Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Three poisons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromThree poisons (Buddhism))
Innate character flaws described in Buddhism
The three poisons are represented in the center of thewheel of life as a pig, a bird, and a snake.
Part ofa series on
Buddhism

Thethree poisons (Sanskrit:triviṣa; Tibetan:dug gsum) in theMahayana tradition or thethree unwholesome roots (Sanskrit:akuśala-mūla; Pāli:akusala-mūla) in theTheravada tradition are aBuddhist term that refers to the three rootkleshas that lead to all negative states. These three states aredelusion, also known asignorance;greed or sensual attachment; andhatred or aversion.[1][2] These three poisons are considered to be three afflictions or character flaws that are innate in beings and the root ofcraving, and so causingsuffering andrebirth.[1][3]

The three poisons are symbolically shown at the center of the BuddhistBhavachakra artwork, with the rooster, snake, and pig, representing greed, ill-will and delusion respectively.[4][5]

Brief description

[edit]

In theBuddhist teachings, the three poisons (of ignorance, attachment, and aversion) are the primary causes that keep sentient beings trapped insamsara. These three poisons are said to be the root of all of the otherkleshas.[6][7]The three poisons are represented in the hub of thewheel of life as a pig, a bird, and a snake (representing ignorance, attachment, and aversion, respectively). As shown in thewheel of life (Sanskrit:bhavacakra), the three poisons lead to the creation ofkarma, which leads to rebirth in the six realms of samsara.[1][8][9]

Opposite wholesome qualities

[edit]

The three wholesomemental factors that are identified as the opposites of the three poisons are:[10][11]

TheBuddhist path considers these essential forliberation.[10]

Sanskrit/Pali/Tibetan terms and translations

[edit]

The three kleshas of ignorance, attachment and aversion are referred to as thethree poisons (Skt.triviṣa; Tibetan:dug gsum) in theMahayana tradition and as thethree unwholesome roots (Pāli,akusala-mūla; Skt.akuśala-mūla) in theTheravada tradition.

The Sanskrit, Pali, and Tibetan terms for each of the three poisons are as follows:

PoisonSanskrit[12][13]PaliTibetan[12][14]Alternate English translations[12]Skt./Pali/Tib. Synonym[15]
Delusionmohamohagti mugconfusion, bewilderment, ignoranceavidyā (Skt.); avijjā (Pāli); ma rigpa (Tib.)
Attachmentrāgalobha'dod chagsdesire, sensuality, greedn/a
Aversiondveṣadosazhe sdanganger, hatred, hostilityn/a

In the Mahayana traditionmoha is identified as a subcategory ofavidya. Whereasavidya is defined as a fundamental ignorance,moha is defined as delusion, confusion and incorrect beliefs. In the Theravada tradition,moha andavidya are equivalent terms, but they are used in different contexts;moha is used when referring to mental factors, andavidya is used when referring to thetwelve links.[1]

Meditation and the three poisons

[edit]

Meditation is regarded in Buddhism as a primary method for developing a calm and concentrated mind to overcome the three poisons. Through meditative introspection, an individual develops self-awareness and insight into their own mind, which helps reduce internal obstacles. However, effective meditation often requires support such as "moral aptitude" and "good friends" (or teachers).[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdRobert E. Buswell Jr.; Donald S. Lopez Jr. (2013).The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism. Princeton University Press. pp. 546, 59, 68.ISBN 978-1-4008-4805-8.
  2. ^Keown 2004, pp. 8, 47, 89, 106, 143.
  3. ^David Webster (2005).The Philosophy of Desire in the Buddhist Pali Canon. Routledge. pp. 100–105, 177, 236.ISBN 978-0-415-34652-8.
  4. ^David Loy (2003).The Great Awakening: A Buddhist Social Theory. Simon and Schuster. p. 28.ISBN 978-0-86171-366-0.
  5. ^Guido Freddi (2019)."Bhavacakra and Mindfulness".
  6. ^Daniel Goleman (2003), pages 106, 111
  7. ^Khenchen Konchog Gyaltshen (2010), p. 451.
  8. ^David Webster (2005).The Philosophy of Desire in the Buddhist Pali Canon. Routledge. pp. 100–105, 177, 236.ISBN 978-0-415-34652-8.
  9. ^Dalai Lama (1992), p. 4, 42
  10. ^abGethin 1998, p. 81.
  11. ^Steven M. Emmanuel (2015).A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 435–436.ISBN 978-1-119-14466-3.
  12. ^abcPadmakara (1998), p. 336, 414. (from the glossary)
  13. ^Keown 2004, p. 8.
  14. ^Ranjung Yeshe Wiki - Dharma Dictionary.http://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/dug_gsum
  15. ^Keown 2004, p. 179.
  16. ^Wright, Dale Stuart (2009).The six perfections: Buddhism and the cultivation of character. New York: Oxford University press. pp. 175–176.ISBN 978-0-19-538201-3.

Sources

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
   Topics inBuddhism   
Foundations
The Buddha
Bodhisattvas
Disciples
Key concepts
Cosmology
Branches
Practices
Nirvana
Monasticism
Major figures
Texts
Countries and regions
History
Philosophy
Culture
Miscellaneous
Comparison
Lists
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Three_poisons&oldid=1298433372"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp