HMS TrafalgerHMSTrafalgar | |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Operators | |
| Preceded by | Victoria class |
| Succeeded by | Royal Sovereign class |
| In commission | 1890–1911 |
| Completed | 2 |
| Retired | 2 |
| General characteristics | |
| Type | Ironclad battleship |
| Displacement |
|
| Length | 345 ft (105 m) |
| Beam | 73 ft (22 m) |
| Draught | 27 ft 6 in (8.38 m) |
| Propulsion | 2 × coal-fired 3-cylinder steam engines, 6 cylindrical boilers, twin screws |
| Speed | 16.7 knots (30.9 km/h; 19.2 mph) |
| Complement | 577 |
| Armament | |
| Armour |
|
The twoTrafalgar-class battleships of theBritishRoyal Navy were late-nineteenth-centuryironclad warships. Both were named after naval battles won by the British during theNapoleonic Wars under the command ofAdmiral Nelson. The two ships were namedHMSNile andHMSTrafalgar.

Laid down in 1886, they were designed byWilliam Henry White to be improved versions of theAdmiral class,[citation needed] having a greater displacement to allow for improved protection. However they sacrificed a full armoured belt for greater thickness amidships in a partial belt.
They were originally intended to have a secondary armament of eight 5 inch guns but this was changed to six quick-firing 4.7 inch guns for use against attacking torpedo boats, which led to a weight increase of 60 tons, partly due to the increased amount of ammunition carried. This was one of the changes which led to the vessels being 600 tons overweight, causing an increase in draught of a foot.
TheTrafalgars were the penultimate low-freeboard battleships built for the Royal Navy. This design had been favoured for several years because it reduced the size of the target that the ships presented to enemy guns in battle, and because the smaller hull area allowed thicker armour. However, as a consequence of having a freeboard of only about 15 feet, the vessels were unable to cope with very rough seas. This was mitigated by having them spend most of their active service in the relatively calmMediterranean.
When they were built, many observers overestimated the vulnerability of large ships totorpedoes and the perceived inability to avoid them, which made them believe that large warships would inevitably be replaced by smaller, less vulnerable, and less valuable, vessels.[1] For example,John Hibbert, the parliamentary secretary of theAdmiralty, toldParliament in March 1886: "I think I may safely say that these two large iron-clads will probably be the last iron-clads of this type that will ever be built in this or any other country. In France they are ceasing to go on with the construction of large iron-clads."[2]
| Name | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trafalgar | Portsmouth Dockyard | 18 January 1886 | 20 September 1887 | 1890 |
| Nile | Pembroke Dockyard | 8 April 1886 | 27 March 1888 | 10 July 1891 |