Amammaliaform. Initially described as a basal mammaliaform related toDocodonta, but later redescribed as aNeogeneshrew fossil that was reworked into the older deposit.[9]
^abcBhat, M. S.; Ray, S.; Datta, P. M. (2020). "New cynodonts (Therapsida, Eucynodontia) from the Late Triassic of India and their significances".Journal of Paleontology.95 (2):376–393.doi:10.1017/jpa.2020.95.
^abDatta, D.; Ray, S. (2023). "A giant phytosaur (Diapsida, Archosauria) from the Upper Triassic of India with new insights on phytosaur migration, endemism and extinction".Papers in Palaeontology.9 (1). e1476.Bibcode:2023PPal....9E1476D.doi:10.1002/spp2.1476.S2CID257103850.
Kumar, J.; Sharma, K. M. (2019). "Micro and mega-vertebrate fossils from the Late Triassic Tiki Formation, South Rewa Gondwana Basin, India: palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographic implications".Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India.64:151–168.
Pal, P.K (1984). "Triassic plant megafossils from the Tiki Formation, South Rewa Gondwana Basin, India".The Palaeobotanist.32:253–309.
Chatterjee, S (1978). "A primitive parasuchid (Phytosaur) reptile from the Upper Triassic Maleri Formation of India".Palaeontology.21:83–127.
Huene, F. von (1940). "The tetrapod fauna of the Upper Triassic Maleri Beds".Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India Palaeontologia Indica. New Series.32:1–42.
Lydekker, R (1885). "The Reptilia & Amphibia of the Maleria & Denwa Groups".Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologia Indica, Series IV. Indian Pretertiary Vertebrata.1:1–38.