAlta California, but only the western portion ofSanta Fe de Nuevo Mexico, and includes all of present-dayCalifornia,Nevada andUtah, most ofArizona, western portions ofNew Mexico andColorado, and the southwestern corner ofWyoming.
Articles VIII and IX ensured the safety of existingproperty rights ofMexican citizens living in the transferred territories. Despite assurances to the contrary,land grants by theMexican government to its citizens were often not honored by theUnited States because of unilateral modifications to and interpretations of the Treaty and U.S. legal decisions.[7][8] Land disputes between the descendants of Mexican land owners and Anglo Americans continued into the 21st century.[9][10] The United States also agreed to assume $3.25 million (equivalent to $118.1 million today) in debts that Mexico owed to United States citizens.
The residents had one year to choose whether they wanted American or Mexican citizenship; over 90% chose American citizenship. The others moved to what remained of Mexico (where they received land) or, in some cases in New Mexico, were allowed to remain in place as Mexican citizens.[11][12]
Article XII engaged the United States to pay, "In consideration of the extension acquired", 15 million dollars (equivalent to $550 million today),[13] in annual installments of 3 million dollars.
Article XI of the treaty was important to Mexico.[14] It provided that the United States would prevent and punish raids byIndians into Mexico, prohibited Americans from acquiring property, including livestock, taken by the Indians in those raids, and stated that the United States would return captives of the Indians to Mexico. Mexicans believed that the United States had encouraged and assisted theComanche andApache raids that had devastated northern Mexico in the years before the war. This article promised relief to them.[15]
Article XI, however, proved unenforceable. Destructive Indian raids continued despite a heavy U.S. presence near the Mexican border. Mexico filed 366 claims with the U.S. government for damages done by Comanche and Apache raids between 1848 and 1853.[16] In 1853, in the Treaty of Mesilla concluding theGadsden Purchase, Article XI was annulled.[17]
The land that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo brought into the United States became, between 1850 and 1912, all or part of nine states:California (1850),Nevada (1864),Utah (1896), andArizona (1912), as well as, depending upon interpretation, the entire state of Texas (1845), which then included part ofKansas (1861);Colorado (1876);Wyoming (1890);Oklahoma (1907); andNew Mexico (1912). The area of domain acquired was given by the Federal Interagency Committee as 338,680,960 acres.[18] The cost was $16,295,149 or approximately 5 cents an acre.[18] The remainder (the southern parts) of New Mexico and Arizona were peacefully acquired under theGadsden Purchase, which was carried out in 1853. In this transfer the United States paid an additional $10 million (equivalent to $300 million in 2024) for land intended to accommodate atranscontinental railroad. However, theAmerican Civil War delayed the construction of such a route, and it was not until 1881 that theSouthern Pacific Railroad finally was completed as a second transcontinental railroad, fulfilling the purpose of the acquisition.[19]
Mexico had claimed the area in question since winning its independence from theSpanish Empire in 1821 following theMexican War of Independence. The Spanish had conquered part of the area from theIndigenous peoples over the preceding three centuries. Still, powerful and independent Indigenous nations remained within that northern region of Mexico.[citation needed]
Most of that land was too dry and too mountainous to support a large population. About 80,000 Mexicans inhabited California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas during the period 1845 to 1850, with far fewer inNevada, southern and western Colorado, and Utah.[20] On 1 March 1845, U.S. PresidentJohn Tyler signed legislation to authorize the United States toannex the Republic of Texas, effective on 29 December 1845. The Mexican government, which had never recognized theRepublic of Texas as an independent country, had warned that annexation would be viewed as anact of war. Both the United Kingdom and France recognized the Republic of Texas's independence and repeatedly tried to dissuade Mexico from declaring war against its northern neighbor. British efforts to mediate the quandary proved fruitless, in part because other political disputes (particularly theOregon boundary dispute) arose between Great Britain (as the claimant of modern Canada) and the United States.
On 10 November 1845, before the outbreak of hostilities, PresidentJames K. Polk sent his envoy,John Slidell, to Mexico. Slidell had instructions to offer Mexico around $5 million for the territory ofNuevo México and up to $40 million forAlta California.[21] The Mexican government dismissed Slidell, refusing to even meet with him.[22] Earlier in that year, Mexico had broken offdiplomatic relations with the United States, based partly on its interpretation of theAdams–Onís Treaty of 1819, under which newly independent Mexico claimed it had inherited rights. In that agreement, the United States had "renounced forever" all claims to Spanish territory.[23][24]
Neither side took any further action to avoid a war. Meanwhile, Polk settled a major territorial dispute with Britain via theOregon Treaty, which was signed on 15 June 1846. By avoiding any chance of conflict with Great Britain, the United States was given a free hand regarding Mexico. After theThornton Affair of 25–26 April, when Mexican forces attacked an American unit in the disputed area, with the result that 11 Americans were killed, five wounded, and 49 captured, Congress passed a declaration of war, which Polk signed on 13 May 1846. The Mexican Congress responded with its own war declaration on 23 April 1846.[citation needed][25]
U.S. forces quickly moved beyond Texas to conquer Alta California, and New Mexico. Fighting there ended on 13 January 1847 with the signing of the "Capitulation Agreement" at "Campo de Cahuenga" and the end of theTaos Revolt.[26] By the middle of September 1847, U.S. forces had successfully invaded central Mexico and occupied Mexico City.
Some Eastern Democrats called forcomplete annexation of Mexico and recalled that a group of Mexico's leading citizens had invited General Winfield Scott to become dictator of Mexico after his capture of Mexico City (he declined).[27] However, the movement did not draw widespread support. President Polk'sState of the Union address in December 1847 upheld Mexican independence and argued at length that occupation and any further military operations in Mexico were aimed at securing a treaty ceding California and New Mexico up to approximately the32nd parallel north and possiblyBaja California and transit rights across theIsthmus of Tehuantepec.[22]
Despite several military defeats, the Mexican government was reluctant to agree to the loss of California and New Mexico. Even with its capital under enemy occupation, the Mexican government was inclined to consider factors such as the unwillingness of the U.S. administration to annex Mexico outright and what appeared to be deep divisions in domestic U.S. opinion regarding the war and its aims, which caused it to imagine that it was actually in a far better negotiating position than the military situation might have suggested.[citation needed] A further consideration was the growing opposition to slavery that had caused Mexico to end formal slavery in 1829 and its awareness of the well-known and growing sectional divide in the U.S. over the issue of slavery. It, therefore, made sense for Mexico to negotiate to play Northern U.S. interests against Southern U.S. interests.[citation needed]
The Mexican negotiators also had intercepted a secret letter from Secretary of State Buchanan to Trist reiterating that annexingBaja California and acquiring American transit rights in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec were expendable American demands. With that knowledge, the Mexicans steadfastly refused to budge on either issue. (Chamberlin, Eugene [1963])
The Mexicans proposed peace terms that offered only the sale ofAlta California north of the37th parallel north — north ofSanta Cruz, California andMadera, California and the southern boundaries of today's Utah and Colorado. Anglo-American settlers already dominated this territory, but perhaps more importantly from the Mexican point of view, it represented the bulk of pre-war Mexican territory north of theMissouri Compromise line ofparallel 36°30′ north — lands that, if annexed by the United States, would have been presumed by Northerners to be forever free of slavery. The Mexicans also offered to recognize the freedom of Texas from Mexican rule and its right to join the Union but held to its demand of theNueces River as a boundary.[citation needed]
While the Mexican government could not reasonably have expected the Polk Administration to accept such terms, it would have had reason to hope that a rejection of peace terms so favorable to Northern interests might have the potential to provoke sectional conflict in the United States or perhaps even a civil war that would fatally undermine the U.S. military position in Mexico. Instead, these terms, combined with other Mexican demands (in particular, for various indemnities), only provoked widespread indignation throughout the United States without causing the sectional conflict the Mexicans hoped for.
Jefferson Davis advised Polk that if Mexico appointed commissioners to come to the United States, the government that appointed them would probably be overthrown before they completed their mission, and they would likely be shot as traitors on their return; so that the only hope of peace was to have a U.S. representative in Mexico.[28] Nicholas Trist, chief clerk of the State Department under President Polk, finally negotiated a treaty with the Mexican delegation after ignoring his recall by President Polk in frustration with the failure to secure a treaty.[29] Notwithstanding that the treaty had been negotiated against his instructions, given its achievement of the major American aim, President Polk passed it on to the Senate.[29]
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed by Nicholas Trist (on behalf of the United States) and Luis G. Cuevas, Bernardo Couto, and Miguel Atristain asplenipotentiary representatives of Mexico on 2 February 1848 at the main altar of the oldBasilica of Guadalupe at VillaHidalgo (within the present city limits) as U.S. troops under the command of Gen.Winfield Scott were occupyingMexico City.[30]
The version of the treaty ratified by theUnited States Senate eliminated Article X,[31] which stated that the U.S. government would honor and guarantee allland grants awarded in lands ceded to the United States by those respective governments to citizens of Spain and Mexico. Article VIII guaranteed that Mexicans who remained more than one year in the ceded lands would automatically become full-fledged United States citizens (or they could declare their intention of remaining Mexican citizens); however, the Senate modified Article IX, changing the first paragraph and excluding the last two. Among the changes was that Mexican citizens would "be admitted at the proper time (to be judged of by the Congress of the United States)" instead of "admitted as soon as possible", as negotiated between Trist and the Mexican delegation.
An amendment byJefferson Davis giving the United States most ofTamaulipas andNuevo León, all ofCoahuila, and a large part ofChihuahua was supported by both senators from Texas (Sam Houston andThomas Jefferson Rusk),Daniel S. Dickinson of New York,Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois,Edward A. Hannegan of Indiana, and one each from Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Ohio, Missouri, and Tennessee. Most of the leaders of the Democratic party,Thomas Hart Benton,John C. Calhoun,Herschel V. Johnson,Lewis Cass,James Murray Mason of Virginia andAmbrose Hundley Sevier were opposed, and the amendment was defeated 44–11.[32]
An amendment by Whig Sen.George Edmund Badger of North Carolina to exclude New Mexico and California lost 35–15, with three Southern Whigs voting with the Democrats.Daniel Webster was bitter that four New England senators made deciding votes for acquiring the new territories.
A motion to insert into the treaty theWilmot Proviso (banning slavery from the acquired territories) failed 15–38 on sectional lines.
The treaty was leaked toJohn Nugent before the U.S. Senate could approve it. Nugent published his article in theNew York Herald and, afterward, was questioned by senators. He was detained in a Senate committee room for one month, though he continued to file articles for his newspaper and ate and slept at the home of the sergeant at arms. Nugent did not reveal his source, and senators eventually gave up their efforts.[33]
The treaty was subsequentlyratified by the U.S. Senate by a vote of 38 to 14 on 10 March 1848 and by Mexico through alegislative vote of 51 to 34 and a Senate vote of 33 to 4, on 19 May 1848. News that New Mexico's legislative assembly had just passed an act for the organization of a U.S. territorial government helped ease Mexican concern about abandoning the people of New Mexico.[34] The treaty was formally proclaimed on 4 July 1848.[35]
The Mexican Congress and PresidentManuel de la Peña y Peña met atQuerétaro City in May, 1848 while Mexico City was occupied, and were now faced with the task of negotiating the treaty while dealing with separatism and anarchy spreading throughout the country. TheCaste War was ongoing in Yucatán, and the insurgents in that conflict had occupied the major cities. Many states considered the federal government to be an enemy and refused to pay taxes. Meanwhile, most notably in the Federal District there was a Mexican element advocating annexation of the entire country to the United States.[36]
The majority of congress supported the government's peace policy viewing in the Treaty of Guadalupe nothing but the unfortunate result of a poorly fought war, and viewed under this perspective as a national necessity. A foreign relations commission returned affirmative answers to two questions that congress had directed it to report upon:May the government with the consent of Congress cede a portion of territory? Is it suitable to make peace upon the terms which have been proposed? The first question was resolved based upon the principle that congress was the deposit of the national sovereignty. The second question was resolved upon the consideration that Mexico had never been in full possession of the territories that were about to be ceded, and that most of that land was either not populated, or populated by hostile Indigenous tribes.[36] It was also taken into account that Mexico could not continue the war without facing certain defeat and risking the loss of the entire country.[37]After the commission reported its findings, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was approved by congress. President Peña y Peña prepared decrees to prevent disorder in the capital once the occupiers left and to establish a national guard. On 26 May 1848 the government received the commissionersNathan Clifford andAmbrose Hundley Sevier who were in Mexico to negotiate the treaty after congress had approved it with some slight modifications.[37]
Meanwhile, the President had to deal with guerilla warfare throughout the country afflicting both the American occupiers and Mexican merchants. The aim of the guerillas was to disrupt the American supply chain from Veracruz to the capital. This was also leading to indiscriminate American reprisals.[37] As the peace treaty was concluded and the occupiers were on the point of leaving the country, congress namedJose Joaquin Herrera to the presidency of the republic, and Peña y Peña left his post as president in exchange for the presidency of the Supreme Court on 3 June 1848. The government left Querétaro and returned to the capital.[37]
On 30 May 1848, when the two countries exchanged ratifications of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, they further negotiated a three-article protocol to explain the amendments.[38] The first article stated that the original Article IX of the treaty, although replaced by Article III of theTreaty of Louisiana, would still confer the rights delineated in Article IX. The second article confirmed the legitimacy of land grants pursuant to Mexican law.[39]
The protocol further noted that the Mexican Minister of Foreign Affairs had accepted said explanations on behalf of the Mexican Government,[39] and was signed inQuerétaro by A. H. Sevier,Nathan Clifford andLuis de la Rosa.
The United States would later ignore the protocol on the grounds that the U.S. representatives had over-reached their authority in agreeing to it.[40]
TheTreaty of Mesilla, which concluded the Gadsden purchase of 1854, had significant implications for the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Article II of the treaty annulled article XI of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and article IV further annulled articles VI and VII of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Article V, however, reaffirmed the property guarantees of Guadalupe Hidalgo, specifically those contained within articles VIII and IX.[41]
In addition to the sale of land, the treaty also provided recognition of the Rio Grande as the boundary between the state of Texas and Mexico.[42] The land boundaries were established by a survey team of appointed Mexican and American representatives,[29] and published in three volumes as theUnited States and Mexican Boundary Survey. On 30 December 1853, the countries, by agreement, altered the border from the initial one by increasing the number of border markers from 6 to 53.[29] Most of these markers were simply piles of stones.[29] Two later conventions, in 1882 and 1889, further clarified the boundaries, as some of the markers had been moved or destroyed.[29] Photographers were brought in to document the location of the markers. These photographs are in Record Group 77, Records of the Office of the Chief Engineers, in the National Archives.
The southern border of California was designated as a line from the junction of the Colorado and Gila rivers westward to the Pacific Ocean so that it passes one Spanish league south of the southernmost portion of San Diego Bay. This was done to ensure that the United States received San Diego and its excellent natural harbor.[43]
The treaty extended the choice of U.S. citizenship to Mexicans in the newly purchased territories before many African Americans, Asians, and Native Americans were eligible. If they chose to, they had to declare to the U.S. government within a year of the Treaty being signed; otherwise, they could remain Mexican citizens, but they would have to relocate.[6] Between 1850 and 1920, the U.S. Census counted most Mexicans as racially "white".[44]
Community property rights in California and other western states are based on theVisigothic Code which Spain adopted and then brought to the Americas, including the former territories of Mexico that were ceded to the U.S. Although each state had different motivations for adopting the Spanish approach, one common driver was that it was already in place in the region for many years. According to a 2011 assessment, changing to a common law system for marital property "would have been nothing short of a revolution".[45]
)_1848_UTA.jpg)
The United States received the territories ofAlta California andSanta Fe de Nuevo México. Today they comprise some or all of the U.S. states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. While this land was vast in area, most of it was very sparsely populated, inhabited mostly byIndigenous Americans, rather than white Americans or Mexicans.[46]
Additional issues stemming from the treaty included contention over slavery, border disputes with Mexico, mapping difficulties, cross-border incursions by both nations, community land grant claims, and water rights assignment between the two nations.
Disputes about whether to make all this new territory intoslave states or free states, includingBleeding Kansas, contributed heavily to the rise in North–South tensions that led to theAmerican Civil War just over a decade later.
Following the signing of the treaty, border disputes continued, with the United States sending envoyJames Gadsden to negotiate the sale of additional territory to the US.[47] In 1853, AmericanfilibusterWilliam Walker led an unauthorized expedition intoBaja California andSonora, proclaiming the short-livedRepublic of Lower California with the aim of being annexed by the United States.[48][49] Although Walker's unrecognized state collapsed in January 1854, Mexican PresidentAntonio Lopez de Santa Anna continued to see the US as a threat amid Mexico's persisting economic problems.[50] Desiring to stave off American expansionist desires as well as alleviate domestic financial problems, Santa Anna sought to sell an area as small as possible to the US for as much money as possible, leading to the controversial $15 millionGadsden Purchase in 1854.[51]
The border commission also faced many difficulties in mapping out the boundary, with the surveying process lasting over 7 years. The work of the commission was hampered by a multitude of issues including: transportation difficulties, unforgiving terrain, extreme weather, inaccurate information and negotiations with Indigenous Americans who had not been considered in the prior treaty negotiations.[46]
The financial cost of enforcing Article XI was significant, becoming higher than the cost of the original treaty. In New Mexico alone military spending rose to $12 million between 1848 and 1853, and the Mexican government presented claims of damages of over $31 million to the US in 1868.[52]
TheChannel Islands of California andFarallon Islands are not mentioned in the Treaty.[53]
The armed forces of both countries routinely crossed the border. Mexican andConfederate troops often clashed during theAmerican Civil War, and the United States crossed the border during the war ofSecond French intervention in Mexico. In March 1916,Pancho Villa led a raid on the U.S. border town ofColumbus, New Mexico, which was followed bythe Pershing expedition. The shifting of the Rio Grande since the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe caused a dispute over the boundary between the states of New Mexico and Texas, a case referred to as theCountry Club Dispute that was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927.[54]
Controversy over community land grant claims inNew Mexico persists to this day.[55]
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo led to the establishment in 1889 of theInternational Boundary and Water Commission to maintain the border and, according to newer treaties, to allocate river waters between the two nations and to provide for flood control and water sanitation. Once viewed as a model of international cooperation, in recent decades, the IBWC has been heavily criticized as an institutional anachronism, bypassed by modern social, environmental, and political issues.[56]
Writing many years later, Nicholas Trist would describe the Treaty as "a thing for every right-minded American to be ashamed of".[57]
The Library holds the copy of the Treaty found in Nicholas Trist's papers, and as such, it does not represent the final version of the document which is kept at the U.S. National Archives.
| ||
| Life |  | |
| Presidency | ||
| Public image | ||
| Family |
| |
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
