Tomás de Mercado (1525–1575) was a SpanishDominicanfriar and both aneconomist and atheologian, best known for his bookSumma de Tratos y Contratos ("Manual of Deals and Contracts") of 1571. Together withMartín de Azpilcueta he founded the economic tradition of "Iberianmonetarism"; both form part of the general intellectual tradition often known as "LateScholasticism", or theSchool of Salamanca.
He was either born inSeville or possiblyMexico, where he joined the Dominicans as a young man, becoming lecturer in Arts in the Priory inMexico City, before returning to study atSalamanca University, where he then became a lecturer inphilosophy,moral theology and law.[1] He then worked in the Exchange House ofSeville, the centre of Spain's international money-flows.[2] He died at sea on a voyage returning to Mexico.
Mercado became more widely known outside the Spanish-speaking world after he was discussed byJoseph Schumpeter in hisHistory of Economic Analysis, published posthumously, ed. Elisabeth Boody Schumpeter, in 1954. With the strong revival of monetarist economics since then, he has attracted further scholarly attention.
TheSumma was an expanded edition of a work first published in 1569 asDe los tratos de India y tratantes en ellas,[3] redacted at Sevillian merchants' request.[4] It was written for businessmen as well as scholars and contains many general digressions on social issues, often in very lively language.[5]
He devotes much thought to the concept of the fair or "just price", analysing it in terms ofwheat, and strongly supporting the fixed price set by the government (tasa del trigo) on social and ethical grounds, even if it meant producers selling at a loss.[6] He considered thus that theprices control politic of the Spanish authorities were a divine obligation made to the prince, in charge of tranquillity and peace of the kingdom.[7] Consequently, Mercado is a vigorous supporter of theintervention of the State in the economy, in the contrary ofLuis de Molina orLeonardus Lessius, who considered that any intervention of the authorities is inopportune owing to the corruption and the clientelism that it will create.[8]
Mercado devoted a chapter to theAfrican slave trade, of which he was highly critical, seeing clearly that the concept of "just enslavement" did not reflect the practice of the actual trade.[9] However he regarded it as acceptable for Europeans to buy slaves enslaved by Africans, and accepted the enslavement of captives in war, those sentenced for crimes, or children sold by their parents from necessity.[10]
