TheTreaty of Adrianople (also called theTreaty of Edirne) concluded theRusso-Turkish War of 1828–29, betweenImperial Russia and theOttoman Empire. The terms favored Russia, which gained access to the mouths of theDanube and new territory on theBlack Sea. The treaty opened theDardanelles to all commercial vessels, granted autonomy toSerbia, and promised autonomy forGreece. It also allowed Russia to occupyMoldavia andWalachia until the Ottoman Empire had paid a largeindemnity; those indemnities were later reduced. The treaty was signed on 14 September 1829 inAdrianople by CountAlexey Fyodorovich Orlov of Russia and Abdülkadir Bey of the Ottoman Empire.[2]
The Ottoman Empire gave Russia access to the mouths of the Danube and the fortresses ofAkhaltsikhe andAkhalkalaki inGeorgia. The Sultan recognized Russia's possession of Georgia (withImeretia,Mingrelia,Guria) and of the Khanates ofErivan andNakhichevan which had been ceded to the tsar byPersia in theTreaty of Turkmenchay a year earlier.[3] The treaty opened the Dardanelles to all commercial vessels, thus liberating commerce for cereals, livestock and wood. However, it took theTreaty of Hünkâr İskelesi (1833) finally to settle the Straits Question between the signatories.
Under the Treaty of Adrianople, the Sultan reguaranteed the previously promised autonomy to Serbia, promised autonomy forGreece, and allowed Russia to occupy Moldavia and Wallachia until the Ottoman Empire had paid a large indemnity. However, under the modifications of the later Treaty of Hünkâr İskelesi, these indemnities were sharply curtailed.[4] The treaty also fixed the border between the Ottoman Empire and Wallachia on thethalweg of theDanube, transferring to Wallachia the rule of therayas ofTurnu,Giurgiu andBrăila.[5][6]
The main sections of the treaty were as follows:
In recognition of theTreaty of London, the independence of Greece, or autonomy under Ottoman suzerainty, was accepted.
The Ottoman Empire had nominal suzerainty over the Danube states of Moldavia and Wallachia; for all practical purposes, they were independent.
Russia took control of the towns of Anape and Poti in Caucasus.
The Russian traders in Turkey were placed under the legal jurisdiction of the Russian ambassador.
Among the inhabitants of the annexed territory,Georgians predominated, in addition to whom there livedAzerbaijanis ("Tatars" in the terminology of that time),Turks,Armenians, andKurds. Soon after the end of hostilities, Turks and Kurds left the newly annexed territories to the Ottoman Empire, and about 30 thousand Ottoman Armenians fromErzurum andKars Pashalyks settled in their places. The resettled Armenians were not only settled in theAkhaltsikhe andAkhalkalaki regions, but also inTbilissi,Erevan andNakhchivan.[7]
^H.E. Stier (dir.): Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1984, p. 134,ISBN3141009198.
^John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton (1907).The Cambridge Modern History. Macmillan & Co. p. 202.
^Tucker, Spencer C., ed. (2010).A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. ABC-CLIO. p. 1154.ISBN978-1851096725.The Turks recognize Russian possession of Georgia and the khanates of Yerevan (Erivan) and Nakhichevan that had been ceded by Persia to Russia the year before.
^Note 285 contained in theCollected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Volume 12 (International Publishers: New York, 1979) p. 678.
^Constantin Giurescu.Istoria Românilor. București, 1938.
^Nicolae Iorga.Istoria Românilor. București, 1934.
^Наталия Георгиевна Волкова, «Этнические процессы в Закавказье в XIX–XX вв»
Anderson, M.S.The Eastern Question, 1774–1923: A Study in International Relations (1966)online
Ciachir, Nicolae. "The Adrianople Treaty (1829) and Its European Implications." inEuropean Politics 1815–1848 (Routledge, 2017) pp. 95–113.
Kerner, Robert J. "IV. Russia's New Policy in the near East after the Peace of Adrianople; Including the Text of the Protocol of 16 September 1829."Cambridge Historical Journal 5.3 (1937): 280–290.
Šedivý, Miroslav. "From Adrianople to Münchengrätz: Metternich, Russia, and the Eastern Question 1829—33."International History Review 33.2 (2011): 205–233.