Principality of Travunia Травунија Travunija | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9th century–11th century | |||||||||
 Travunia in 9th century | |||||||||
| Religion | Christianity | ||||||||
| Government | Monarchy | ||||||||
| Prince | |||||||||
• before 839 | Beloje(first known) | ||||||||
• c. 1054 | Domanek(last independent) | ||||||||
| History | |||||||||
• Established | 9th century | ||||||||
| 11th century | |||||||||
| |||||||||
| Today part of | Croatia Bosnia and Herzegovina Montenegro | ||||||||
Travunia (Serbo-Croatian:Travunija /Травунија;Greek:Τερβουνία,romanized: Tervounía;Ancient Greek:Τερβουνία,romanized: Terbounía;Latin:Tribunia) was aSouth Slavic medieval principality that was part ofMedieval Serbia (850–1371), and later theMedieval Bosnia (1373–1482). The principality became hereditary in a number of noble houses, often kin to the ruling dynasty. The region came underOttoman rule in 1482. Its seat was in the city ofTrebinje.
In the 9th and 10th centuries, theŽupa of Travunia was held by theBelojević noble family, who were entitled the rule during the reign ofPrince Vlastimir (r. 830–850), of theVlastimirović dynasty. After the death ofČaslav, the last dynastic member, theprincipality disintegrated, and the provinces were annexed by the Bulgars and Byzantines. In 1034,Stefan Vojislav (the founder of theVojislavljević dynasty) incited a rebellion and renounced Byzantine rule, becoming thePrince of Serbs, ruling from the seat atDuklja. In the early 12th century,Desa of theVukanović dynasty wrestled the region, and it continued under the rule of theNemanjić dynasty (1166–1371), either held by dynastic members or close associates (most often military commanders), of which was the notableVojinović noble family. AfterNikola Altomanović, the holder of a large province during thefall of the Serbian Empire, was defeated in 1373, his estates were divided between Prince Lazar Hrebeljanović of Serbia, Đurađ I Balšić of Zeta, and Ban Tvrtko I Kotromanić of Bosnia. Trebinje continued under the Bosnian crown in the hands of thePavlović family, and from 1435 under theKosača family. It was finally annexed in 1481 by the Ottomans and organized into theSanjak of Herzegovina.
Tribulium was the original name for this settlement and the etymology of it may be analyzed astri-bulium, or the place of the 'three hills', from the numeral 'three' (*trei-) and an appellative derived from the IE root *b(h)eu- 'to swell, puff'.[1]
The Slavs invaded the Balkans during the reign ofJustinian I (r. 527–565), when eventually up to 100,000 Slavs raidedThessalonica. The Western Balkans was settled withSclaveni (Sklavenoi), the east withAntes.[2] The Sklavenoi plundered Thrace in 545, and again the next year. In 551, the Slavs crossedNiš initially headed for Thessalonica, but ended up inDalmatia. In 577 some 100,000 Slavs poured intoThrace andIllyricum, pillaging cities and then settling down.[3]Charlemagne,King of the Franks from 768 until his death in 814, expanded the Frankish kingdom into anempire that incorporated much of western and central Europe.[4] Dalmatia which was southeast of the Frankish empire, was in the hands of the Croats and Serbs.[5]Radoslav of Serbia orhis son was the ruler of Serbia during the uprisings (819–822) ofLjudevit Posavski against the Franks. According to theRoyal Frankish Annals, in 822, Ljudevit went from his seat inSisak to theSerbs who controlled a great part ofDalmatia ("ad Sorabos, quae natio magnam Dalmatiae partem obtinere dicitur") but according toJohn (Jr.) Fine, it was hard to find Serbs in this area since the Byzantine sources were limited to the southern coast, also it is possible that among other tribes exists tribe of group of small tribes of Serbs.[6][7] The mentioning of "Dalmatia" in 822 and 833 as an old geographical term by the authors of Frankish Annals wasPars pro toto with a vague perception of what this geographical term actually referred to.[8] In late 870s, theTheme of Dalmatia ("thema Dalmatias") was established, with the strategos seated atDubrovnik (Ragusa, Ragusion). These small cities in the region (alsoDyrrachium) did not stretch into the hinterlands, and had no military capacity, thus Basil I paid a tax of '72 gold coins' to the princes of Zahumlje and Travunia.[9][10]
| - taken from De Administrando Imperio, byConstantine VII (905–959) |
Trebinje is first attested inDAI byConstantine VII (905–959), when describing the migration and geography of the Serbs in 7th century,[11] but the population's 7th Century identity remains a matter of dispute as it rather indicates Serbian political and ethnic connection[12] during the time ofČaslav in 10th Century.[13][14][15][16][17]Travunia (Τερβουνια) was a province subservient toSerbian Principality under theVlastimirović Dynasty. The first known office holder wasBeloje, a count, who ruled underPrince Vlastimir (also possibly underRadoslav orProsigoj, fl. 819). In the mid 9th century, Vlastimir marries his daughter toKrajina, the son of Beloje, and gives him theŽupa of Trebinje to govern under his suzerainty. TheBelojević noble family is entitled the rule of Travunia;Hvalimir, and his sonČučimir continue the office under the Serbian crown.
From 927 to 960,Časlav Klonimirović, the last of theVlastimirović dynasty, held supreme rule of Travunia which at the time borderedZahumlje to the west, the city of Ragusa orDubrovnik to the southwest,Duklja to the south andSerbia (crownland, seeRascia) to the north. Its coastline spanned from Dubrovnik toBoka Kotorska. With the death of Časlav, Serbia disintegrated and Duklja absorbed most of Rascia along with Zahumlje and Trebinje.[18] TheCatepanate of Ras was established during the rule ofJohn Tzimiskes (r. 969–976).[19] A seal of astrategos of Ras has been dated to Tzimiskes' reign, making it possible for Tzimiskes' predecessorNikephoros II Phokas to have enjoyed recognition in Rascia.[20][21]
In the 990s, Bulgarian Tsar Samuel made client states out of most of the Balkans, including Duklja and Zahumlje.[22] In 998, Samuel launched a major campaign againstJovan Vladimir to prevent a Byzantine-Serbian alliance. When his troops reached Duklja, Vladimir withdrew to the mountains, Samuel left part of the army at the foot of the mountains and led the remaining soldiers to besiege the coastal fortress ofUlcinj. In an effort to prevent bloodshed, he asked Jovan Vladimir to surrender, but Jovan refused, some Serb nobles offered their services to the Bulgarians and, when it became clear that further resistance was fruitless, the Serbs surrendered. Jovan Vladimir was exiled to Samuel's palaces inPrespa.[23] The Bulgarian troops proceeded to pass throughDalmatia, taking control ofKotor and journeying toDubrovnik. Although they failed to take Dubrovnik, they devastated the surrounding villages. The Bulgarian army then attackedCroatia in support of the rebel princesKrešimir III andGojslav and advanced northwest as far asSplit,Trogir andZadar, then northeast throughBosnia andRaška and returned to Bulgaria.[23]
The dawn of the 10th century brought a short-lived Bulgarian occupation after the fall of the Rascian lands, but prince Caslav restored a Principality of Serbia by 931 and ruled Travunia as well. Travunia flourished under the greatest Serbian early medieval ruler – SaintJovan Vladimir of Duklja and Travunia in the late 10th and early 11th century. With the trickery of Jovan Vladimir in 1016, Byzantine domination was restored under old Prince Dragomir. Dragomir was assassinated in Kotor in 1018 which brought upon Byzantine military occupation.Stefan Vojislav raised a rebellion in the 1030s.[24] Prince ofZachlumia Ljutovid exerted his influence over Travunia, even though Stefan Vojislav claimed it. After inflicting a sound defeat to the Byzantines atBar, Vojislav dispatched 50 captured Greeks to demoralize Liudevit's army that was awaiting at Klobuk. Vojislav's son Gojislav led the Dioclean forces and easily defeated Liutovid's forces, killing Liutovid himself with the help of two bodyguards. Travunia was fully incorporated into Doclea. When Gojslav became the ruler, he elected Trebinje as the new Serbian capital. He was assassinated by Travunian Prince Ljutovid who raised a rebellion in 1047–1050 andMihailo I Vojislavljević had to depose Domanec, Liutovid's son, and move the capital from Travunia, placing his brother Saganek as Prince of Travunia. Saganek was overthrown in 1055, and it took Radoslav, Mihailo's faithful brother to finally kill Domanec and seize control over Travunia. In 1077 a Slavic Kingdom of Doclea and Dalmatia was proclaimed. It commanded the road fromRagusa toConstantinople, traversed, in 1096, byRaymond of Toulouse and hiscrusaders.With the coming of the 12th century, Travunia was fully incorporated into the unifiedSerbian state. Later, theNemanjić dynasty took over since 1166/68. In 1217, the Serbian Kingdom was proclaimed.
With the death of Stefan Vojislav, the rule was divided between the five sons.[25] Gojislav had received Travunia (Trebinje), and briefly ruled until he was killed by local nobles, who set upDomanek as Prince.[25] Mihailo pursued and attacked Domanek, who fled, in his place Saganek was put to govern Travunia.[25] Domanek then returned, and drove out Saganek.[25] Mihailo offered the office to Radoslav, who declined, afraid of losingLuška župa (futureZeta).[25] Radoslav perhaps distrusted his brother, thinking he would seize Zeta, but Mihailo seems to have offered him a deal.[25] TheByzantine Empire, wanting to take advantage of the death of Stefan Vojislav, prepared an offensive against unstable Duklja.[25] At this time, the four remaining brothers made peace and made an alliance.[25] The treaty concluded is the oldest in Serbian history.[25] After the agreement, Radoslav attackedTrebinje, killing Domanek.[25] After this event, their mother (who had acted as an stability in the relations between the brothers) died.[25] While in no imminent danger from that side, Mihailo found it favorable to further strengthen ties with Byzantium around 1052, gaining the title ofprotospatharios, also marrying a niece ofConstantine IX Monomachos. This might have implied titular recognition of Constantinople's authority, but no real concessions on his part. It corresponded to the then-current balance of forces, and bought some 20 years of peace and prosperity to his land.
Under the name ofTribunia orTravunja (the Trebigne of the Ragusans), it belonged to theSerbian Empire until 1355.[citation needed] Trebinje became a part of the expandedMedieval Bosnian state underTvrtko I in 1373.[26] There is a medieval tower in Gornje Police whose construction is often attributed toVuk Branković.[27] The oldTvrdoš Monastery dates back to the 15th century.
The Area ofTrebinje, has produced theHouse of Mrnjavčević and was at times ruled by members of the Serbian royal family, like Queen Hellen of Anjou in the 13th century.[citation needed] Travunia got a neighbour by 1326, as the Bosnians conquered Zachlumia. In 1345, theSerbian Empire was created. After the collapse of the Serbian Empire in 1371, the area of Trebinje became ruled by theHouse of Vojinović Serbian dynasty fromHum. WithNikola Altomanović's defeat, the Bosnian King Tvrtko took the area in 1377[28] and it has been a component of Herzegovina ever since.
This lists only the rulers who had Travunia as their appanage or fief and will not house the rulers of the region of Travunia. Travunia was merged into neighbouring states and lost its importance several times in history (amalgamation).
Glavnu poteškoću uočavanju etničke raznolikosti Slavena duž jadranske obale činilo je tumačenje Konstantina Porfirogeneta, po kojemu su Neretvani (Pagani), Zahumljani, Travunjani i Konavljani porijeklom Srbi. Pri tome je car dosljedno izostavljao Dukljane iz ove srpske zajednice naroda. Čini se, međutim, očitim da car ne želi govoriti ο stvarnoj etničkoj povezanosti, već da su mu pred očima politički odnosi u trenutku kada je pisao djelo, odnosno iz vremena kada su za nj prikupljani podaci u Dalmaciji. Opis se svakako odnosi na vrijeme kada je srpski knez Časlav proširio svoju vlast i na susjedne sklavinije, pored navedenih još i na Bosnu. Zajedno sa širenjem političke prevlasti, širilo se i etničko ime, što u potpunosti odgovara našim predodžbama ο podudarnosti etničkog i političkog nazivlja. Upravo zbog toga car ne ubraja Dukljane u Srbe, niti se srpsko ime u Duklji/Zeti udomaćilo prije 12. stoljeća.
Kraniometrijske analize provedene na kosturnim ostacima iz grobišta od jadranskog priobalja do duboko u unutrašnjost upućuju na zaključak da su se populacije koje se smatraju starohrvatskima postupno širile u zaleđe sve do južne Panonije tek u vrijeme od 10. do 13. stoljeća.. Izneseni nalazi navode na zaključak da se Hrvati nisu uopće naselili u južnoj Panoniji tijekom izvorne seobe sa sjevera na jug, iako je moguće da su pojedine manje skupine zaostale na tom području utopivši se naposljetku u premoćnoj množini ostalih doseljenih slavenskih populacija.. Širenje starohrvatskih populacija s juga na sjever pripada vremenu od 10. stoljeća nadalje i povezano je s izmijenjenim političkim prilikama, jačanjem i širenjem rane hrvatske države. Na temelju svega ovoga mnogo je vjerojatnije da etnonim "Hrvati" i doseoba skrivaju činjenicu o prijenosu političke vlasti, što znači da je car političko vrhovništvo poistovjetio s etničkom nazočnošću. Točno takav pristup je primijenio pretvarajući Zahumljane, Travunjane i Neretljane u Srbe (DAI, c. 33, 8-9, 34, 4-7, 36, 5-7).
Porfirogenet piše kako stanovnici svih triju sklavinija vuku podrijetlo od Srba, no vjerojatnije je tumačenje toga navoda u smislu njihove podložnosti Srbiji, pod čiju su vlast potpali najvjerojatnije tijekom prve polovice 10. stoljeća, u vrijeme srpskoga kneza Petra ili pak Časlava. U prilog odvojenoj etničkoj pripadnosti govori i podatak prema kojemu bi Travunjani bili Srbi samo od vremena bizantskoga cara Heraklija do srpskoga kneza Vlastimira, kada su stekli određenu neovisnost pod županom Krajinom, kao i navođenje jasne i odvojene lokalne tradicije vladajućeg roda Zahumljana o podrijetlu njihovih predaka s područja Visle.
Sporovi hrvatske i srpske historiografije oko etničkoga karaktera sklavinija između Cetine i Drača bespredmetni su, jer transponiraju suvremene kategorije etniciteta u rani srednji vijek u kojem se identitet shvaćao drukčije. Osim toga, opstojnost većine sklavinija, a pogotovo Duklje (Zete) govori i u prilog ustrajanju na vlastitom identitetu kojim su se njihove elite razlikovale od onih susjednih ... Međutim, nakon nekog vremena (možda poslije unutarnjih sukoba u Hrvatskoj) promijenio je svoj položaj i prihvatio vrhovništvo srpskog vladara jer Konstantin tvrdi da su Zahumljani (kao i Neretvani i Travunjani) bili Srbi od vremena onog arhonta koji je Srbe, za vrijeme Heraklija, doveo u njihovu novu domovinu. Ta tvrdnja, naravno, nema veze sa stvarnošću 7. st., ali govori o političkim odnosima u Konstantinovo vrijeme.
Dragomir, Župan von Travunija war und zwar vermählt mit einer Tochter des 980 — 1019 regierenden..
Then the emperor sent a note to Vladimir's uncle Dragimir, so that he might come and receive the land of Tribunia, where he might gather his people and strengthen his country, and this was done.
Desa, si trovò a governare una parte della Zeta e della Travunija..
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)42°43′02″N18°22′10″E / 42.7172547°N 18.3694839°E /42.7172547; 18.3694839