Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Tomb of the Scipios

Coordinates:41°52′34″N12°30′03″E / 41.87614°N 12.50075°E /41.87614; 12.50075
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Common tomb of the Scipio family during the Roman Republic
Tomb of the Scipios
Entrance to the tomb.
Tomb of the Scipios is located in Rome
Tomb of the Scipios
Tomb of the Scipios
Location in ancient Rome
Map
Click on the map for a fullscreen view
LocationRegio IX Circus Flaminius
Coordinates41°52′34″N12°30′03″E / 41.87614°N 12.50075°E /41.87614; 12.50075
TypeMausoleum
History
BuilderAugustus
Founded28 BC

TheTomb of the Scipios (Latin:sepulcrum Scipionum),[1] also called thehypogaeum Scipionum, was the common tomb of thepatricianScipio family during theRoman Republic for interments between the early 3rd century BC and the early 1st century AD. Then it was abandoned and within a few hundred years its location was lost.

The tomb was rediscovered twice, the last time in 1780[2] and stands under a hill by the side of the road behind a wall at numbers 9 and 12 Via di Porta San Sebastiano,Rome, where it can be visited by the public for a small admission fee. The location was privately owned on discovery of the tomb but was bought by the city in 1880 at the suggestion ofRodolfo Amedeo Lanciani.[3] A house was subsequently built in a previous vineyard there. The current main entrance to the tomb is an arched opening in the side of the hill, not the original main entrance. After discovery the few surviving remains were moved and interred with honor elsewhere or unknowingly discarded. The moveables—the one whole sarcophagus and the fragments of othersarcophagi—were placed on display in the hall of the Pio-Clementino Museum at theVatican in 1912. The sepulchre is a rock-cut chambered tomb on the interior, with the remains of a late façade on the exterior.

During the republic the tomb stood in a cemetery for notables and their families located in the angle between theVia Appia and theVia Latina on a connecting road joining the two just past the branch point. It was originally outside the city not far from where the Via Appia passed through theServian Wall at thePorta Capena. In subsequent centuries new construction changed the landmarks of the vicinity entirely. The wall was expanded to become theAurelian Wall through which thePorta Appia admitted the Via Appia. The cemetery was now inside the city. The Appian gate today is called thePorta San Sebastiano. Before it is the so-calledArch of Drusus, actually a section ofaqueduct. The Via Appia at that location was renamed to the Via di Porta San Sebastiano. It passes through the Parco degli Scipioni where the cemetery once was located. The via is open to traffic. Most of it is lined by walls.

History

[edit]
Floor plan of the tomb, based on a plan byFilippo Coarelli.[4] 1 is the old entrance fronting on the park road, 2 is a "calcinara", an intrusive mediaeval lime kiln, 3 is the arched entrance seen in the photographs (street number 6), anciently overlooking the Via Appia, 4 is the entrance to the new room (street number 12). Letters from A to I were the sarcophagi or loculi with inscriptions. The tomb is now empty except for facsimiles; the remains were discarded or reinterred, while the sarcophagi fragments ultimately went to the Vatican.

Period of use by the family

[edit]

The tomb was founded around the turn of the 3rd century BC, after the opening of theVia Appia in 312 BC, probably by the then head of the family,Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus, consul in 298 BC. He was the earliest known occupant after his death around 280 BC. His sarcophagus was the only one to survive intact – it is now on show at theVatican Museums, reunited with its original inscription. According to Coarelli, the capacity of 30 burial places was reached, and the main body of the complex was essentially complete, by the middle 2nd century BC,[5] but new burials continued at long intervals until the 1st century AD. During that time the tomb was a landmark in ancient Rome.

The tomb held the remains of one person outside the Scipio family: the poetEnnius, of whom there was a marble statue in the tomb according to Cicero.[6] None of the more familiar Scipios (Africanus,Asiaticus andHispanicus) were buried here, but according toLivy andSeneca were buried in their villa atLiternum.

The inscriptions on the sarcophagi also suggest that thehypogeum was complete about 150 BC. At that time it came to be supported by another quadrangular room, with no passage to the hypogeum – in this were buried a few others of the family. The creation of a solemn "rupestre" facade also dates to that period. The decoration is attributed to the initiative ofScipio Aemilianus, and is a fundamental example ofHellenization of Roman culture in the course of 2nd century BC. At that period the tomb became a kind of family museum, that perpetuated and publicised the deeds of its occupants.

The last well-known use of the tomb itself was in theClaudio-Neronian period, when the daughter and the grandchild ofGnaeus Cornelius Lentulus Gaetulicus were buried here. Repairs on the tomb continued until the 4th century. After then the mainly Christian Romans (who did not have the same loyalties to the traditions of pagan Rome) apparently stopped maintaining it and lost track of it.

Rediscoveries and publications

[edit]

Only the general direction of the tomb along theVia Appia to the south was known from the written sources. The question of whether it was inside or outside the city caused some confusion, apparently without realization that the city had expanded to include it.[7] The tomb was rediscovered in 1614 in a vineyard, broken into (the term "excavated" in the modern sense does not apply), two sarcophagi were found, the inscription (titulus) of L. Cornelius, son of Barbatus, consul 259, was broken out and was sold. It changed hands many times before rejoining the collection; meanwhile, it was published by Giacomo Sirmondo in 1617 in "Antiquae inscriptionis, qua L. Scipionis Barbati, filii expressum est elogium, explanatio."[3] This use ofelogium came to apply to the entire collection (elogia Scipionum).

The owner of the property in 1614 did not alter or further publicize the tomb. He must have resealed it, hid the entrance and kept its location a secret, for whatever reasons, as it disappeared from public knowledge and was lost again, despite publication of the inscription. In 1780 the then owners of the vineyard, the brothers Sassi, who apparently had no idea it was there, broke into the tomb again during remodelling of their wine cellar.[8] They opened it to the leading scholars of the day. Someone, perhaps them, fragmented the slabs covering theloculi, with the obvious intent of accessing the contents, being careful to preserve the inscriptions. If the act is to be attributed to the Sassi, and if the motive of treasure-hunting is to be imputed to them, they found no treasure. What they did find they turned over to the Vatican underPope Pius VI, including the gold signet ring taken off the finger bone of Barbatus. Apparently some masonry was placed in the tomb with an obscure intent.

Drawing based on Piranesi's plan view, criticised by Lanciani[9] as being too idealized.

The tomb was published in Rome in 1785 byFrancesco Piranesi in "Monumenti degli Scipioni." The accuracy of the drawings in that work (actually, two works, by father and son) leaves much to be desired. For example, the corridor containing Barbatus' coffin is shown complete, when it has always ended in the rock ledge.[10]

The tomb was subsequently neglected again (but not lost) until purchased by the city of Rome; in fact, there were reports of a Roma family living in it. The tomb was restored in 1926 by the X Ripartizione of the Comune di Roma. At that time, masonry installed in 1616 and 1780 was removed. At the present time it contains duplicates of the material in the Vatican and is well cared for. Steel pins or beams support sections in danger of collapsing.

Art and architecture

[edit]

The monument is divided into two distinct parts: the main complex, dug into atuff ledge on a large square plan, and a brick-built arcade from the later period, with a separate entrance. The view expressed by Simon Bell Platner[11] (among others) that the tomb was built over atuff quarry is purely conjectural. No evidence exists either for or against.

The central room is divided by four large pilasters, repaired in the course of excavations to ensure the hypogeum did not collapse, with 4 long arcades along the sides and two central galleries that cross each other at right angles, giving the appearance of a grid plan.

The façade faced north-east, but only a small part of its right hand end survives, with few remains of wall paintings. It was made up of a highpodium bordered by severe cornices, in which were three ashlar arches made ofAnienetuff : one led to the entrance of the hypogeum (central), one to the new room (right hand), while the third (left hand) led nowhere. This base was entirely covered in frescoes, of which only small pieces remain, showing three layers: the two oldest (from about the middle of the 2nd century BC) show historical scenes (some soldier figures can be recognised), while the last, the most recent, has a red simple decoration with stylized waves (1st century AD).

More spectacular was the upper part of the façade, with a tripartite view, semicolumns and 3 niches into which (according toLivy) were placed the statues ofScipio Africanus, his brotherScipio Asiaticus and the poetEnnius, author of a poem,Scipio.[12]

On the left a large circular cavity has destroyed a corner of the tomb, probably by the construction and use of alime kiln in the medieval period.

Elevation view of the tomb façade of the 2nd half of the 2nd century BC, as reconstructed byFilippo Coarelli.[13]

The so-called "Head of Ennius"

[edit]

Two sculpted heads have been found in the tomb. One, discovered in 1780, is now in theVatican Museums. This first head (24 cm high and made of Aniene tuff) has come to be called Ennius, who had a whole statue on the hypogeum façade according to Livy, but this attribution is incorrect, since the sources state that Ennius's statue was in marble, not tuff. The other head, of marble, was discovered in 1934 and immediately stolen; it is known only from a single photograph. It is unclear where in the tomb the heads were found; they are probably portraits of another occupant of the tomb. The slightly inclined position of the neck has caused some to believe the first head is part of a larger statue, perhaps a reclining feasting figure from a sarcophagus lid, a type common in southernEtruria from the start of the 3rd century BC.

The head's modelling is in essence but effective, with a roundish face, swollen lips, wide nose and large eyelids. The hair is indicated very vaguely and the head bears a laurel wreath with small leaves and foliage. Scholars propose dating it to the end of the 2nd century BC, when the Etruscan style of Latium underwent its first Greek influences.

The so-called "Head of Ennius"

Sarcophagi and inscriptions

[edit]

The 30 resting places approximately correspond to the number of Scipiones who lived between the beginning of the 3rd and the middle of 2nd century BC, according to Coarelli.[5] There are two types of sarcophagi – "monolithic" (i.e.; carved from a single block oftuff) and "constructed." The latter type, which is in the majority, is an arched recess sunk into the wall in which the deceased was placed, and the opening covered by an inscribed slab with the letters painted red. English writers typically called these recesses "loculi".[14] The recesses stand where they were, but the slabs have been moved to the Vatican. The monolithic sarcophagus of Barbatus was at the end of a corridor, in line with what once may have been a window, now the main entrance. The other sarcophagi of both types were added later as further shafts and rooms were sunk for the purpose.

The most important sarcophagi are those of Scipio Barbatus, now at the Vatican Museums, and that considered to belong to Ennius, both of substantial bulk. They do not entirely correspond with Etruscan sculpture, but show the elements of originality inLatin and particularly Roman culture, and are comparable with other Roman tombs (such as theEsquiline Necropolis) in other cities such asTusculum.

Sarcophagus of Scipio Barbatus (A)

[edit]
Main article:Sarcophagus of Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus § Epitaph on Sarcophagus

The name is incised on the lid (CIL VI 1284) and the epitaph (CIL VI 1285) on the front of the only intact sarcophagus (some of the decorative detail has been restored). The letters were originally painted red. A Doric-style decorative panel is above the inscription featuring roses alternating with column-like triglyphs. The top of the sarcophagus is modeled as a cushion.[15]

Sarcophagus of Lucius Cornelius Scipio (B)

[edit]
Main article:Lucius Cornelius Scipio (consul 259 BC) § Epitaph

The name is on a lid fragment (CIL VI 1286) and the epitaph on a slab fragment (CIL VI 1287). The name is painted in red letters. They hang on the wall of the museum.[15]

Sarcophagus of Publius Cornelius Scipio, Flamen Dialis (C)

[edit]
Main article:Publius Cornelius Scipio (flamen Dialis)

All that remains of the sarcophagus, now in the Vatican, is two fragments of a stone plate containing the engraved inscription, considered one inscription,CIL VI 1288. The break obscures a few letters easily and comprehensibly restored.

Epitaph of Asiaticus II.

Sarcophagus and inscription of Lucius Cornelius Scipio, son of Asiaticus (D)

[edit]

The inscription on the sarcophagus (CIL VI 1296) survives in the Vatican and identifies the deceased as Lucius Cornelius L.f. P.n. Scipio, probably the second generation of the Cornelii Scipiones Asiatici (Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus II).

Livy records that thequaestor Lucius Cornelius Scipio was sent to meet KingPrusias II of Bithynia and conduct him to Rome, when this monarch visited Italy in 167 BC.[16] Smith reports that this quaestor is probably to be identified with the Lucius Cornelius Scipio, son of Lucius, grandson of Publius, who is commemorated in theelogia Scipionum from the Tomb of the Scipios in Rome. His father was the conqueror ofAntiochus. The inscription is:[17]

L·CORNELI L·F·P
SCIPIO·QVAIST
TR·MIL·ANNOS
GNATVS·XXX III
MORTVOS·PATER
REGEM ANTIOCO
SVBEGIT

A transliteration into modern upper and lower case letters with punctuation, with an understood letter in brackets, is:[18]

L. Corneli. L. f. P. [n]
Scipio, quaist.,
tr. mil., annos
gnatus XXXIII
mortuos. Pater
regem Antioco subegit.

A translation into classical Latin is:[19]

Lucius Cornelius Lucii filius Publii nepos Scipio. Quaestor Tribunus Militum annos natus XXXIII mortuus. Pater regem Antiochum subegit.

A translation into English is:[20]

Lucius Cornelius, son of Lucius, grandson of Publius, Scipio, quaestor, military tribune, died aged 33 years. His father conquered king Antiochus.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Cicero,Tusculan Disputations,i.13
  2. ^Ricci (2003) p. 394.
  3. ^abLanciani (1897) p. 321.
  4. ^Coarelli, Filippo (1988).Il Sepolcro degli Scipioni a Roma. Itinerari d'arte e di cultura (in Italian). Rome: Fratelli Palombi. p. 13.ISBN 8876213449.
  5. ^abWallace-Hadrill, Andrew (2009)."Housing the Dead: the tomb as house in Roman Italy"(PDF). The University of Chicago Divinity School, the Martin Marty Center for the Advanced Study of Religion. pp. 11–12. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 June 2010. Retrieved14 June 2009.
  6. ^Cicero, Marcus Tullius. "IX".For Aulus Licinius Archias, the Poet.Our countryman, Ennius, was dear to the elder Africanus; and even in the tomb of the Scipios his effigy is believed to be visible, carved in the marble
  7. ^Parker, John Henry (1877).The Archaeology of Rome. Vol. Part IX: Tombs in and near Rome. Oxford, London: James Parker and Co., John Murray. p. 4.
  8. ^Lanciani (1897) pp. 322–324.
  9. ^Lanciani (1897) p. 324.
  10. ^Lanciani (1897) p. 325.
  11. ^Platner (1929), p. 485 (see underExternal links below).
  12. ^Livius, Titus. "XXXVIII.56".History of Rome."...in the tomb of the Scipios there are three statues, two of which (we are told) are the memorials of Publius and Lucius Scipio, while the third represents the poet Quintus Ennius.
  13. ^Richardson, Lawrence (1992).A new topographical dictionary of ancient Rome (2nd, illustrated ed.). Baltimore: by Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 360.ISBN 0801843006.
  14. ^Dennie, John (1904).Rome of to-day and yesterday: the pagan city (5 ed.). New York & London: G.P. Putnam. p. 109.
  15. ^abRicci (2003) p. 395.
  16. ^Liv. xlv. 44
  17. ^Wordsworth, John (1874).Fragments and specimens of early Latin, with intr. and notes. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 161.
  18. ^Egbert, James Chidester (1896).Introduction to the Study of Latin Inscriptions (revised with supplement ed.). New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: American Book Company. p. 296.
  19. ^Thompson, Henry (1852).History of Roman literature: with an introductory dissertation on the sources and formation of the Latin language (2, revised and enlarged ed.). London: J. J. Griffin. p. lxviii.
  20. ^Flower, Harriet I. (2000).Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture (3, illustrated, reprint ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 327.ISBN 978-0199240241.

Bibliography

[edit]

External links

[edit]

Media related toGrave of Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus at Wikimedia Commons

Preceded by
Tomb of Hilarus Fuscus
Landmarks of Rome
Tomb of the Scipios
Succeeded by
Tombs of Via Latina
Walls and gates
Ancientobelisks
Art
Ancient Roman
landmarks
Triumphal arches
Aqueducts
Sewers
Public baths
Religious
Fora
Civic
Entertainment
Palaces andvillae
Column monuments
Commerce
Tombs
Bridges
Roman Catholic
basilicas
Other churches
Castles and palaces
Fountains
Other landmarks
Squares,streets
and public spaces
Parks, gardens
and zoos
Museums and
art galleries
Landscape
Seven Hills
Metropolitan City
of Rome Capital
Events and traditions
Enclave
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tomb_of_the_Scipios&oldid=1333624473"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp