Thrust-to-weight ratio is adimensionless ratio ofthrust toweight of areaction engine or a vehicle with such an engine. Reaction engines includejet engines,rocket engines,pump-jets,Hall-effect thrusters, andion thrusters, among others. These generate thrust by expelling mass (propellant) in the opposite direction of intended motion, in accordance withNewton's third law. A related but distinct metric is thepower-to-weight ratio, which applies to engines or systems that deliver mechanical, electrical, or other forms ofpower rather than direct thrust.
In many applications, the thrust-to-weight ratio serves as an indicator of performance. The ratio in a vehicle’s initial state is often cited as afigure of merit, enabling quantitative comparison across different vehicles or engine designs. The instantaneous thrust-to-weight ratio of a vehicle can vary during operation due to factors such as fuel consumption (which reduces mass) or changes ingravitational acceleration, for example in orbital or interplanetary contexts.
| Thrust | 1500 N |
| Mass | 17.1 kg |
| TWR | ~8.945 |
The thrust-to-weight ratio of an engine or vehicle is calculated by dividing its thrust by its weight (not to be confused with mass). The formula is:
where:
For valid comparison of the initial thrust-to-weight ratio of two or more engines or vehicles, thrust must be measured under controlled conditions. Because an aircraft's weight can vary considerably, depending on factors such as munition load, fuel load, cargo weight, or even the weight of the pilot, the thrust-to-weight ratio is also variable and even changes during flight operations. There are several standards for determining the weight of an aircraft used to calculate the thrust-to-weight ratio range.
The thrust-to-weight ratio andlift-to-drag ratio are the two most important parameters in determining the performance of an aircraft.
The thrust-to-weight ratio varies continually during a flight. Thrust varies with throttle setting,airspeed,altitude, air temperature, etc. Weight varies with fuel burn and payload changes. For aircraft, the quoted thrust-to-weight ratio is often the maximum static thrust at sea level divided by themaximum takeoff weight.[2] Aircraft with thrust-to-weight ratio greater than 1:1 can pitch straight up and maintain airspeed until performance decreases at higher altitude.[3]
A plane can take off even if the thrust is less than its weight as, unlike a rocket, the lifting force is produced by lift from the wings, not directly by thrust from the engine. As long as the aircraft can produce enough thrust to travel at a horizontal speed above its stall speed, the wings will produce enough lift to counter the weight of the aircraft.
For propeller-driven aircraft, the thrust-to-weight ratio can be calculated as follows in imperial units:[4]
where ispropulsive efficiency (typically 0.65 for wooden propellers, 0.75 metal fixed pitch and up to 0.85 for constant-speed propellers), hp is the engine'sshaft horsepower, andistrue airspeed in feet per second, weight is in lbs.
The metric formula is:

The thrust-to-weight ratio of a rocket, or rocket-propelled vehicle, is an indicator of its acceleration expressed in multiples of gravitational accelerationg.[5]
Rockets and rocket-propelled vehicles operate in a wide range of gravitational environments, including theweightless environment. The thrust-to-weight ratio is usually calculated from initial gross weight at sea level on earth[6] and is sometimes calledthrust-to-Earth-weight ratio.[7] The thrust-to-Earth-weight ratio of a rocket or rocket-propelled vehicle is an indicator of its acceleration expressed in multiples of earth's gravitational acceleration,g0.[5]
The thrust-to-weight ratio of a rocket improves as the propellant is burned. With constant thrust, the maximum ratio (maximum acceleration of the vehicle) is achieved just before the propellant is fully consumed. Each rocket has a characteristic thrust-to-weight curve, or acceleration curve, not just a scalar quantity.
The thrust-to-weight ratio of an engine is greater than that of the complete launch vehicle, but is nonetheless useful because it determines the maximum acceleration thatany vehicle using that engine could theoretically achieve with minimum propellant and structure attached.
For a takeoff from the surface of theearth using thrust and noaerodynamic lift, the thrust-to-weight ratio for the whole vehicle must be greater thanone. In general, the thrust-to-weight ratio is numerically equal to theg-force that the vehicle can generate.[5] Take-off can occur when the vehicle'sg-force exceeds local gravity (expressed as a multiple ofg0).
The thrust-to-weight ratio of rockets typically greatly exceeds that ofairbreathing jet engines because the comparatively far greater density of rocket fuel eliminates the need for much engineering materials to pressurize it.
Many factors affect thrust-to-weight ratio. The instantaneous value typically varies over the duration of flight with the variations in thrust due to speed and altitude, together with changes in weight due to the amount of remaining propellant, and payload mass. Factors with the greatest effect include freestream airtemperature,pressure,density, and composition. Depending on the engine or vehicle under consideration, the actual performance will often be affected bybuoyancy and localgravitational field strength.
| Vehicle | thrust-weight ratio | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit | 0.205[8] | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Airbus A340-300 Enhanced | 0.2229 | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Airbus A380 | 0.227 | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Boeing 747-8 | 0.269 | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Boeing 777-200ER | 0.285 | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Boeing 737 MAX 8 | 0.311 | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Airbus A320neo | 0.310 | Max take-off weight, full power |
| Boeing 757-200 | 0.341 | Max take-off weight, full power (w/Rolls-Royce RB211) |
| Tupolev 154B | 0.360 | Max take-off weight, full power (w/Kuznetsov NK-8-2) |
| Tupolev Tu-160 | 0.363[citation needed] | Max take-off weight, fullafterburners |
| Concorde | 0.372 | Max take-off weight, full afterburners |
| Rockwell International B-1 Lancer | 0.38 | Max take-off weight, full afterburners |
| HESA Kowsar | 0.61 | With full fuel, afterburners. |
| BAE Hawk | 0.65[9] | |
| Lightning F.6 | 0.702 | Max take-off weight, full afterburners |
| Lockheed Martin F-35 A | 0.87[citation needed] | With full fuel (1.07 with 50% fuel, 1.19 with 25% fuel) |
| HAL Tejas Mk 1 | 1.07 | With full fuel |
| CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder | 1.07 | With full fuel |
| Dassault Rafale | 1.028[citation needed] (1.219 with loaded weight & 50% internal fuel) | Version C, 100% fuel |
| Sukhoi Su-30MKM | 1.00[10] | Loaded weight with 56% internal fuel |
| McDonnell Douglas F-15 | 1.04[11] | Nominally loaded |
| Mikoyan MiG-29 | 1.09[12] | Full internal fuel, 4 AAMs |
| Lockheed Martin F-22 | >1.09 (1.26 with loaded weight and 50% fuel)[13] | |
| General Dynamics F-16 | 1.096[citation needed] (1.24 with loaded weight & 50% fuel) | |
| Hawker Siddeley Harrier | 1.1[citation needed] | VTOL |
| Eurofighter Typhoon | 1.15[14] | Interceptor configuration |
| Space Shuttle | 1.3[15] | Take-off |
| Simorgh (rocket) | 1.83 | |
| Space Shuttle | 3 | Peak |
| Engine | Mass | Thrust, vacuum | Thrust-to- weight ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kN) | (lbf) | |||
| MD-TJ42 powered sailplane jet engine[16] | 3.85kg (8.48 lb) | 0.35 | 78.7 | 9.09 |
| RD-0410 nuclear rocket engine[17][18] | 2,000 kg (4,400 lb) | 35.2 | 7,900 | 1.8 |
| Pratt & Whitney J58 jet engine (Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird)[19][20] | 2,722 kg (6,001 lb) | 150 | 34,000 | 5.6 |
| Rolls-Royce/Snecma Olympus 593 turbojet with reheat (Concorde)[21] | 3,175 kg (7,000 lb) | 169.2 | 38,000 | 5.4 |
| Williams FJ33-5A | 140 kg (310 lb) | 8.21 | 1,846 | 5.98 |
| Pratt & Whitney F119[22] | 1,800 kg (4,000 lb) | 91 | 20,500 | 7.95 |
| PBS TJ40-G1NS jet engine[23] | 3.6 kg (7.9 lb) | 0.425 | 96 | 12.04 |
| RD-0750 rocket engine three-propellant mode[24] | 4,621 kg (10,188 lb) | 1,413 | 318,000 | 31.2 |
| RD-0146 rocket engine[25] | 260 kg (570 lb) | 98 | 22,000 | 38.4 |
| RocketdyneRS-25 rocket engine (Space Shuttle Main Engine)[26] | 3,177 kg (7,004 lb) | 2,278 | 512,000 | 73.1 |
| RD-180 rocket engine[27] | 5,393 kg (11,890 lb) | 4,152 | 933,000 | 78.7 |
| RD-170 rocket engine | 9,750 kg (21,500 lb) | 7,887 | 1,773,000 | 82.5 |
| F-1 (Saturn V first stage)[28] | 8,391 kg (18,499 lb) | 7,740.5 | 1,740,100 | 94.1 |
| NK-33 rocket engine[29] | 1,222 kg (2,694 lb) | 1,638 | 368,000 | 136.7 |
| SpaceX Raptor 3 rocket engine[30] | 1,525 kg (3,362 lb) | 2,746 | 617,000 | 183.6 |
| Merlin 1D rocket engine, full-thrust version[31][32] | 467 kg (1,030 lb) | 914 | 205,500 | 199.5 |
| Specifications | F-15K[a] | F-15C | MiG-29K | MiG-29B | JF-17 | J-10 | F-35A | F-35B | F-35C | F-22 | LCA Mk-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engines thrust, maximum (N) | 259,420 (2) | 208,622 (2) | 176,514 (2) | 162,805 (2) | 84,400 (1) | 122,580 (1) | 177,484 (1) | 177,484 (1) | 177,484 (1) | 311,376 (2) | 84,516 (1) |
| Aircraft mass, empty (kg) | 17,010 | 14,379 | 12,723 | 10,900 | 7,965 | 09,250 | 13,290 | 14,515 | 15,785 | 19,673 | 6,560 |
| Aircraft mass, full fuel (kg) | 23,143 | 20,671 | 17,963 | 14,405 | 11,365 | 13,044 | 21,672 | 20,867 | 24,403 | 27,836 | 9,500 |
| Aircraft mass, max. take-off load (kg) | 36,741 | 30,845 | 22,400 | 18,500 | 13,500 | 19,277 | 31,752 | 27,216 | 31,752 | 37,869 | 13,500 |
| Total fuel mass (kg) | 06,133 | 06,292 | 05,240 | 03,505 | 02,300 | 03,794 | 08,382 | 06,352 | 08,618 | 08,163 | 02,458 |
| T/W ratio, full fuel | 1.14 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.07 | 1.05 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 1.14 | 1.07 |
| T/W ratio, max. take-off load | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
With afterburner, reverser and nozzle ... 3,175 kg ... Afterburner ... 169.2 kN
The Merlin 1D weighs 1030 pounds, including the hydraulic steering (TVC) actuators. It makes 162,500 pounds of thrust in vacuum. that is nearly 158 thrust/weight. The new full thrust variant weighs the same and makes about 185,500 lbs force in vacuum.